Plan Review Details - Permit 15060997
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15060997
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-08-05 Time 08:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-08-05 Time 08:25 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-07-17 Time 09:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-07-17 Time 09:20 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-17 09:22:542ND REVIEW: FBC 2010
  
 ALTHOUGH YOU HAVE SUBMITTED A LARGER GENERIC PLAN BY
 ALLEN GEZELMAN, PE, WHICH IS APPRECIATED, THE SITE
 SPECIFIC SKETCH YOU ORIGINALLY PROVIDED WAS ALSO TOO
 SMALL AND WILL NOT COPY PROPERLY INTO OUR RECORDS
 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. IT IS A DARK PHOTO COPY FROM A
 NOTEBOOK WHICH WAS SKETCHED UPON. FURTHER, THE SKETCH
 IS VERY UNCLEAR IN TERMS OF DETAIL SUCH THAT I CANNOT
 DETERMINE TO ANY EXTENT WHATSOEVER THE INTENT OF THE
 SCOPE OF WORK.
  
 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN
 UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE
 AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT
 IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND
 RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS
 DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM
 OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS,
 WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE
 TECHNICAL CODES.
  
 THE PLANS ARE TOO SMALL TO READ AND WILL NOT TRANSLATE
 WELL INTO THE CITY RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. PLEASE
 SUBMIT LARGER PLANS.
 FBC 107.2.1.4 QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS. BUILDING PLANS
 SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE UPON
 SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEDIUM.
 THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE,
 SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO
 RECORDS MANAGEMENT.
  
 STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO
 CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6710
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-07-10 Time 17:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-07-10 Time 17:23 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-10 17:24:531ST REVIEW: FBC 2010
  
  
 THE PLANS ARE TOO SMALL TO READ AND WILL NOT TRANSLATE
 WELL INTO THE CITY RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. PLEASE
 SUBMIT LARGER PLANS.
 FBC 107.2.1.4 QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS. BUILDING PLANS
 SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE UPON
 SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEDIUM.
 THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE,
 SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO
 RECORDS MANAGEMENT.
  
 STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO
 CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6710
 [email protected]
  
  

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2015-08-27 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-08-27 Time 13:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-08-27 Time 12:56 Sent To I
Notes
2015-08-27 13:26:37AFTER CAREFUL EVALUATION OF THIS SUBMITTAL, IT WAS
 DECIDED TO APPROVE THE PERMIT AND LEAVE THE COMPLIANCE
 ISSUES TO THE FIELD INSPECTOR. WE DISCUSSED THE GENERIC
 NATURE OF THE DRAWINGS AND THE LACK OF CERTAINTY WITH
 THE SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS.

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-08-04 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-08-04 Time 13:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-08-04 Time 17:35 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-05 08:30:56PLEASE NOTE THAT I, MIKE ALBARRAN, ELECTRICAL PLANS
 EXAMINER HAVE COMPLETED THE REVIEW OF THE ABOVE
 MENTIONED JOB. BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS WITH REGARDS TO
 THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE
 CORRECTED AND THE PLANS RESUBMITTED FOR ANOTHER REVIEW.
 1. YOU CONTINUE TO SUBMIT GENERIC DRAWINGS. AS PER FAC
 61G15-23.002, A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL SIGN AND
 SEAL ALL PLANS. EACH SHEET SHALL HAVE A TITLE BLOCK
 CONTAINING THE NAME ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE
 ENGINEER. EACH TITLE BLOCK, AT A MINIMUM SHALL CONTAIN
 AMONG OTHER CRITERIA THE NAME AND IDENTIFICATION OF THE
 PROJECT AND THE DATE PREPARED.
 2. WHAT YOU HAVE PROVIDED IS NOT A RISER DIAGRAM. THAT
 MAY HELP THE BLDG. PLANS EXAMINER LOCATE THE VARIOUS
 PANELS ON THE ROOF.
 3. THE FACT THAT I COMMITTED A TYPO DOES NOT ELIMINATE
 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BACKFED BREAKERS TO BE LISTED
 FOR THE APPLICATION. THE PV SUB-PANEL HAS NOTHING TO DO
 WITH THE BACKFED BREAKER. THAT IS FOR THE PROTECTION OF
 ANY PERSON SERVICING THE UNIT ALONG WITH ITS RATING.
 4. REGARDLESS OF COMPLIANCE LISTED STATED I DO NOT SEE
 A UL LISTING ON THE DEVICE NOR DOES IT SPECIFICALLY
 STATE THAT IT IS IN FACT AN INTER-ACTIVE UNIT. HAD THIS
 DEVICE BEEN TESTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE UL
 STANDARDS, IT WOULD PROUDLY DISPLAY THE UL STICKER.
 5. WHEN YOU SUBMIT THE PROPER AND CORRECTED DRAWINGS,
 YOU MAY WANT TO REMOVE THE WORD ROMEX AND EDIT NOTE 10
 ALTOGETHER.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO
 CONTACT ME DIRECTLY.
  

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-07-16 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-07-16 Time 14:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-07-16 Time 13:39 Sent To B
Notes
2015-07-16 14:25:29PLEASE NOTE THAT I, MIKE ALBARRAN, ELECTRICAL PLANS
 EXAMINER HAVE COMPLETED THE REVIEW OF THE ABOVE
 MENTIONED JOB. BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS WITH REGARDS TO
 THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE
 CORRECTED AND THE PLANS RESUBMITTED FOR ANOTHER REVIEW.
 1. YOU HAVE SUBMITTED A GENERIC DRAWING WITH MULTIPLE
 SYSTEMS. YOU SHALL INDICATE WHICH OF THESE SYSTEMS YOU
 WILL BE INSTALLING. IF YOUR INSTALLATION DIFFERS FROM
 THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS, A SITE SPECIFIC DRAWING SHALL
 BE PROVIDED.
 2. YOU SHALL PROVIDE A SITE SPECIFIC RISER DIAGRAM
 SHOWING LOCATION OF INTERCONNECTION OF THE PV SYSTEM
 AND VARIOUS COMPONENTS. THIS RISER SHALL INCLUDE ALL
 REQUIRED SIGNAGE.
 3. THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS APPEAR TO INCLUDE A BACK-FED
 BREAKER WITHOUT ANY REFERENCES TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 NEC 690.9(E).
 4. THE SUBMITTED SPECS FOR THE INVERTER FAIL TO
 INDICATE A LISTING OR RATING FOR AN INTER-ACTIVE SYSTEM
 AS REQUIRED IN NEC 690.60.
 5. FAILURE WITH NOTE 4 ABOVE VOIDS COMPLIANCE WITH NEC
 690.61.
 6. ROMEX, AS MENTIONED IN YOUR NOTES IS A BRAND NAME
 AND NOT A TYPE OF LISTED CABLE; FURTHERMORE NEC
 334.12(B)(4) PROHIBITS THE USE OF NM, NMC ETC. IN WET
 LOCATIONS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO
 CONTACT ME DIRECTLY.
  
 THANK YOU
  

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-06-29 Time 09:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-06-29 Time 13:11 Sent To  
Notes
2015-06-29 14:01:38107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN
 UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE
 AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT
 IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND
 RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS
 DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2015-08-27 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-08-27 Time 13:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-27 13:27:508/27/15 - WITH HESITATION THIS PASSED ELECTRICAL
 REVIEW. CONTRACTOR WAS NOTIFIED VIA EMAIL. SENT TO
 SMALL READY BIN "L".MA

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2015-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-08-05 Time 08:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-07-27 Time 08:24 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-07-17 Time 09:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-07-15 Time 13:46 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-15 13:46:52RESUB ROUTED TO MALBARRAN.

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-07-10 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-07-10 Time 17:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-06-23 Time 17:04 Sent To  
Notes
2015-06-23 09:41:20ZONING

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status N Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved