Plan Review Details - Permit 15040473
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15040473
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2015-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-09-16 Time 07:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-09-16 Time 07:33 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2015-05-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-05-09 Time 10:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-05-09 Time 10:43 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-09 11:03:31****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW:
  
 1. PROVIDE SOMETHING WHICH PROVIDES DOCUMENTATION THAT
 THIS PRODUCT COMPLIES WITH ONE OF THE OPTIONS LISTED IN
 FBC 1507.15.1.
  
 PER ROBERT BROWN, BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE SITE SPECIFIC
 LETTER IS NOT ADEQUATE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM D
 6694.
  
 PER ROBERT BROWN, BUILDING OFFICIAL, THIS DOCUMENT MAY
 BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL.
  
 2. PERMIT 02090676 FOR 7404 74TH WAY IS EXPIRED (DID
 NOT OBTAIN A FINAL INSPECTION).
  
 PER ROBERT BROWN, BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE PERMIT FOR
 THAT BUILDING WILL BE WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO THAT
 THE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO THAT NO COATING
 WORK WILL BE DONE UNTIL THE EXPIRED PERMIT IS ISSUED
 AND INSPECTED. AN INSPECTION HOLD HAS BEEN PLACED ON
 PERMIT 15040482.
  
 **NEW COMMENT**
  
 3. THE EXPIRED PERMIT 02090676 HAS BEEN PULLED IN
 ANTICIPATION OF APPLICATION FOR A REISSUE PERMIT (AND
 IS NOT SCANNED INTO OUR RECORDS SYSTEM). THE
 APPLICATION STATES THAT THE REROOF WAS INSULATION OVER
 A CONCRETE DECK. THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY CONTRACTOR
 STATE THAT THIS IS A WOOD DECK, SO NO MOISTURE SURVEY
 IS REQUIRED. PLEASE RESOLVE THIS DISCREPANCY.
  
 IF THE DECKS ARE CONCRETE, REMOVE THE MANUFACTURER'S
 LETTER STATING THAT THEY ARE WOOD DECKS AND SUBMIT A
 MOISTURE SURVEY. AN INQUIRY TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL
 AND RECORDS RETENTION SUPERVISOR HAS BEEN PLACED IN
 ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER A MASTER CAN STILL BE USED
 FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 IF THE DECKS ARE WOOD, PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF THIS SINCE
 THE ONE REROOF PERMIT (WHICH WAS ISSUED AND INSPECTED)
 INDICATES OTHERWISE.
  
 IF NOT ALL OF THE DECKS ARE IDENTICAL, A MASTER CANNOT
 BE USED. CONTRACTOR IS TO REVISE EACH APPLICATION TO
 INDICATE ROOF DECK TYPE AND THE APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
 PROVIDED.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-04-28 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-04-28 Time 16:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-04-28 Time 15:54 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-28 16:12:29****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW:
  
 1-5. OK
  
 6. APPLICATION AND PROPOSAL SPECIFY GACO FLEX S2000,
 1.5 GALLONS PER 100 SF. SEE PAGE 3 OF THE NOA; TWO
 COATS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF .75 GAL / 100' EACH ARE
 REQUIRED. ALTHOUGH THE TOTAL GALLONS PER SF IS
 CONSISTENT WITH THE NOA, THE APPLICATION METHOD
 PROPOSED ("A TOP COAT") DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE NOA.
  
 3RD REVIEW - CONTRACTOR HAS PROVIDED SPEC SHEETS WHICH
 ALLOW 1 COAT RATHER THAN 2. THE MIAMI DADE NOA SHOULD
 NOT BE USED AS THIS IS NOT THE APPLICATION FOR THIS
 JOB. HOWEVER, FBC 1507.15.1 REQUIRES THAT
 LIQUID-APPLIED ROOF COATINGS COMPLY WITH ONE OF SEVERAL
 STANDARDS. THE MIAMI DADE NOA INDICATES THAT THE S2000
 COMPLIES WITH ASTM D 6694. I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE ANY
 ONE OF THE REQUIRED ASTM STANDARD OPTIONS IN THE SPEC
 SHEET.
  
 AS YOU DO NOT WISH TO INSTALL THIS PRODUCT AS REQUIRED
 BY THE NOA, PLEASE REMOVE THE NOA. PROVIDE SOMETHING
 WHICH PROVIDES DOCUMENTATION THAT THIS PRODUCT COMPLIES
 WITH ONE OF THE OPTIONS LISTED IN FBC 1507.15.1.
  
 7-8. OK
  
 9. PERMIT 02090676 FOR 7404 74TH WAY IS EXPIRED (DID
 NOT OBTAIN A FINAL INSPECTION). IF THIS PROJECT
 INCLUDES THIS ADDRESS, THIS PERMIT IS TO BE RESOLVED
 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT FOR THAT BUILDING.
  
 3RD REVIEW - AS THIS JOB WILL PROGRESS QUICKLY,
 CONTRACTOR IS TO WRITE A LETTER STATING THAT THEY
 UNDERSTAND THAT THIS BUILDING FOR PERMIT 02090676 WILL
 NOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME AS A REISSUE PERMIT HAS NOT
 BEEN APPLIED FOR.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE FIVE COMPLETE
 COLLATED SETS OF DOCUMENTS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE (REMOVE
 MIAMIDADE NOA, INSERT DOCUMENT WHICH INCLUDES THE ASTM
 STANDARD).
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-04-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-04-21 Time 12:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-04-21 Time 12:10 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-21 12:34:14****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1. SEE PREVIOUS ITEM #1. PER CONVERSATION, CONTRACTOR
 WILL USE A MASTER. A MINIMUM OF THREE FIELD SETS WAS
 RECOMMENDED (SO FOUR SETS TOTAL WOULD NEED TO BE
 SUBMITTED). ONLY ONE SET WAS SUBMITTED. SEE FBC 107, A
 MINIMUM OF TWO COMPLETE COLLATED SETS OF DOCUMENTS
 REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE.
  
 TO MAKE THIS VERY CLEAR - CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A
 MINIMUM OF TWO COLLATED IDENTICAL SETS OF DOCUMENTS FOR
 PERMIT ISSUANCE. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY, WHEN SUBMITTAL OF
 FIVE SETS WAS DISCUSSED, ONE WAS SUBMITTED.
  
 2. PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE EXISTING ROOF. THE
 PERMIT DOCUMENTS SHOULD INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION
 REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE, FBC 107.
  
 2ND REVIEW, PERMIT DOCUMENTS SHOULD INCLUDE SOMETHING
 WHICH STATE EXISTING ROOF TYPE. I HAVE HIGHLIGHTED
 "TPO" ON ONE DOCUMENT. THIS COULD BE ONE POSSIBLE
 METHOD OF INDICATING EXISTING ROOF TYPE, BUT THIS IS
 THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. CONTRACTOR TO DO
 ENOUGH RESEARCH TO DETERMINE EXISTING ROOF TYPE AND
 SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED INSTALLATION, THEN PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTS WHICH CLEARLY INDICATE EXISTING ROOF TYPE
 DETERMINED BY CONTRACTOR.
  
 3. 2ND REVIEW, A NEW NOA PROVIDED WITH "S-2000
 SOLVENTLESS SILICONE BASECOAST/TOPCOAT" HIGHLIGHTED.
  
 GACOWASH SPEC SHEET - OK
 GACOFLEX E5320 SPEC SHEET - DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY STATE
 THAT IT CAN BE USED WITH TPO ROOF - EITHER HIGHLIGHT
 WHERE TPO IS SPECIFICALLY NAMED OR PROVIDE A LETTER
 FROM THE MANUFACTURER SINCE TPO ROOF IS NOT INCLUDED IN
 THE NOA
 S20 SERIES SPEC SHEET - MENTIONS TPO BUT THE PRODUCT IN
 THE NOA (S-2000 SOLVENTLESS SILICONE BASECOAST/TOPCOAT)
 IS NOT NAMED. SOMETHING FROM THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD
 TIE THIS SPEC SHEET TO THE PRODUCT PROPOSED.
  
 4. OK
  
 5. E5320 IS SPECIFIED AS A "PRIMER COAT" IN THE
 PROPOSAL. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEETS/INSTALLATION
 INSTRUCTIONS, FBC 107. APPLICATION PROPOSES "PRIMER" AT
 A RATE OF 1 GALLON / 250 SF. SINCE THIS PRODUCT DOES
 NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A PRODUCT APPROVAL (IT IS ONLY
 REFERENCED IN THE ROOF COATING SYSTEMS IN THE NOA),
 PROVIDE MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEETS WHICH INCLUDE
 INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRODUCT AND THE RECOMMENDED
 APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE. ALTHOUGH IT DOES NOT HAVE
 A PRODUCT APPROVAL, IT APPEARS THAT THIS IS THE PRODUCT
 WHICH ASSURES THE BOND REQUIRED FOR WIND RESISTANCE FBC
 1609.
  
 2ND REVIEW, THE RATE WHICH CONTRACTOR PROPOSES IS FOR A
 CONCRETE DECK. PROVIDE SOMETHING FROM THE MANUFACTURER
 TO INDICATE THAT 1 GALLON PER 250 SF IS ACCEPTABLE.
  
 6. APPLICATION AND PROPOSAL SPECIFY GACO FLEX S2000,
 1.5 GALLONS PER 100 SF. SEE PAGE 3 OF THE NOA; TWO
 COATS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF .75 GAL / 100' EACH ARE
 REQUIRED. ALTHOUGH THE TOTAL GALLONS PER SF IS
 CONSISTENT WITH THE NOA, THE APPLICATION METHOD
 PROPOSED ("A TOP COAT") DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE NOA.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 7. OK
  
 8. AS ITEMS 5 AND 6 WERE NOT ADDRESSED, COMMENT STILL
 APPLIES - IF METHOD OF INSTALLATION AS PROPOSED ON THE
 APPLICATION IS NOT APPROVED, NEW APPLICATIONS WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 9. PERMIT 02090676 FOR 7404 74TH WAY IS EXPIRED (DID
 NOT OBTAIN A FINAL INSPECTION). IF THIS PROJECT
 INCLUDES THIS ADDRESS, THIS PERMIT IS TO BE RESOLVED
 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT FOR THAT BUILDING.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-04-15 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-04-15 Time 07:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-04-15 Time 07:33 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-15 08:48:38****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE, A SUMMARY OF THE DOCUMENTS
 SUBMITTED ARE AT THE END OF THIS PLAN REVIEW.
  
 1. DUE TO THE NUMBER OF PERMITS, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT
 A "MASTER" BE GENERATED. THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS WOULD BE
 STORED UNDER THE MASTER, PERMIT CARDS WOULD REFERENCE
 THE MASTER, AND CONTRACTOR WOULD PROVIDE A FEW SETS OF
 DOCUMENTS - ONE FOR THIS DEPARTMENT TO RETAIN, AND A
 FEW SETS FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES (THE NUMBER WOULD
 DEPEND ON THE NUMBER OF BUILDINGS FOR WHICH INSPECTIONS
 WOULD BE CALLED IN ON ONE DAY AS IT IS A REQUIREMENT TO
 HAVE THE PLANS PROVIDED ON THE JOBSITE AT TIME OF
 INSPECTION). A MINIMUM OF THREE INSPECTION SETS ARE
 RECOMMENDED.
  
 IF CONTRACTOR ELECTS NOT TO USE A MASTER, EACH PERMIT
 PACKAGE IS TO BE REVISED TO ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS. THE
 NOA WAS SUBMITTED WITH SHEET 2 ON THE TOP OF THE
 PACKAGE. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PUT NOA PAGES IN
 ORDER. THIS HAS BEEN DONE FOR YOU FOR APPROXIMATELY
 HALF OF THE APPLICATIONS.
  
 2. PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE EXISTING ROOF. THE
 PERMIT DOCUMENTS SHOULD INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION
 REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE, FBC 107.
  
 BASED ON TWO RECORDS, (PERMIT #01041400 FOR ADDRESSES
 7113,7114 71ST WAY AND 7223 7224 72ND WAY, ALSO SEE
 01041405, 01041403), IT APPEARS THAT THE EXISTING ROOF
 SYSTEM IS TPO, INSULATED DECK (NOA 98-0305.02, JPS
 ELASTOMERIC CORPORATION, STEVENS ROOFING SYSTEMS,
 SINGLE PLY ROOFING SYSTEM OVER CONCRETE DECK, NOA
 SUB-TYPE TPO). DESCRIPTIONS OF ADDRESSES INCLUDED IN
 THESE THREE PERMITS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET. I
 HAVE VERIFIED THAT BOTH 01041400 AND 01041405 WERE
 ISSUED WITH THE TPO ROOF NOA REFERENCED. EXISTING ROOF
 TYPE SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR.
  
 3. SEE PAGE 3, PVC SINGLE PLY ROOF SYSTSMS IS
 UNDERLINED. BASED ON OUR PERMIT RECORDS FOR THIS
 PROJECT, THE ROOF IS TPO. TPO IS NOT ONE OF THE SYSTEMS
 INCLUDED IN THE MIAMI DADE NOA. PLEASE ADDRESS BY
 PROVIDING INFORMATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER WHICH
 DOCUMENTS THE SUITABILITY OF THIS APPLICATION.
  
 4. PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS FOR THE GACOWASH. THIS SHOULD
 PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRODUCT AS WELL AS
 RECOMMENDED DILUTION RATE, FBC 107.
  
 5. E5320 IS SPECIFIED AS A "PRIMER COAT" IN THE
 PROPOSAL. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEETS/INSTALLATION
 INSTRUCTIONS, FBC 107. APPLICATION PROPOSES "PRIMER" AT
 A RATE OF 1 GALLON / 250 SF. SINCE THIS PRODUCT DOES
 NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A PRODUCT APPROVAL (IT IS ONLY
 REFERENCED IN THE ROOF COATING SYSTEMS IN THE NOA),
 PROVIDE MANUFACTURER SPEC SHEETS WHICH INCLUDE
 INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRODUCT AND THE RECOMMENDED
 APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE. ALTHOUGH IT DOES NOT HAVE
 A PRODUCT APPROVAL, IT APPEARS THAT THIS IS THE PRODUCT
 WHICH ASSURES THE BOND REQUIRED FOR WIND RESISTANCE FBC
 1609.
  
 6. APPLICATION AND PROPOSAL SPECIFY GACO FLEX S2000,
 1.5 GALLONS PER 100 SF. SEE PAGE 3 OF THE NOA; TWO
 COATS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF .75 GAL / 100' EACH ARE
 REQUIRED. ALTHOUGH THE TOTAL GALLONS PER SF IS
 CONSISTENT WITH THE NOA, THE APPLICATION METHOD
 PROPOSED ("A TOP COAT") DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE NOA.
  
 7. ONLY ONE PAGE OF A THREE PAGE CONTRACT WAS PROPOSED.
 PROVIDE THE COMPLETE CONTRACT, FBC 109.
  
 8. IF METHOD OF INSTALLATION AS PROPOSED ON THE
 APPLICATION IS NOT APPROVED, NEW APPLICATIONS WILL BE
 REQUIRED. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO HAVE ONLY INFORMATION
 DESCRIBING THE PROJECT ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION (WHICH
 SHOULD INCLUDE ROOF AREA, TYPE OF ROOF PROPOSED, MEAN
 ROOF HEIGHT, DECK TYPE), AND HAVE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 INSTALLATION IN THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS. IT IS NOT TYPICAL
 TO SPEC INSTALLATION IN THE PERMIT DESCRIPTION. AS THE
 PERMIT DESCRIPTION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO BE CODE COMPLIANT, A NEW PERMIT APPLICATION
 WILL BE REQUIRED UNLESS IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE
 INSTALLATION METHOD PROPOSED ON THE APPLICATION IS
 ACCEPTABLE AND A PERMIT IS ISSUED WITH THIS SPEC.
  
 9. PERMIT 02090676 FOR 7404 74TH WAY IS EXPIRED (DID
 NOT OBTAIN A FINAL INSPECTION). IF THIS PROJECT
 INCLUDES THIS ADDRESS, THIS PERMIT IS TO BE RESOLVED
 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT FOR THAT BUILDING.
  
 TO RESOLVE THE EXPIRED PERMIT:
  
 APPLICATION WITH THE DESCRIPTION: "FINAL INSPECTION
 ONLY TO CLOSE EXPIRED PERMIT #02090676" TO BE SUBMITTED
 AT THE BUILDING DIVISION USING THE STANDARD COUNTY WIDE
 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. A RECORDS RESEARCH REQUEST
 SHOULD BE SUBMITTED AT THE SAME TIME TO OBTAIN A COPY
 OF THAT PERMIT. IF AVAILABLE, IT WILL BE SUPPLIED FOR
 YOU.
  
 AFTER ISSUANCE, A FINAL INSPECTION SHOULD BE SCHEDULED.
  
 *******************************************************
 ************
 INFORMATION REGARDING DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH
 APPLICATION:
  
 NOA 12-0426.06 WAS SUBMITTED.
  
 APPLICATION PROPOSED INSTALLATION STATES: "APPLY PRIMER
 AT RATE OF 1 GALLON PER 250 SQ FT APPLY G4CO FLEX S-200
 AT RATE OF 1.5 GALLONS PER 100 SQ FT."
  
 SYSTEM "S-2000" IS UNDERLINED ON PAGE 3 OF THE NOA.
  
 PAGE 2 OF THE NOA HAS BEEN PULLED OUT OF ORDER AND PUT
 ON THE TOP OF EACH PACKAGE. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THIS
 WAS DONE; IT APPEARS THAT THE SYSTEM SELECTED IS ON
 PAGE 3. NOA SHOULD BE PUT IN ORDER.
  
 THE CONTRACT PROVIDED PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING, WHICH IS
 CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICATION:
  
 PRIMER COAST OF GACOFLEX E-5320 PRIMER AT A RATE OF 1
 GALLON PER 250 SF
 TOP COAT OF GACOFLEX S-2000 COATING AT A RATE OF 1.5
 GALLONS PER 100 SF
 *******************************************************
 ************
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2015-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-09-16 Time 07:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-09-09 Time 10:51 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-10 10:51:40RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2015-05-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-05-09 Time 11:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-05-05 Time 10:22 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-06 10:23:07RE-SUBMITTAL SENT TO SAMANTHA HILL FOR REVIEW. JG.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-04-28 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-04-28 Time 16:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-04-22 Time 15:54 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-04-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-04-21 Time 12:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-04-17 Time 15:46 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-17 15:47:04SENT TO S HILL


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved