| 2014-10-17 10:37:04 | WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.2.1.4. - |
| | 1) PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE. |
| | THESE PLANS WOULD ALSO BE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD PER FL. |
| | ADMIN. CODE RULE 61G15-23.002. |
| | 2) THE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | STATES "GREASE TRAP A - FOR BAR" YET THE SUBMITTED SITE |
| | PLANS SHOWS THE LOCATION FOR GREASE TRAP "A" AND ALSO |
| | FOR GREASE TRAPS "A"."B", & "C". . WHICH IS IT, A OR B |
| | OR C ? CLARIFY. CLEARLY WRITE THE FULL DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE WORK ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | 3) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ALL PLANS/ DOCUMENTS FOR THIS |
| | PERMIT PER WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.1. COMPILE |
| | ALL DOCUMENTS INTO 2 SETS STAPLED TOGETHER. |
| | 4) TWO DIFFERENT DESIGNS FOR THE 750 GAL. CONCRETE |
| | VAULT TANKS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. YOU MUST IDENTIFY WHICH |
| | DESIGN WILL BE USED.THE DESIGN FROM US CONCRETE |
| | PRODUCTS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH SEC. 1003.5.2 & 1003.5.3 |
| | OF THE 2010 FPC. |
| | 5) YOU HAVE SUBMITTED GREASE INTERCEPTOR SIZING |
| | CALCULATIONS FROM THE 2010 FPC FOR CONCRETE VAULT TYPE |
| | GREASE INTERCEPTOR AND ALSO FOR A SCHIER INTERCEPTOR. |
| | WHICH ONE ARE YOU USING? |
| | 6) YOU HAVE SUBMITTED GREASE INTERCEPTOR SIZING |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR RESTAURANTS AND ALSO FOR OTHER |
| | ESTABLISHMENTS WITH COMMERCIAL KITCHENS. WHICH ONE IS |
| | IT? |
| | I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT DOCUMENTS YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO USE |
| | FOR THIS PERMIT SINCE THIS SUBMITTAL IS VAGUE AND |
| | CONFUSING WITH THE CONFLICTING DOCUMENTS.WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, ENSURE THAT ALL APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ARE |
| | ARRANGED IN TWO SETS WITH ALL INFORMATION CLEAR ENOUGH |
| | FOR A COMPLETE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW |
| | TIM LARGE |
| | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR |
| | 561-805-6692 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |