Plan Review Details - Permit 15070058
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15070058
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2016-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-02-10 Time 11:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-02-09 Time 17:43 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-10 11:32:15****PROVISOS****
 ****REVISION REQUIRED PRIOR TO DECK FLOOR
 INSTALLATION****
 ****ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 PLAN PREPARED BY VJ GERLEY, PE DATED 2/5/2016:
  
 1. FBC 107.2.1: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF
 SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND
 EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT
 WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND
 RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS ...
  
 IN ORDER FOR AN ACCURATE REVIEW TO BE PERFORMED,
 PROVIDE BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE EXISTING BUILDING:
 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FBC CHAPTER 3, BUILDING TYPE
 FBC CHAPTER 5.
  
 2. FBC 5TH EDITION EXISTING BUILDING 301.1, APPLICANT
 IS TO ELECT THE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE. REVISE PLAN TO
 INDICATE METHOD SELECTED. COMPLETE CODE REFERENCES
 CANNOT BE PROVIDED WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION.
  
 3. SCOPE NOT CLEAR. SECTION 1-6 STATES THAT ELECTRICAL
 WIRING MAY BE REUSED BUT NO ELECTRICAL PLAN WAS
 SUBMITTED, NO ELECTRICAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED, FBC
 107.
  
 4. REGARDING THE PARTITION WALLS, NO SPECIFICATION
 (OTHER THAN "REPLACE WITH REPAIR EQUAL TO EXISTING")
 WAS PROVIDED. THIS IS A WALL SUBJECT TO WIND LOADS.
 BUILDING "E" ELEVATION INDICATES THAT THE WALL IS TO
 REMAIN.
  
 ALL OF THE DETAIL NUMBERS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. THERE ARE
 SOME REFERENCES TO DETAILS BUT THE DETAILS THEMSELVES
 ARE NOT IDENTIFIED, FBC 107.
  
 FIRST FLOOR CMU PARTITION WALL DOES NOT APPEAR IN
 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, PLAN INDICATES
 REPLACEMENT IF NECESSARY, REVISE TO PROPOSE NEW OR
 REMOVE.
  
 5. THE PLAN IS NOT CLEAR AS TO SCOPE, FBC 107. BUILDING
 ORIENTATION HAS NOT BEEN INDICATED, DETAILS DO NOT
 CORRELATE WITH PLAN OR ELEVATIONS.
  
 6. FBC 1609, SECTION 1-12 STATES "WIND PRESSURES
 DESIGNED FOR OPEN STRUCTURE", BUT THIS STRUCTURE DOES
 NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF OPEN, SEE FBC 1609,
 ASCE7-10, CHAPTER 26. REVISE ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATION
 AND REVISE OTHER DETAILS AS APPLICABLE OR CLARIFY.
  
 7. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS GIVEN AS 24 FEET. BUILDING 'E'
 ELEVATION DEPICTS THREE STORIES AND A PITCHED ROOF.
 SECTION C SPECS A 12IN FLOOR JOIST. IT APPEARS THAT 24
 FEET IS NOT AN ACCURATE MRH FOR THIS STRUCTURE AS IT IS
 26FT FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF TRUSSES,
 NO DIMENSION PROVIDED FOR THE ROOF. EITHER CORRECT THE
 MRH OR PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CLARIFY THE STATED MRH OF
 24FT.
  
 8. FBC 1809.4, TYPICAL WALL SECTION DOES NOT SPECIFY
 DEPTH OF FOUNDATION RELATIVE TO GRADE, REVISE.
  
 9. BALCONY DESIGN LOADS NOT SPECIFIED, PLEASE REVISE,
 FBC 107.
  
 10. RAILING ENGINEERING IS A PHOTOCOPY AND NOT REVIEWED
 BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED FOR DELEGATED
 ENGINEERING, FAC61G. PROVIDE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED
 ORIGINAL ENGINEERING WITH THE REVISED PLAN.
  
 11. ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS ARE NOT MARKED RELATIVE TO
 DIRECTION. SECTION 3 APPEARS TO BE THE REAR (BASED ON
 ROOF ORIENTATION). IF THIS IS A SECTION WHICH
 REPRESENTS THE REAR, CONSTRUCTION/REPAIR OF THE
 CANTILEVER TO THE SIDES IS NOT CLEAR. IT APPEARS THAT
 NO REPAIR DETAIL WAS PROVIDED FOR THE SECOND FLOOR LEFT
 AND RIGHT SIDE CANTILEVERED BALCONY AREAS, FBC 107.
  
 12. A FLASHING SPECIFICATION PROVIDED, BUT TYPICAL WALL
 SECTION AND UNNUMBERED SECTION (PREVIOUSLY SECTION 3)
 GRAPHICALLY APPEAR TO DEPICT FLASHING ON THE SECOND
 FLOOR, BUT NOT ON THE THIRD FLOOR. FBC 1403.2, REVISE
 PLAN TO EITHER INCLUDE FLASHING ON THE THIRD FLOOR OR
 PROVIDE DETAILS TO CLARIFY HOW AN INSTALLATION WHICH
 LACKS FLASHING WILL NOT COMPROMISE THE WATER RESISTANCE
 OF THE EXTERIOR WALL.
  
 13. THE WIND INFORMATION SPECIFIES "OVERHANGS" DESIGN
 PRESSURE OF -0 FOR ZONE 1. IS "OVERHANGS" THE
 BALCONIES? PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEGATIVE
 PRESSURE OF -0 FOR ZONE 1, FBC 1609.
  
 14. FBC 107, PLAN SPECIFIES HARDIBOARD SOFFITS, SECTION
 6-2 SPECIFIES PLYWOOD, CLARIFY. REMOVE ANY OTHER
 DISCREPANCIES FROM THE PLAN.
  
 15. ENGINEER SPECIFIES DECTEC OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD.
  
 SEE DECTEC PRODUCT APPROVAL, 5/8" TONGUE AND GROOVE
 PLYWOOD GLUED WITH LEPAGE BULLDOG GRIP PL 400 HEAVY
 DUTY SUB FLOOR ADHESIVE, #8 WOOD SCREWS AT 6" OC
 REQUIRED. THIS ASSEMBLY HAS A DESIGN PRESSURE
 LIMITATION OF -135PSF. ZONE 3 ON THE PLAN HAS A DESIGN
 PRESSURE REQUIREMENT OF -137.2. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THE
 ENGINEER SPECIFIES A PRODUCT WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY HIM. EXISTING BALCONY
 FLOOR JOIST SPACING IS NOT STATED ON THE SECTIONS SO IT
 IS NOT CLEAR IF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS COMPLY WITH THE
 24IN OC REQUIREMENT.
  
 THIS DISCREPANCY (TONGUE AND GROOVE VS. STANDARD),
 JOIST SPACING, AND DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION OF THE
 DECTEC IS TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE
 BALCONY FLOORS. A SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL CAN BE
 CONSIDERED SUBJECT TO INFORMATION (ENGINEERING
 RATIONALE), COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS, ETC. PROVIDED BY
 ENGINEER.
  
 16. THE ARTISAN LAP SIDING NOA IS FOR SIDING AND DOES
 NOT INCLUDE INFORMATION FOR FASCIA INSTALLATION.
 PROVIDE THE APPLICABLE PRODUCT APPROVAL, REVIEWED BY
 DESIGNER OF RECORD, FBC 1609, FBC 107.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-01-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-01-13 Time 12:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-01-13 Time 12:42 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-13 12:44:52DISCUSSED WITH CONTRACTOR - ENGINEER IS TO REVISE PLAN
 AND RESUBMIT
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-12-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-12-17 Time 18:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-12-17 Time 18:04 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-17 18:05:55****CORRECTIONS****
 ****UPDATED ON 1/26/2016****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 PLAN PREPARED BY **REDACTED** DATED 11/16/15:
  
 1. FBC 107.2.1: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF
 SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND
 EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT
 WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND
 RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS ...
  
 IN ORDER FOR AN ACCURATE REVIEW TO BE PERFORMED,
 PROVIDE BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE EXISTING BUILDING:
 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FBC CHAPTER 3, BUILDING TYPE
 FBC CHAPTER 5.
  
 2. FBC 5TH EDITION EXISTING BUILDING 301.1, APPLICANT
 IS TO ELECT THE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE. REVISE PLAN TO
 INDICATE METHOD SELECTED. COMPLETE CODE REFERENCES
 CANNOT BE PROVIDED WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION.
  
 3. SCOPE NOT CLEAR. SECTION 1-6 STATES THAT ELECTRICAL
 WIRING MAY BE REUSED BUT NO ELECTRICAL PLAN WAS
 SUBMITTED, NO ELECTRICAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED, FBC
 107.
  
 4. SOME STATEMENTS ON THE PLAN ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO
 MEANING. FOR INSTANCE, ITEM 1-4, "NEW BALCONY DECKING
 AND ALUMINUM RAILING, THIS DOES NOT QUALIFY EXISTING
 JOIST INTEGRITY." DESIGNER'S INTENT IS NOT CLEAR,
 PLEASE REVISE TO CLARIFY.
  
