Plan Review Details - Permit 15040150
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15040150
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-06-02 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-06-02 Time 10:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-06-02 Time 10:51 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-04-20 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-04-20 Time 17:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-04-20 Time 14:26 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-17 18:05:29SUBMITTAL BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS.
 CODE: 2010
  
 1- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR:
 A) SLIDING GLASS DOORS SIZES SPECIFIED FOR D107 DOORS
 ON DOOR SCHEDULE. NOA 12-0130.13 SUBMITTED DOESN'T
 INCLUDE D107 DOOR SIZE AND WAS ALREADY APPROVED WITH
 THE ORIGINAL PACKAGE. WINDOOR INCORPORATED DRAWING
 #08-02265 SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE AN NOA NUMBER OR
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER. IF THERE IS NOT AN
 APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL, THEN MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY
 FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR LOCAL
 PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCEDURE.
  
 B) WINDOW SIZES FOR W5, W6, W7 AND W8 WINDOWS SHOWN ON
 WINDOW SCHEDULE. AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
 (1) FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL13252-R2 SUBMITTED IS
 MISSING DRAWINGS 09 OF 17 THRU 17 OF 17. (2) CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY WINDOW AND MULLION SIZE ON FLORIDA PRODUCT
 APPROVALS FL13252-R2 AND FL14218-R3 SUBMITTED TO
 COMPARE WITH ARCHITECT WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A9.
  
 2- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER
 OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. SEC.
 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 3- FLAT ROOF INFORMATION SUBMITTED:
 A) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT NOA'S SUBMITTED. ONE IS FROM
 GAF AND THE OTHER ONE IS FROM TAMKO. THE ARCHITECT OF
 RECORD APPROVED THE TAMKO . COORDINATE INFORMATION AS
 REQUIRED ANDS SUBMIT ONLY ONE NOA. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 B) CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO
 BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC.
 R301.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 C) ENGINEER TO REVISE THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS
 SUBMITTED;
 (1) BUILDING EXPOSURE IS "D" NOT "B". REVISE THE
 BUILDING EXPOSURE AND DESIGN PRESSURES AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. R301.2.1.4 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 (2)IDENTIFY SELECTED APPROVED ASSEMBLY. SEC. R301.1.
 (3) THE MINIMUM FASTENER SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE LESS
 THAN 4 IN. O.C.. SEE RAS 117 SEC. 8.1 AND REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
 (4) IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS A TYPO ON THE FRONT PAGE OF
 THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. ENGINEER IS MAKING
 REFERENCE TO AXCE 7-10. IT SHOULD BE ASCE 7-10. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 4- SOIL TEST REPORT TO HAVE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL
 SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FL. ST..
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-06-02 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-06-02 Time 10:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-05-05 Time 17:34 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-05 17:34:50RE-SUBMITTAL SENT TO JULIO GOMEZ FOR REVIEW. JG.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-04-17 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-04-17 Time 17:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-04-03 Time 08:04 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-04 08:04:47SENT TO J GOMEZ
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-06-02 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-06-02 Time 10:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-06-02 Time 10:49 Sent To  
Notes
2015-06-02 10:50:45ENGINEER LETTER AND PICTURES SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
 INSPECTION.
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-05-27 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-05-27 Time 12:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-05-27 Time 12:10 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-27 12:36:07REVISED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
 1- ENGINEER TO SPECIFY SELECTED ASSEMBLY.
 2- CONTRACTOR HIGHLIGHTED ASSEMBLY WITH ANCHOR SHEET
 FASTENING OPTION #1 ON PAGE 6 OF 15 OF NOA 12-0716.18.
 THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THIS ASSEMBLY IS -52.5 PSF.
 THIS ASSEMBLY CAN NOT BE USED BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MEET
 THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ZONE 1 AS SPECIFIED BY THE
 ENGINEER.
 3- FASTENING CAN NOT BE LESS THAN 4 INCHES ON CENTER.
 CALCULATIONS SHOW 3.8". THIS CONTRADICTS ENGINEER NOTE
 "ALL FRACTIONS ROUNDED DOWN BUT KEEPING TO MIN 4"
 SPACING". RAS 117 DON'T ALLOW SPACING LESS THAN 4".
 4- ACCORDING TO NOA SUBMITTED THE NAILS NEED TO BE
 STAGGERED IN THE CENTER OF THE SHEET. ENGINEER TO
 REVISE NAILING PATTERN AS REQUIRED.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved