| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15010897 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-08-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-08-24 |
Time |
06:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-08-24 |
Time |
06:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-08-11 |
Time |
09:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-08-11 |
Time |
08:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-11 09:29:38 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 15010897 | | | ADD: 4720 BROADWAY | | | CONT: ROBLING ARCHITECTURE | | | TEL: (561)649-6705 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | 4TH REVIEW | | | DATE: TUES. AUG. 11/ 2015 | | | | | | ACTION: BUILDING PROVISO/ DEFERRED SUBMITTAL | | | | | | ARCHITECT DAMON ROBLING SENT E-MAIL 08/10/15 04:04 PM | | | ASKING IF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS CAN BE A PROVISO/ | | | DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. | | | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, | | | | | | 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS | | | SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE DEFINED AS THOSE | | | PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT SUBMITTED AT THE | | | TIME OF THE | | | APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. | | | DEFERRAL OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR | | | APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE | | | REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE | | | SHALL LIST THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON | | | THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL. | | | DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN | | | PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW | | | THEM AND FORWARD THEM TO THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION INDICATING THAT THE | | | DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE | | | BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO | | | THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL | | | ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED | | | SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 1) ROOFING REPORT: FL 13464-RO ROOFING GAF MODIFIED FL | | | 13464- R0 THE ROOFING SUB-SYSTEMS TO BE APPLIED HAS NOT | | | BEEN IDENTIFIED NOR THE ASSOCIATED PRESSURES. SEE | | | APPENDIX SHEET 2 OF 13 NOTE 8 REQUIRES ENHANCED | | | FASTENING BY A QUALIFIED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD ON SHEET A1.0 HAS LISTED TABLE # | | | 1 ON PLANS WHICH ALLOWS THE FOLLOWING PRODUCTS (TABLE | | | 1) MAKE UP THE SUBJECT SYSTEMS. NOTE TABLES 2A, 2B & 2C | | | ARE STEEL DECKS WITH INSULATION NONE OF THE SUB-SYSTEMS | | | HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED FOR INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 2) FROM 3RD REVIEW: SHEET A7.0 FOR EXTERIOR FINISHES | | | INDICATES THE USE OF REYNOBOND ACM PANELS FOR THE | | | EXTERIOR FINISH OF THE BUILDING. NO PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | WERE SUBMITTED FOR THIS PRODUCT. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 | | | PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & | | | CLADDING | | | | | | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. | | | 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION | | | SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | (31)(C) PANEL WALLS: ACM PANELS/ AND OR MCM PANELS. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-08-10 |
Time |
07:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-08-10 |
Time |
06:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-10 07:36:59 | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 3RDD REVIEW | | | DATE: MON. AUG. 10/ 2015 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 2) PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | | | 2A) 3RD REQUEST. GAF MODIFIED FL 13464- R0 THE ROOFING | | | SUB-SYSTEMS TO BE APPLIED HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED NOR | | | THE ASSOCIATED PRESSURES. SEE APPENDIX SHEET 2 OF 13 | | | NOTE 8 REQUIRES ENHANCED FASTENING BY A QUALIFIED | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD ON SHEET A1.0 HAS LISTED TABLE # | | | 1 ON PLANS WHICH ALLOWS THE FOLOWING PRODUCTS (TABLE 1) | | | MAKE UP THE SUBJECT SYSTEMS. NOTE TABLES 2A, 2B & 2C | | | ARE STEEL DECKS WITH INSULATION NONE OF THE SUB-SYSTEMS | | | HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED FOR INSTALATION. THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD HAS NOT INDICATED TO BE PICKED BY ROOFING | | | CONTRACTOR AND REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. HAS NOT | | | INDICATED THIS TO BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 3-5) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 6A) NEW COMMENT. SHEET A7.0 FOR EXTERIOR FINISHES | | | INDICATES THE USE OF REYNOBOND ACM PANELS FOR THE | | | EXTERIOR FINISH OF THE BUILDING. NO PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | WERE SUBMITTED FOR THIS PRODUCT. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 | | | PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & | | | CLADDING | | | | | | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. | | | 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION | | | SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | (31)(C) PANEL WALLS: ACM PANELS/ AND OR MCM PANELS | | | | | | 6B) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 | | | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE | | | ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING | | | ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. | | | | | | 7) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION | | | & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
Time |
13:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
Time |
11:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-30 13:56:37 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 15010897 | | | ADD: 4720 BROADWAY | | | CONT: ROBLING ARCHITECTURE | | | TEL: (561)649-6705 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW | | | DATE: TUES. JUNE 30/ 2015 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 2) PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | | | 2A) 2ND REQUEST. GAF MODIFIED FL 13464- R0 THE ROOFING | | | SUB-SYSTEMS TO BE APPLIED HAS NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED NOR | | | THE ASSOCIATED PRESSURES. SEE APPENDIX SHEET 2 OF 13 | | | NOTE 8 REQUIRES ENHANCED FASTENING BY A QUALIFIED | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | | | | | 3) SEMI-COMPLIED. SHEET S-4 FOR ROOF ZONES 2 & 3 THE | | | NEGATIVE PRESSURES ARE LOW FOR A 10 SQ. FT. AREA TAKEN | | | @ ELE. 20 FEET ABOVE GRADE. ROOF ZONE 2 INDICATES A | | | -48.47 SHOULD BE APPROX. -67.8 (VASD) AND ROOF ZONE 3 | | | THE PLANS SHOW A -57.65 AND SHOULD BE -102 (VASD) . | | | | | | 4) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5) 2ND REQUEST. SHEET A7.0 INDICATES WALL DETAIL A-G. | | | SHEET A8.0 SECTIONS 2,3 & 4 ARE THESE SECTIONS SHOW A | | | FRAMED OUT WALL SECTIONS. THERE IS NO ATTACHMENT, | | | FRAMING OR MATERIALS FOR THE SURFACE FINISH? NO DETAILS | | | FOR THIS BUILT OUT WALL IN THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS | | | EITHER. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION | | | & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-02-25 |
Time |
07:43 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-02-20 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-02-25 07:09:51 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 15010897 | | | ADD: 4720 BROADWAY | | | CONT: ROBLING ARCHITECTURE | | | TEL: (561)649-6705 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | IMPORTANT NOTICE: EFFECTIVE MAY 11, 2015 | | | ALL PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED | | | ELECTRONICALLY | | | UPON APPLICATION AND FEE PAYMENT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | SUBMISSION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | 1 UPLOAD VIA THE PROJECTDOX PORTAL WITH DIGITAL | | | SIGNATURES OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AS APPLICABLE; USE | | | THE REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT | | | 2 INCLUDE ON A CD IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DIGITAL | | | SIGNATURES ARE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED; USE THE REQUIRED | | | NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT | | | 3 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER | | | DESIGN DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED; USE THE | | | REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT | | | 4 ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER DESIGN DOCUMENTS SUBJECT | | | TO ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DIGITIZE THE DOCUMENTS | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN IT BECOMES | | | AVAILABLE | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW | | | DATE: WED. FEB. 20-25 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) SHEET T1.0 BUILDING CODE CLASSIFICATION: | | | 1A) LIST (1) EXIT FOR 50 SEATS TOTAL PLEASE SEE THE | | | 2010 FBC-B TABLE 1015.1 ONE EXIT UNDER THE MERCANTILE | | | OCCUPANCY IS MAXIMUM AT 49 OCCUPANTS. | | | 1B) PLEASE NOTE UNDER APPLICABLE CODES THIS PLAN IS TO | | | BE BUILT IN THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH. | | | | | | 2) THERE IS A COVERSHEET LISTING PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | | THERE IS NO HEADER, TITLE BLOCK FROM A CONTRACTOR NOR | | | THE DESIGNER, NO SHOP DRAWING STAMP OF APPROVAL, NOR | | | SIGNATURE OF THE DESIGNER OF RECORD INDICATING THEY | | | WERE REVIEWED AND CODE COMPLIANT. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED | | | BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN | | | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | | | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, | | | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. | | | | | | 2A) KAWNEER OUTSWING STOREFRONT DOORS NOA 11-1013.03 | | | TECHNICAL SHEETS SUBMITTED 8 1/2 X 11 SIZED FOR 8 1/2 X | | | 14 CUT OFF 1/3 OF SHEET. | | | 2B) KAWNEER STOREFRONT NOA 11-0908.10 TECHNICAL SHEETS | | | SUBMITTED 8 1/2 X 11 SIZED FOR 8 1/2 X 14 CUT OFF 1/3 | | | OF SHEET. | | | 2C) TIA BAR TC-5 SERIES ROOF CURBS NOA-0828.02 | | | TECHNICAL SHEETS SUBMITTED 8 1/2 X 11 SIZED FOR 8 1/2 X | | | 14 CUT OFF 1/3 OF SHEET. | | | 2D) MIAMI TECH ALUMINUM A/C STANDS 13-1017.09 TECHNICAL | | | SHEETS SUBMITTED 8 1/2 X 11 SIZED FOR 8 1/2 X 14 CUT | | | OFF 1/3 OF SHEET. | | | FLEMING-BARON EXTERIOR DOOR FL 14237-R1 NO TECHNICAL | | | SHEETS SUBMITTED. | | | GAF MODIFIED FL 13464- R0 THE ROOFING SUB-SYSTEMSTO BE | | | APPLIED NOT IDENTIFIED NOR THE ASSOCIATED PRESSURES. | | | | | | 3) SHEET S-2 THE WIND DESIGN PRESSURES INDICATE A B | | | EXPOSURE PLEASE REVIEW WHEN WITHIN 1400 FT OF THE | | | INTERCOASTAL FOR THIS LOCATION TO BE CONSIDERED A B | | | EXPOSURE THE JOBSITE LOCATION WOULD NEED TO BE A | | | MINIMUM 2,600 FT AWAY FROM THE INTERCOASTAL. FBC-B | | | 1609.4.2 SURFACE ROUGHNESS CATEGORIES. BECAUSE THE | | | EXPOSURE C CATEGORY HAS MULTIPLIERS WITH ITS HEIGHT THE | | | PRESSURES PROVIDED ARE LOW. TABLE 1609.7(2). | | | | | | 4A) SHEET S-2 DETAIL # 3 SHOWS A NEW CONCRETE DECK- THE | | | PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE TYPE OR AMOUNT OF RE-INFORCING | | | STEEL OR CONCRETE MIX? 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 4B) DETAIL #2 SHOWS A NEW ROOF DECK NOTE SEE PLANS | | | AGAIN NO DETAIL FOR RE-INFORCING STEEL OR CONCRETE MIX, | | | NEW ROOF PITCH W/ VERMICULITE? | | | | | | 5) SHEET A8.0 SECTIONS 2,3 & 4 ARE THESE SECTIONS FOR | | | THE SIGN OR BUILT OUT WALL SECTIONS? NO ATTACHMENT, | | | FRAMING OR MATERIALS FOR THE SURFACE FINISH? | | | 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION | | | & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | | THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-17 |
Time |
14:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-17 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-07-21 |
Time |
08:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-07-21 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-22 08:20:28 | NO NEW ELECTRICAL PLANS INCLUDED IN THE RESUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE. EMAILED AND CORRESPONDED WITH DAMON OF | | | ROBLING. HE FORWARDED TO BRIAN ALLEN OF ROBLING, HE | | | ASSURES ME THEY WILL INCLUDE THE ELECTRICAL SHEETS IN | | | THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL COMING SOON... | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-01-28 |
Time |
14:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-01-28 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-01-28 13:41:24 | 1/28/2015 | | | PROJECT: KFC | | | PERMIT#: 15010897 | | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC, 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC | | | ,2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, | | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | | 1ST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | REVISE PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) SHEET T1.0 | | | CHANGE THE VERSION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE IN | | | EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THIS SUBMITTAL FROM 2011 TO THE | | | 2008 NEC. | | | | | | 2) SHEET E2.0 | | | PROVIDE A GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | NEC TABLE 250.66 FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEM RISER. | | | INDICATE THE CIRCUIT FEEDING PANEL LA. | | | INDICATE THE FEEDER SIZE AND TYPE FEEDING PANEL LA. | | | PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE | | | | | | 3) SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATIONS ACCOMPANIED BY | | | MANUFACTURERS EQUIPMENT SUBMITTALS, AND SHOP DRAWINGS | | | ARE REQUIRED FOR SITE LIGHTING, GENERATORS. HOOD | | | EXHAUST, FIRE ALARM, ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM, SECURITY, | | | CCTV, AUDIO/VIDEO, NETWORK, DATA, AND, COMMUNICATION. | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ | | | 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF | | | | | | ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REQUIRED TO INSERT THE CORRECTED | | | PAGES INTO THE DENIED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. VOID THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND LEAVE FOR COMPARATIVE | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-07-07 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-07-02 |
Time |
14:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-02-12 |
Time |
14:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-02-12 |
Time |
13:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-02-12 14:47:08 | 1. THE LOADING AREA CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE | | | PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. PLEASE SHOW THE LOADING | | | AREA IN ANOTHER LOCATION. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE LABEL TO GATE WIDTH AND INTERIOR OPENINGS FOR | | | THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. THE ENCLOSURE MUST | | | MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN SECTION 94-444, | | | FIGURE XIV-3 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-06-12 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-06-12 |
Time |
09:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-02-10 17:28:11 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | PLEASE REVISE THE EDITION OF THE FLORIDA LIFE SAFETY | | | CODE TO 2012. | | | | | | PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHOWING ALL OCCUPANY LOADS, | | | EXIT PATHS, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, EXIT PATH | | | DIMENSION, EIXTS, EXIT DOORS, AND FIRE EXTINGUISHERS | | | LOCATIONS. | | | | | | PROVIDE CONSTUCTION COMMENTS/NOTES ON THE PLAN | | | INDICATING THE INSTALLATION OF A NFPA 96 COMPLIANT HOOD | | | SYSTEM TO BE SUBMITTED THROUGH SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS. | | | | | | PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION COMMENTS/NOTE ON THE PLAN | | | INDICATING THE INSTALLATION OF A NFPA COMPLIANT HOOD | | | SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TO BE SUBMITTED THROUGH SEPARATE | | | SHOP DRAWINGS. | | | | | | PROVIDE INDICATION THE THE BUILDING ADDRESS WILL BE | | | VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. NUMBERS SHALL BE ATTACHED TO | | | THE BUILDING AND BE AT LEAST SIX-INCHES IN HEIGHT WITH | | | 1-INCH STROKE AND SHALL CONTRAST THE BACKGROUND. | | | | | | PER FLORIDA STATUTE 633.027 AND FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE | | | CODE 69A-60.0081, STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT FRAME | | | FLOOR/ROOF TRUSS CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH | | | A SIGN AFFIXED TO THE BUILDING. PROVIDE INDICATIONS | | | THAT A MALTESE CROSS 8-INCHES WIDE AND 8-INCHES TALL | | | AND BE OF A BRIGHT RED REFLECTIVE COLOR AND BEAR THE | | | APPROPRIATE LETTER R/F/RF DESIGNATION SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED WITHIN 24" OF THE FRONT DOOR. | | | | | | DOORS SHALL BE ARRANGED TO BE OPENED READILY FROM THE | | | EGRESS SIDE WHENEVER THE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. LOCKS, | | | IF PROVIDED, SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE USE OF A KEY, TOOL, | | | OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT FOR OPERATION FROM THE | | | EGRESS SIDE. | | | | | | INDICATE IF THE DOORS WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH ANY | | | LOCK/LATCH. IF THE DOORS WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A | | | LOCK/LATCH, INDICATE HOW THE LOCK/LATCH WILL BE | | | RELEASED FROM THE EGRESS SIDE OF THE DOOR. | | | | | | PER SECTION NFPA 101, 7.2.1.5.9, THE LOCK/LATCH | | | RELEASING MECHANISM ON ALL DOORS SHALL OPEN THE DOOR | | | WITH NOT MORE THAN ONE RELEASING OPERATION. THE | | | RELEASING MECHANISM SHALL HAVE AN OBVIOUS METHOD OF | | | OPERATION THAT IS READILY OPERATED UNDER ALL LIGHTING | | | CONDITIONS. THE RELEASING DEVICE SHOULD BE CAPABLE OF | | | BEING OPERATED WITH ONE HAND AND SHOULD NOT REQUIRE | | | TIGHT GRASPING, TIGHT PINCHING OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST | | | TO OPERATE. | | | | | | A THUMB TURN LOCK IS NOT PERMITTED ON THE MAIN ENTRY | | | DOOR(S). IN LIEU OF PANIC HARDWARE, THE MAIN ENTRY IS | | | PERMITTED TO BE EQUIPPED WITH A KEYED LOCK WITH | | | LOCK/UNLOCK INDICATOR WINDOW AND SIGNAGE STATING THE | | | DOOR IS TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. NO | | | OTHER LOCKING OR LATCHING MECHANISMS ARE PERMITTED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-07-11 |
Time |
07:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-07-11 |
Time |
07:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-01-30 |
Time |
11:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-01-30 |
Time |
11:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-01-30 11:34:41 | GAS | | | 1) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR ALL | | | GAS EQUIPMENT. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LISTED AND | | | LABELED PER 2010 FL. GAS CODE SEC. 301.3. | | | 2) REFER TO THE APPLICABLE PIPE SIZING TABLE ON SHT.P-2 | | | FROM THE 2010 FGC THAT WAS USED TO SIZE THE GAS | | | PIPING.FGC SEC.402.3. | | | 3) SHOW THE TOTAL DEVELOPED LENGTH OF THE GAS PIPING | | | FROM THE POINT OF DELIVERY. 402.4.1. | | | 4) INDICATE THE TYPE OF PIPE BEING USED FOR THE GAS | | | SYSTEM. WPB AMEND.TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.2.1. | | | 5) INDICATE THE PIPE SIZE OF THE DROPS TO THE | | | EQUIPMENT. WPB AMEND.TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.2.1. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-08-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-08-24 |
Time |
06:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-08-19 |
Time |
14:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-19 14:41:36 | RESUB ROUTED TO DKITTREDGE VIA SGRAHAM'S DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-08-18 |
Time |
14:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-07-31 |
Time |
09:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-07-22 |
Time |
08:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-06-11 |
Time |
09:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-03-02 |
Time |
15:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-01-27 |
Time |
12:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-02-25 |
Time |
07:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-02-25 |
Time |
07:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-06-29 |
Time |
11:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-06-29 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-29 11:06:34 | PASS PROVISO | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE A DETAIL FROM THE ENGINEER ON THE RTU CURB | | | TO | | | ROOF TIEDOWN AND RTU TO CURB TIEDOWN. PROVIDE THE | | | TYPE AND SIZE ANCHOR USED ON THE DETAIL. PER SECTION | | | 301.12 WIND RESISTANCE 2010 FBC (M) | | | 2) REFER TO SECTION 304.11 GUARDS 2010 FBC (M) | | | 3) REFER TO SECTION 307.2.1 CONDENSATE DISPOSAL | | | 2010 FBC (M) | | | 4) HOODS AND COOLERS REQUIRE SEPARATE APPLICATION | | | PLANS AND PERMIT. | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER | | | [email protected] | | | OFFICE 561-805-6732 | | | FAX 561-805-6676 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-03-02 |
Time |
15:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-03-02 |
Time |
15:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-03-02 15:51:02 | PLAN DENIED | | | 1) RETURN AIR REQUIRED FOR OFFICE PER SECTION | | | 601.4 BALANCED RETURN AIR 2010 FBC (M) | | | 2) PROVIDE A DETAIL FROM THE ENGINEER ON | | | CURB TO ROOF TIE DOWN AND RTU TO CURB | | | TIE DOWN .PROVIDE TYPE SIZE AND SPACING | | | OF ANCHOR. PER SECTION 301.12 WIND RESISTANCE | | | FBC (M) 2010 | | | 3) SEPARATE APPLICATION PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIRED | | | FOR HOODS AND COOLERS . |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-07-11 |
Time |
07:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-07-11 |
Time |
06:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-01-30 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-01-30 |
Time |
06:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-01-30 11:26:38 | 1) SHT.A1.0 - TOILET ROOMS ARE SHOWN AS 6 '- 8 3/4" IN | | | WIDTH.THE ROOMS ARE NOT WIDE ENOUGH TO COMPLY WITH FAC | | | 604.3.1 AND THE FPC SEC. 405.3.1. THE MINIMUM WIDTH IS | | | 85" IF BUILT PERFECT OR 86" FOR CONSTRUCTION | | | TOLERANCES. | | | 2) SUBMIT AN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE FOOD OPERATION. | | | WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.2.1. | | | 3) SHT.A4.0 - THE REQUIRED CLEAR FLOOR SPACEDIMENSIONS | | | FOR THE PLUMBING FIXTURES DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE | | | WRITTEN DIMENSIONS; WATER CLOSET NEEDS 60 INCHES IN | | | WIDTH, 30 INCHES FOR THE LAVATORY EQUALS 90 INCHES | | | MINIMUM. THE PLAN SHOWS 80 3/4 ". CLARIFY. | | | 4) SHT. A.6 - SHOW THE MOUNTING HEIGHT FOR ALL TOILET | | | ROOM ACCESSORIES. ALL ACCESSORIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | 2010 FL. ACCESS. CODE. | | | 5) SHT. A6.0 - SHOW THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS OF ALL | | | FIXTURES FROM THE FINISH FLOOR.COMPLY W/2010 FAC | | | CHAPTER 306 FOR KNEE & TOE CLEARANCES AND CHAPTER 6 FOR | | | PLUMBING ELEMENTS. | | | 6) SHT. P.1 - SIZE ALL SECTIONS OF THE WASTE STACKS & | | | VENT STACKS, WPB AMEND.TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.2.1. | | | 7) SHT. P-1 - CLEANOUTS ARE REQD. IN THE BASE OF THE | | | STACKS PER 2010 FPC SEC.708.3.4. | | | 8) SHT.P-1 - RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS A DRY VENT ON FIXTURE | | | FD-2 AT DRIVE-THRU. DRY VENTS TO CONNECT ABOVE | | | CENTERLINE OF DRAIN PIPE. FPC SEC.905.3. | | | 9) FLOOR DRAINS NOT RECEIVING THE DISCHARGE FROM | | | INDIRECT WASTES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH TRAP PRIMERS PER | | | FPC SEC.1002.4. | | | 10) SHT. P-2 - HOSE BIBBS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH | | | SHUTOFF VALVES PER FPC SEC.606.2. | | | 11) ALL BEVERAGE LINWS SHALL BE EQUIPPED W/BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS COMPLYING WITH FPC SEC.608.16.1, ASSE 1022. | | | NON-CARBONATED AND COFFEE BEVERAGE DISPENSERS SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH FPC SEC.608.16.10, ASSE 1022. | | | 12) APPROVAL OF THE PLANS IS REQUIRED BY THE DEPT. OF | | | BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTEL & | | | RESTAURANTS. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-08-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-08-20 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-08-20 |
Time |
09:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-20 10:11:29 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 8/20/15 | | | | | | 1. APPROVAL OF ZBA 3322 ALLOWS FOR 92'-7" SETBACK FOR | | | DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOW EXPANSION FROM A RESIDENTIAL | | | ZONING DISTRICT. | | | | | | 2. SHEET SP1 REDLINED TO INCLUDE CORRECT REFERENCES TO | | | MINIMUM PARKING, LOT, AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. PROVISO | | | ADDED FOR ADDITIONAL STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR. | | | | | | 3. SHEET FRP.1 REDLINED TO INCLUDE CORRECT/CLARIFIED | | | PARKING SPACE LINE COLORING SCHEME. | | | | | | 4. LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER A | | | SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW AND A HOLD HAS BEEN | | | PLACED ON THE FINAL C.O. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-08-18 |
Time |
14:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-08-18 |
Time |
09:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-18 14:44:49 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED** | | | | | | 8/18/15 | | | | | | ITEMS TO BE REVISED: | | | | | | 1. APPLICANT TO SUBMIT REVISED DRAWNING SHOWING 3 FOOT | | | WIDE WINDOW ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BROADWAY ENTRY | | | DOOR. | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENT: | | | | | | 2. APPLICANT WILL SUBMIT SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH 6/23/15 ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-06-23 |
Time |
11:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-06-17 |
Time |
10:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-23 11:37:04 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 6/23/15 | | | | | | 1. A GENERAL CALCULATION SHOWS THAT THE WINDOW COVERAGE | | | ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE BUILDING FACADE ALONG BROADWAY | | | HAD DECREASED FROM 36% TO 22%. (EXISTING CODE | | | REQUIREMENT IS 70%). DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE | | | RENOVATION THE FULL 70% WILL NOT NEED TO BE ACHIEVED, | | | HOWEVER, A MINIMUM OF 36% WINDOW COVERAGE WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE | | | COMPLIANCE. ANY DECREASE BELOW WHAT IS EXISTING WILL | | | REQUIRE A VARIANCE. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5 FOOT SETBACK FOR THE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | 3. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN WILL NEED TO INCLUDE THE LIGHT | | | SPILLAGE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR | | | SEC. 94-310(D), ILLUMINATION SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN | | | 0.5 FC AT THE BOUNDARY TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONING | | | DISTRICT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ABUTS A RESIDENTIAL | | | ZONING DISTRICT TO THE EAST. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 4. RESPONSE COMMENTS INDICATE THAT SURVEY WAS PROVIDED, | | | HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO SURVEY INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL | | | PACKET. | | | | | | 5. ZONING APPROVAL OF THE DRIVE-THRU WINDOW EXPANSION | | | ON THE BACK IS PENDING SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF A | | | CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A WAIVER TO | | | THE BUILDING DISTANCE FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING | | | DISTRICT. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE POINT WHERE | | | CUSTOMER PARKING DRIVE LANE INTERSECTS DRIVE-THRU EXIT | | | LANES. | | | | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 7. THE CHART FOR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | INCORRECTLY LISTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE AND SETBACK | | | REQUIREMENTS. PLANS HAVE BEEN RED LINED TO INDICATE THE | | | CORRECTIONS. ANY REVISIONS TO SHEET SP 1 WILL NEED TO | | | INCORPORATE THESE CHANGES. | | | | | | 8. PLANS WERE RED LINED TO MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THE | | | PARKING CALCULATIONS WHICH REQUIRE 3 PARKING SPACES PER | | | 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA AND ONE HANDICAP | | | PARKING SPACES FOR UP TO 25 REGULAR PARKING SPACES | | | PROVIDED. ANY REVISIONS TO SHEET SP 1 WILL NEED TO | | | INCORPORATE THESE CHANGES. | | | | | | 9. DIMENSIONED PARKING SPACES ON THE SITE PLAN SHOW 9', | | | HOWEVER, THE STANDARD DETAIL SHOWS PARKING SPACES AT | | | 9.5'. YOU MAY WISH TO HAVE THESE CONSISTENT TO AVOID | | | CONFUSION WHEN THE PARKING LOT IS STRIPED. | | | | | | 10 SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPING. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: | | | A. DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR SEC. | | | 94-442(B)(2)(B) AND SEC. 94-443. | | | B. SHOW ANY UTILITIES AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | C. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS/BUFFERS THAT ARE A MINIMUM | | | OF 5 FEET IN WIDTH AS MEASURED FROM THE INSIDE OF THE | | | CURBING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittrid |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
Time |
12:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2015-02-03 |
Time |
08:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-02-10 12:14:37 | PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 2/10/15 | | | | | | BUILDING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. ZLDR SEC. 94-221(D)(5) REQUIRES STOREFRONTS ALONG | | | FRONTAGE LINES...EACH STOREFRONT MUST HAVE CLEAR GLAZED | | | AREAS, ALONG A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS FACADE | | | LENGTH, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE GROUND. | | | WHILE ADDITIONAL WINDOWS WITH CLEAR GLAZING IS | | | PREFERRED TO MEET THE MINIMUM GLAZING REQUIREMENT WITH | | | THE FACADE RENOVATION, IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THERE ARE | | | EXISTING INTERNAL FUNCTIONS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING | | | WHICH DO NOT MAKE THIS OPTIONS PRACTICAL. HOWEVER, | | | ADDITIONAL DESIGN ELEMENTS SUCH AS FAUX WINDOW, | | | TRELLIS, LANDSCAPING, AWNINGS, ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, | | | ETC. WILL NEED TO BE PROPOSED ALONG THE 'BLANK' PORTION | | | OF THE FACADE ALONG BROADWAY TO MEET THE INTENT OF THE | | | BMUD ZONING DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FOR AN URBAN, | | | PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED DISTRICT. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING | | | CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSED WINDOWS: | | | A. ZLDR SEC. 94-221(D)(6)(C) - 'WINDOWS SHALL BE | | | RECESSED A MINIMUM OF TWO INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE | | | OF THE FACADE.' | | | B. ZLDR SEC. 94-221(D)(6)(D) - 'MULTIPLE WINDOWS IN THE | | | SAME ROUGH OPENING SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A FOUR-INCH | | | WIDE POST AND SIT ON ONE CONTINUOUS SILL.' | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 3. INCLUDE PROPERTY SURVEY. | | | | | | 4. DIMENSION BUILDING SETBACK INCLUDING THE | | | ADDITION(S). | | | | | | 5. DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANTS IN THE BMUD TYPE II ZONING | | | DISTRICT ARE SUBJECT TO EXTRA REQUIREMENTS. ALL | | | PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE 100 FEET | | | FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT (ZLDR SEC. | | | 94-273(D)(66)). A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT ABUTS THE | | | SUBJECT PROPERTY TO THE EAST. PLEASE DIMENSION PLANS TO | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE. ANY NEW ADDITIONS WITHIN THIS 100 FOOT | | | SETBACK ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A WAVIER THROUGH THE | | | CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROCESS. | | | | | | 6. DIMENSION DRIVE AISLES TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | WITH MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIREMENTS (ZLDR SEC. 94-485). | | | | | | 7. HOW WILL SOMEONE IN THE PARKING LOT ACCESS THE | | | BUILDING ENTRANCE? PLEASE INDICATE THE ROUTE OF SAFE | | | PEDESTRIAN ACCESS. | | | | | | 8. 'NEW CONCRETE WALK' ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING IS NOT A FUNCTIONAL WALKWAY BECAUSE OF THE | | | MENU BOARD AND PROPOSED ADDITION. IF THIS IS INTENDED | | | TO BE A FUNCTIONAL WALKWAY OR PROVIDE A CONNECTION | | | PLEASE REVISE TO DEMONSTRATE FEASIBILITY AS A WALKWAY. | | | OTHERWISE, PROVIDE LANDSCAPING WITHIN THIS AREA RATHER | | | THAN CONCRETE. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE AND INDICATE THE LOCATION OF TRAFFIC | | | CONTROL SIGNAGE (I.E. DO NOT ENTER, ONE-WAY, STOP). | | | | | | 10. HOW DOES SOMEONE EXIT THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE? | | | IT APPEARS THEY WOULD NEED TO BACK-UP IN TO THE | | | ENTRANCE DRIVE TO BE ABOUT TO PROCEED IN THE ONE-WAY | | | DIRECTION AROUND THE BUILDING. THIS IS VERY UNSAFE FOR | | | ANY PARKING SPACE TO BE LOCATED IN FRONT OF THE | | | BUILDING WITH THE PROPOSED CONFIGURATION. PLEASE | | | REVISE. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE REVISE PARKING CALCULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH ZLDR SEC. 94-221(F)(1). THE SITE WILL LIKELY | | | EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PARKING PERMITTED, HOWEVER, THE SITE | | | IMPROVEMENTS ARE BRINGING THE SITE CLOSER TO COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE MAXIMUM PARKING REGULATIONS SO THE CAP WILL | | | NOT APPLY AS LONG AS YOU ARE REDUCING THE PARKING AND | | | NOT INCREASING IT. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | ZLDR SEC. 94-111(I). INDICATE LOCATION OF BICYCLE | | | PARKING ON SITE PLAN AND PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING THE | | | BICYCLE RACK AND MINIMUM SPACING DIMENSIONS. (NOTE: | | | BICYCLE RACK SHOULD BE AN INVERTED U, A, POST AND LOOP, | | | OR SIMILAR STYLE. WAVE STYLE RACKS ARE NOT PERMITTED.) | | | | | | 13. NEW LIGHTING IS PROPOSED FOR THE BUILDING. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ZLDR SEC. 94-309(A) AND 94-310(D). | | | | | | 14 PARKING STRIPING DETAIL WAS NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE DOUBLE LINE STRIPING DETAIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | ZLDR SEC. 94-485. | | | | | | 15. ALL PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE DIMENSIONED. | | | | | | 16. PROVIDE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING DETAILS FOR THE | | | HANDICAP PARKING SPACE. | | | | | | 17. BASED ON 1) EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS EXCEEDING $10,000 | | | (ZLDR SEC. 94-219(D)(9)(A)) AND/OR 2) THE VALUE OF | | | CONSTRUCTION ($200,000) EXCEEDING 50% OF THE | | | STRUCTURE'S VALUE ($44,334) ACCORDING TO THE PBC | | | PROPERTY APPRAISER (ZLDR SEC. 94-441(C)(2)), THE | | | LANDSCAPING ON THE SITE SHALL BE BROUGHT IN TO | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN | | | ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDRS. IF THE SITE CONFORMS TO | | | ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE | | | PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO | | | ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS | | | PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND IRRIGATION | | | PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL TO BRING THE | | | SITE INTO CONFORMITY. | | | | | | 18. THE CONCRETE ISLAND IN REAR OF PROPERTY BEING | | | PROPOSED WITH THE NEW PARKING LOT CONFIGURATION SHOULD | | | BE LANDSCAPED. | | | | | | 19. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS, AND SIMILAR DEVICES SHALL BE SCREENED FROM | | | VIEW ON ALL SIDE BY THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE BY | | | LANDSCAPING OR BUILT ELEMENTS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL | | | PART OF THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE. | | | | | | 20. WILL SITE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF ANY | | | TREES? IF YES, PLEASE SUBMIT A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT | | | APPLICATION THROUGH THE PLANNING DIVISION: HTTP://WPB.O | | | RG/PLANNING/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/37/2013/04/TREEALT | | | ERATIONPERMITREVISED03-12-09.PDF | | | | | | 21. A NEW DOUBLE DRIVE-THRU CONFIGURATION IS BEING | | | PROPOSED FOR THE SITE TO FACILITATE A MORE EFFICIENT | | | MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE THROUGH THE DRIVE-THRU. THERE IS | | | SOME CONCERN WITH EXCESSIVE STACKING TO SPILL OUT ON TO | | | BROADWAY. WILL THERE BE A PLAN IN PLACE TO PREVENT | | | EXCESSIVE STACKING AND BACK-UP ONTO BROADWAY? | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 22. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPING AND | | | PARKING LOT STRIPING. | | | | | | 23. SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR SIGNAGE AND ZONING | | | WILL CONDUCT THEIR REVIEW OF THE SIGNAGE AT THAT TIME. | | | | | | 24. ALL REFERENCES TO THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) CAN BE FOUND AT THE | | | FOLLOWING LINK: HTTPS://WWW.MUNICODE.COM/LIBRARY/FL/WES | | | T_PALM_BEACH/CODE_OF_ORDINANCES/TOC | | | | | | 25. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME PRIOR TO RESUBMITING TO | | | DISCUSS PROPOSED REVISIONS. | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | 2015-02-02 15:26:58 | 2/2/15 |
|
|