Plan Review Details - Permit 15061317
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15061317
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2016-01-07 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2016-01-07 Time 09:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2016-01-07 Time 09:11 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-07 09:32:23BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
 1- SHEET 5 OF 6:
 A) REVISE ROOF BCLL. THE 10PSF NON-CONCURRENT LOAD
 SPECIFIED AFTER THE 20PSF IS INCORRECT. THE CORRECT
 LIVE LOAD IS 20PSF PER NOTES "B" AND "G" OF-TABLE
 R301.5.
 B) ROOF FRAMING PLAN: SPECIFY CONNECTOR AT BOTH ENDS OF
 ALL GIRDER TRUSSES.
 C) CONNECTOR #2 SPECIFIED FOR GIRDER TRUSS A15G NEEDS
 TO BE REVISED. THIS IS A TWO PLY GIRDER TRUSS. REVISE
 THE NUMBER OF CONNECTORS REQUIRED FOR A TWO PLY TRUSS
 AND SPECIFY THE CORRECT SIZE OF NAIL ACCORDING TO THE
 NUMBER OF TRUSSES. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CONNECTOR
 HHETA AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. 1.
 2- REVISE THE EXPOSURE SPECIFIED ON THE DESIGN
 CRITERIA. BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT "B".
 SEC. R301.2.1.4.3.
 3- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 A) CONDITIONED AREA DOESN'T MATCH AREA SHOWN ON PLANS.
 B) ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 5 DOESN'T MATCH
 PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
 C) REVISE DOOR TYPE SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 5. THERE ARE
 NOT WOOD DOORS.
 D) ENTRY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15210.6 SUBMITTED IS
 FOR DOORS WITH GLAZING. THIS DOORS NEED TO BE ENTERED
 IN THE WINDOWS SECTIONS NOT DOORS.
 E) COMPLETE THE FLORIDA CODE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST PAGE
 5 OF 5.
 F) COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY
 CARD.
 NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR
 AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING
 THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING.
 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 FAC 61G20-3.0002(33) FOR:
 A) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 B) SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS SHOWN ON SHEET A-3 BY THE
 DINING ROOM AREA.
 C) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. INFORMATION FROM JELD-WEN
 SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NUMBER.
 D) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD. SEE ITEM #6 BELOW. NOTE: SEE ROOF TILE NOA
 11-0510.02 SUBMITTED FOR LISTED ADHESIVES.
 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS.
 6- ROOFING FINISH MATERIAL WAS CHANGED FROM SHINGLES TO
 CONCRETE TILE. DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY HOW IS THE
 TILE GOING TO BE INSTALLED (ADHESIVE OR SCREWS/NAILS).
 7- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOIL TEST REPORT WITH
 ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 471 F.S.
 8- TRUSS ENGINEER TO REVISE TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED:
 A) ALL INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWINGS NEED A TITLE BLOCK
 WITH THE ENGINEER NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER AND
 THE DATE OF THE DRAWING AS REQUIRED BY 1G15-31.003 OF
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
 B) REVISE THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD TO COMPLY WITH FOOTNOTES
 "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NEED 20PSF ATTIC LIVE LOAD. SEE PLANS AND TABLE R301.5.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-12-31 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-12-31 Time 19:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-12-31 Time 11:33 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-30 19:07:01NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), THIRD BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST.
 CODE: 2010 FBC.
  
 ****NOTE:
 COMMENTS BELOW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO
 MEANS THAT OWNER/BUILDER MAY OBTAIN PERMIT IF OTHER
 TRADES PASS THEIR REVIEWS. AND, THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE
 ADDRESSED AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED AND BEFORE
 INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED.. REVISION FEES WILL APPLY.
 OWNER/BUILDER TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED.
  
  
 NOTE:
 PERMIT APPLICATION IS MISSING FROM PACKAGE SUBMITTED.
  
  
 1- SHEET 5 OF 6:
 A) CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD ON THE DESIGN
 CRITERIA. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5 AND
 REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA AS REQUIRED.
 RESPONSE: THE ROOF BCLL WAS REVISED TO SAY 20PSF, BUT
 THERE IS A NOTE STATING THAT "10PSF BCLL
 NON-CONCURRENT". THERE IS A CONFLICT ON THIS STATEMENT.
 IF THE BCLL IS 20PSF, THEN THE NON-CONCURRENT LIVE LOAD
 IS 20PSF NOT 10PSF. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 B) REVISE THE EXPOSURE SPECIFIED ON THE DESIGN
 CRITERIA. BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT "B".
 SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC.
  
 2- TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET 3 OF 6:
 A) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT NAIL TYPES AND SPACING SPECS
 FOR THE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1.
 RESPONSE: WALL SECTION STILL SHOWS TWO DIFFERENT NAILS.
 10D RING SHANK NAILS AND 10D NAILS. SPECIFY ONLY ONE
 TYPE. NOTE: RING SHANK NAILS ARE REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R803.2.3.1.
  
 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 A) OWNER/AGENT TO CERTIFY CODE COMPLIANCE AT BOTTOM OF
 FORM SUBMITTED. SEC. 103.2.3.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 B) CONDITIONED AREA DOESN'T MATCH PLANS . REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT.
  
 C) ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 5 DOESN'T MATCH
 PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 D) REVISE DOOR TYPE SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 5. THERE ARE
 NOT WOOD DOORS. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. AND,
 SEE COMMENT BELOW. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 E) ENTRY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15210.6 SUBMITTED IS
 FOR DOORS WITH GLAZING. THIS DOORS NEED TO BE ENTERED
 IN THE WINDOWS SECTIONS NOT DOORS. SEE SEC. 405.5.3 OF
 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION ANDS REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 F) COMPLETE THE FLORIDA CODE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST PAGE
 5 OF 5 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 405.4.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 G) COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY
 CARD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 405.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR
 AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING
 THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING.
  
 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 FAC 61G20-3.0002(33) FOR:
 A) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 RESPONSE: INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT AN APPROVED
 PRODUCT APPROVAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. THREE TIMES).
  
 B) SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS SHOWN ON SHEET A-3 BY THE
 DINING ROOM AREA. THERE IS NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 SLIDING GLASS DOORS IN THE RE-SUBMITTED PACKAGE.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 C) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. INFORMATION FROM JELD-WEN
 SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NUMBER. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER
 THAT CORRESPONDS TO PACKAGE SUBMITTED.
 RESPONSE: SAME PACKAGE RE-SUBMITTED. COMMENT NOT
 ADDRESSED.
  
 D) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD. SEE ITEM #6 BELOW. NOTE: SEE ROOF TILE NOA
 11-0510.02 SUBMITTED FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. PROVIDE THAT
 PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 6- ROOFING FINISH MATERIAL WAS CHANGED FROM SHINGLES TO
 CONCRETE TILE. DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO SPECIFY HOW
 IS THE TILE GOING TO BE INSTALLED (ADHESIVE OR
 SCREWS/NAILS) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN
 PRESSURES OF SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC. IF USING
 SCREWS/NAILS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER REQUIRED TO
 MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES.
  
 7- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOIL TEST REPORT AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R401.4 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 RESPONSE: SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED NEED TO HAVE
 ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS
 FOR PUBLIC RECORDS.
  
 8- SHEET 5 OF 6:
 A) ROOF FRAMING PLAN IS MISSING THE CONNECTOR AT THE
 END OF SOME GIRDER TRUSSES. CIRCLE DENOTING CONNECTOR
 IS IN BLANK. SPECIFY CONNECTOR AT BOTH ENDS OF GIRDER
 TRUSSES. SEC. R301.
  
 B) CONNECTOR #2 SPECIFIED FOR GIRDER TRUSS A15G NEEDS
 TO BE REVISED. THIS IS A TWO PLY GIRDER TRUSS. REVISE
 THE NUMBER OF CONNECTORS REQUIRED FOR A TWO PLY TRUSS
 AND SPECIFY THE CORRECT SIZE OF NAIL ACCORDING TO THE
 NUMBER OF TRUSSES. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CONNECTOR
 HHETA AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301.
  
 9- TRUSS ENGINEER TO REVISE TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED:
 A) ALL INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWINGS NEED A TITLE BLOCK
 WITH THE ENGINEER NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER AND
 THE DATE OF THE DRAWING AS REQUIRED BY 1G15-31.003 OF
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 B) REVISE THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD TO COMPLY WITH FOOTNOTES
 "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NEED 20PSF ATTIC LIVE LOAD. SEE PLANS AND TABLE R301.5.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 **** PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 **** PLEASE REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET. SUBMIT OLD COPIES
 FOR REFERENCE. DON"T STAPLE OLD COPIES TO NEW REVISED
 SET.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-11-10 Time 17:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-11-10 Time 17:22 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 17:38:03NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), SECOND BUILDING
 REVIEW CHECKLIST.
 CODE: 2010 FBC.
  
  
 NOTE: PACKAGE RE-SUBMITTED IS MISSING:
 A) THE PERMIT APPLICATION.
 B) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
 C) THE SOIL TEST REPORT.
  
  
 1- PLANS NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED AND WITH ORIGINAL
 SEAL AND SIGNATURE BY THE ENGINEERS SHOWN ON THE TITLE
 BLOCK AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN
 SUBMITTING DRAWINGS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. NOTE: THERE ARE
 TWO DIFFERENT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ON THE TILE BLOCK
 OF DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS AN
 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND A MEP ENGINEER. DRAWINGS NEED
 TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER RESPONSIBLE FOR
 EACH DESIGN.
 RESPONSE: INFORMATION ON PLANS SUBMITTED SHOW WHITE
 OUT. PLANS WITH WHITE OUT ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR PUBLIC
 RECORDS. ORIGINAL PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED SHOWING ONLY
 THE INFORMATION OF THE ENGINEER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
 DESIGN. AND, SIGN AND SEAL NEW COPIES ACCORDINGLY.
  
 2- SHEET A-1:
 A) REVISE THE DESIGN DATA SHOWN ON THE FOOTING NOTES.
 THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT EXPOSURE
 "B". SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND
 REVISE ALL THE DESIGN PRESSURES ON SHEET A-5
 ACCORDINGLY.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SHEET A-1 WAS
 NOT REVISED.
  
 B) REVISE THE PROJECT INFORMATION & DESIGN CRITERIA.
 THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT EXPOSURE
 "C". SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND
 REVISE ALL THE DESIGN PRESSURES ACCORDINGLY.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SHEET A-1 WAS
 NOT REVISED.
  
 C) PROJECT INFORMATION & DESIGN CRITERIA: SPECIFY THE
 ULTIMATE WIND LOAD AND THE NOMINAL WIND LOAD. SEC.
 R301.2.1.3.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SHEET A-1 WAS
 NOT REVISED.
  
 D) CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD ON THE PROJECT
 INFORMATION & DESIGN CRITERIA. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND
 "G" OF TABLE R301.5 AND REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA AS
 REQUIRED.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SHEET A-1 WAS
 NOT REVISED.
  
 3- TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-2:
 A) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT NAIL TYPES AND SPACING SPECS
 FOR THE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1.
 NOTE: ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ROOF SHEATHING
 SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN THE "ROOF SHEATHING DETAIL" AND "
 FLOOR & ROOF SHEATHING FASTENER DETAIL" ON SHEET A-4.
  
 RESPONSE: THERE IS NO COORDINATION BETWEEN INFORMATION
 SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION AND INFORMATION SHOWN
 ON SHEET A-4. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY RING SHANK NAIL
 MIN. AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1.
  
 B) PROVIDE SPECS FOR WALL FINISH. "TO MATCH EXIST.
 FINISH" DOESN'T APPLY. THERE IS NOT EXISTING FINISH.
 THIS IS A NEW HOUSE. SEC. R701.
 RESPONSE: FINISH SPECIFICATIONS WERE NOT REVISED.
  
 C) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE STONE VENEER AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R703.7 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY ALL THE
 FASTENERS, ETC.
  
 4- SHEET A-3:
 A) FLOOR PLAN IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT'S TOO DARK LETTERING
 AND NUMBERS ARE HARD TO READ. PLAN IS NOT CLEAR FOR
 SCANNING AND FILING PURPOSES. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC.
 107.2.1.4 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 RESPONSE: SAME DRAWING WAS RE-SUBMITTED. NEW CLEAR AND
 LEGIBLE DRAWING WAS NOT SUBMITTED AND THERE IS WHITE
 OUT OVER THE PREVIOUS ENGINEER INFORMATION. WHITE OUT
 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE ON ANY DRAWING.
  
 B) SIZE OF ATTIC ACCESS SHOWN BY THE LAUNDRY AREA
 DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. R807. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 C) PROVIDE A BATHROOM WITH A DOOR SIZE THAT COMPLIES
 WITH SEC. R320.1.1.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 D) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ANCHOR FASTENING
 SPACING OF THE GARAGE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK. IT'S NOT
 THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R301.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 5- ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET A-4: PROVIDE COMPLETE
 ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SPECIFY ALL BEAMS AND LINTELS.
 SPECIFY ALL ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS. SEC.
 R301.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 6- SHEET A-5:
 A) CODE ANALYSIS INFORMATION SHOWN ON TOP OF THE SHEET
 IS INCORRECT. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. THE 2010 FBC EXISTING BUILDING CODE AND
 ALTERATION LEVEL 2 DON'T APPLY. THIS IS NEW
 CONSTRUCTION.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 SCREENED PORCH SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R301.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 7- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE MISSING FROM THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. UNABLE TO VERIFY IF REVISIONS
 WERE DONE.
  
 A) CONDITIONED AREA DOESN'T MATCH PLANS . REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 B) COORDINATE TYPE OF DOORS WITH PLANS AND PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 FAC 61G20-3.0002(33) FOR:
 A) GARAGE DOORS THAT MEETS THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 EXPOSURE "D" AS REQUIRED BY ITEM #2 ABOVE.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 B) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. ENGINEER OF
 RECORD TO REVISE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY ITEM #2
 ABOVE.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 C) FIXED WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 D) GARAGE SIDE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 E) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 RESPONSE: INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT AN APPROVED
 PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 F) ALL TRUSS STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS..
 NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER
 PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR
 ENGINEER OF RECORD TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR.
 RESPONSE: COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 G) ENTRY DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 H) SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS SHOWN ON SHEET A-3 BY THE
 DINING ROOM AREA. THERE IS NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 SLIDING GLASS DOORS IN THE RE-SUBMITTED PACKAGE.
  
 I) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. INFORMATION FROM JELD-WEN
 SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NUMBER. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER
 THAT CORRESPONDS TO PACKAGE SUBMITTED.
  
 9- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 10- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOIL TEST REPORT AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.4 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 11- TRUSS ENGINEER TO REVISE TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED:
 A) THE DESIGN CRITERIA IS INCORRECT. THIS BUILDING IS
 LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT EXPOSURE "B". REVISE
 COMPLETE TRUSS PACKAGE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301.2.1.4.3
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 B) TRUSS PACKAGE COVER SHEET DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC.
 61G15-31.003 OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: MISSING
 ENGINEER OF RECORD INFORMATION, THE BUILDING WAS
 DESIGNED BASED ON THE 2010 FBC NOT 2014 FBC,
  
 C) ALL INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWINGS NEED A TITLE BLOCK
 WITH THE ENGINEER NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER AND
 THE DATE OF THE DRAWING AS REQUIRED BY 1G15-31.003 OF
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
  
 D) REVISE THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD TO COMPLY WITH FOOTNOTES
 "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 **** PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 **** PLEASE REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET. SUBMIT OLD COPIES
 FOR REFERENCE. DON"T STAPLE OLD COPIES TO NEW REVISED
 SET.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-08-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-08-21 Time 14:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-08-21 Time 14:22 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-21 14:43:48NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS.
 CODE: 2010 FBC
  
 1- PLANS NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED AND WITH ORIGINAL
 SEAL AND SIGNATURE BY THE ENGINEERS SHOWN ON THE TITLE
 BLOCK AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN
 SUBMITTING DRAWINGS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. NOTE: THERE ARE
 TWO DIFFERENT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ON THE TILE BLOCK
 OF DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS AN
 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND A MEP ENGINEER. DRAWINGS NEED
 TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER RESPONSIBLE FOR
 EACH DESIGN.
  
 2- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.)
 FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED
 PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY
 IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT
 CODE.
  
 3- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO
 LOW. VALUATION IS BASED ON ALL LABOR, MATERIALS,
 CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL THE DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $276,948. THE
 PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $5460.75.
  
 4- SHEET A-1:
 A) REVISE THE DESIGN DATA SHOWN ON THE FOOTING NOTES.
 THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT EXPOSURE
 "B". SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND
 REVISE ALL THE DESIGN PRESSURES ON SHEET A-5
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 B) REVISE THE PROJECT INFORMATION & DESIGN CRITERIA.
 THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT EXPOSURE
 "C". SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND
 REVISE ALL THE DESIGN PRESSURES ACCORDINGLY.
  
 C) PROJECT INFORMATION & DESIGN CRITERIA: SPECIFY THE
 ULTIMATE WIND LOAD AND THE NOMINAL WIND LOAD. SEC.
 R301.2.1.3.
  
 D) CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD ON THE PROJECT
 INFORMATION & DESIGN CRITERIA. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND
 "G" OF TABLE R301.5 AND REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 5- DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET A-2. IT DOESN'T PROVIDE
 ANY INFORMATION SHOWING HOW THE SURFACE DRAINAGE IS
 DIVERTED TO A STORM SEWER OR ANY OTHER APPROVED POINT
 OF COLLECTION. NOTE: WATER NEEDS TO BE DIVERTED AWAY
 FROM FOUNDATION WALLS. SEE SEC. R401.3 AND REVISE PLAN
 AS REQUIRED.
  
 6- TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-2:
 A) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT NAIL TYPES AND SPACING SPECS
 FOR THE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1.
 NOTE: ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ROOF SHEATHING
 SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN THE "ROOF SHEATHING DETAIL" AND "
 FLOOR & ROOF SHEATHING FASTENER DETAIL" ON SHEET A-4.
  
 B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 WALL INSULATION SPECIFIED ON THIS TYP. WALL SECTION (RV
 PLUS SHIELD R-7). SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
 NOTE: IS THERE ANY REASON WHY PROVIDING A HIGHER THAN
 STANDARD R INSULATION VALUE ON THE CONCRETE BLOCK
 WALL?.
 PLEASE COORDINATE INFORMATION ON THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS AND PLANS TO AVOID UNNECESSARY CONFLICTS
 OR DELAYS.
  
 C) PROVIDE SPECS FOR WALL FINISH. "TO MATCH EXIST.
 FINISH" DOESN'T APPLY. THERE IS NOT EXISTING FINISH.
 THIS IS A NEW HOUSE. SEC. R701.
  
 7- SHEET A-3:
 A) FLOOR PLAN IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT'S TOO DARK LETTERING
 AND NUMBERS ARE HARD TO READ. PLAN IS NOT CLEAR FOR
 SCANNING AND FILING PURPOSES. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC.
 107.2.1.4 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 B) SIZE OF ATTIC ACCESS SHOWN BY THE LAUNDRY AREA
 DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. R807. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 C) PROVIDE A BATHROOM WITH A DOOR SIZE THAT COMPLIES
 WITH SEC. R320.1.1.
  
 D) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ANCHOR FASTENING
 SPACING OF THE GARAGE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK. IT'S NOT
 THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R301.
  
 8- ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET A-4: PROVIDE COMPLETE
 ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SPECIFY ALL BEAMS AND LINTELS.
 SPECIFY ALL ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS. SEC.
 R301.
  
 9- SHEET A-5: CODE ANALYSIS INFORMATION SHOWN ON TOP OF
 THE SHEET IS INCORRECT. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 10- SHEET A-5:
 A) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 SCREENED PORCH SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R301.
  
 11- SPECIFY CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM BY ALL THE BEDROOMS
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.
  
 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 A) CONDITIONED AREA DOESN'T MATCH PLANS . REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 B) COORDINATE TYPE OF DOORS WITH PLANS AND PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 13- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 FAC 61G20-3.0002(33) FOR:
 A) GARAGE DOORS THAT MEETS THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 EXPOSURE "D" AS REQUIRED BY ITEM #4 ABOVE.
  
 B) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND, CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY WINDOW MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY ITEM #4 ABOVE.
  
 C) FIXED WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 D) GARAGE SIDE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 E) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 F) ALL TRUSS STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS..
 NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER
 PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR
 ENGINEER OF RECORD TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR.
  
 G) ENTRY DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 14- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT
 SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 **** PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 **** PLEASE REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET. SUBMIT OLD COPIES
 FOR REFERENCE. DON"T STAPLE OLD COPIES TO NEW REVISED
 SET.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-01-06 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2016-01-06 Time 09:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mvaldes Date 2016-01-06 Time 09:30 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-06 09:41:28PASSED ROUTED TO MECHANICAL CC
2015-12-17 16:59:06NEW PLANS SUBMITTED. JG.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-15 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-11-15 Time 12:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-11-15 Time 12:12 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-10 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-09-10 Time 10:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-09-10 Time 10:22 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-10 10:32:491ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 NEC 2008
  
 DESIGN IS COMPLIANT, HOWEVER MUST BE SIGNED AND SEALED
 BY THE DESIGNERR OF REORD.
  
 STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO
 CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6710
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2016-01-06 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2016-01-06 Time 12:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-12-17 Time 16:56 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-17 16:56:33PLANS SENT TO R33 SHELF FOR REVIEWS. JG.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2015-11-16 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2015-11-16 Time 09:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-11-02 Time 15:18 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-02 15:19:49R19
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-10-13 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-10-13 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-09-30 Time 13:50 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-13 09:28:34APPLICANT HAS ELECTED TO REMOVE PLAN FROM REVIEW CYCLE
 AND RE-SUBMIT NEW PLANS ONCE HE HAS MET WITH DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-09-10 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-09-10 Time 10:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-06-29 Time 16:46 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-11-10 Time 17:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-11-10 Time 17:38 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 17:39:03$10,003.08 PAID. MU-2015-122.
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-08-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-08-21 Time 14:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-08-21 Time 14:39 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-21 14:42:291- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.)
 FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED
 PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY
 IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT
 CODE.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-01-06 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2016-01-06 Time 12:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2016-01-06 Time 12:32 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-06 12:34:32MECHANICAL NOTES:
 1) NO VALUE OR PERMIT NUMBER ON THE AC APPLICATION.
 2) MASTER PERMIT APPLIOCATION MISSING.
2015-12-31 14:40:51NEW DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. JG.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-11-16 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2015-11-16 Time 08:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-11-16 Time 08:34 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-16 09:45:522ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #15061317
 11/16/15
  
 1) THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE MISSING FROM THE PERMIT
 PACKAGE AND ARE REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. PLEASE PROVIDE: A)
 PERMIT APPLICATION B) ENERGY CALCULATIONS C) AC COOLING
 AND HEATING LOAD CALCULATIONS D) AHRI CERTIFICATE FOR
 THE AC SYSTEM.
 2) SHEET A-6: THE MEP ENGINEER OF RECORD WHOSE TITLE
 BLOCK APPEARS ON THE PAGE SHALL SIGN AND SEAL THE PLAN
 IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 61G15-23.002 FLORIDA
 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, AND 471 FLORIDA STATUTES. ALL
 HANDWRIITEN NOTES ON THE PLAN SHALL BE SIGNED AND DATED
 BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. PLEASE NOTE THE SUBMITTED
 PLAN HAS BEEN REDLINED BY AN UNIDENTIFIED PERSON AND IS
 NO LONGER A VALID SUBMITTAL PER SECTION 107.2 WPB
 AMENDMENTS OT THE FBC-10 BUILDING CODE. PROVIDE A CLEAN
 SET OF DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW.
 3) THE REVISED PLAN SHALL CLEARLY PROVIDE: A) AC
 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE B) DUCT LAYOUT PLAN INCLUDING THE
 TYPE AND SIZE OF- SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS, TRANSFER
 DUCTS, DIFFUSER AND RETURN GRILLS, AND SUPPLY AND
 RETURN CFM'S ( SEE SECTION M1602.4 BALANCED RETURN AIR
 FOR TRANSFER DUCT SIZING). C) BATH, KITCHEN, AND DRYER
 EXHAUST SYSTEM DETAILS INCLUDING TYPES AND SIZES OF
 EXHAUST DUCTS, DUCT RUNS AND TERMINATION LOCATIONS,
 MAKE-UP AIR CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE KITCHEN
 AND DRYER SYSTEMS.
 4) SUBMIT SPECS FOR THE KITCHEN EXHAUST AND THE DRYER.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-10 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-09-10 Time 10:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-09-10 Time 10:36 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-10 10:41:091ST REVIEW: FBC 2010
  
 PLAN TO BE SIGNED AND SEAL BY DESIGNER ON PLAN.
  
 FBC-EC 403.2.5 PROVIDE A SIZING CALCULATION AND
 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.
  
 FBC- 107.3.5.3 ? PROVIDE A MECHANICAL PLAN TO SHOW
 SUPPLY DUCTS PER FBC-R M16 & BATH EXHAUST PER FBC-R
 M15., INCLUDE DUCT SIZING AND INSULATION VALUES CFM.
  
 FBC-R M1305.1.3 APPLIANCES IN ATTICS.
 ATTICS CONTAINING APPLIANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN
 OPENING AND A CLEAR AND UNOBSTRUCTED PASSAGEWAY LARGE
 ENOUGH TO ALLOW REMOVAL OF THE LARGEST APPLIANCE, BUT
 NOT LESS THAN 30 INCHES (762 MM) HIGH AND 22 INCHES
 (559 MM) WIDE AND NOT MORE THAN 6 FEET (1829 MM) LONG
 MEASURED ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF THE PASSAGEWAY FROM
 THE OPENING TO THE APPLIANCE. THE PASSAGEWAY SHALL HAVE
 CONTINUOUS SOLID FLOORING IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 5
 NOT LESS THAN 24 INCHES (610 MM) WIDE. A LEVEL SERVICE
 SPACE AT LEAST 30 INCHES (762 MM) DEEP AND 30 INCHES
 (762 MM) WIDE SHALL BE PRESENT ALONG ALL SIDES OF THE
 APPLIANCE WHERE ACCESS IS REQUIRED. THE CLEAR ACCESS
 OPENING DIMENSIONS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 20 INCHES BY
 30 INCHES (508 MM BY 762 MM), AND LARGE ENOUGH TO ALLOW
 REMOVAL OF THE LARGEST APPLIANCE.
  
 FBC-R M1305.1.3.1 ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS.
 A LUMINAIRE CONTROLLED BY A SWITCH LOCATED AT THE
 REQUIRED PASSAGEWAY OPENING AND A RECEPTACLE OUTLET
 SHALL BE INSTALLED AT OR NEAR THE APPLIANCE LOCATION IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 34.
  
 FBC-R M1305.1.3.2 AIR-HANDLING UNITS.
 AIR-HANDLING UNITS SHALL BE ALLOWED IN ATTICS IF THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
 1. THE SERVICE PANEL OF THE EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED WITHIN
 6 FEET (1829 MM) OF AN ATTIC ACCESS.
 2. A DEVICE IS INSTALLED TO ALERT THE OWNER OR SHUT THE
 UNIT DOWN WHEN THE CONDENSATION DRAIN IS NOT WORKING
 PROPERLY.
 3. THE ATTIC ACCESS OPENING IS OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO
 REPLACE THE AIR HANDLER.
 4. A NOTICE IS POSTED ON THE ELECTRIC SERVICE PANEL
 INDICATING TO THE HOMEOWNER THAT THE AIR HANDLER IS
 LOCATED IN THE ATTIC. SAID NOTICE SHALL BE IN ALL
 CAPITALS, IN 16 POINT TYPE, WITH THE TITLE AND FIRST
 PARAGRAPH IN BOLD:
  
 STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO
 CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6710
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2015-12-20 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-12-20 Time 12:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-12-20 Time 11:50 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-17 17:00:29NEW PLANS SUBMITTED. JG.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2015-11-03 Time 11:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2015-11-03 Time 11:58 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-10-08 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-10-08 Time 08:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-10-08 Time 06:09 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-08 06:47:231) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ON
 THE TITLE BLOCK.THE DRAWINGS NEED TO BE SIGNED AND
 SEALED BY THE ENGINEER RESPONSIBLE FOR EACH DESIGN
 DISCIPLINE PER FL. STATUTE 471 AND FL. ADMIN. CODE RULE
 61G15-23.002.
 2) SHT. A-8 IS MISSING FROM ONE SET OF PLANS. SUBMIT
 TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS FOR REVIEW. WPB AMEND. TO
 FBC SEC.107.1.
 3) SUBMIT A SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM THAT IS CODE
 COMPLIANT AND CORRELATES WITH THE FLOOR PLAN. WPB
 AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.3.5.3.
 4) SHT. A-8 SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. FL. ADMIN. CODE RULE
 61G15-23.002.
 5) SHT. A-3 - THE SEAL FROM FROM JOHN HOLT HAS BEEN
 PASTED ONTO THE PLAN.THIS VIOLATES FL> ADMIN. CODE
 61G15-23.002. PLANS SHALL BEAR THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL
 OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL.
  
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 TIM LARGE
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
 561-805-6692
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-07-21 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-07-21 Time 11:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-07-21 Time 11:14 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-21 11:21:391ST REVIEW: FBC 2010
  
 FBC 107.3.5.3; PROVIDE PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM.
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561 805 6711
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-12-31 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-12-31 Time 16:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-12-31 Time 16:52 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-31 14:52:17PLANS WERE REVISED FOR CONCRETE TILE INSTEAD OF
 SHINGLES. JG.
  
 1- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 FAC 61G20-3.0002(33) FOR:
 A) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD. NOTE: SEE ROOF TILE NOA 11-0510.02 SUBMITTED
 FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. PROVIDE THAT PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVAL
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 NOTE:
 ROOF TILE NOA 11-0510.02 SUBMITTED IS OK.
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-12 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-11-12 Time 11:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-11-12 Time 11:25 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-12 11:25:5111/12/15 NEW SHINGLES NOA 12-1204.03. SUBMITTED. JG.
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-08-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-08-24 Time 09:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-08-24 Time 09:45 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-24 09:46:20SHINGLES NOA 12-0309.01 SUBMITTED. JG.
  
 11/12/15 NEW SHINGLES NOA 12-1204.03. SUBMITTED. JG.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-11-09 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2015-11-09 Time 14:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date 2015-11-09 Time 14:43 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-10-02 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 2015-10-02 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date 2015-10-02 Time 10:11 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-07-07 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2015-07-07 Time 16:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date 2015-07-07 Time 16:12 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-07 16:13:517/7/15 ZONING FAILED
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved