Plan Review Details - Permit 15040129
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15040129
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2019-04-04 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2019-04-04 Time 12:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2019-04-04 Time 12:28 Sent To  
Notes
2019-04-04 12:29:24RECEIVED NEW APPLICATION AND RE-ISSED FOR FINAL ONLY.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2015-10-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-10-06 Time 13:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-10-06 Time 13:07 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2015-09-17 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-09-17 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-09-17 Time 14:47 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-17 14:53:479/17/15 RESPONDED E-MAIL TO SAM MALO.
  
 GOOD AFTERNOON,
 THE ENERGY CODE REQUIRES R19 MIN. IF YOU HAVE ENOUGH
 ROOM IN THE 2X10 ROOF JOIST FOR CROSS VENTILATION, THEN
 I DON'T SEE ANY PROBLEM. CHECK THE DIMENSION OF THE R20
 INSULATION.
 REGARDS,
  
 FROM: "SAM MALO"
 TO: ,
 DATE: 09/17/2015 12:24 PM
 SUBJECT: GARTH IVEY RES. 15040129
  
 GOOD AFTERNOON MR. GOMEZ,
 ?
 I SPOKE TO LISA SMITH, WHO PREPARED THE ENERGY CALCS.
 TO SEE IF WE USED R-20 IN THE "FLAT" ROOF AREA, TO
 ALLOW ADEQUATE CLEARANCE FOR VENTILATION, AND HOW THIS
 WOULD AFFECT THE CALCULATIONS. SO FAR, THIS DOESN'T
 SEEM TO BE AN ISSUE, SINCE THE ROOF AREA IS ONLY ~400
 SF, THE CALCS. STILL PASS.
 WOULD THIS BE ACCEPTABLE TO YOU?
 ?
 THANK YOU,
 SAM MALO
  
 ?
  
 ***BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS FOR THIRD REVIEW.
  
 ***NOTE: THE BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH A
 PROVISO. A PROVISO MEANS THAT THE COMMENTS BELOW WILL
 BE ADDRESSED AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED. REVISSION FEES
 WILL APPLY.
 OWNER TO ADVICE IS PROVISO IS PREFERRED OR IF
 RE-SUBMITTING PAPERWORK TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS BEFORE
 PERMIT IS ISSUED.
  
  
 RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS.
 CODE: 2010 FBC.
  
 1- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 (***NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE
 COORDINATED WITH PLANS AND ALL THE FORMS ARE COMPLETE
 AND SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DELAYS.
 REPEAT COMMENT. ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND PLANS WERE NOT
 COORDINATED).
  
 A) CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #6 DOESN'T
 MATCH PLANS SUBMITTED. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 B) R-VALUE SHOWN ON ITEM #9 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 C) CEILING TYPES AND AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #10 DON'T MATCH
 PLANS. ENGINEER SHOWS VENTED ATTIC (PITCHED AND FLAT
 ROOFS) AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE DOESN'T MATCH PLANS.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 D) OWNER/AGENT TO CERTIFY AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 103.2.3.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 IMPORTANT: LABEL WILL BE REQUIRED SHOWING THE DOORS AND
 WINDOWS U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON ITEM #7 .
 THIS IS REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS DON'T USE THE
 DEFAULT FACTOR.
  
 2- DESIGN PRESSURES WERE CHANGED ON THE WINDOW AND DOOR
 SCHEDULES ON SHEET 5.0. THE REVISE DESIGN PRESSURES
 DON'T CORRESPOND TO EXPOSURE "C". REVISE THE DESIGN
 PRESSURES ACCORDING TO THE WINDOW/DOOR SIZE AND
 LOCATION. SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR:
 A) MODIFIED BITUMEN FOR THE FLAT ROOF. AND CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY. ALSO, PROVIDE SIGNED AND
 SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED
 FL1654-R9 WAS REVISED. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT FLORIDA
 PRODUCT APPROVAL REVISION #14. ALSO, NEED TO MARK WHICH
 APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY
 DESIGN PRESSURES. SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117
 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES.
 (NOTE: MAKE SURE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE FOR THE 2010
 CODE VERSION).
  
 ****REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 B) VENTED HARDIE SOFFIT AS SPECIFIED ON SHEET 4.2. NOA
 15-0122.04 SUBMITTED DOESN'T INCLUDE VENTED SOFFITS.
 NOTE: ENGINEER TO SPECIFY SIZE OF VENTS TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R806.
  
 4- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT
 SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS INCLUDING
 THE PEEL & STICK SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON
 SHEET 4.2. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 5- CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR THE OVERHEAD GARAGE DOORS,
 SHINGLES RIDGE VENTILATION AND ROOF SHINGLES. CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY WHICH ONE IS GOING TO BE USED TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 6- STATIC ROOF LOUVER NOA 12-0809.01 SUBMITTED:
 ENGINEER TO REVIEW APPROVED APPLICATIONS ON PAGE 3 OF 4
 OF NOA 12-0809.01 SUBMITTED. THEN ENGINEER'S PROPOSED
 INSTALLATION ON SHEET 4.3 DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE
 APPROVED APPLICATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE
 COMPLETE ENGINEER ANALYSIS SHOWING ALTERNATIVE
 COMPLIANCE. SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 7- ENGINEER TO REVISE THE ROOF VENTING DETAIL ON SHEET
 4.3. THERE IS NOT 2" AIR GAP ON 2X10 ROOF RAFTERS WHEN
 INSTALLING R-30 INSULATION AS SHOWN ON DETAIL S2/4.2.
 KEEP IN MIND THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE 2X10 AND THE
 THICKNESS OF R-30. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R806 OF
 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 ****PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET.. SUMIT
 OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2015-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-09-16 Time 10:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-09-16 Time 10:38 Sent To E
Notes
2015-09-16 10:56:56 
 ***NOTE: THE BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH A
 PROVISO. A PROVISO MEANS THAT THE COMMENTS BELOW WILL
 BE ADDRESSED AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED. REVISSION FEES
 WILL APPLY.
 OWNER TO ADVICE IS PROVISO IS PREFERRED OR IF
 RE-SUBMITTING PAPERWORK TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS BEFORE
 PERMIT IS ISSUED.
  
  
 RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS.
 CODE: 2010 FBC.
  
 1- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 (***NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE
 COORDINATED WITH PLANS AND ALL THE FORMS ARE COMPLETE
 AND SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DELAYS.
 REPEAT COMMENT. ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND PLANS WERE NOT
 COORDINATED).
  
 A) CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #6 DOESN'T
 MATCH PLANS SUBMITTED. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 B) R-VALUE SHOWN ON ITEM #9 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 C) CEILING TYPES AND AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #10 DON'T MATCH
 PLANS. ENGINEER SHOWS VENTED ATTIC (PITCHED AND FLAT
 ROOFS) AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE DOESN'T MATCH PLANS.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 D) OWNER/AGENT TO CERTIFY AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 103.2.3.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 IMPORTANT: LABEL WILL BE REQUIRED SHOWING THE DOORS AND
 WINDOWS U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON ITEM #7 .
 THIS IS REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS DON'T USE THE
 DEFAULT FACTOR.
  
 2- DESIGN PRESSURES WERE CHANGED ON THE WINDOW AND DOOR
 SCHEDULES ON SHEET 5.0. THE REVISE DESIGN PRESSURES
 DON'T CORRESPOND TO EXPOSURE "C". REVISE THE DESIGN
 PRESSURES ACCORDING TO THE WINDOW/DOOR SIZE AND
 LOCATION. SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR:
 A) MODIFIED BITUMEN FOR THE FLAT ROOF. AND CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY. ALSO, PROVIDE SIGNED AND
 SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED
 FL1654-R9 WAS REVISED. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT FLORIDA
 PRODUCT APPROVAL REVISION #14. ALSO, NEED TO MARK WHICH
 APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY
 DESIGN PRESSURES. SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117
 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES.
 (NOTE: MAKE SURE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE FOR THE 2010
 CODE VERSION).
  
 ****REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 B) VENTED HARDIE SOFFIT AS SPECIFIED ON SHEET 4.2. NOA
 15-0122.04 SUBMITTED DOESN'T INCLUDE VENTED SOFFITS.
 NOTE: ENGINEER TO SPECIFY SIZE OF VENTS TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R806.
  
 4- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT
 SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS INCLUDING
 THE PEEL & STICK SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON
 SHEET 4.2. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 5- CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR THE OVERHEAD GARAGE DOORS,
 SHINGLES RIDGE VENTILATION AND ROOF SHINGLES. CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY WHICH ONE IS GOING TO BE USED TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 6- STATIC ROOF LOUVER NOA 12-0809.01 SUBMITTED:
 ENGINEER TO REVIEW APPROVED APPLICATIONS ON PAGE 3 OF 4
 OF NOA 12-0809.01 SUBMITTED. THEN ENGINEER'S PROPOSED
 INSTALLATION ON SHEET 4.3 DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE
 APPROVED APPLICATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE
 COMPLETE ENGINEER ANALYSIS SHOWING ALTERNATIVE
 COMPLIANCE. SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 7- ENGINEER TO REVISE THE ROOF VENTING DETAIL ON SHEET
 4.3. THERE IS NOT 2" AIR GAP ON 2X10 ROOF RAFTERS WHEN
 INSTALLING R-30 INSULATION AS SHOWN ON DETAIL S2/4.2.
 KEEP IN MIND THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE 2X10 AND THE
 THICKNESS OF R-30. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R806 OF
 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 ****PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET.. SUMIT
 OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2015-08-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-08-06 Time 08:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-08-06 Time 08:57 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-06 08:58:208/6/15 RECEIVED ANOTHER E-MAIL FROM SAM MALO REGARDING
 THE ROOF VENTILATION ITEM #11:
  
 ****RESPONSE:
 THERE IS NO INFORMATION FOR THE CROSS VENTILATION FOR
 THE FLAT ROOFS. ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS SHOWN
 ONLY ADDRESSES THE PITCHED ROOFS. ARE THE PITCHED ROOFS
 INTERCONNECTED SO THE AIR FLOW FROM ONE ROOF TO THE
 OTHER?. SEE AREA WHERE THE EXISTING MAIN ROOF RECEIVES
 THE NEW ROOF FOR THE GARAGE ADDITION. IS THE ROOF
 SHEATHING OF THE EXISTING MAIN ROOF GOING TO BE REMOVED
 OR THE NEW ROOF TRUSSES ARE LAYING ON THE ROOF
 SHEATHING?. PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAIL SHOWING THE
 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AT THIS AREA. THE CODE
 REQUIREMENT IS TO PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION FOR ENTIRE
 ROOF INCLUDING THE FLAT ROOFS. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. CAREFULLY REVIEW THE ROOF PLAN
 WITH HIM, ADDRESS THE CROSS VENTILATION CODE ISSUE AND
 RESUBMIT REVISED PLANS. I APOLOGIZE BUT NO MORE PARTIAL
 REVIEWS WILL BE DONE UNTIL PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR FULL
 REVIEW. TO BE FAIR TO THE OTHERS, I NEED TO DO THE
 REVIEW ON PLANS THAT ARE ALREADY SUBMITTED AND WAITING
 ON LINE. I THINK MY COMMENT IS VERY CLEAR. IF YOU THINK
 YOU NEED MORE CLARIFICATION ON THIS ISSUE, PLEASE
 CONTACT STEVE KENNEDY, MY SUPERVISOR AT (561)805-6712
 OF [email protected].
 SINCERELY,
  
  
  
  
  
  
 RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS.
 CODE: 2010 FBC.
  
 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE DONE FOR A
 PROPERTY IN FORT PIERCE. REVISE ALL THE INFORMATION ON
 TOP OF FORM AS REQUIRED, AND, INCLUDE THE BUILDER'S
 NAME. SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
 REVIEW OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE DONE WHEN
 CORRECT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED.
 ***NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE
 COORDINATED WITH PLANS AND ALL THE FORMS ARE COMPLETE
 AND SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DELAYS.
  
 2- THE PROJECT NAME SHOWN ON PLANS SUBMITTED IS
 CHAMBERS RESIDENCE. THIS DOESN'T MATCH THE NAME OF THE
 OWNER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 ***RESPONSE: SOME SHEETS STILL HAVE THE WRONG NAME.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 3- SHEET 3.0 SPECIFIES REMOVAL OF WINDOWS AND DOORS.
 CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS
 (SPECIALLY THE BEDROOM WINDOWS) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604 OF 2010
 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING.
 ****RESPONSE: CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE
 EXISTING WINDOW AND ACTUAL SIZE OF THE PROPOSED WINDOW.
 SIZES SHOWN ON SHEET 6.0 AND WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET
 5.0 ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
 (EGRESS WINDOWS SPECIFIED ON THE WINDOW SCHEDULE DON'T
 COMPLY WITH EGRESS).
  
 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR:
 A) WOOD ENTRY DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1
 SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR
 FINISH. IS NOT A SOLID WOOD DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR WOOD DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO MATCH
 PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 B) DINING ROOM EXTERIOR DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DOOR
 SCHEDULE.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1
 SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR
 FINISH. IS NOT AN ALUMINUM SOLID DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR ALUMINUM DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO
 MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 C) STORAGE DOUBLE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1
 SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR
 FINISH. IS NOT AN ALUMINUM SOLID DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR ALUMINUM DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO
 MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 D) MODIFIED BITUMEN FOR THE FLAT ROOF. AND CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY. ALSO, PROVIDE SIGNED AND
 SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED
 FL1654-R9 WAS REVISED. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT FLORIDA
 PRODUCT APPROVAL REVISION #14. ALSO, NEED TO MARK WHICH
 APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY
 DESIGN PRESSURES. SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117
 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES.
 (NOTE: MAKE SURE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE FOR THE 2010
 CODE VERSION).
  
 E) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON
 FRAMING PLANS AND ALL DETAILS. NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING
 THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT
 APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR.
 ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. THERE WAS
 ONLY ONE LETTER SUBMITTED FROM SIMPSON-STRONG-TIE.
 (THAT'S NOT A PRODUCT APPROVAL. THE LETTER DOENS'T
 APPLY TO THIS JOB AND IS NOT VALID WITHOUT COMPLETE
 ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS).
  
 K) HARDIE BOARD SIDING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
 ***RESPONSE: REVISED WALL SECTIONS SPECIFY STUCCO,
 WHILE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SPECIFY HARDIE SIDING. REVISE
 ALL DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
  
 L) HARDIE SOFFIT AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS/SECTIONS.
 ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 M) CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING MIAMI-DADE NOA 11-1114.04 FOR
 HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS. WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T
 SPECIFY THIS TYPE OF WINDOW. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 N) NEW COMMENT. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE RIDGE
 VENT AND GOOSE-NECK VENTS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER
 ON SHEET 4.3.
  
 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. PRODUCT
 APPROVALS DON'T HAVE THE ENGINEER'S REVIEW STAMP OR ANY
 OTHER METHOD THAT SHOWS IN WRITING THAT THE ENGINEER
 REVIEWED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NEED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AS REVIEWED).
  
 11- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 ROOF CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 OF 2010
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR PITCHED AND FLAT ROOFS. IF
 DESIGNING UNVENTED ATTIC , THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE
 SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R806.4
 ***RESPONSE: ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET 4.3 ONLY
 PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE PITCHED ROOFS. THERE IS NOT
 INFORMATION FOR THE FLAT ROOF. ALSO, PROVIDE COMPLETE
 DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIOS FOR THE RIDGE VENT AND
 GOOSE-NECK VENTS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE CROSS
 VENTILATION AND SIZES OF ALL VENTS.
  
 12- REVISED WALL SECTIONS SPECIFY STUCCO FINISH. STUCCO
 THICKNESS IS 7/8" MIN NOT 3/4". REVISE ALL DETAILS AS
 REQUIRED. TABLE R702.1(1).
  
 13- WOOD TRUSS DESIGN LOADS ON SHEET 4.3: SPECIFY THE
 ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2010
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: REVISE LOADS ON SHEET 4.0. THERE IS A PULL
 DOWN STAIR. SEE NOTE "G" OF TABLE R301.5.
  
 ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 ****PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET.. SUMIT
 OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-08-05 Time 14:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-08-05 Time 14:58 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-05 15:05:128/5/15 RECEIVED E-MAIL FROM SAM MALO REGARDING THE ROOF
 VENTILATION ITEM #11:
  
 ****RESPONSE:
 DRAWING IS NOT LEGIBLE. UNABLE TO SEE WHAT'S PROPOSED.
  
  
  
  
  
 RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS.
 CODE: 2010 FBC.
  
 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE DONE FOR A
 PROPERTY IN FORT PIERCE. REVISE ALL THE INFORMATION ON
 TOP OF FORM AS REQUIRED, AND, INCLUDE THE BUILDER'S
 NAME. SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
 REVIEW OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE DONE WHEN
 CORRECT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED.
 ***NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE
 COORDINATED WITH PLANS AND ALL THE FORMS ARE COMPLETE
 AND SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES TO AVOID UNNECESSAARY DELAYS.
  
 2- THE PROJECT NAME SHOWN ON PLANS SUBMITTED IS
 CHAMBERS RESIDENCE. THIS DOESN'T MATCH THE NAME OF THE
 OWNER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 ***RESPONSE: SOME SHEETS STILL HAVE THE WRONG NAME.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 3- SHEET 3.0 SPECIFIES REMOVAL OF WINDOWS AND DOORS.
 CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS
 (SPECIALLY THE BEDROOM WINDOWS) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604 OF 2010
 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING.
 ****RESPONSE: CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE
 EXISTING WINDOW AND ACTUAL SIZE OF THE PROPOSED WINDOW.
 SIZES SHOWN ON SHEET 6.0 AND WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET
 5.0 ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
 (EGRESS WINDOWS SPECIFIED ON THE WINDOW SCHEDULE DON'T
 COMPLY WITH EGRESS).
  
 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR:
 A) WOOD ENTRY DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1
 SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR
 FINISH. IS NOT A SOLID WOOD DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR WOOD DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO MATCH
 PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 B) DINING ROOM EXTERIOR DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DOOR
 SCHEDULE.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1
 SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR
 FINISH. IS NOT AN ALUMINUM SOLID DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR ALUMINUM DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO
 MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 C) STORAGE DOUBLE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1
 SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR
 FINISH. IS NOT AN ALUMINUM SOLID DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR ALUMINUM DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO
 MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 D) MODIFIED BITUMEN FOR THE FLAT ROOF. AND CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY. ALSO, PROVIDE SIGNED AND
 SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED
 FL1654-R9 WAS REVISED. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT FLORIDA
 PRODUCT APPROVAL REVISION #14. ALSO, NEED TO MARK WHICH
 APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY
 DESIGN PRESSURES. SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117
 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES.
 (NOTE: MAKE SURE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE FOR THE 2010
 CODE VERSION).
  
 E) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON
 FRAMING PLANS AND ALL DETAILS. NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING
 THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT
 APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR.
 ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. THERE WAS
 ONLY ONE LETTER SUBMITTED FROM SIMPSON-STRONG-TIE.
 (THAT'S NOT A PRODUCT APPROVAL. THE LETTER DOENS'T
 APPLY TO THIS JOB AND IS NOT VALID WITHOUT COMPLETE
 ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS).
  
 K) HARDIE BOARD SIDING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
 ***RESPONSE: REVISED WALL SECTIONS SPECIFY STUCCO,
 WHILE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SPECIFY HARDIE SIDING. REVISE
 ALL DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
  
 L) HARDIE SOFFIT AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS/SECTIONS.
 ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 M) CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING MIAMI-DADE NOA 11-1114.04 FOR
 HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS. WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T
 SPECIFY THIS TYPE OF WINDOW. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 N) NEW COMMENT. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE RIDGE
 VENT AND GOOSE-NECK VENTS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER
 ON SHEET 4.3.
  
 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. PRODUCT
 APPROVALS DON'T HAVE THE ENGINEER'S REVIEW STAMP OR ANY
 OTHER METHOD THAT SHOWS IN WRITING THAT THE ENGINEER
 REVIEWED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NEED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AS REVIEWED).
  
 11- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 ROOF CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 OF 2010
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR PITCHED AND FLAT ROOFS. IF
 DESIGNING UNVENTED ATTIC , THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE
 SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R806.4
 ***RESPONSE: ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET 4.3 ONLY
 PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE PITCHED ROOFS. THERE IS NOT
 INFORMATION FOR THE FLAT ROOF. ALSO, PROVIDE COMPLETE
 DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIOS FOR THE RIDGE VENT AND
 GOOSE-NECK VENTS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE CROSS
 VENTILATION AND SIZES OF ALL VENTS.
  
 12- REVISED WALL SECTIONS SPECIFY STUCCO FINISH. STUCCO
 THICKNESS IS 7/8" MIN NOT 3/4". REVISE ALL DETAILS AS
 REQUIRED. TABLE R702.1(1).
  
 13- WOOD TRUSS DESIGN LOADS ON SHEET 4.3: SPECIFY THE
 ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2010
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: REVISE LOADS ON SHEET 4.0. THERE IS A PULL
 DOWN STAIR. SEE NOTE "G" OF TABLE R301.5.
  
 ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 ****PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET.. SUMIT
 OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-07-15 Cont ID  
Sent By J Gomez Date 2015-07-14 Time 17:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-07-14 Time 17:32 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-14 17:33:53RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS.
 CODE: 2010 FBC.
  
 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE DONE FOR A
 PROPERTY IN FORT PIERCE. REVISE ALL THE INFORMATION ON
 TOP OF FORM AS REQUIRED, AND, INCLUDE THE BUILDER'S
 NAME. SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
 REVIEW OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE DONE WHEN
 CORRECT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED.
 ***NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE
 COORDINATED WITH PLANS AND ALL THE FORMS ARE COMPLETE
 AND SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES TO AVOID UNNECESSAARY DELAYS.
  
 2- THE PROJECT NAME SHOWN ON PLANS SUBMITTED IS
 CHAMBERS RESIDENCE. THIS DOESN'T MATCH THE NAME OF THE
 OWNER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 ***RESPONSE: SOME SHEETS STILL HAVE THE WRONG NAME.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 3- SHEET 3.0 SPECIFIES REMOVAL OF WINDOWS AND DOORS.
 CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS
 (SPECIALLY THE BEDROOM WINDOWS) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604 OF 2010
 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING.
 ****RESPONSE: CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE
 EXISTING WINDOW AND ACTUAL SIZE OF THE PROPOSED WINDOW.
 SIZES SHOWN ON SHEET 6.0 AND WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET
 5.0 ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
 (EGRESS WINDOWS SPECIFIED ON THE WINDOW SCHEDULE DON'T
 COMPLY WITH EGRESS).
  
 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR:
 A) WOOD ENTRY DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1
 SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR
 FINISH. IS NOT A SOLID WOOD DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR WOOD DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO MATCH
 PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 B) DINING ROOM EXTERIOR DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DOOR
 SCHEDULE.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1
 SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR
 FINISH. IS NOT AN ALUMINUM SOLID DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR ALUMINUM DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO
 MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 C) STORAGE DOUBLE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15213-R1
 SUBMITTED IS FOR "FIBERGLASS DOOR" WITH WOOD DOOR
 FINISH. IS NOT AN ALUMINUM SOLID DOOR. PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR ALUMINUM DOOR OR REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE TO
 MATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 D) MODIFIED BITUMEN FOR THE FLAT ROOF. AND CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY. ALSO, PROVIDE SIGNED AND
 SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED
 FL1654-R9 WAS REVISED. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT FLORIDA
 PRODUCT APPROVAL REVISION #14. ALSO, NEED TO MARK WHICH
 APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY
 DESIGN PRESSURES. SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117
 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES.
 (NOTE: MAKE SURE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE FOR THE 2010
 CODE VERSION).
  
 E) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON
 FRAMING PLANS AND ALL DETAILS. NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING
 THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT
 APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR.
 ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. THERE WAS
 ONLY ONE LETTER SUBMITTED FROM SIMPSON-STRONG-TIE.
 (THAT'S NOT A PRODUCT APPROVAL. THE LETTER DOENS'T
 APPLY TO THIS JOB AND IS NOT VALID WITHOUT COMPLETE
 ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS).
  
 K) HARDIE BOARD SIDING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
 ***RESPONSE: REVISED WALL SECTIONS SPECIFY STUCCO,
 WHILE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SPECIFY HARDIE SIDING. REVISE
 ALL DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
  
 L) HARDIE SOFFIT AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS/SECTIONS.
 ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 M) CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING MIAMI-DADE NOA 11-1114.04 FOR
 HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS. WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T
 SPECIFY THIS TYPE OF WINDOW. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 N) NEW COMMENT. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE RIDGE
 VENT AND GOOSE-NECK VENTS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER
 ON SHEET 4.3.
  
 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 ***RESPONSE: (REPEAT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. PRODUCT
 APPROVALS DON'T HAVE THE ENGINEER'S REVIEW STAMP OR ANY
 OTHER METHOD THAT SHOWS IN WRITING THAT THE ENGINEER
 REVIEWED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NEED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AS REVIEWED).
  
 11- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 ROOF CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 OF 2010
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR PITCHED AND FLAT ROOFS. IF
 DESIGNING UNVENTED ATTIC , THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE
 SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R806.4
 ***RESPONSE: ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET 4.3 ONLY
 PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE PITCHED ROOFS. THERE IS NOT
 INFORMATION FOR THE FLAT ROOF. ALSO, PROVIDE COMPLETE
 DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIOS FOR THE RIDGE VENT AND
 GOOSE-NECK VENTS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE CROSS
 VENTILATION AND SIZES OF ALL VENTS.
  
 12- REVISED WALL SECTIONS SPECIFY STUCCO FINISH. STUCCO
 THICKNESS IS 7/8" MIN NOT 3/4". REVISE ALL DETAILS AS
 REQUIRED. TABLE R702.1(1).
  
 13- WOOD TRUSS DESIGN LOADS ON SHEET 4.3: SPECIFY THE
 ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2010
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: REVISE LOADS ON SHEET 4.0. THERE IS A PULL
 DOWN STAIR. SEE NOTE "G" OF TABLE R301.5.
  
 ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 ****PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET.. SUMIT
 OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-05-15 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-05-15 Time 16:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-05-15 Time 16:41 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-15 16:58:42RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS.
 CODE: 2010 FBC.
  
 1- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 103.2.1 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 2- PLANS SUBMITTED NEED THE ENGINEER'S SEAL AND
 ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 F.S.
  
 3- THE OWNER OF THE HOUSE IS A TRUST. IT DOESN'T
 QUALIFY AS OWNER/BUILDER. NEED CONTRACTOR TO APPLY FOR
 THE PERMITS. CHAPTER 489 F.S.
  
 4- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO
 LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR,MATERIALS,
 CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN
 PROFESSIONALS FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS. REVISE VALUATION AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE
 COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACTS THAT INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND
 MATERIALS, INCLUDING THE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS FEES.
  
 5- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH
 COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT.
 BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID
 RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF
 THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
  
 6- THE PROJECT NAME SHOWN ON PLANS SUBMITTED IS
 CHAMBERS RESIDENCE. THIS DOESN'T MATCH THE NAME OF THE
 OWNER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 7- SHEET 3.0 SPECIFIES REMOVAL OF WINDOWS AND DOORS.
 CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS
 (SPECIALLY THE BEDROOM WINDOWS) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604 OF 2010
 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING.
  
 8- AREA TABULATION SHOWN ON SHEET 2.0 DOESN'T MATCH
 AREAS SHOWN ON SHEET 5.0. PROVIDE CORRECT AREAS FOR A/C
 AREA, GARAGE, STORAGE, ETC. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 9- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR:
 A) WOOD ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 B) DINING ROOM EXTERIOR DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS..
  
 C) STORAGE DOUBLE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 D) GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR SIZE AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 E) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.
  
 F) FIXED WINDOWS.
  
 G) ROOF SHINGLES.
  
 H) PEEL AND STICK SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON
 PLANS.
  
 I) MODIFIED BITUMEN FOR THE FLAT ROOF. AND CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY. ALSO, PROVIDE SIGNED AND
 SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 J) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON
 FRAMING PLANS AND ALL DETAILS. NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING
 THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT
 APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR.
  
 K) HARDIE BOARD SIDING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 L) HARDIE SOFFIT AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 11 - SHEET 4.1:
 A) WHERE ARE DETAILS S1/4.2, S2/4.2, S3/4.2 AND S4/4.2
 THAT ARE KEYED ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN?. SEC. 107.2.1
 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 B) SIZE OF STEEL COLUMN BASE PLATE SHOWN ON DETAIL
 F5/4.1 DOESN'T MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON COLUMN/BASE
 PLATE SCHEDULE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 C) DETAIL F2/4.1: SIMPSON SP6 CONNECTOR DOESN'T WORK
 FOR A 2X4 WOOD STUD. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1
 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 12- SPECIFY GUTTERS WITH DOWNSPOUTS AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R318.6 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 13- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 ROOF CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 OF 2010
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR PITCHED AND FLAT ROOFS. IF
 DESIGNING UNVENTED ATTIC , THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE
 SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R806.4
  
 14- PROVIDE GARAGE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. SEC.
 R301.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 15- WALL SECTIONS ON SHEET 4.2 SHOW R16 AND R19 WALL
 INSULATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH THE
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS. ALSO, TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT
 R19 BATT INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON A 2X6 WALL. SEC.
 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 16- WOOD TRUSS DESIGN LOADS ON SHEET 4.3: SPECIFY THE
 ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2010
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 17- SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS AT GARAGE WING AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R807 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 ****PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-09-17 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-09-17 Time ` Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-09-17 Time 16:55 Sent To I
Notes
2015-09-17 17:26:55ALL PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By Albarran Date 2015-07-17 Time 11:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-07-17 Time 10:18 Sent To I
Notes
2015-07-17 11:32:02ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
  
 SECOND REVIEW FAILED AS INDICATED BELOW:
  
 THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO THE
 ELECTRICAL SUBMITTAL FOR A SATISFACTORY ELECTRICAL
 REVIEW:
  
 1.PER NEC 220.16, YOU SHALL PROVIDE LOAD CALCS FOR THE
 NEW LOAD CENTER.
 2. PER NEC 408.4, YOU SHALL PROVIDE A CIRCUIT DIRECTORY
 A/K/A PANEL SCHEDULE.
 3. INDICATE THE FEEDERS CONDUCTORS FOR THE NEW LOAD
 CENTER. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE RESULTS OF THE
 CONNECTED LOAD.
 4. YOU SHALL INDICATE THE FOLLOWING WITH EITHER A NOTE
 OR SHOWN ON THE PLANS:
 ALL OUTDOOR RECEPTACLES SHALL BE RATED AS WEATHER
 RESISTANT AS PER NEC 406.8
 ALL RECEPTACLES SHALL BE TAMPER RESISTANT AS PER NEC
 406.11
 ARC-FAULT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED AS PER NEC 210.12
 LIGHTING OUTLET BOXES IN THE CEILING SHALL BE CAPABLE
 OF SUPPORTING 50#'S AS PER NEC 314.27
 5. BEDROOM HALL SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL ALSO BE CAPABLE OF
 DETECTING HIGH LEVELS OF CO (CARBON MONOXIDE) AS PER
 FBC-R 315.
 6.RELOCATE THE LIGHT OUTLET AT THE REAR DOORS SO AS NOT
 TO BLOCK IT BEHIND THE DOOR.
 7. OUTLETS SPACING THROUGHOUT ALL HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL
 BE AS INDICATED BY NEC 210.52(A)
 8. OUTLETS ALONG THE KITCHEN COUNTER SHALL BE AS PER
 NEC 210.52(C)
 9. MASTER BATHROOM OUTLET SHALL BE AS INSTRUCTED BY NEC
 210.52(D)
 10. THE MASTER BEDROOM CORRIDOR IS MISSING AN OUTLET AS
 PER NEC 210.52(H)
 11. CLARIFY THE DELTA 1 CLOUD WITH REGARDS TO WHAT USED
 TO BE HVAC EQUIPMENT IN THE FIRST REVIEW. KEEPING IN
 MIND THAT NEC 110.33(B) HAS SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS WHICH
 SHALL BE ADDRESSED/CONSIDERED.
  
 FOR QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT MIKE ALBARRAN
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-05-18 Time 12:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-05-18 Time 11:50 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-18 13:15:20ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
  
 FIRST REVIEW FAILED AS INDICATED BELOW:
  
 THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO THE
 ELECTRICAL SUBMITTAL FOR A SATISFACTORY ELECTRICAL
 REVIEW:
  
 1. YOU SHALL PROVIDE LOAD CALC FOR THE NEW LOAD CENTER.
 2. YOU SHALL PROVIDE A PANEL SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LOAD
 CENTER.
 3. INDICATE THE FEEDERS CONDUCTORS FOR THE NEW LOAD
 CENTER. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE RESULTS OF THE
 CONNECTED LOAD.
 4. INDICATE IF THE NEW LOAD CENTER IS GOING TO HAVE A
 MAIN BREAKER OR WILL IT BE A MAIN LUG ONLY THEREFORE
 THE MAIN TO BE IN THE MAIN PANEL. IN SUCH CASE THE
 FEEDERS TO THE MAIN PANEL SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO CARRY
 THE ADDED LOAD.
 5. ALL CENTRAL VACUUM CLEANER OUTLETS TO BE AS MANDATED
 BY NEC 422.15
 6. ALL OUTDOOR RECEPTACLES SHALL BE RATED AS WEATHER
 RESISTANT AS PER NEC 406.8
 7. ALL RECEPTACLES SHALL BE TAMPER RESISTANT AS PER
 NE#C 406.11
 8. ARC-FAULT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED AS PER NEC 210.12
 9. BEDROOM HALL SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL ALSO BE CAPABLE OF
 DETECTING HIGH LEVELS OF CO (CARBON MONOXIDE) AS PER
 FBC-R 315.
 10.RELOCATE THE LIGHT OUTLET AT THE REAR DOORS SO AS
 NOT TO BLOCK IT BEHIND THE DOOR.
 11. LIGHTING OUTLET BOXES IN THE CEILING SHALL BE
 CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING 50#'S AS PER NEC 314.27
 12. TELEPHONE AND TV COMMUNICATION BOXES, THOUGH NOT
 INDICATED ON THE PLANS, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ADEQUATE
 LIGHTING AS INDICATED IN NEC 210.70(3)
 13. OUTLETS SPACING THROUGHOUT ALL HABITABLE ROOMS
 SHALL BE AS INDICATED BY NEC 210.52(A)
 14. OUTLETS ALONG THE KITCHEN COUNTER SHALL BE AS PER
 NEC 210.52(C)
 15. MASTER BATHROOM OUTLET SHALL BE AS INSTRUCTED BY
 NEC 210.52(D)
 16. THE MASTER BEDROOM CORRIDOR IS MISSING AN OUTLET AS
 PER NEC 210.52(H)
  
 FOR QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT MIKE ALBARRAN
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2015-09-17 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-09-17 Time 17:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-08-24 Time 08:31 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-17 17:33:039/17/15 - PASSED ELECTRICAL REVIEW AS NOTED. STILL
 MISSING BLDG & ROOFING. OWNER CONTACTED BY PHONE. SENT
 TO LARGE DENIED BIN "G". MA
2015-08-25 08:31:12LIBRARY
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-07-17 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-07-17 Time 11:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-06-18 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-17 11:37:077/16/15 - FAILED ELECTRICAL REVIEW. CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED
 VIA EMAIL. SEND TO LARGE DENIED BIN "T". MA
2015-06-18 15:51:16R-30
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-05-18 Time 16:57 Rev Time  
Received By jgomez Date 2015-04-03 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-04 09:23:20R16
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2015-10-07 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-10-07 Time 12:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-10-07 Time 12:03 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-07 12:05:00NO FEES DUE. MU-2015-14466. RE-STAMPED ON 10/7/15 WITH
 ORIGINAL REVIEW DATE OF 6/16/15. STAMPED BY DB.
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-10-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-10-06 Time 18:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-10-06 Time 18:33 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-06 18:37:45BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS WERE REVISED ON SHEET #2.
 BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY TO UPDATED
 INFORMATION.
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status   Date 2015-10-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-07-14 Time 17:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-07-14 Time 17:47 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-14 17:48:47NO FEES MU-215-14466.
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-05-15 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-05-15 Time 18:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-05-15 Time 18:11 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-15 18:11:471- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.)
 FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED
 PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY
 IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT
 CODE.
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2015-09-14 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-09-14 Time 16:12 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-07-16 Cont ID  
Sent By C Cole Date 2015-07-16 Time 07:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-07-16 Time 07:12 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-16 07:56:112ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 MECHANICAL
 7/16/15
  
 1) THE SUBMITTED MANUAL J COOLING AND HEATING
 CALCULATIONS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE FOR THE WRONG
 ADDRESS AND THE WRONG BUILDING PROJECT- 4104 LOOKOUT
 COURT, FT. PIERCE. AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED IN THE 1ST
 REVIEW, PLEASE SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT AT 211 DESOTA RD, WEST PALM BEACH- PERMIT
 #15040129. PLEASE NOTE THE CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DIRECTIONAL
 ORIENTATION OF THE HOUSE AS SHOWN IN THE SURVEY, AND ON
 THE PLANS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2015-05-18 Time 14:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-04-03 Time 14:43 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-18 14:58:061ST. MECHANICAL REVIEW. 5/18/15
  
 1) PROVIDE AC LOAD CALCULATIONS INCLUDING MANUAL J
 WORKSHEETS PER SECTION 403.6.1 FBC-10 ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
 2) DESIGN CRITERIA: PROVIDE A LIST OF APPLICABLE CODES
 AND STANDARDS USED IN THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. SEE
 FBC-10 RESIDENTIAL, AND
 FBC-10 EXISTING BUILDING CODE. PLACE THE LEVEL OF
 ALTERATION ON THE PLANS.
 3) PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTION 711 FBC-10 EXISTING BUILDING, AND TABLE 104.4.1
 FBC-10 ENERGY.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLAN INDICATES NEW AC CONDITIONING
 IN THE GARAGE WHICH WILL DEFINE THE AREA AS AN ADDITION
 PER SECTION 202.
 THIS AREA MUST NOW MEET THE CURRENT CODE FOR THE
 THERMAL ENVELOPE (WALL AND CEILING INSULATIONS), WINDOW
 AND DOOR U-VALUES AND SHGC, ETC.
 4) SHEET 8.0: UPDATE THE CODE SECTION FOR CU TIE DOWN
 IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION M1307.2.1 FBC-10
 RESIDENTIAL.
  
 CHRISTOPHER COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-09-05 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-09-05 Time 09:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-09-05 Time 09:25 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-05 09:46:07SEPARATE PERMIT FOR GAS.
 GAS PLAN REVIEW
 A GAS PLAN HAS NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL
 PACKAGE. A GAS PLAN REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED AT
 THIS TIME. A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT AND PLANS WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR A CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM THE RELATED WORK.
 PROVIDE COMPLETE PLANS, APPLIANCE/ EQUIPMENT
 SPECIFICATIONS AND GAS RISER THAT REFLECTS THE ENTIRE
 SCOPE OF GAS WORK TO BE DONE. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC.
 107.2.1.
  
2015-07-14 17:44:20NEW DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. JG.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-05-13 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-05-13 Time 13:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-05-13 Time 12:41 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-13 13:14:15SEPARATE PERMIT REQD. FOR GAS.
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2015-10-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-10-06 Time 17:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-10-06 Time 17:40 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-06 17:42:241- MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM FL1654-R6.
  
 2- SHINGLES FL10674-R10.
  
 3- SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT FL10450-R6.
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-09-16 Time 19:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-09-16 Time 18:59 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-16 19:00:431- MODIFIED BITUMEN FOR THE FLAT ROOF. AND CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY. ALSO, PROVIDE SIGNED AND
 SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED
 FL1654-R9. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT
 APPROVAL REVISION #14. THE ONE SUBMITTED REVISION R9 IS
 NOT CURRENT. ALSO, NEED TO MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
 IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY DESIGN PRESSURES.
 SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED
 IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
 PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES.
  
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-07-15 Cont ID  
Sent By J Gomez Date 2015-07-15 Time 15:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-07-15 Time 07:42 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-15 15:28:341- MODIFIED BITUMEN FOR THE FLAT ROOF. AND CLEARLY
 IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY. ALSO, PROVIDE SIGNED AND
 SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY
 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 ***RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED
 FL1654-R9. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT
 APPROVAL REVISION #14. THE ONE SUBMITTED REVISION R9 IS
 NOT CURRENT. ALSO, NEED TO MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY
 IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY DESIGN PRESSURES.
 SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED
 IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
 PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES.
  
  
 2- SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT FL10450-R4. OK.
  
 3- SHINLES NOA 11-0919.05. OK.
  
  
  
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-05-15 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-05-15 Time 18:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-05-15 Time 18:31 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-15 18:33:031- NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SHINGLES, PEEL /STICK
 UNDERLAYMENT AND MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING. JG.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-07-01 Cont ID  
Sent By S Graham Date 2015-07-01 Time 14:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date 2015-07-01 Time 14:36 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-04-10 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2015-04-10 Time 12:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date 2015-04-10 Time 12:11 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-10 12:12:274/10/15 ZONING FAILED.
  
 1. PROVIDE TWO UP TO DATE SURVEYS.
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved