| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15040957 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-21 |
Time |
17:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-21 |
Time |
17:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
|
Date |
2015-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-14 |
Time |
07:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-14 |
Time |
07:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-14 08:08:55 | RESPONDED TO MRS. MICKEY'S E-MAIL BELOW. THE 12/31/2015 | | | EXPIRATION DATE IS FOR THE "QUALITY ASSURANCE CONTRACT" | | | NOT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPLY. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | YOUR COMMENT: | | | | | | B) THE USP PRODUCT APPROVAL FL859-R4 IS FOR THE 2007 | | | CODE VERSION.? THIS | | | | | | ONE CANNOT BE USED.?? THE CODE VERSION IS TOO OLD.??? | | | THE CODE FOR WHICH | | | | | | THIS HOUSE WAS REVIEWED WAS FOR 2010 FBC.???? NEED | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE | | | | | | 2010 FBC CODE VERSION. | | | | | | ? | | | | | | THIS CODE STOPS AT 2007. PLEASE SEE BELOW. THE ATTACHED | | | PA DOES NOT EXPIRE TILL 12.31.15. | | | | | | ? | | | | | | IF YOU CAN DIRECT ME TO THE 2010 FBC VERSION, I WOULD | | | APPRECIATE IT. | | | | | | ? | | | | | | I WILL EMAIL YOU TOMORROW WITH THE ENGINEER ON RECORD | | | APPROVAL FOR THE OTHER PA AND WILL HAVE THE REVISED | | | ENERGY CALCS EMAILED TO YOU TOMORROW FOR YOUR REVIEW. | | | | | | ? | | | | | | THANK YOU | | | | | | ? | | | | | | MICKEY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-07-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-13 |
Time |
14:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-13 |
Time |
14:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-13 14:28:38 | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS FOR E-MAILED INFORMATION SENT | | | BY MRS. MICKEY RUDICK: | | | | | | 1- USP PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED: | | | A) THE USP PRODUCT APPROVAL FL6223-R3 IS FOR THE 2014 | | | FBC AND IS PENDING APPROVAL. THIS ONE CAN NOT BE USED | | | BECAUSE IS NOT APPROVED YET AND IS FOR A DIFFERENT CODE | | | VERSION. THE CODE FOR WHICH THIS HOUSE WAS REVIEWED WAS | | | FOR 2010 FBC. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE 2010 FBC | | | CODE VERSION. | | | | | | B) THE USP PRODUCT APPROVAL FL859-R4 IS FOR THE 2007 | | | CODE VERSION. THIS ONE CAN NOT BE USED. THE CODE | | | VERSION IS TOO OLD. THE CODE FOR WHICH THIS HOUSE WAS | | | REVIEWED WAS FOR 2010 FBC. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | | THE 2010 FBC CODE VERSION. | | | | | | C) THE USP PRODUCT APPROVAL FL6223-R1 IS FOR THE 2007 | | | CODE VERSION. THIS ONE CAN NOT BE USED. THE CODE | | | VERSION IS TOO OLD. THE CODE FOR WHICH THIS HOUSE WAS | | | REVIEWED WAS FOR 2010 FBC. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | | THE 2010 FBC CODE VERSION. | | | | | | 2- THE PRECAST LINTELS NOA 14-0903.02 SUBMITTED IS OK. | | | | | | 3- SLIDING GLASS DOORS NOA 14-0128.11 SUBMITTED IS OK. | | | | | | | | | BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS THAT MR. ROBERT IS GOING TO TAKE | | | CARE OF: | | | | | | 2- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | A) ITEM # 5 STATES THAT CALCULATIONS ARE NOT DONE WORST | | | CASE SCENARIO. THEN, WHY THE BUILDING WAS ROTATED 90 | | | DEGREES AS SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 6. ALSO WINDOWS AND | | | WALLS ON PAGE 3 OF 6 SHOW ROTATED BUILDING ORIENTATION. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS THAT SHOW THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION | | | OF THE BUILDING. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION. (REPEAT COMMENT. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | NEED TO BE DONE FOR THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE | | | BUILDING. ACCORDING TO THE NORTH ARROW SHOWN ON THE | | | SURVEY, THERE ARE NOT NORTH-EAST, EAST-SOUTH, | | | SOUTH-WEST, WEST-NORTH, ETC. . REVISE PLANS SHOWING THE | | | ACTUAL ORIENTATION NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST). | | | | | | B) DOORS ON PAGE 3 OF 6 SPECIFY WOOD DOOR. WHERE IS THE | | | WOOD DOOR?. WHY IN BEDROOMS?. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 | | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. (REPEAT COMMENT. THE BEDROOM | | | SPECIFICATION WAS CHANGED BY HAND TO SAY "GARAGE TO | | | HOUSE". HAND CHANGES ARE NOT ALLOWED ON A COMPUTER | | | GENERATED PROGRAM. GARAGE NOTES ON SHEET C-1 HAVE THE | | | OPTION FOR 3 TYPES OF DOORS, SO SOLID WOOD DOOR MAY NOT | | | BE INSTALLED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH). | | | | | | IMPORTANT: LABELS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR | | | SPECIFIED ON ITEM #7 FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WILL BE | | | VERIFIED IN FIELD. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | *** PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVED ANY REVISED DRAWING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
15:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
15:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-10 15:38:43 | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS; | | | | | | ****NOTE: BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. | | | THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED AND THESE COMMENTS MAY BE | | | ADDRESSED AS "REVISIONS" AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED. | | | FEES MAY APPLY. PLEASE ADVICE IF YOU WANT THE PROVISO | | | OPTION. | | | | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: | | | A) USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND ALL | | | DETAILS. (FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS FL6223-R1 AND FL | | | 859-R4 SUBMITTED ARE FOR 2007 FBC. NEED PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS FOR CURRENT 2010 FBC, WHICH IS THE CODE | | | ADOPTED FOR THIS PERMIT APPLICATION). | | | | | | B) ALL PRECAST LINTELS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. (NOA | | | 13-0321.07 SUBMITTED IS FOR 4", 6" AND 12" PRECAST | | | LINTELS. THESE LINTELS ARE NOT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. | | | PROVIDE CORRECT PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT MATCHES LINTELS | | | SPECIFIED ON PLANS). | | | | | | C) NEW COMMENT: SLIDING GLASS DOORS A SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | NEW NOA 15-0106.08 SUBMITTED DOESN'T COVER SIZES SHOWN | | | ON PLANS. PLANS CALL FOR 10'-0" HIGH DOORS. (NOA | | | 14-0128.11 SUBMITTED THE FIRS TIME WAS OK.) | | | | | | 2- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | A) ITEM # 5 STATES THAT CALCULATIONS ARE NOT DONE WORST | | | CASE SCENARIO. THEN, WHY THE BUILDING WAS ROTATED 90 | | | DEGREES AS SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 6. ALSO WINDOWS AND | | | WALLS ON PAGE 3 OF 6 SHOW ROTATED BUILDING ORIENTATION. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS THAT SHOW THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION | | | OF THE BUILDING. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION. (REPEAT COMMENT. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | | NEED TO BE DONE FOR THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE | | | BUILDING. ACCORDING TO THE NORTH ARROW SHOWN ON THE | | | SURVEY, THERE ARE NOT NORTH-EAST, EAST-SOUTH, | | | SOUTH-WEST, WEST-NORTH, ETC. . REVISE PLANS SHOWING THE | | | ACTUAL ORIENTATION NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST). | | | | | | B) DOORS ON PAGE 3 OF 6 SPECIFY WOOD DOOR. WHERE IS THE | | | WOOD DOOR?. WHY IN BEDROOMS?. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 | | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. (REPEAT COMMENT. THE BEDROOM | | | SPECIFICATION WAS CHANGED BY HAND TO SAY "GARAGE TO | | | HOUSE". HAND CHANGES ARE NOT ALLOWED ON A COMPUTER | | | GENERATED PROGRAM. GARAGE NOTES ON SHEET C-1 HAVE THE | | | OPTION FOR 3 TYPES OF DOORS, SO SOLID WOOD DOOR MAY NOT | | | BE INSTALLED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH). | | | | | | IMPORTANT: LABELS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR | | | SPECIFIED ON ITEM #7 FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WILL BE | | | VERIFIED IN FIELD. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | *** PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVED ANY REVISED DRAWING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
Time |
07:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-11 09:16:19 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. | | | CODE: 2010 FBC. | | | | | | 1- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION WAS | | | UPDATED TO $517,735. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, | | | MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $8,484.60. | | | | | | 2- PLEASE PROVIDE COPY OF THE IMPACT FEES PAID RECEIPT. | | | COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT ARE | | | ALWAYS REQUIRED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | | | | | 3- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. IF | | | SPECIFYING ADHESIVE, THEN PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL. IF | | | SPECIFYING SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY THE SIZE AND NUMBER OF | | | SCREWS. | | | | | | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: | | | A) ALL USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND | | | ALL DETAILS. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. | | | OR, LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO | | | EACH SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. | | | | | | B) ALL PRECAST LINTELS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. | | | | | | C) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF | | | RECORD. SEE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR LISTED | | | PRODUCTS. | | | | | | D) THERE WERE TWO ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | SUBMITTED. NOA 11-0321.03 AND FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FL7473-R5 ALONG WITH RIDGE FL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FL8095-R2. PROVIDE COMPLETE ROOFING PACKAGE EITHER | | | MIAMI NOA'S OR COMPLETE PACKAGE FROM FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL. MISMATCHING IS NOT ALLOWED. | | | | | | 5- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED | | | DON'T IDENTIFY WHO REVIEWED THEM. THERE IS ONLY A | | | STATEMENT SAYING REVIEWED WITH SOME INITIALS AND DATE. | | | BUT, THIS DOESN'T IDENTIFY THE REVIEWER OF RECORD. | | | PROVIDE NAME OF THE ENGINEER WHO APPROVED IT. ENGINEER | | | MAY ALSO PROVIDE LETTER IDENTIFYING EACH PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL THAT WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED. | | | | | | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | | CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF SOFFITS AND CEILINGS | | | IN COVERED PORCHES SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R703.2 | | | OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: TYP. WALL SECTION ONLY | | | SPECIFIES STUCCO ON METHAL LATH. WILL THIS RESIST THE | | | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL?. | | | | | | 7- CLEARLY SPECIFY SIZE OF MULLIONS TO BE USED AT ENTRY | | | DOOR ASSEMBLY AND ALL OTHER WINDOW MULLIONS TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED AND | | | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. SEC. R301.1 OF 2010 | | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | 8- SURVEYOR NOTE #6 STATES THAT THIS SURVEY IS NOT | | | INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. PROVIDE SURVEY THAT | | | MAY BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | 9-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | | A) ITEM # 5 STATES THAT CALCULATIONS ARE NOT DONE WORST | | | CASE SCENARIO. THEN, CLARIFY WHY THE BUILDING WAS | | | ROTATED 90 DEGREES AS SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 6. ALSO | | | WINDOWS AND WALLS ON PAGE 3 OF 6 SHOW ROTATED BUILDING | | | ORIENTATION. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS THAT SHOW THE ACTUAL | | | ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 | | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | | | B) ITEM #10 CALLS FOR R-38 CEILING INSULATION. THIS | | | DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED EITHER PLANS OR | | | CALCULATIONS TO MATCH. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION. | | | | | | C) DOORS ON PAGE 3 OF 6 SPECIFY WOOD DOOR. WHERE IS THE | | | WOOD DOOR?. WHY IN BEDROOMS?. THERE ARE NOT SOLID WOOD | | | DOORS ON EXTERIOR DOORS. SEE PRODUCT APPROVALS. SEC. | | | 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | | | D) SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY THE MECHANICAL REVIEWER. | | | | | | IMPORTANT: THE U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON | | | ITEM #7 FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WILL BE VERIFIED IN | | | FIELD. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | *** PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVED ANY REVISED DRAWING. | | | SUBMIT ASIDE ORIGINAL SET OF DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
12:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
11:58 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-10 12:19:19 | ALL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-06-01 |
Time |
19:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-06-01 |
Time |
18:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-01 19:15:23 | THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE CORRECTED AND THE PLANS | | | RESUBMITTED FOR A SECOND REVIEW: | | | | | | THESE PLANS WERE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2008 | | | EDITION OF THE NEC, THE 2013 EDITION OF THE NFPA72, THE | | | APPLICABLE CHAPTERS OF THE 2010 EDITION OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, FLORIDA BUILDING CODE RESIDENTIAL AND | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | 1. THE SERVICE RISER INDICATES THHN CONDUCTORS TO POOL | | | PANEL. PER NEC 300.5(B), IF THESE OR ANY OTHER, WILL | | | TRAVEL UNDERGROUND THEY SHALL HAVE AN INSULATION LISTED | | | FOR WET LOCATION | | | 2. ARC-FAULT PROTECTION SHALL BE AS INDICATED IN THE | | | CURRENTLY APPLICABLE CODE. 2008 EDITION OF NEC | | | 3. NOT JUST THOSE BOXES MARKED AS FB, BUT ALL CEILING | | | BOXES USED FOR LIGHTING SHALL BE LISTED TO SUPPORT | | | 50#?S AS INDICATED IN NEC 314.27(A) | | | 4. EVERY RECEPTACLE O THE EXTERIOR/IN A WET LOCATION | | | SHALL BE LISTED AS WEATHER-RESISTANT AS INDICATED IN | | | NEC 406.8(B) | | | 5. NOWHERE ON THE DRAWINGS DID I SEE A NOTE FOR THE | | | BONDING OF THE GAS LINE AS INDICATED IN NEC 250.104(B) | | | | | | AS INDICATED ABOVE, THIS INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | ALL THE ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2010 | | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT | | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS | | | | | | FOR QUESTIONS ON THE ABOVE, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | MIKE ALBARRAN | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PH: (561) 805-6743 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-21 |
Time |
17:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-16 |
Time |
13:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-16 13:40:34 | ROUTED TO CCOLE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
19:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
Time |
08:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
Time |
12:49 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-04-24 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
15:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
15:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-10 15:53:12 | $9,904.34 PAID. MU-2015-8885. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
Time |
12:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-11 12:49:31 | PROVIDE COPY OF THE IMPACT FEES PAID RECEIPT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-07-17 |
Time |
07:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-07-17 |
Time |
06:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
08:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
08:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-10 08:51:35 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 20140 MECHANICAL | | | PERMIT #15040957 7/10/15 | | | | | | 1) THE NORTH ARROW DIRECTION ON THE REVISED AC PLAN | | | DOES NOT MATCH THE NORTH ARROW DIRECTION ON THE NEW | | | SURVEY: PLEASE CORRECT. | | | 2) BASED ON THE NORTH DIRECTIONAL ARROW SHOWN ON THE | | | NEW SURVEY (WHICH APPEARS CORRECT BY PAPA MAPPING), THE | | | WINDOW DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATIONS ON THE AC SIZING | | | CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT: PLEASE REVISE THE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | 3) THE AC PLAN NOTES INDICATES THE CONDENSATE PIPES | | | WILL BE RUN THROUGH THE ATTIC, HOWEVER THE NOTES ALSO | | | INDICATE THE AHU'S WILL BE HUNG FROM THE GARAGE | | | CEILING. WILL A CONDENSATE PUMP BE INSTALLED? | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-06-04 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-06-04 |
Time |
08:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-04 08:46:06 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL & MECHANICAL | | | | | | 1) THE NUMBER OF WINDOWS AND DOORS LISTED IN THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS AND THE MANUAL J SIZING CALCS DO NOT MATCH | | | THE HOUSE PLANS. SEE SHEET A-1: I AM COUNTING 15 | | | WINDOWS- EITHER SH OR FIXED GLASS, 2 TRIPLE SGD'S, 2 | | | SIDE-HINGED DOUBLE DOORS, AND 1 SINGLE SIDE HINGED | | | DOORS. THE CALCS ARE LISTING ONLY 14 WINDOWS AND 1 SIDE | | | HINGED DOOR. | | | PLEASE REVISE THE CALCS AND THE AC PLANS: PLACE A NORTH | | | ARROW ON THE AC PLANS AND NUMBER THE WINDOWS AND DOORS | | | TO CORRELATE WITH THE CORRECTED CALCULATION SUBMITTALS. | | | PLEASE NOTE THE MANUAL J IS INDICATING R38 INSULATION | | | ABOVE THE CEILING, HOWEVER THE PLANS ARE INDICATING | | | R30. | | | 2) ENERGY FORM 405-2010: COMPLETE THE CODE COMPLIANCE | | | CHECKLIST ON PAGE 6 OF THE CORRECTED SUBMITTAL. | | | 3) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WATER | | | HEATER AND VENT, AND THE KITCHEN HOOD AND MAKE-UP AIR | | | COMPONENTS. | | | PLEASE NOTE THE IGNITION SOURCE OF THE WATER HEATER | | | SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 18" ABOVE THE GARAGE FLOOR, | | | UNLESS LISTED AS FLAMMABLE VAPOR IGNITION RESISTANT- | | | SECTION G2408.2 FBC-10 RES. | | | 4) THE AC PLAN APPEARS TO INDICATE FLEX DUCTS IN THE | | | GARAGE WHICH ARE PROHIBITED PER SECTION R302.5.2 | | | RESIDENTIAL. UNLESS THE AIR HANDLERS ARE IN THE ATTIC, | | | STEEL DUCTS OR DUCT BOARD MUST BE INSTALLED. | | | 5) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE FL. PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | | THE BMP CONDENSER TIE-DOWN CLIPS. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
04:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
04:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-10 04:49:59 | SEPARATE PERMIT REQD. FOR GAS. | | | GAS PLAN REVIEW | | | A GAS PLAN HAS NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE. A GAS PLAN REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED AT | | | THIS TIME. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT AND PLANS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR A CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM THE RELATED WORK. | | | PROVIDE COMPLETE PLANS AND GAS RISER THAT REFLECTS THE | | | ENTIRE SCOPE OF GAS WORK TO BE DONE. WPB AMEND. TO FBC | | | SEC. 107.2.1. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-30 |
Time |
10:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-30 |
Time |
10:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
19:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
19:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-10 19:44:27 | ROOF TILE NOA 11-0321.03. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
Time |
17:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-11 17:17:28 | | | | 1) NEED ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER | | | OF RECORD. SEE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR LISTED | | | PRODUCTS. | | | | | | 2- THERE WERE TWO ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | SUBMITTED. NOA 11-0321.03 AND FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FL7473-R5 ALONG WITH RIDGE FL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | FL8095-R2. PROVIDE COMPLETE ROOFING PACKAGE EITHER | | | MIAMI NOA'S OR COMPLETE PACKAGE FROM FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL. MISMATCHING IS NOT ALLOWED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-07-02 |
Time |
17:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-07-02 |
Time |
16:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-05-26 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-05-26 |
Time |
09:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-26 09:48:21 | 5/26/15 - CONDITIONAL APPROVAL ISSUED. LANDSCAPE PERMIT | | | TO BE SUBMITTED AND LANDSCAPING INSTALLED PRIOR TO C.O. | | | SIGNED DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO PLANS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-05-08 |
Time |
13:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-05-08 |
Time |
12:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-08 13:24:04 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 5/8/2015 | | | | | | 1. A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT IN CONFORMANCE WITH | | | ARTICLE XIV SHALL BE SUBMITTED. (NOTE: ZLDR SEC. | | | 94-442(B)(2)A. ? FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT | | | LEAST ONE SHADE, FLOWERING, OR FRUIT TREE SHALL BE | | | PLANTED FOR EACH 1,200 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR | | | PORTION THEREOF. FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AT | | | LEAST ONE SHRUB SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 500 SQUARE | | | FEET OF OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. PLEASE ADJUST | | | CALCULATIONS TABLE.) | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 2. SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR POOL AND DRIVEWAY | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|