| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15010651 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-04-09 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-04-09 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-09 14:08:06 | NEW ADDRESS ASSIGNED - CHANGED FROM 650 OKEECHOBEE TO | | | 1099 FLORIDA AVE | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-15 |
Time |
11:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-15 |
Time |
11:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-15 12:09:13 | ****PROVISO**** | | | ****ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | EOR: THOMAS ROGERS, PE (ONM&J) | | | ARCHITECT: WILLIAM A. HANSER (LEO A DALY) | | | | | | 1. 105.13 PHASED PERMIT APPROVAL. AFTER SUBMITTAL OF | | | THE APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THE BUILDING | | | OFFICIAL IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THE | | | CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATIONS OR ANY OTHER PART OF A | | | BUILDING OR STRUCTURE BEFORE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS | | | FOR THE WHOLE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN | | | SUBMITTED. THE HOLDER OF SUCH PERMIT FOR THE FOUNDATION | | | OR OTHER PARTS OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL PROCEED | | | AT THE HOLDER?S OWN RISK WITH THE BUILDING OPERATION | | | AND WITHOUT ASSURANCE THAT A PERMIT FOR THE ENTIRE | | | STRUCTURE WILL BE GRANTED. CORRECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED | | | TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TECHNICAL CODES. THIS | | | PROVISION IS ONLY FOR THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, ALL | | | OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION MUST | | | BE SECURED PRIOR TO THIS PROVISION BEING APPLIED. | | | | | | 2. CONSTRUCTION HOURS ARE 7AM - 7PM MONDAY THROUGH | | | FRIDAY; 8AM - 8PM WEEKENDS, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 34-72. A WRITTEN EXCEPTION MAY | | | BE GRANTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL; PLEASE SUBMIT ANY | | | SUCH REQUESTS (IF NEEDED) TIMELY TO [email protected], CC | | | [email protected] AND [email protected]. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-13 |
Time |
15:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-13 |
Time |
15:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-13 15:53:37 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | EOR: THOMAS ROGERS, PE (ONM&J) | | | ARCHITECT: WILLIAM A. HANSER (LEO A DALY) | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IF YOU WISH TO | | | HAVE THIS REVIEW PASSED WITH PROVISO, OR IF REVISED | | | SHEETS A000 AND S9.1 ARE AVAILABLE FOR IMMEDIATE | | | SUBMISSION. | | | | | | 1. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN IS PENDING DECISION FROM | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL AND CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR; PLAN | | | HAS A DATE OF JUNE 22. | | | | | | 2. INFORMATIONAL ONLY - AS THIS IS A THRESHOLD JOB, | | | THREE SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3-7. OK | | | | | | 8A. FBC 705.8, PREVIOUS COMMENT WAS PARTIALLY | | | ADDRESSED. THE DIMENSION FROM THE PROPOSED GARAGE TO | | | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON THE PLAN AS | | | 30FT. SEE FBC 705.3: | | | | | | WHERE A NEW BUILDING IS TO BE ERECTED ON THE SAME LOT | | | AS AN EXISTING BUILDING, THE LOCATION OF THE ASSUMED | | | IMAGINARY LINE WITH RELATION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING | | | SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE EXTERIOR WALL AND THE OPENING | | | PROTECTION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING MEET THE CRITERIA | | | AS SET FOR THE IN SECTIONS 705.5 AND 705.8. | | | | | | REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE FOR THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING (APPEARS TO BE 12 FT FROM THE ASSUMED PROPERTY | | | LINE). THIS APPLIES ONLY TO THE PORTIONS OF THE | | | BUILDINGS WHICH DIRECTLY FACE THE OTHER BUILDING. | | | | | | IF ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE IS RELOCATED, SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | FOR EACH BUILDING AS APPLICABLE (FBC 705.5 AND 705.8). | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, ARCHITECT HAS A RESPONSE WHICH REFERS TO A | | | NEW ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE AND REVISED INFORMATION, BUT | | | THE SAME SHEET (AS000 DATED 5/18/2015 REVISION 3) WAS | | | SUBMITTED. IT APPEARS THAT THE ARCHITECT ADDRESSED THE | | | COMMENT AND REVISED THE SHEET BUT THE SHEET WAS NOT | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | IN THE EVENT THAT IS NOT THE CASE AND THE PREVIOUS | | | COMMENT WAS NOT CLEAR; TO CLARIFY, EACH BUILDING | | | (PROPOSED GARAGE AND EXISTING CONVENTION CENTER) IS TO | | | SHOW COMPLIANCE TO THE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN | | | THE TWO BUILDINGS. LINE ON THE PLAN DATED 5/18 IS SHOWN | | | 30FT FROM THE PROPOSED GARAGE, BUT ARCHITECT REFERS IN | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER TO AN EXCEPTION FOR PARKING GARAGES | | | WHICH ALLOWS UNLIMITED OPENINGS IF THE DISTANCE IS | | | GREATER THAN 10 FT. THEREFORE IT APPEARS THAT THE LINE | | | COULD BE RELOCATED TO SLIGHTLY OVER 10FT, THEN IT | | | APPEARS THAT THE DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING CONVENTION | | | CENTER WOULD THEN BE OVER 30FT. PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN | | | ACCORDINGLY AND INCORPORATE THE EXCEPTION INTO THE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 9-13. OK | | | | | | 14. PER CONVERSATION WITH ENGINEER, PLEASE REVISE S9.1 | | | SECTION 1, TO SHOW CONTINUOUS WATERPROOFING AT THE | | | FOOTING, FBC 1805.3.3. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS WAS | | | REVISED BUT THE SAME SHEET DATED 5/18/15 WAS SUBMITTED | | | (THEREFORE THE DETAIL WAS NOT REVISED). IT APPEARS THAT | | | THE SHEET WAS REVISED BUT NOT SUBMITTED, AS WAS | | | POSSIBLY THE CASE WITH SHEET AS000. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, WATERPROOFING SPEC SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED | | | BUT LACK THE SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP OR COVER LETTER. | | | THIS SUBMITTAL IS ACCEPTED BUT IN THE FUTURE PLEASE | | | HAVE ALL SUBMITTALS INCLUDE A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP | | | OR LETTER. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE RESPONSE LETTERS ARE | | | NOT TYPICALLY INCORPORATED INTO THE PERMIT RECORD. | | | | | | 15. OK | | | | | | 16. ADVISORY ONLY - CONSTRUCTION HOURS ARE 7AM - 7PM | | | MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; 8AM - 8PM WEEKENDS, CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 34-72. A WRITTEN | | | EXCEPTION MAY BE GRANTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL; | | | PLEASE SUBMIT ANY SUCH REQUESTS (IF NEEDED) TIMELY TO | | | [email protected], CC [email protected] AND [email protected]. | | | | | | 18. SEE PREVIOUS LIST: PER CONTRACTOR, NO ELECTRICAL | | | WORK IS A PART OF THIS PHASE. BE ADVISED THAT, PRIOR TO | | | FIRST POUR, THE BUILDING INSPECTOR WILL REQUIRE | | | INFORMATION FROM THE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT | | | WHICH VERIFIES THAT BUILDING GROUNDING IS NOT A PART OF | | | THIS PHASE. IN ORDER TO AVOID FIELD DELAYS, DESIGNER IS | | | ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT THIS INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | VERIFICATION THAT LIGHTNING PROTECTION IS NOT A PART OF | | | THE FOUNDATION PERMIT WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FIRST | | | POUR. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW, PER ARCHITECT, SHEETS F EE201 AND F EE 202 | | | WERE TO BE SUBMITTED TO ADDRESS THIS COMMENT. THEY WERE | | | NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMISSION. IT IS AT CONTRACTOR'S | | | RISK THAT AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS NOT ISSUED WITH THE | | | BUILDING PERMIT. BASED ON THE ELECTRICAL REVIEWER'S | | | PRELIMINARY CURSORY REVIEW OF THE ELECTRICAL AND | | | LIGHTNING PROTECTION PLANS PROVIDED WITH THE BUILDING | | | PERMIT 15060144, IT APPEARED THAT SOME ELECTRICAL OR | | | LIGHTNING PROTECTION WORK MAY BE REQUIRED IN THIS | | | PHASE. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-02 |
Time |
11:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-05-28 |
Time |
11:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-02 11:27:17 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | EOR: THOMAS ROGERS, PE (ONM&J) | | | ARCHITECT: WILLIAM A. HANSER (LEO A DALY) | | | | | | 1. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN IS ACCEPTABLE WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING EXCEPTION. | | | ALTHOUGH LIKELY NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT, PLEASE | | | SEE PAGE 10 ITEMS B AND C, AND FBC 1609.1.2(2); ALL | | | OPENINGS ARE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MISSILE | | | IMPACT RESISTANCE (REVISE LANGUAGE TO REMOVE REFERENCE | | | TO THE 60 FEET LIMITATION). | | | | | | 2. INFORMATIONAL ONLY - AS THIS IS A THRESHOLD JOB, | | | THREE SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3-7. OK | | | | | | 8A. FBC 705.8, PREVIOUS COMMENT WAS PARTIALLY | | | ADDRESSED. THE DIMENSION FROM THE PROPOSED GARAGE TO | | | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON THE PLAN AS | | | 30FT. SEE FBC 705.3: | | | | | | WHERE A NEW BUILDING IS TO BE ERECTED ON THE SAME LOT | | | AS AN EXISTING BUILDING, THE LOCATION OF THE ASSUMED | | | IMAGINARY LINE WITH RELATION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING | | | SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE EXTERIOR WALL AND THE OPENING | | | PROTECTION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING MEET THE CRITERIA | | | AS SET FOR THE IN SECTIONS 705.5 AND 705.8. | | | | | | REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE FOR THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING (APPEARS TO BE 12 FT FROM THE ASSUMED PROPERTY | | | LINE). THIS APPLIES ONLY TO THE PORTIONS OF THE | | | BUILDINGS WHICH DIRECTLY FACE THE OTHER BUILDING. | | | | | | IF ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE IS RELOCATED, SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | FOR EACH BUILDING AS APPLICABLE (FBC 705.5 AND 705.8). | | | | | | 9-11. OK | | | | | | 12. DELEGATED ENGINEERING (HAYWARD BAKER) TO BE | | | REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD, FBC 107. | | | | | | THIS MAY BE DONE BY INCORPORATING A REFERENCE INTO THE | | | PLAN (AS WAS DONE WITH THE SOILS REPORT), A SHOP | | | DRAWING REVIEW STAMP, OR A LETTER. OTHER METHODS WOULD | | | BE CONSIDERED. | | | | | | HB2 AND HB3 ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED; PLEASE SEE FBC | | | 471, FAC61G15-23.002 (DOC UMENTS PREPARED BY AN | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS). PLEASE FEEL FREE TO | | | CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS IF ENGINEER OBJECTS TO SIGNING | | | AND SEALING THESE SHEETS. | | | | | | 13. OK | | | | | | 14. PER CONVERSATION WITH ENGINEER, PLEASE REVISE S9.1 | | | SECTION 1, TO SHOW CONTINUOUS WATERPROOFING AT THE | | | FOOTING, FBC 1805.3.3. | | | | | | WATERPROOFING DETAILS (PER ENGINEERING DETAILS ARE TO | | | BE FOUND ON ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS) WERE NOT SUBMITTED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WATERPROOFING DETAILS FOR THIS PHASE. | | | | | | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT, IF SPEC SHEETS FOR THE | | | WATERPROOFING PRODUCTS ARE NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | | ISSUANCE, THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR | | | TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR OR DESIGNER IS ENCOURAGED | | | TO SUBMIT AT THIS TIME TO AVOID FIELD DELAYS. | | | | | | ALL SUBMITTALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD | | | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. | | | | | | 15. OK | | | | | | 16. ADVISORY ONLY - CONSTRUCTION HOURS ARE 7AM - 7PM | | | MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; 8AM - 8PM WEEKENDS, CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 34-72. A WRITTEN | | | EXCEPTION MAY BE GRANTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL; | | | PLEASE SUBMIT ANY SUCH REQUESTS (IF NEEDED) TIMELY TO | | | [email protected], CC [email protected] AND [email protected]. | | | | | | 17. OK | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 18. PER CONTRACTOR, NO ELECTRICAL WORK IS A PART OF | | | THIS PHASE. BE ADVISED THAT, PRIOR TO FIRST POUR, THE | | | BUILDING INSPECTOR WILL REQUIRE INFORMATION FROM THE | | | ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT WHICH VERIFIES THAT | | | BUILDING GROUNDING IS NOT A PART OF THIS PHASE. IN | | | ORDER TO AVOID FIELD DELAYS, DESIGNER IS ENCOURAGED TO | | | SUBMIT THIS INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
Time |
17:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-04-29 |
Time |
10:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-01 17:06:17 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | ****REVISED 5/14/15*** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | EOR: THOMAS ROGERS, PE (ONM&J) | | | ARCHITECT: WILLIAM A. HANSER (LEO A DALY) | | | | | | 1. INFORMATIONAL ONLY - A COPY OF THE THRESHOLD | | | INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THOMAS J. ROGERS, PE, | | | ONM&J, HAS BEEN ROUTED TO KEN CONRAD, CHIEF BUILDING | | | INSPECTOR. | | | | | | 2. INFORMATIONAL ONLY - AS THIS IS A THRESHOLD JOB, | | | THREE SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3. NA | | | | | | 4. THRESHOLD DOCUMENTS PENDING K. CONRAD APPROVAL. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME FOR THE SUPERINTENDENT. ** | | | | | | 5. THE SOILS PROVIDED IS NOT AN ORIGINAL. ORIGINAL | | | SIGNED, SEALED REPORTS ARE REQUIRED, FS471. | | | | | | THE SOILS HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE THE ENGINEER'S REVIEW | | | (REFERENCE ON SHEET S7.1). PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL, THE | | | EOR IS TO REVIEW ALL SUBMITTALS INCLUDING THE | | | GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, FBC 107. | | | | | | ** | | | | | | 6-7. OK | | | | | | 8A. FBC 705.8, SHOW LOCATION OF ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE | | | (BETWEEN THE EXISTING CONVENTION CENTER AND PROPOSED | | | PARKING GARAGE); PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO SHOW DISTANCE OF | | | EACH BUILDING TO THE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE (FBC 705.3) | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW; THIS WAS NOT PROVIDED. ARE THE TWO | | | BUILDINGS TO BE CONSIDERED ONE LARGE BUILDING? IF THEY | | | ARE TO BE CONSIDERED ONE BUILDING, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 501. IF | | | THEY ARE TWO BUILDINGS, ENOUGH INFORMATION FOR EACH | | | BUILDING IS TO BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | WITH FBC 705.3. | | | | | | PROVIDE THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED GARAGE, FBC TABLE 501. | | | | | | 8B, SHEET AS000 INCLUDES ?MIXED USE OCCUPANCY HOUSING | | | A?; PLEASE CLARIFY. SEE FBC CHAPTER 3. | | | | | | 8C, SHEET AS000 CITES SECTION 905.3 EXCEPTIONS 3 & 4 | | | FOR SPRINKLERS; THIS SECTION IS FOR STANDPIPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE REVISE OR CLARIFY. | | | | | | ADVISORY ONLY; SPRINKLERS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE ROOF | | | TOP CANOPY PER DISCUSSIONS WITH FIRE DEPT. THIS IS NOT | | | REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | 9-11. OK | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 12. EMAIL FROM CONTRACTOR WHICH CLARIFIES SCOPE UNDER | | | THIS PERMIT STATES THAT A TEMPORARY SHEET PILE WILL BE | | | INSTALLED. THIS IS SHOWN ON THE VIBROFLOTATION SITE | | | PLAN BUT IS NOT SHOWN ANYWHERE IN THE PLAN PROVIDED. | | | PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO INCORPORATE THE | | | TEMPORARY SHEET PILES INTO THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT, | | | FBC 107. | | | | | | 13. OK | | | | | | 14. PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING, PLEASE VERIFY THAT PLANS ARE | | | COMPLETE. FOR INSTANCE; SHEETS S1A AND S2A REFER TO | | | DETAIL 7 ON S9.3, BUT THAT SHEET WAS NOT PROVIDED (SEE | | | S2A AT GRIDLINE A13). DETAIL 8 S9.1 LACKS THE STIRRUP | | | SIZE. | | | | | | THE TRENCH DETAIL WAS PROVIDED, S9.1 SECTION 1, BUT THE | | | WATERPROOFING INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED (REFERS TO | | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS, WHICH WERE NOT PROVIDED). ALSO | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS DETAIL DOES NOT SHOW A WATERSTOP; | | | WATERPROOFING IS NOT CONTINUOUS TO PROTECT THE FOOTING | | | FBC 1805.3.3. | | | | | | SEE ALSO COMMENTS FROM VIBROFLOTATION PERMIT | | | APPLICATION 15031039 (IT IS NOT CLEAR AT THIS POINT | | | WHETHER THIS WILL BE A SEPARATE PERMIT OR INCORPORATED | | | INTO THIS FOUNDATION PERMIT): | | | | | | 15. FBC 3304.1, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT CONTRACTOR | | | ADVISE THE RESIDENTS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION | | | OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT. PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE | | | ADJACENT TOWNHOUSES HAVE EXPRESSED CONCERN REGARDING | | | THE STRUCTURAL IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACTOR | | | HAS EXPLAINED HOW THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED, FBC 3307.1. | | | PER CONTRACTOR, A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE ADJACENT | | | STRUCTURES WILL BE PERFORMED AND DOCUMENTED PRIOR TO | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | IF THE ANALYSIS DISCUSSED IS NOT DONE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE | | | OF THIS VIBROFLOTATION PERMIT, CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE | | | A LETTER STATING WHY THIS IS NOT NECESSARY AT THIS | | | TIME. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT CONTRACTOR PROVIDE | | | INFORMATION REGARDING THE TIMING AND NATURE OF THIS | | | PERMIT TO THE RESIDENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT. | | | | | | 16. ADVISORY ONLY - CONSTRUCTION HOURS ARE 7AM - 7PM | | | MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; 8AM - 8PM WEEKENDS, CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 34-72. A WRITTEN | | | EXCEPTION MAY BE GRANTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL; | | | PLEASE SUBMIT ANY SUCH REQUESTS (IF NEEDED) TIMELY TO | | | [email protected], CC [email protected] AND [email protected]. | | | | | | 17. FOR ALL NEW SHEETS FOR THIS PERMIT AND ALL NEW | | | SHEETS SUBMITTED ON OTHER RELATED PERMITS: | | | | | | A. INCLUDE THE ARCHITECT BUSINESS NUMBER ON EACH SHEET, | | | FS481. | | | B. CHANGE ADDRESS FROM "650 OKEECHOBEE BL" TO "1099 | | | FLORIDA AVE." | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-02-12 |
Time |
09:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-01-31 |
Time |
13:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-02-12 09:51:06 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. INFORMATIONAL ONLY - A COPY OF THE THRESHOLD | | | INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THOMAS J. ROGERS, PE, | | | ONM&J, HAS BEEN ROUTED TO KEN CONRAD, CHIEF BUILDING | | | INSPECTOR. | | | | | | 2. INFORMATIONAL ONLY - AS THIS IS A THRESHOLD JOB, | | | THREE SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3. INFORMATIONAL ONLY - IMPORTANT NOTICE: EFFECTIVE | | | MARCH 2, 2015 | | | | | | ALL PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED | | | ELECTRONICALLY | | | | | | UPON APPLICATION AND FEE PAYMENT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | | SUBMISSION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | 1 UPLOAD VIA THE PROJECTDOX PORTAL WITH DIGITAL | | | SIGNATURES OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AS APPLICABLE; USE | | | THE REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT | | | 2 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DIGITAL | | | SIGNATURES AS APPLICABLE; USE THE REQUIRED NAMING | | | CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT | | | 3 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER | | | DESIGN DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED; USE THE | | | REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT | | | 4 ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER DESIGN DOCUMENTS SUBJECT | | | TO ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DIGITIZE THE DOCUMENTS | | | | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND SPECIFIC PROCEDURES WILL BE | | | SENT TO YOU WHEN AVAILABLE | | | | | | FOR THIS THRESHOLD JOB, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | PROVIDING A SET OF ALL DOCUMENTS TO THE SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR. | | | | | | 4. FS 553.79(5), FBC 2010 110.3.7.1, THE ENFORCING | | | AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO PERFORM | | | STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT | | | TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THE | | | ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. PROVIDE A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR AGREEMENT SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES. | | | | | | PROVIDE A RESUME OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE AND COPIES OF | | | ALL CERTIFICATES/LICENSES AS APPLICABLE FOR PROPOSED | | | INSPECTORS. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME OR KEN CONRAD, CHIEF | | | BUILDING INSPECTOR, FOR MORE INFORMATION | | | ([email protected], 561-805-6666). | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT REFERRED TO ON SHEET | | | S7.1 (TIERRA SOUTH 7/15/14), FBC 2010 BUILDING 1803.5. | | | | | | 6. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT AND SUBMITTED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS | | | FS481. THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE MARKED *FOR | | | REFERENCE ONLY*. THE PAGES PROVIDED ARE REQUIRED | | | INFORMATION TO OBTAIN A FOUNDATION PERMIT, FBC 107. | | | | | | 6. THRESHOLD BLDG, REQUIRED STATEMENT: | | | | | | W.P.B. AMENDMENT 109.3.6.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING | | | WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE | | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT | | | THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S | | | KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE | | | APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE | | | LOCAL AUTHORITY IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | | | PLEASE INCLUDE THE THRESHOLD DESIGN COMPLIANCE | | | STATEMENT ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS (ALREADY ON THE | | | ENGINEERING SHEETS). | | | | | | 7. PLEASE INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY NOTICE | | | INTO THE PLAN: | | | | | | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION | | | 110.7 IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY | | | REGULATED BY THIS CODE SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER | | | SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE CONDITION OF ADJACENT | | | PROPERTY, UNLESS SUCH ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT | | | SAID PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT GRANTED BY THE | | | APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER TERMS OR CONDITIONS | | | AGREEABLE TO THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER. THIS | | | INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE CONTROL OF DUST, | | | NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFFS, DEBRIS, AND THE | | | STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION | | | ACTIVITY SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT LEGAL HISTORIC | | | SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING ADJACENT | | | PROPERTIES, AND MAY REQUIRE SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN | | | COMPLYING WITH ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | | POSITIVE DRAINAGE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. | | | ACCORDINGLY, DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS AND OWNERS OF ALL | | | NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, | | | POOLS, PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS OR SIMILAR ITEMS, ON | | | EXISTING PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A SIGNIFICANT DECREASE | | | OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCEL OR HAS ALTERED THE | | | DRAINAGE FLOW ON THE DEVELOPED PROPERTY SHALL, AS A | | | PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED | | | DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | | PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT, A | | | CERTIFICATION FROM A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL | | | OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | | | 8. ALTHOUGH LOCATION OF PROPOSED GARAGE RELATIVE TO LOT | | | LINES AND EXISTING STRUCTURE APPEAR COMPLIANT, IT IS | | | NOT POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE WITHOUT THE | | | INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW. PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO | | | INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IN ORDER TO | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 705.8: | | | | | | SHOW LOCATION OF ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE (BETWEEN THE | | | EXISTING CONVENTION CENTER AND PROPOSED PARKING | | | GARAGE); PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO SHOW DISTANCE OF EACH | | | BUILDING TO THE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE (FBC 705.3) | | | | | | BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE (FBC 602) AND OCCUPANCY | | | CLASSIFICATION OF EXISTING CONVENTION CENTER AND | | | PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE | | | | | | SPRINKLER INFORMATION FOR EXISTING CONVENTION CENTER | | | AND PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE (FBC TABLE 503) | | | | | | 9. SCOPE UNDER THIS FOUNDATION PERMIT PER CONTRACTOR | | | INCLUDES VIBROFLOTATION, EXCAVATION OF LOWER LEVEL, | | | CONCRETE WORK FOR FOOTINGS, ELEVATOR PITS, FOUNDATION | | | WALL AND FIRST LIFT OF COLUMNS. A TRENCH DRAIN IS SHOWN | | | ON S1B WITH A REFERENCE TO ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS, IS | | | THIS ALSO IN THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT? IF INCLUDED, | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL, FBC 107. IF NOT INCLUDED, DISREGARD | | | COMMENT. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE IN CREATING A SECURE SITE | | | AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH 3306.1 PROTECTION OF PEDESTRIANS | | | AND 3306.5 AND 3306.6 BARRIERS. | | | | | | 11. SHEET S7.1, SEVERAL REFERENCE STANDARDS REFER TO | | | *LATEST EDITION*. SEE FBC CHAPTER 35 AND REVISE TO | | | INDICATE THE STANDARD VERSION USED FOR DESIGN. IF A | | | STANDARD USED IN THE DESIGN OF THIS STRUCTURE IS NOT | | | THE STANDARD SPECIFIED BY FBC CHAPTER 35, THIS SHOULD | | | BE SUBMITTED USING FBC 104.11, ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS | | | AND METHODS. PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
Time |
12:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
Time |
10:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2015-04-14 |
Time |
13:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2015-04-14 |
Time |
13:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-14 13:25:28 | 2ND REVIEW | | | | | | PER RANDY SHURR THEY ARE NOT DOING ANY ELECTRICAL WORK | | | AT THIS PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE EMAIL IN FILE. RL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
Time |
12:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
Time |
11:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-02-10 12:09:00 | NO ELECTRICAL PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THIS | | | PORTION OF CONSTRUCTION. RL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-06-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-06-22 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-06-22 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-06-22 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-06-22 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-22 10:16:51 | SEE E15040015 FOR CIVIL APPROVAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-05-22 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-05-22 |
Time |
09:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-22 11:02:05 | 1. PLEASE CONNECT THE FIRE RISER DRAIN TO THE SANITARY | | | SYSTEM RATHER THAN THE STORMWATER SYSTEM. PER NFPA | | | STANDARDS: WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DISCHARGE | | | OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING WALL, THE DRAIN SHOULD BE PIPED | | | TO A SUMP, WHICH IN TURN SHOULD DISCHARGE BY GRAVITY OR | | | BE PUMPED TO A WASTE WATER DRAIN OR SEWER. | | | | | | 2. VERIFY THAT THE PEAK FLOWS FROM THE VARIOUS SUMP | | | PUMPS (DRAINAGE AND SEWER) HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE | | | SANITARY SEWER AND STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS FROM | | | THE SITE. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
Time |
12:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
Time |
12:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-07 12:47:57 | LAND STABILIZATION / EROSION CONTROL BOND TO BE | | | SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY LAND DISTURBING | | | ACTIVITIES. TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER ENGINEERING | | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL E15040015. | | | | | | PER ANGELA JONES - OK TO APPROVE PRIOR TO SITE PLAN | | | APPROVAL. LOCATION OF BUILDING HAS BEEN FINALIZED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-03-03 |
Time |
11:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-03-03 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-03-03 11:41:28 | ENGINEERING DEPT COMMENTS | | | | | | 1. AS MENTIONED DURING THE PPRC REVIEW, AN ENGINEERING | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | PROJECT. THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. TECHNICAL | | | DETAILS OF THE WATER, SEWER, STORMWATER, TRAFFIC | | | CIRCULATION, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION WILL BE | | | REVIEWED AS PART PART OF THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN | | | BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 2. CONDITIONS OF FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL MUST BE MET | | | PRIOR TO BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY | | | OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROJECT WILL PROVIDE | | | ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. COMPLIANCE | | | WITH CHAPTER 40E-4 WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THIS PROVISION [SECTIONS 90-201, 94-35(C )(11), AND | | | 94-307]. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-06-26 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-06-26 |
Time |
15:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-26 15:16:31 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | THIS REVIEW APPROVAL IS FOR THE FOUNDATION ONLY. | | | | | | THE REQUIREMENT OF A FULL SPRINKLER SYSTEM ON ALL | | | FLOORS REMIANS UNDER REVIEW AND IS NOT APPROVED UNDER | | | THIS PERMIT. | | | | | | THE LIFE SAFETY GENERAL INFORMATION ON SHEET AS000 HAS | | | NOT BEEN FULLY REVIEWED AND/OR APPROVED BY FIRE | | | PREVENTION REGARDING "OPEN" OR "CLOSED" EXTERIOR WALL | | | OPENINGS. GREATER DETAIL AND EXPLANATION IS NEEDED FOR | | | THE EXTERIOR WALL COVERINGS AND THEIR COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA LIFE SAFETY CODE, NFPA | | | 101 CHAPTER 42, NFPA 88A AND IT'S A HIGHRISE BUILDING. | | | | | | PER NFPA 88A - | | | 5.5 OPENING REQUIREMENTS FOR OPEN PARKING STRUCTURES. | | | 5.5.1 EACH PARKING LEVEL SHALL HAVE WALL OPENINGS OPEN | | | TO THE | | | ATMOSPHERE, FOR AN AREA OF NOT LESS THAN 0.4 M2 FOR | | | EACH LINEAR | | | METER (1.4 FT2 FOR EACH LINEAR FOOT) OF ITS EXTERIOR | | | PERIMETER. | | | | | | PROVIDE DETAILS THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN ON EACH TEIR | | | COMPLIES BEFORE AND THEN AFTER THE FACADE IS APPLIED. | | | | | | 5.5.2 SUCH OPENINGS SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED OVER 40 | | | PERCENT OF | | | THE BUILDING PERIMETER OR UNIFORMLY OVER TWO OPPOSING | | | SIDES. | | | | | | PROVIDE DEATILS THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN ON EACH WALL | | | BEFORE AND THEN AFTER THE FACADE IS APPLIED. | | 2015-06-15 14:27:00 | NEW DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-05-20 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-05-20 |
Time |
15:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-20 16:25:27 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | THIS REVIEW APPROVAL IS FOR THE FOUNDATION ONLY. | | | | | | THE REQUIREMENT OF A FULL SPRINKLER SYSTEM ON ALL | | | FLOORS REMIANS UNDER REVIEW AND IS NOT APPROVED UNDER | | | THIS PERMIT. | | | | | | THE LIFE SAFETY GENERAL INFORMATION ON SHEET AS000 HAS | | | NOT BEEN FULLY REVIEWED AND/OR APPROVED BY FIRE | | | PREVENTION REGARDING "OPEN" OR "CLOSED" EXTERIOR WALL | | | OPENINGS. GREATER DETAIL AND EXPLANATION IS NEEDED FOR | | | THE EXTERIOR WALL COVERINGS AND THEIR COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA LIFE SAFETY CODE, NFPA | | | 101 CHAPTER 42, NFPA 88A AND IT'S A HIGHRISE BUILDING. | | | | | | PER NFPA 88A - | | | 5.5 OPENING REQUIREMENTS FOR OPEN PARKING STRUCTURES. | | | 5.5.1 EACH PARKING LEVEL SHALL HAVE WALL OPENINGS OPEN | | | TO THE | | | ATMOSPHERE, FOR AN AREA OF NOT LESS THAN 0.4 M2 FOR | | | EACH LINEAR | | | METER (1.4 FT2 FOR EACH LINEAR FOOT) OF ITS EXTERIOR | | | PERIMETER. | | | | | | PROVIDE DETAILS THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN ON EACH TEIR | | | COMPLIES BEFORE AND THEN AFTER THE FACADE IS APPLIED. | | | | | | 5.5.2 SUCH OPENINGS SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED OVER 40 | | | PERCENT OF | | | THE BUILDING PERIMETER OR UNIFORMLY OVER TWO OPPOSING | | | SIDES. | | | | | | PROVIDE DEATILS THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN ON EACH WALL | | | BEFORE AND THEN AFTER THE FACADE IS APPLIED. | | 2015-05-19 10:38:50 | NEW PLANS SUBMITTED. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-04-13 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-04-13 |
Time |
15:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-13 16:43:00 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | THIS REVIEW APPROVAL IS FOR THE FOUNDATION ONLY. | | | | | | THE REQUIREMENT OF A FULL SPRINKLER SYSTEM ON ALL | | | FLOORS REMIANS UNDER REVIEW AND IS NOT APPROVED UNDER | | | THIS PERMIT. | | | | | | THE LIFE SAFETY GENERAL INFORMATION ON SHEET AS000 HAS | | | NOT BEEN FULLY REVIEWED AND/OR APPROVED BY FIRE | | | PREVENTION REGARDING "OPEN" OR "CLOSED" EXTERIOR WALL | | | OPENINGS. GREATER DETAIL IS NEEDED FOR THE EXTERIOR | | | WALL COVERINGS AND THEIR COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA LIFE SAFETY CODE, NFPA 101 | | | CHAPTER 42, NFPA 88A AND IT'S A HIGHRISE BUILDING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-01-29 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-01-29 |
Time |
13:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
Time |
12:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-06-12 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-15 14:32:36 | SENT TO C31 SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-02 |
Time |
11:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-05-19 |
Time |
10:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-19 10:38:13 | RE-SUBMITTAL SENT TO C27 SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
Time |
12:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-03-27 |
Time |
14:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-09 14:09:07 | ****EXPEDITED**** | | | C25 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-03-03 |
Time |
11:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-01-21 |
Time |
08:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-02-10 |
Time |
17:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-01-31 |
Time |
14:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-02-12 09:28:19 | COUNTY OWNED - SEE COPY OF EMAIL FROM WILLIE SWOPE, | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | NO IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT REQUIRED | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-02-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-02-11 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-02-11 |
Time |
16:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
Time |
06:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-06-29 |
Time |
13:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-23 |
Time |
06:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-21 |
Time |
10:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-23 06:03:49 | 1) SHT. F-PP110C - THE STORM DRAIN AT GRIDLINE F7 IS | | | SHOWN AS 10" (8300 SQ.FT.) AND AS AN 8" STORM DRAIN ON | | | SHT.F-PP402. CLARIFY. | | | 2) SHT. F-PP402 SHOWS 2" DRAINS FROM THE AUTOMATIC FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM DISCHARGING INTO THE STORM DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM. THIS ARRANGEMENT APPEARS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS | | | AND ON SEVERAL PAGES.THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM CANNOT | | | DISCHARGE TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PER CITY OF WPB | | | CODE OF ORDINANCES ARTICLE V, SEC.90-203. | | | 3) SHT.F-PP402 - THERE IS A HORIZONTAL 4" ST NEAR | | | GRIDLINE D-12 THAT JUST ENDS AND CONNECTS TO NOTHING. | | | MAY BE TYPO. CLARIFY. | | | 4) SHT. F-PP402 - 4" ST UP TO GROUND LEVEL NOT SHOWN ON | | | PLAN F-PP110A BETWEEN COLS."C" & "D" AND "12" & "13". | | | CLARIFY. | | | 5) SHT.F-PP402 - 10" ST SHOWN ON SHEET F-PP402 BY | | | ELEVATORS #1 & #2 BUT NOT ON F-PP110A. CLARIFY. | | | 6) SHT. F-PP110A & SHT. F-PP110B SHOWS HUB DRAINS IN | | | STAIRWELLS #1 & #2.THESE STAIRWELLS APPEAR TO BE RATED | | | ENCLOSED STAIRS. THE HUB DRAINS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN | | | THE STAIRWELLS PER THE 2010 FBC SEC.1022.4. | | | 7) SHT. F-PP110A - PROVIDE A MATCH LINE REFERENCE AT | | | THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE SOUTH OF COLUMN LINE #8. WPB | | | AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 8) SHT.F-PP120A - SHOW THE DISCHARGE POINT OF THE 2" | | | SANITARY PUMP LINE OR REFER TO THE DRAWING WHERE IT CAN | | | BE FOUND. WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 9) SHT. F-PP401 - IDENTIFY THE AREAS ON THE CONDENSATE | | | RISERS WHERE THEY ARE LOCATED, THE AHU'S ARE NOT SHOWN | | | ON THE PLAN. DO THE SAME ON THE PLAN VIEWS. WPB AMEND. | | | TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 10) SHT. F-PP401 - EXPAND THE SANITARY RISER FOR THE | | | TOILET ROOM SO I CAN REVIEW IT. IT IS CRAMMED AND | | | DIFFICULT TO READ. LABEL THE PLUMBING FIXTURES.WPB | | | AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 11) THE EJECTOR CONNECTION TO THE SANITARY SYSTEM SHALL | | | CONNECT A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET FROM THE BASE OF ANY STACK | | | PER 2010 FBC- PLUMBING SEC.712.3.5. | | | 12) SHT. F-PP120B - COLUMN 12E NOTES 3/4" CW DN. BUT | | | NOTHING IS SHOWN. CLARIFY. | | | 13) SUBMIT A WATER RISER DIAGRAM FOR ALL THE WATER | | | PIPING TO BE DONE. WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. | | | 107.3.5.1.3. | | | 14) ALL HUB DRAINS AND FLOOR DRAINS CONNECTED TO THE | | | SANITARY SYSTEM SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH TRAP PROIMERS | | | PER 2010 FBC-PLUMBING SEC.100.2.4. THIS INCLUDES THE | | | ONE S FOR THE ELEVATORS SUMPS. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-23 |
Time |
11:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-23 |
Time |
03:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-23 11:01:29 | 1) SHT.F-PP 402 SHOWS SUMP PUMPS IN THE ELEVATOR | | | SHAFTS. THE SUMP PUMPS SHALL BE INDIRECTLY CONNECTED TO | | | THE PLUMBING SYSTEM PER THE 2010 FPC SEC. 301.6 AND | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 1003.4. | | | 2) SUBMIT A DETAIL AND SIZING CALCULATIONS FOR THE OIL | | | SEPARATOR.COMPLY WITH 2010 FPC SEC. 1004.4.2.1. | | | 3) SHT. F-PP110 REFERS TO SHT.F-PP401. THERE IS NO SUCH | | | SHEET IN THIS SET OF PLANS. CLARIFY. | | | 4) SUBMIT DETAILS ON THE PUMPS IN THE ELEVATOR SHAFTS, | | | THE STORM DRAIMAGE AN`D THE SEWAGE PUMPS. WPB AMEND.TO | | | 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 5) THERE IS AN 8" STORM DRAIN NEAR GRID LINE D2 THAT IS | | | SHOWN ON F-PP402 BUT IS NOT SHOWN ON PLAN. CLARIFY. | | | 6) SHT. F-PP110 A - AS DRAWN, IT APPEARS THAT THE PUMP | | | DISCHARGE FROM THE ELEVATOR SUMPS ARE PUMPING AGAINST | | | EACH OTHER. CLARIFY. | | | 7) SUBMIT A SEPARATE RISER FOR THE UNDERGROUND | | | CONDENSATE AND FOR THE SANITARY. THE PIPING ON SHT. | | | F-PP402 IS CRAMMED SO CLOSE TOGETHER IT IS ALMOST | | | IMPOSSIBLE TO REVIEW. EXPAND THE PIPING DIAGRAM SO A | | | COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW CAN BE PEFORMED. DO THE SAME FOR | | | THE SANITARY PIPING ALSO. | | | WPB AMEND.TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 8) SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE OIL INTERCEPTOR ON THE PLAN | | | VIEW DRAWING. WPB AMEND.TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-01-29 |
Time |
10:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-01-29 |
Time |
09:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-01-29 10:57:05 | !) SUBMIT A PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM FOR THE FLOOR DRAIN | | | SYSTEM BEING INSTALLED IN THE GARAGE. WPB AMEND. TO | | | 2010 FBC SEC.107.1.2.1, 107.3.5.1.3. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-15 |
Time |
14:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-12 |
Time |
17:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-02 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-06-02 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-02 11:12:30 | SEE BUILDING COMMENT #1 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-05-04 |
Time |
07:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-05-04 |
Time |
07:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-04 07:28:03 | 5/4 PENDING RECEIPT OF CONTRACTOR'S RESUME | | | TO BE APPROVED BY KCONRAD | | | ONE SET ON SH DESK | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-01-31 |
Time |
13:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-01-31 |
Time |
13:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-01-31 14:01:54 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. INFORMATIONAL ONLY - A COPY OF THE THRESHOLD | | | INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THOMAS J. ROGERS, PE, | | | ONM&J, HAS BEEN ROUTED TO KEN CONRAD, CHIEF BUILDING | | | INSPECTOR. | | | | | | 2. FS 553.79(5), FBC 2010 110.3.7.1, THE ENFORCING | | | AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO PERFORM | | | STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT | | | TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THE | | | ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. PROVIDE A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR AGREEMENT SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES. | | | | | | PROVIDE A RESUME OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE AND COPIES OF | | | ALL CERTIFICATES/LICENSES AS APPLICABLE FOR PROPOSED | | | INSPECTORS. | | | | | | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME OR KEN CONRAD, CHIELF | | | BUILDING INSPECTOR, FOR MORE INFORMATION | | | ([email protected], 561-805-6666). | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-06-26 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-06-26 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-15 14:32:06 | NEW DRAWING SUBMITTED. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-05-26 |
Time |
17:41 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-05-26 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-19 10:39:44 | NEW PLANS SUBMITTED. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
Time |
12:28 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
Time |
11:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-17 12:30:47 | THIS APPROVAL IS ONLY FOR THE FOUNDATION. THE SITE | | | PLAN, ELEVATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT ARE NOT | | | APPROVED BY THIS PERMIT. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-02-06 |
Time |
15:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-02-06 |
Time |
15:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-02-06 15:30:33 | FAILED | | | | | | THE SITE PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED. | | | ZONING WILL REIVEW ONCE THE SITE PLAN HAS BEEN | | | APPROVED. | | 2015-02-02 16:06:01 | 2/2/15 |
|
|