Plan Review Details - Permit 15050974
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15050974
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2015-06-05 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2015-06-05 Time 09:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2015-06-05 Time 09:37 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-06-03 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2015-06-03 Time 13:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2015-06-03 Time 13:42 Sent To  
Notes
2015-06-03 14:06:25PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2010
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 1) SPECIFY THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS ON THE
 PLANS OR APPLICATION. FBC 107.2.1
  
 2) SPECIFY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE TWO ROOF AREAS.
 FBC 107.2.1
  
 3) THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE FOR THE W-6 SYSTEM ON
 PAGE 3 OF THE TARCO MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM (FL
 9487 - R2) IS - 75.0 PSF. NOTE #5 ON PAGE 1 DOES NOT
 ALLOW RATIONAL ANALYSIS TO INCREASE THE DESIGN PRESSURE
 FOR THIS SYSTEM. THE REQUIRED ROOF UPLIFT PRESSURES FOR
 A STRUCTURE WITH A FLAT ROOF AND A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF
 15' OR LESS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE CATEGORY "C" WITH A 170
 MPH VULTIMATE WIND SPEED ARE -37.9 PSF IN ROOF ZONE 1,
 -63.6 PSF IN ROOF ZONE 2 AND -95.7 PSF IN ROOF ZONE 3.
 THE PROPOSED ROOF SYSTEM DOES NOT HAVE ADEQUATE DESIGN
 PRESSURE FOR ROOF ZONE 3. FBC-R 301.2.1
  
 4) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK WAS SPECIFIED AS $7000.00 ON
 THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION AND THE VALUE ON THE NEW
 APPLICATION IS $6000.00. CLARIFY. FBC 109.3

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-05-27 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2015-05-27 Time 14:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2015-05-27 Time 13:11 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-27 14:14:36PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 IT APPEARS THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAS A CGC LICENSE, BUT
 DOES NOT HAVE A ROOFING LICENSE. THEREFORE, THIS
 CONTRACTOR CAN NOT PERFORM THE WORK SPECIFIED BY THIS
 PERMIT.
  
 1) SPECIFY THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS ON THE
 PLANS OR APPLICATION. FBC 107.2.1
  
 2) SPECIFY WHICH ONE OF THE APPROVED ASSEMBLIES LISTED
 IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WILL BE INSTALLED.
 INDICATE THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE FOR THAT ASSEMBLY.
  
 3) PROVIDE TWO SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117
 CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING FROM A FLORIDA
 LICENSED ARCHITECT, ENGINEER OR REGISTERED ROOF
 CONSULTANT AS REQUIRED BY LIMITATION #7 OF NOA NO.
 12-0703.06.

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-05-21 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2015-05-21 Time 18:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2015-05-21 Time 18:04 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-21 18:15:55PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS
  
 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 1) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED IS AN
 UNDERLAYMENT THAT IS TO BE USED AS PART OF A ROOF
 ASSEMBLY. IT CAN NOT BE USED AS A PERMANENT CAP SHEET.
 FBC-R903.1
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved