| 2015-02-27 08:03:41 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) FBC 107.2.5 SITE PLAN. THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | ACCOMPANIED BY A SITE PLAN SHOWING TO SCALE THE SIZE |
| | AND LOCATION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION AND EXISTING |
| | STRUCTURES ON THE SITE, DISTANCES FROM LOT LINES, THE |
| | ESTABLISHED STREET GRADES AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED |
| | GRADES AND, AS APPLICABLE, FLOOD HAZARD AREAS, |
| | FLOODWAYS, AND DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATIONS; AND IT SHALL BE |
| | DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY LINE |
| | SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 2) FBC 107.2.1 PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR THE ARCH |
| | AND HALF GABLE CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 3) FBC 107.2.1 SPECIFY THE MATERIAL THAT WILL BE USED |
| | TO COVER THE PORCH CEILING AND SOFFIT. |
| | |
| | 4) FBC 107.2 CLARIFY IF THERE WILL BE A SLAB ON GRADE |
| | FOR THE AREA UNDER THE COVERED PORCH ON EITHER SIDE OF |
| | THE EXISTING STEPS. |
| | |
| | 5) FBC-R803.2.3.1 SHEATHING FASTENINGS. |
| | WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING SHALL BE FASTENED TO |
| | ROOF FRAMING WITH 8D RING-SHANK NAILS AT 6 INCHES ON |
| | CENTER AT EDGES AND 6 INCHES ON CENTER AT INTERMEDIATE |
| | FRAMING. RING-SHANK NAILS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING |
| | MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: |
| | 1. 0.113 INCH NOMINAL SHANK DIAMETER. |
| | 2. RING DIAMETER OF 0.012 OVER SHANK DIAMETER. |
| | 3. 16 TO 20 RINGS PER INCH. |
| | 4. 0.280 INCH FULL ROUND HEAD DIAMETER. |
| | 5. 2 INCH NAIL LENGTH. |
| | WHERE ROOF FRAMING WITH A SPECIFIC GRAVITY, 0.42 < G < |
| | 0.49 IS USED, SPACING OF RING-SHANK FASTENERS SHALL BE |
| | 4 INCHES ON CENTER IN NAILING ZONE 3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | FIGURE R803.2.3.1 WHERE VASD AS DETERMINED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R301.2.1.3 IS 130 MPH OR |
| | GREATER. |
| | |
| | 6) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE SUBMITTALS FOR ROOF |
| | COVERING AND CONNECTORS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE |
| | CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 7) FBC 107.2.1.2 FOR ROOF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY THE |
| | CODE, THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL ILLUSTRATE, |
| | DESCRIBE AND DELINEATE THE TYPE OF ROOFING SYSTEM, |
| | MATERIALS, FASTENING REQUIREMENTS, FLASHING |
| | REQUIREMENTS AND WIND RESISTANCE RATING THAT ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. PRODUCT EVALUATION AND |
| | INSTALLATION SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIND |
| | CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE OR A STATEMENT |
| | BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE MUST |
| | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8) THE COVERED PATIO DETAIL DOES NOT SHOW THAT THE |
| | RAFTERS WILL HAVE A HEEL CUT TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE |
| | BEARING ON THE 2 X 12 BEAM. FBC-R301.1 |
| | |
| | 9) THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN IS INCORRECTLY LABELED AS THE |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | |
| | |