 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 15061450
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15061450 |
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-09-17 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-09-17 |
Time |
14:20 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-17 14:57:41 | PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. | | | FIRE INSPECTOR PROVISO WAS TRANSFERED BY ME TO FIRST | | | PAGE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
Time |
12:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
Time |
11:43 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-26 12:18:51 | YOU SHALL PROVIDE CUT SHEETS OF THE EQUIPMENT BEING | | | INSTALLED ALONG WITH ELECTRICAL DATA AND WIRING | | | INFORMATION. | | | PAGE 4 OF 4 REFLECTS A CARD READER NOT INCLUDED ON THE | | | LEGEND. WHICH IS CORRECT? IS THERE A READER AND IT WAS | | | NOT INCLUDED ON THE LEGEND, OR IS THE READER A LEFTOVER | | | FROM THE PREVIOUS INSTALLATION. THE PAGES 3 & 4 OF 4 DO | | | INDICATE BROWARD COUNTY COURTHOUSE. | | | BY THE WAY, LOOK AT PAGE 4 OF 4 AND TELL ME IT THERE IS | | | A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE VIEWS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-07-22 |
Time |
16:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-07-22 |
Time |
16:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-22 16:42:26 | 7/22/2015 | | | PROJECT: PHILLIPS POINT #1100 | | | PERMIT#: 15061450 | | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC, 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC, | | | 2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER ONE, | | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | | 1ST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | REVISE YOUR PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT | | | CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF | | | THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL | | | CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT | | | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED | | | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | WPB AMENDMENTS TO FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 2) QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS. BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE | | | DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE UPON SUBSTANTIAL | | | PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEDIUM. THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, | | | OTHER STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER | | | TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. | | | THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, | | | SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO | | | RECORDS MANAGEMENT. WPB AMENDMENTS TO FBC 107.2.1.4 | | | | | | 3) ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND | | | ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF | | | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. FBC, WPB | | | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ | | | 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF | | | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | | THIS REVIEW. | | | ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REQUIRED TO INSERT THE CORRECTED | | | PAGES INTO THE DENIED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. VOID THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND LEAVE FOR COMPARATIVE | | | REVIEW. | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-08-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-08-13 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-08-13 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-13 09:20:23 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: | | | | | | PER SECTION 7.2.1.6.2, ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS DOORS | | | ARE PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT ALL SEVEN OF THE FOLLOWING | | | CRITERIA ARE MET: | | | 1. A SENSOR SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE EGRESS SIDE, | | | ARRANGED TO DETECT AN OCCUPANT APPROACHING DOORS THAT | | | ARE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS UPON | | | DETECTION OF AN APPROACHING OCCUPANT OR LOSS OF POWER | | | TO THE SENSOR. | | | 2. LOSS OF POWER TO THE PART OF THE ACCESS CONTROL | | | SYSTEM THAT LOCKS THE DOORS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK | | | THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS. | | | 3. THE DOORS SHALL BE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE | | | DIRECTION OF EGRESS FROM A MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE | | | LOCATED VERTICALLY 40 TO 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND | | | WITHIN 60 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF THE SECURED DOORS. | | | 4. THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL BE READILY | | | ACCESSIBLE AND CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT READS | | | PUSH TO EXIT. | | | 5. WHEN OPERATED, THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL | | | RESULT IN DIRECT INTERRUPTION OF POWER TO THE LOCK, | | | INDEPENDENT OF THE ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM ELECTRONICS, | | | AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED FOR NOT LESS THAN | | | 30 SECONDS. | | | 6. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL | | | AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF | | | EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE | | | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET. | | | 7. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER | | | SYSTEM OR AUTOMATIC DETECTION SYSTEM SHALL | | | AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF | | | EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE | | | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-07-22 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-07-06 |
Time |
13:51 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-06 14:00:31 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: | | | | | | PER SECTION 7.2.1.6.2, ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS DOORS | | | ARE PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT ALL SEVEN OF THE FOLLOWING | | | CRITERIA ARE MET: | | | 1. A SENSOR SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE EGRESS SIDE, | | | ARRANGED TO DETECT AN OCCUPANT APPROACHING DOORS THAT | | | ARE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS UPON | | | DETECTION OF AN APPROACHING OCCUPANT OR LOSS OF POWER | | | TO THE SENSOR. | | | 2. LOSS OF POWER TO THE PART OF THE ACCESS CONTROL | | | SYSTEM THAT LOCKS THE DOORS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK | | | THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS. | | | 3. THE DOORS SHALL BE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE | | | DIRECTION OF EGRESS FROM A MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE | | | LOCATED VERTICALLY 40 TO 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND | | | WITHIN 60 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF THE SECURED DOORS. | | | 4. THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL BE READILY | | | ACCESSIBLE AND CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT READS | | | PUSH TO EXIT. | | | 5. WHEN OPERATED, THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL | | | RESULT IN DIRECT INTERRUPTION OF POWER TO THE LOCK, | | | INDEPENDENT OF THE ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM ELECTRONICS, | | | AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED FOR NOT LESS THAN | | | 30 SECONDS. | | | 6. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL | | | AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF | | | EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE | | | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET. | | | 7. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER | | | SYSTEM OR AUTOMATIC DETECTION SYSTEM SHALL | | | AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF | | | EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE | | | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-09-17 |
Time |
14:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-09-16 |
Time |
09:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-17 15:01:42 | 9/17/15 - PASSED ELECTRICAL REVIEW. TRANSFERRED FIRE | | | MARSHALL PROVISO TO FIRST PAGE. CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED VIA | | | PHONE CALL TO PAM.SENT TO SMALL READY BIN "C". MA | | 2015-09-17 09:55:08 | RESUB ROUTED TO MALBARRAN |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-08-26 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-08-05 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-26 12:21:55 | 8/26/15 - FAILED ELECTRICAL REVIEW AS NOTED. CONTRACTOR | | | NOTIFIED VIA EMAIL. SENT TO SMALL DENIED BIN "C". MA | | 2015-08-05 15:59:00 | RESUB ROUTED TO FIRE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-07-22 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-30 12:38:53 | TO THE FIRE BOX |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |