| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15040554 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2016-03-14 |
Time |
06:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2016-03-14 |
Time |
06:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2016-02-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2016-02-04 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-10-30 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-10-30 |
Time |
08:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-04-25 |
Time |
11:59 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-04-25 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-25 11:48:57 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | W. P. B. PERMIT: 15040554 | | | ADD: 460 S. ROSEMARY AVE. SUITE # 1801 | | | CONT: TBD | | | TEL: (954)914-9848/ TABITHA | | | E-MAIL: TABITHA. [email protected] | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW | | | DATE: SAT. APRIL 25/ 2015 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) PLANS APPEAR TO BE CODE COMPLIANT BUT THE PLANS ARE | | | NOT STAMPED BY CITY PLACE MANAGEMENT REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2016-02-16 |
Time |
14:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2016-02-16 |
Time |
14:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-16 14:38:09 | REVIEW DONE BY M. VALDES |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2015-11-23 |
Time |
12:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2015-11-23 |
Time |
16:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-18 |
Time |
13:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-18 |
Time |
12:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-18 14:02:37 | 5/18/2015 | | | PROJECT: NAIL SALON | | | PERMIT#: 15040554 | | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC, 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC | | | ,2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, | | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | | 1ST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | REVISE YOUR PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) REVISE THE LIGHTING PLAN AND THE PANEL SCHEDULE TO | | | INCLUDE THE EMERGENCY/EXIT LIGHT CIRCUIT IS THE SAME | | | BRANCH CIRCUIT AS THAT SERVING THE NORMAL LIGHTING IN | | | THE AREA AND CONNECTED AHEAD OF ANY LOCAL SWITCHES. NEC | | | 700.12. | | | | | | 2) REVISE THE FLOOR PLAN AND THE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR THE | | | WATER HEATER CIRCUIT. IT APPEARS TO BE A TYPO BUT THE | | | CIRCUIT IS IDENTIFIED AS A 3POLE CIRCUIT BUT HAS ONE | | | POLE IDENTIFIED AS 50AMP AND THE OTHER TWO AS 30AMP. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 3) INDICATE OR VERIFY THE REQUIRED GFI RECEPTACLE ON | | | THE ROOF WITHIN SIGHT OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. NEC | | | 210.63 SEE 210.8(A)(3), | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE SUBMITTALS ON EQUIPMENT SUCH AS PEDICURE | | | CHAIRS, NAIL DRYERS, | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ | | | 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF | | | | | | ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REQUIRED TO INSERT THE CORRECTED | | | PAGES INTO THE DENIED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. VOID THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND LEAVE FOR COMPARATIVE | | | REVIEW. | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-03-09 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-03-09 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-09 11:55:22 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: | | | | | | 1. SHEET A 2.00 & 2.01 INDICATES A DOOR SWING THAT | | | SWINGS AGAINST THE PATH OF EGRESS. | | | PER SECTION NFPA 101, DOOR SWING DIRECTION, 7.2.1.4.2, | | | DOOR IS REQUIRED TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS | | | TRAVEL FOR AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 OR GREATER PERSONS. | | | THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS SHOWS THE REQUIRED PATH OF TRAVEL | | | THROUGH THAT DOOR. | | | | | | 2. SHEET A 2.01 INDICATES THE SINGLE MAN DOOR AS BRING | | | LOCKED AND HANDLES REMOVED. THIS IS A REQUIRED EXIT AND | | | PER SHEET A 2.00 IS INDICATED AS "EXIT B". ENSURE THIS | | | DOOR IS FULLY OPERATION AND FUNCTIONING AS A REQUIRED | | | EXIT DOOR. | | | | | | 3. SHEET E2 INDICATES NO EXIT SIGNS OVER REQUIRED EXT | | | DOORS # 2 AND EXIT B. INSTALL EXIT SIGNS OVER THESE | | | REQUIRED EXIT DOORS. | | | | | | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED | | | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE | | | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-28 11:03:49 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: | | | | | | 1. SHEET A 2.00 & 2.01 INDICATES A DOOR SWING THAT | | | SWINGS AGAINST THE PATH OF EGRESS. | | | PER SECTION NFPA 101, DOOR SWING DIRECTION, 7.2.1.4.2, | | | DOOR IS REQUIRED TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS | | | TRAVEL FOR AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 OR GREATER PERSONS. | | | THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS SHOWS THE REQUIRED PATH OF TRAVEL | | | THROUGH THAT DOOR. | | | | | | 2. SHEET A 2.01 INDICATES THE SINGLE MAN DOOR AS BRING | | | LOCKED AND HANDLES REMOVED. THIS IS A REQUIRED EXIT AND | | | PER SHEET A 2.00 IS INDICATED AS "EXIT B". ENSURE THIS | | | DOOR IS FULLY OPERATION AND FUNCTIONING AS A REQUIRED | | | EXIT DOOR. | | | | | | 3. SHEET E2 INDICATES NO EXIT SIGNS OVER REQUIRED EXT | | | DOORS # 2 AND EXIT B. INSTALL EXIT SIGNS OVER THESE | | | REQUIRED EXIT DOORS. | | | | | | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED | | | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE | | | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE | | | INSPECTION. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-04-16 |
Time |
16:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-17 10:55:03 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) SHEET A2.00 INDICATES AN EXIT EGRESS LAYOUT THAT IS | | | NOT APPROVED. THESE EXITS ARE NOT REMOTELY LOCATED. THE | | | SEPARATION DISTANCE DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, 7.5.1.3.3. THE SEPARATION DISTANCE | | | SHALL BE 1/3 OF THE DIAGONAL MEASURED IN A STRAIGHT | | | LINE BETWEEN THE NEAREST EDGE OF THE EXITS, EXIT | | | ACCESS, OR EXIT DISCHAGES. AN ADDITIONAL EXIT IS | | | REQUIRED THAT IS REMOTELY LOCATED AND MEETING THE | | | DISTANCE REQUIRMENT. | | | | | | 2) SHEET A0.01 INDICATES AN INCORRECT FIRE CODE | | | REFERENCE. THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE | | | PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 | | | AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES OR | | | STANDARDS. | | | FIRE SPRINKLER WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF NFPA 13, 2010 EDITION. | | | FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | NFPA 72, 2010 EDITION. | | | CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | NFPA 241, 2009 EDITION. | | | FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF NFPA 10, 2010 EDITION. | | | ELECTRIC WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, 2011 EDITION. | | | | | | 3) SHEET A2.00 THE NATURE OF THE REMODEL REQUIRES AN | | | EVALUATION OF THE FIRE ALARM AND SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR | | | CODE COVERAGE AND COMPLIANCE. | | | PROVIDE A NOTE STATING: THE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, FIRE | | | ALARM AND/OR FIRE SPRINKLER SHALL REMAIN ACTIVE | | | THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. | | | ANY AND ALL WORK ON THE FIRE ALARM AND FIRE SPRINKLER | | | SYSTEMS SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND | | | BY CERTIFIED LIFE SAFETY CONTRACTORS. | | | ANY TIME THAT WORK ON THE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, | | | SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM, EXCEEDS 4 HOURS, A FIRE | | | WATCH SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL FULL | | | AND COMPLETE PROTECTION IS RETURNED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
13:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-03-04 |
Time |
14:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2016-02-16 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2016-01-26 |
Time |
10:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-11-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cpuell |
Date |
2015-11-24 |
Time |
14:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2015-10-16 |
Time |
07:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-10-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-06-01 |
Time |
16:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-04-15 |
Time |
16:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-03-11 |
Time |
07:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-03-10 |
Time |
17:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-11 07:48:51 | MECHANICAL PROVISIOS: | | | PERMIT #15040554 | | | 3/11/16 | | | | | | 1) UNDERSLAB PVC EXHAUST DUCTS SHALL BE INSPECTED PRIOR | | | TO CLOSING SLAB TRENCHES. | | | 2) PROVIDE A SUBMITTAL FOR THE PVC DUCTS REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | | 3) PROVIDE A TEST AND BALANCE REPORT FOR THE SYSTEMS, | | | AND PERFORM AN EXHAUST SYSTEM TEST AT FINAL INSPECTION. | | | 4) SUBMIT A REVISED ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMPLIANCE FORM | | | IN INK (CURRENT SUBMITTAL IS IN PENCIL). | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
Time |
09:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
Time |
09:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-08 10:19:42 | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL | | | PERMIT #15040554 | | | 2/8/16 | | | | | | 1) THE PEDICURE AREA EXHAUST SYSTEM DESIGN DOES NOT | | | APPEAR TO BE A "SOURCE CAPTURE SYSTEM" AS REQUIRED BY | | | FOOTNOTE H. TABLE 403.3. THE PLAN IS INDICATING EXHAUST | | | GRILLS AT THE CEILING LEVEL, HOWEVER THE SOURCE OF THE | | | FUMES AND ODORS ARE AT FLOOR LEVEL. | | | 2) PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAILS OF THE UNDERSLAB DUCT. | | | REFER TO SECTION 603.8 AND INDICATE THE TYPE AND GAGE | | | OF DUCT MATERIAL, HOW IT WILL BE PROTECTED AND SEALED, | | | THE MINIMUM SLOPE AND ACCESS TO THE DRAINAGE POINT. | | | PROVIDE A SUBMITTAL REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE EOR. | | | 3) PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAILS OF THE EXHAUST RISERS AT | | | THE MANICURE TABLES- SHOW THE TYPE AND GAGE OF DUCT | | | MATERIAL, HOW CONNECTIONS TO THE UNDERSLAB DUCT AND | | | TABLE TOP WILL BE MADE. | | | 4) PLEASE PROVIDE NOTE TO CLARIFY THE SEQUENCE OF | | | OPERATION FOR THE NAIL EXHAUST SYSTEMS. ARE THESE | | | SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO RUN CONTINUOUSLY? ARE THE EXHAUST | | | FANS LINKED WITH THE AC SYSTEMS WHICH ARE PROVIDING THE | | | MAKE-UP AIR FOR THE SYSTEMS? | | | 5) THE AC COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATIONS ARE | | | INDICATING APPROXIMARELY 10-TONS OF COOLING FOR THE | | | NAIL AREA AND THE FRONT RETAIL, BREAKROOM, TOILET ROOMS | | | AND AREAS ETC, HOWEVER THE TWO SYSTEMS SELECTED PROVIDE | | | A TOTAL OF 11.5- TONS OF COOLING FOR THOSE AREAS. | | | SENSIBLE COOLING LOAD INDICATED IN THE CALCS IS 62239 | | | BTUH, HOWEVER TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD OF THE UNITS COMBINED | | | IS APPROX. 83,000 BTUH- SEE SECTION 503.2.2 FBC-10 | | | ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | 6) PLEASE CORRECT THE NOTE INDICATING FIRE DAMPERS FOR | | | THE DRYER EXHAUST DUCTS- THEY ARE PROHIBITED PER | | | SECTION 504.2 FBC-10 MECHANICAL. | | | 7) PROVIDE THE MIAMI-DADE NOA'S OR FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS FOR EF-2, EF-3, AND THE AIR INTAKE LOUVERS. | | | VERFIY ALL REQUIRED CLEARANCES AS REQUIRED BY 401.4, | | | AND 501.2.1. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
Time |
12:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
Time |
12:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-29 13:01:23 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL | | | PERMIT #15040554 | | | 10/29/15 | | | | | | 1) COMMENTS #2, 3, & 4 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW STILL EXIST. | | | I AM REPRINTING THEM BELOW FOR RE-REVIEW: | | | | | | 2) M2: GENERAL NOTE #12 INDICATES THAT CO2 SENSORS WILL | | | MONITOR THE QUALITY OF AIR IN THE SPACE, HOWEVER NO | | | SENSORS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THIS SYSTEM DESIGN IS MEETING THE | | | INTENT OF TABLE 403.3 FMC-10, AND TABLE 6-4 ASHRAE 62.1 | | | WHICH REQUIRES CAPTURING THE CHEMICAL FUMES AT THEIR | | | SOURCES AND EXHAUSTING THEM FROM THE SPACE (SEE | | | FOOTNOTE H PRINTED BELOW). | | | THE DESIGN DOES NOT INDICATE ANY EXHAUST HOODS OR DUCTS | | | AT THE STATIONS. IN ADDITION, PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE CO2 | | | SENSORS WILL ACTIVATE THE SYSTEM UPON DETECTION OF | | | CHEMICAL FUMES. | | | 3) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF MIAMI-DADE NOA'S OR FL. | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE AC STAND, AND THE INTAKE AND | | | EXHAUST LOUVERS. | | | 4) PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS (CUT SHEET) | | | FOR THE EXHAUST FAN. | | | | | | 5) THE REVISED PLAN INDICATES A TRANSFER DUCT FROM THE | | | NAIL AREA TO THE RETAIL AREA. PLEASE REFER TO TABLE | | | 403.3 FOOTNOTE B AND H, AND REVISE THE PLAN TO MEET | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | B. MECHANICAL EXHAUST REQUIRED AND THE RECIRCULATION OF | | | AIR FROM SUCH SPACES IS PROHIBITED (SEE SECTION | | | 403.2.1, ITEM 3). | | | H. FOR NAIL SALONS, EACH NAIL STATION SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | WITH A SOURCE CAPTURE SYSTEM CAPABLE OF EXHAUSTING NOT | | | LESS THAN 50 CFM PER STATION. | | | | | | PLEASE CORRECT THE PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | COMMENTS LISTED ABOVE. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-05-29 |
Time |
16:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-05-29 |
Time |
16:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-29 17:23:00 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 MECHANICAL | | | | | | 1) SHEET M1: PER NOTES 6 & 7 ON THE PLAN, SHOW THE | | | MOTORIZED DAMPER FOR EF2. | | | 2) M2: GENERAL NOTE #12 INDICATES THAT CO2 SENSORS WILL | | | MONITOR THE QUALITY OF AIR IN THE SPACE, HOWEVER NO | | | SENSORS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THIS SYSTEM DESIGN IS MEETING THE | | | INTENT OF TABLE 403.3 FMC-10, AND TABLE 6-4 ASHRAE 62.1 | | | WHICH REQUIRES CAPTURING THE CHEMICAL FUMES AT THEIR | | | SOURCES AND EXHAUSTING THEM FROM THE SPACE. | | | THE DESIGN DOES NOT INDICATE ANY EXHAUST HOODS OR DUCTS | | | AT THE STATIONS. IN ADDITION, PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE CO2 | | | SENSORS WILL ACTIVATE THE SYSTEM UPON DETECTION OF | | | CHEMICAL FUMES. | | | 3) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF MIAMI-DADE NOA'S OR FL. | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE AC STAND, AND THE INTAKE AND | | | EXHAUST LOUVERS. | | | 4) PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS (CUT SHEET) | | | FOR THE EXHAUST FAN. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
13:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-03-23 |
Time |
13:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-01-30 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-01-30 |
Time |
09:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-01-30 09:48:20 | 1) ONE OF THE WASHING MACHINES & DRYERS SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH 2010 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY,SEC.611.2, 611.3,611.4. | | | SHOW ON THE PLANS.3RD REQUEST | | | 2) SHT. A8.01 - "A" ELEVATION - THE GRAB BARS SHALL BE | | | MEASURED TO THE TOP OF THE GRIPPING SURFACE.FBC- | | | ACCESSIBILITY, SEC. 609.4. REFER TO ACCESSORY MOUNTING | | | SCHEDULE ALSO.3RD REQUEST. | | | 3) DISPENSERS SHALL BE MEASURED TO THE CENTERLINE OF | | | THE DISPENSER, NOT TO THE EDGE AS SHOWN PER FAC | | | SEC.604.7.3RD REQUEST. | | | 4) BREAKROOM SINK SHALL COMPLY W/ 2010 FAC SEC.606.3. | | | 3RD REQUEST. | | | 5) FOUR TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEE SHALL BE IMPOSED ON | | | THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL PER F.S. 553.80 (2) (B). | | | THE ABOVE COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN CORRECTED IN THREE | | | REVIEWS. | | | | | | NOTE: CONTACT ME TO REVIEW THE COMMENTS SO THE PLANS | | | CAN GET CORRECTED AND APPROVED. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-10-26 |
Time |
16:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-10-26 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-26 16:13:57 | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561-805-6711 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: 2ND REQUEST | | | | | | 1. SHOW ON PLANS ONE OF THE WASHIN MACHINES & DRYERS | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH 2010 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY,SEC.61 1.2, | | | 611.3,611.4. | | | 2. SHT. A8. 0L - ''A" ELEVATION - THE GRAB BARS SHALL | | | BE MEASURED TO THE TOP OF THE GRIPPING SURFACE.FBC? | | | ACCESSIBILITY, SEC. 609.4. REFER TO ACCESSORY MOUNTING | | | SCHEDULE ALSO. | | | 3. SHOW ON PLANS DISPENSERS SHALL BE MEASURED TO THE | | | CENTERLINE OF THE DISPENSER, NOT TO THE EDGE AS SHOWN | | | PER FAC SEC.604.7. | | | 4. SHOW ON PLANS BREAKROOM SINK SHALL COMPLY W/ 2010 | | | FAC SEC.606.3. | | | 5. SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS/INSTALLATION | | | MANUAL (2 COPIES) FOR THE PEDICURE CHAIRS. WPB AMEND. | | | TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 6. SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LINT | | | TRAP . WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1 . | | | 7. SHT. P-5 - SHOWS THE P & T LINE TO THE EXTERIOR. THE | | | P & T LINE SHALL DISCHARGE TO AN AIR GAP LOCATED IN THE | | | SAME ROOM AS THE WATER HEATER.2010 FPC SEC.504.6 (2). | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-18 |
Time |
08:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-18 |
Time |
05:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-18 08:17:15 | 1) SHT. A 2.01 - CLEARLY SHOW THE WIDTH OF THE TOILET | | | ROOMS. A MINIMUM OF 85 INCHES IS REQUIRED. 2010 | | | FBC-ACCESSIBILITY, SEC.604.3.1, 606.2. | | | 2) ONE OF THE WASHING MACHINES & DRYERS SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH 2010 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY,SEC.611.2, 611.3,611.4. | | | 3) SHT. A8.01 - "A" ELEVATION - THE GRAB BARS SHALL BE | | | MEASURED TO THE TOP OF THE GRIPPING SURFACE.FBC- | | | ACCESSIBILITY, SEC. 609.4. REFER TO ACCESSORY MOUNTING | | | SCHEDULE ALSO. | | | 4) DISPENSERS SHALL BE MEASURED TO THE CENTERLINE OF | | | THE DISPENSER, NOT TO THE EDGE AS SHOWN PER FAC | | | SEC.604.7. | | | 5) BREAKROOM SINK SHALL COMPLY W/ 2010 FAC SEC.606.3. | | | 6) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS/INSTALLATION | | | MANUAL (2 COPIES) FOR THE PEDICURE CHAIRS. WPB AMEND. | | | TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 7) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LINT | | | TRAP. WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 8) SHT. P-5 - SHOWS THE P & T LINE TO THE EXTERIOR. THE | | | P & T LINE SHALL DISCHARGE TO AN AIR GAP LOCATED IN THE | | | SAME ROOM AS THE WATER HEATER.2010 FPC SEC.504.6 (2). | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
Time |
16:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-03-18 16:16:57 | PROVISO: RETAIL USES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ALONG AT LEAST | | | 26 FEET OF FRONTAGE AS DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS. | | | THE CALCULATION FOR RETAIL USES WAS DONE BASED ON THE | | | ENTIRE BUILDING FROM FERN TO GARDENIA WITH A TOTAL | | | FRONTAGE OF 281 FEET. NON RETAIL PERMITTED ARE THE | | | RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE AND THE VENETIAN SALON (20% OF | | | FRONTAGE) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-11-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2015-11-20 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2015-11-20 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-20 15:58:33 | PROVISO: RETAIL USES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ALONG AT LEAST | | | 26 FEET OF FRONTAGE AS DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS. | | | THE CALCULATION FOR RETAIL USES WAS DONE BASED ON THE | | | ENTIRE BUILDING FROM FERN TO GARDENIA WITH A TOTAL | | | FRONTAGE OF 281 FEET. NON RETAIL PERMITTED ARE THE | | | RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE AND THE VENETIAN SALON (20% OF | | | FRONTAGE) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2015-05-21 |
Time |
16:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2015-05-21 |
Time |
16:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-21 16:15:46 | THE USE AS PRESENTED IS NOT ALLOWED AT THIS LOCATION. | | | ROSEMARY AVENUE REQUIRES RETAIL USES ALONG 80% OF ITS | | | FRONTAGE. A NAIL SALON IS CONSIDERED A PERSONAL SERVICE | | | AND NOT A RETAIL USE. | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
|
|