| 2014-12-12 10:53:05 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | ****LOFTIN PLACE 3RD & 4TH LEVEL POST TENSION |
| | ENGINEERING**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | 1. THERE IS A COVER SHEET FOR "PT CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | GRAVITY LOADS", BUT NO CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | CALCULATIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAC61G15-23. |
| | SIGNATURE/SEAL ARE COPIES AND TITLE BLOCK IS LACKING. |
| | |
| | 2. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS |
| | FS471 (PTE TENDON AND REINFORCEMENT PLANS). |
| | ADDITIONALLY, THERE SHOULD BE A TITLE BLOCK FOR THE |
| | ENGINEER SEALING THE PLAN. IF THE ENGINEER IS WORKING |
| | THROUGH A COMPANY, THAT COMPANY NAME AND CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER ARE TO BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK. THE |
| | SEAL IS TO COMPLY WITH FAC61G15-23. |
| | |
| | TITLE BLOCK IS LACKING (UNLESS THE TITLE BLOCK IS "PTE |
| | SYSTEMS INT'L LLC, IN WHICH CASE THERE SHOULD BE A |
| | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION), SEAL IS REDUCED AND |
| | ILLEGIBLE, SIGNATURE IS A PHOTOCOPY. |
| | |
| | IF CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE |
| | SUBMITTALS DIGITALLY, PLEASE CONTACT [email protected]. |
| | |
| | 2. SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP USED ON THIS SUBMITTAL IS |
| | ILLEGIBLE; IN PARTICULAR THE NAME OF THE ENGINEERING |
| | FIRM. FAC61G15-30. |
| | |
| | **ADDED 2/2/16** |
| | THE SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP FOR BBM STRUCTURAL |
| | ENGINEERS ON THE COVER LETTER IS LEGIBLE, BUT IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHICH ENGINEER REVIEWED THE DELEGATED |
| | ENGINEERING. THE INITIALS ARE "HW"; PLEASE REVISE TO |
| | INCLUDE THE NAME AND PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NUMBER. THE |
| | LETTER IS FOR THE PT CALCULATIONS, BUT CALCULATIONS |
| | WERE NOT SUBMITTED. EITHER THE SHOP DRAWING REVIEW |
| | STAMP ON THE PLANS SHOULD BE MADE LEGIBLE, WITH THE |
| | INDIVIDUAL PERFORMING THE REVIEW CLEAR, OR THE REVIEW |
| | LETTER SHOULD BE REVISED TO INCLUDE THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