 ALSO SEE SECTION 3 "INSPECTION OF EXTIN'G CANTILEVER WD
 JST WITH ROT (STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY):" AND THEN PROVIDES
 A SPEC FOR REPAIR. DESIGNER'S INTENT NOT CLEAR, PLEASE
 REVISE TO CLARIFY.
  
 SECTION 3 "NON-BRG EXIST SEPARATION WALLS W/ROT SHALL
 REPLACE WITH REPAIR EQUAL TO EXISTING." NO
 SPECIFICATION (OTHER THAN "REPLACE WITH REPAIR EQUAL TO
 EXISTING") WAS PROVIDED. THIS IS A WALL SUBJECT TO WIND
 LOADS. BUILDING "E" ELEVATION INDICATES THAT THE WALL
 IS TO REMAIN. SCOPE NOT CLEAR, FBC 107.
  
 NOTE 1-6 "NO STRUCTURAL REMOVAL AS INDICATED ON THE
 DRAWINGS."
  
 5. THE PLAN IS NOT CLEAR AS TO SCOPE, FBC 107. BUILDING
 "E" ELEVATION AND SECTION 3 AND ADJACENT ELEVATION
 INCLUDE ELEMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO WHETHER THEY
 ARE EXISTING OR ARE TO BE REPLACED, PLEASE REVISE TO
 CLEARLY DEPICT SCOPE.
  
 6. FBC 1609, SECTION 1-12 STATES "WIND PRESSURES
 DESIGNED FOR OPEN STRUCTURE", BUT THIS STRUCTURE DOES
 NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF OPEN, SEE FBC 1609,
 ASCE7-10, CHAPTER 26. REVISE ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATION
 AND REVISE OTHER DETAILS AS APPLICABLE OR CLARIFY.
  
 7. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS GIVEN AS 24 FEET. BUILDING 'E'
 ELEVATION DEPICTS THREE STORIES AND A PITCHED ROOF.
 SECTION C SPECS A 12" FLOOR JOIST. IT APPEARS THAT 24
 FEET IS NOT AN ACCURATE MRH FOR THIS STRUCTURE AS IT IS
 26' FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF TRUSSES,
 NO DIMENSION PROVIDED FOR THE ROOF. EITHER CORRECT THE
 MRH OR PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CLARIFY THE STATED MRH OF
 24'.
  
 8. FBC 1809.4, TYPICAL WALL SECTION DOES NOT SPECIFY
 DEPTH OF FOUNDATION RELATIVE TO GRADE, REVISE.
  
 9. HARDIPLANK SPECIFIED; FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT
 APPROVAL REQUIRED, FAC9N-3, FBC 1609. PRODUCT APPROVALS
 ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO
 SUBMITTAL.
  
 10. CEILING FINISHED ARE TO BE REMOVED, BUT NOT
 REPLACED. PLAN INDICATES THAT THE EXISTING JOIST WILL
 REMAIN. IT APPEARS THAT THE PREVIOUS DESIGN INCLUDED AN
 ENCLOSED JOIST, THE PROPOSED DESIGN IS FOR OPEN, BUT NO
 INFORMATION REGARDING THE EXISTING JOIST WAS PROVIDED
 (SUCH AS TYPE OF LUMBER, PT). FOR JOISTS WHICH DID NOT
 ROT, THEY ARE TO REMAIN, BUT THE PLAN IS NOT CLEAR AS
 TO WHETHER OR NOT THE JOISTS WERE DESIGNED TO BE IN
 DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE ELEMENTS, FBC 107.
  
 11. BALCONY DESIGN LOADS NOT SPECIFIED, PLEASE REVISE,
 FBC 107.
  
 12. NEW RAILINGS ARE PROPOSED BUT NO STRUCTURAL
 SPECIFICATION (DESIGN LOADS, INSTALLATION SPEC, ETC.)
 PROVIDED, FBC 107.
  
 13. ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS ARE NOT MARKED RELATIVE TO
 DIRECTION. SECTION 3 APPEARS TO BE THE REAR (BASED ON
 ROOF ORIENTATION). IF THIS IS A SECTION WHICH
 REPRESENTS THE REAR, CONSTRUCTION/REPAIR OF THE
 CANTILEVER TO THE SIDES IS NOT CLEAR. IT APPEARS THAT
 NO REPAIR DETAIL WAS PROVIDED FOR THE SECOND FLOOR LEFT
 AND RIGHT SIDE CANTILEVERED BALCONY AREAS, FBC 107.
  
 14. NO FLASHING DETAIL(S) PROVIDED, FBC 107. TYPICAL
 WALL SECTION AND SECTION 3 GRAPHICALLY APPEAR TO DEPICT
 FLASHING ON THE SECOND FLOOR, BUT NOT ON THE THIRD
 FLOOR. FBC 1403.2, REVISE PLAN TO EITHER INCLUDE
 FLASHING DETAILS OR PROVIDE DETAILS TO CLARIFY HOW AN
 INSTALLATION WHICH LACKS FLASHING WILL NOT COMPROMISE
 THE WATER RESISTANCE OF THE EXTERIOR WALL.
  
 15. I WAS UNABLE TO FIND A SPECIFICATION FOR THE NAILS
 OTHER THAN SIZE. ARE THEY COMMON HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED,
 OR STAINLESS, OR ANOTHER TYPE?
  
 ****NEW COMMENT ON 1/26/2016****
  
 16. BASED ON A CONVERSATION WITH THE CONTRACTOR, THE
 EXISTING BALCONY FLOOR JOISTS ARE NON TREATED SPRUCE
 LUMBER. AS THE NEW DESIGN PROPOSED TO EXPOSE THE
 INTERIOR GRADE LUMBER TO THE ELEMENTS, IT APPEARS THAT
 THIS DESIGN DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. IT APPEARS
 THAT AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. PLEASE
 CONTACT ME IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-07-24 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-07-24 Time 15:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-07-24 Time 15:42 Sent To FIRE
Notes
2015-07-24 15:43:09****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW:
  
 1. WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC 1609 ARE LACKING FROM THE
 PLAN, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE NEW ELEMENTS WAS NOT
 PROVIDED. THIS SHOULD BE 170MPH EXPOSURE C MINIMUM.
  
 SEE ALSO FBC 5TH EDITION EXISTING BUILDING, 301.1, NEW
 STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS TO COMPLY WITH FBC 5TH EDITION.
  
 2. PLANS SHOW THE FOOTINGS AT GRADE. SEE FBC 1809.4 AND
 REVISE. SHOW DISTANCE FROM TOP OF FOOTING TO GRADE
 (MINIMUM 12").
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. SEE ALSO FBC 5TH EDITION EXISTING
 BUILDING, 301.1, NEW STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS TO COMPLY WITH
 FBC 5TH EDITION. ALTERNATE DESIGNS CAN BE CONSIDERED BY
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL BUT SHOULD ADDRESS SCOUR AND BE
 PROPOSED AS AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD PER FBC 104.11.
  
 3. PROVIDE A VERIFIABLE COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS
 JOB, FBC 109.
  
 A CONTRACT WAS PROVIDED BUT APPEARS LOW. PROVIDE A COST
 BREAKDOWN (STICK ESTIMATE).
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-07-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-07-07 Time 15:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-07-07 Time 15:42 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-07 15:47:45****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. GOVERNING CODE, WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC 1609 ARE
 LACKING FROM THE PLAN, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 2. PLANS SHOW THE FOOTINGS AT GRADE. SEE FBC 1809.4 AND
 REVISE. SHOW DISTANCE FROM TOP OF FOOTING TO GRADE
 (MINIMUM 12").
  
 3. PROVIDE A VERIFIABLE COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS
 JOB, FBC 109.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2016-02-08 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2016-02-08 Time 11:53 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-12-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-12-17 Time 18:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-12-03 Time 14:58 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-07-31 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2015-07-31 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-07-31 Time 11:49 Sent To PC
Notes
2015-07-31 12:00:38THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 PLAN IS GENRAL AND VAGUE.
  
 PROVIDE GREATER SITE DETAIL ON BUILDING LOCATION WITHIN
 COMPLEX, SHOWING LOCATION OF "BUILDING E".
  
 PROVIDE COMPLETE "BUILDING E" ELEVATION SHOWING ENTIRE
 BUILDING WITH THE PROPOSED REPAIRS AT EACH PROPOSED
 BALCONY.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2016-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-02-10 Time 11:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-02-04 Time 15:14 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-09 15:20:092/9 TO SH DESK
  
2016-02-04 15:14:35RESUB ROUTED TO FIRE
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2016-01-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-01-13 Time 12:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-01-13 Time 12:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2015-12-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-12-17 Time 18:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-12-01 Time 10:16 Sent To FIRE
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-07-31 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-07-31 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-07-20 Time 09:19 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-24 16:04:457/24 TO FIRE
  
2015-07-23 09:19:31RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-07-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-07-07 Time 15:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-07-01 Time 09:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved