Plan Review Details - Permit 15070019
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15070019
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-08-27 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-08-27 Time 09:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-08-27 Time 09:35 Sent To E
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-07-17 Time 09:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-07-17 Time 09:57 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-17 10:28:501ST REVIEW: 5TH ED. FBC 2014
  
 I APOLOGISE THAT WE CANNOT LOCATE THE PLANS YOU
 ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED ON JULY 1, 2015. NONETHELESS, YOUR
 RE-SUBMITTED DRAWINGS BY GEZELMAN ALONE ARE NOT ENOUGH
 INFORMATION TO CONSTITUTE A FULL SUBMITTAL AS YOU DID
 NOT PROVIDE A SITE SPECIFIC SKETCH INDICATING THE
 ARRANGE OF THE ARRAY. TO FACILITAE RECEIPT OF SUCH
 INFORMATION, YOU MAY EMAIL IT TO ME. PLEASE BE SURE IT
 WILL COMPLY WITH THE SECTIONS BELOW:
  
 FBC107.1 GENERAL. SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS CONSISTING OF
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, STATEMENT OF SPECIAL
 INSPECTIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND OTHER DATA SHALL
 BE SUBMITTED IN TWO OR MORE SETS WITH EACH PERMIT
 APPLICATION. THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PREPARED BY A REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WHERE
 REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES& 61G15
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OR CHAPTER 481, FLORIDA
 STATUTES& 61G1 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. WHERE
 SPECIAL CONDITIONS EXIST, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS
 AUTHORIZED TO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
 TO BE PREPARED BY A
 REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. ELECTRONIC MEDIA
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN REQUIRED BY THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL, AND MAY REQUIRE ONLY ONE SET OF
 SUBMITTALS.
  
 FBC-107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. ALL
 INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCOMPANYING
 DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN.
  
 FBC 107.2.1.4 QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS. BUILDING PLANS
 SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE UPON
 SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEDIUM.
 THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE,
 SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO
 RECORDS MANAGEMENT.
  
  
 STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO
 CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6710
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-08-27 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-08-27 Time 11:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-08-27 Time 10:22 Sent To I
Notes
2015-08-27 11:40:31AFTER CAREFUL EVALUATION OF THIS SUBMITTAL, IT WAS
 DECIDED TO APPROVE THE PERMIT AND LEAVE THE COMPLIANCE
 ISSUES TO THE FIELD INSPECTOR. WE DISCUSSED THE GENERIC
 NATURE OF THE DRAWINGS AND THE LACK OF CERTAINTY WITH
 THE SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS.

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-08-27 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-08-27 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-08-27 Time 09:45 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-27 13:26:01THIS ENTRY WAS MADE IN ERROR. DISREGARD

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-07-15 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-07-15 Time 19:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-07-15 Time 18:29 Sent To B
Notes
2015-07-15 19:51:37PLEASE NOTE THAT I, MIKE ALBARRAN, ELECTRICAL PLANS
 EXAMINER HAVE COMPLETED THE REVIEW OF THE ABOVE
 MENTIONED JOB. BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS WITH REGARDS TO
 THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE
 CORRECTED AND THE PLANS RESUBMITTED FOR ANOTHER REVIEW.
 1. YOU HAVE SUBMITTED A GENERIC DRAWING WITH MULTIPLE
 SYSTEMS. YOU SHALL INDICATE WHICH OF THESE SYSTEMS YOU
 WILL BE INSTALLING. IF YOUR INSTALLATION DIFFERS FROM
 THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS, A SITE SPECIFIC DRAWING SHALL
 BE PROVIDED.
 2. YOU SHALL PROVIDE A SITE SPECIFIC RISER DIAGRAM
 SHOWING LOCATION OF INTERCONNECTION OF THE PV SYSTEM
 AND VARIOUS COMPONENTS. THIS RISER SHALL INCLUDE ALL
 REQUIRED SIGNAGE.
 3. THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS APPEAR TO INCLUDE A BACK-FED
 BREAKER WITHOUT ANY REFERENCES TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 NEC 690.9(E).
 4. THE SUBMITTED SPECS FOR THE INVERTER FAIL TO
 INDICATE A LISTING OR RATING FOR AN INTER-ACTIVE SYSTEM
 AS REQUIRED IN NEC 690.60.
 5. FAILURE WITH NOTE 4 ABOVE VOIDS COMPLIANCE WITH NEC
 690.61.
 6. ROMEX, AS MENTIONED IN YOUR NOTES IS A BRAND NAME
 AND NOT A TYPE OF LISTED CABLE; FURTHERMORE NEC
 334.12(B)(4) PROHIBITS THE USE OF NM, NMC ETC. IN WET
 LOCATIONS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO
 CONTACT ME DIRECTLY.
  
 THANK YOU
  

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-08-27 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-08-27 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-08-25 Time 12:53 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-27 11:47:158/27/15 - WITH HESITATION THIS PASSED ELECTRICAL
 REVIEW. CONTRACTOR WAS NOTIFIED VIA EMAIL. SENT TO
 SMALL READY BIN "L".MA
2015-08-25 12:53:17RESUB ROUTED TO SKENNEDY

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-07-17 Time 10:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-07-15 Time 14:17 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-15 14:17:22ROUTED TO MALBARRAN


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved