City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Permit 14090452

Plan Review Stops For Permit 14090452

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	2015-05-27			Cont ID
Sent By	shill			Date	2015-05-27	Time	09:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	shill			Date	2015-05-27	Time	09:08	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2015-04-28			Cont ID
Sent By	shill			Date	2015-04-28	Time	15:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	shill			Date	2015-04-28	Time	15:09	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-28 15:17:58	**CORRECTIONS**

	SAMANTHA HILL
	BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
	[email protected]
	561-805-6724

	1. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE TWO IDENTICAL COLLATED
	SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS, FBC 107.

	AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO TRY TO PUT TOGETHER TWO SETS.
	SOME OF THE ENGINEERING PAGES PROVIDED ARE PHOTOCOPIES;
	A MIAMI DADE NOA (13-0419.05) IS LACKING PAGE NUMBERS
	AT THE BOTTOM. DUE TO HEAVY WORK LOAD, I AM UNABLE TO
	DO THIS FOR THE CONTRACTOR AT THIS TIME.

	2. ENGINEERING FOR THE ENHANCED FASTENING FOR THE ROOF
	RECOVER IS SPECIFIC TO THAT PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEE
	GENERAL LIMITATION #7, PROVIDE ENGINEERING FOR THE
	ENHANCED FASTENING REQUIRED FOR THE REROOF PRODUCT
	APPROVAL, FS471, FBC 1609.

	3. THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL FOR PRELIMINARY
	REVIEW LACKS THE ADDRESS AND THE OWNER'S SIGNATURE. THE
	CONTRACTOR CAN SIGN FOR OWNER IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS A
	NOTARIZED POWER OF ATTORNEY, FBC 107.

	4. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE NOTIFIY VIA EMAIL. INCLUDE
	"REROOF RESUBMITTED 14090452" IN THE SUBJECT LINE. I
	WILL PRIORITIZE THE RESUBMITTAL AND, IF POSSIBLE, DO
	THE REVIEW WITHIN THREE BUSINESS DAYS.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2015-04-16			Cont ID
Sent By	shill			Date	2015-04-16	Time	09:14	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	shill			Date	2015-04-16	Time	07:08	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-16 09:13:47	**CORRECTIONS**

	SAMANTHA HILL
	BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
	[email protected]
	561-805-6724

	1. AN UNSIGNED LETTER, NOT ON LETTERHEAD, FROM AN
	UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL HAS STATED THAT THIS IS A RECOVER
	APPLICATION, AND AREAS FOR WHICH MOISTURE EXCEED
	ACCEPTABLE LEVELS WILL BE REROOFED. THIS IS IN CONFLICT
	WITH THE APPLICATION WHICH STATES "REROOF FLAT ROOF,
	7740 SF, METAL DECK, MRH 18'FT." A ROOF RECOVER NOA WAS
	SUBMITTED. PROVIDE AN APPLICATION, COMPLETED BY THE
	CONTRACTOR, WHICH INCLUDES THE CORRECT SCOPE OF WORK.
	IT APPEARS THAT ONE OF OUR STAFF MEMBERS COMPLETED THE
	APPLICATION AS THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITTED IT BLANK.

	2. PROVIDE A VERIFIABLE COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS
	JOB, FBC 109, FS489.

	3. PROVIDE A REROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE AREAS
	WHICH WILL BE REROOFED RATHER THAN RECOVERED, WITH
	ENGINEERING FOR ENHANCED FASTENING IF APPLICABLE, FBC
	1609.

	4. DO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:

	A. HAVE THE ENGINEER PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE EXTENT
	OF AREA WHICH WILL REQUIRE A REROOF RATHER THAN A
	RECOVER. TWO OF THE HIGH MOISTURE AREAS ARE IN CLOSE
	PROXIMITY (APPEAR TO BE 10' AND 20' APART). WILL THE
	AREA BETWEEN THESE TWO AREAS BE TREATED AS A RECOVER OR
	WILL THEY BE REMOVED? THE PLAN SHOULD SHOW LOCATIONS
	WITH DIMENSIONS, AS WELL AS DIMENSIONS OF THE OVERALL
	ROOF. THE PLAN SHOULD BE CLEAR THAT THE REPAIR AREA IS
	LESS THAN 25%,

	OR

	B. OBTAIN AN "INSPECTION ONLY" PERMIT, $150 (USE THE
	COUNTY WIDE BUILDING PERMIT FORM, DESCRIPTON OF WORK IS
	"INSPECTION TO VERIFY ROOF AREA TO BE REPLACED IS LESS
	THAN 25% IN ORDER TO OBTAIN ROOF RECOVER PERMIT
	14090452." HALF OF THE PERMIT FEE ($75) WILL BE APPLIED
	TO THIS PERMIT APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF THIS
	INSPECTION WOULD BE TO VERIFY THAT AREA TO BE REPAIRED
	IS LESS THAN 25%, DISCUSS METHOD PROPOSED.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2014-09-13			Cont ID
Sent By	shill			Date	2014-09-13	Time	09:53	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	shill			Date	2014-09-13	Time	09:53	Sent To

Notes

2014-09-13 10:02:48	**CORRECTIONS**

	SAMANTHA HILL
	BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
	[email protected]
	561-805-6724

	1. MOISTURE SURVEY SHOWS UNACCEPTABLE MOISTURE LEVELS
	IN PORTIONS OF THE ROOF DECK. PERMIT APPLICATION STATES
	THIS IS A "REROOF" (REMOVAL OF EXISTING ROOF DOWN TO
	DECK, INSTALL NEW DECK) BUT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL
	SUBMITTED IS FOR A "RECOVER" (INSTALL A NEW ROOF OVER
	THE EXISTING ROOF).

	THE MOISTURE SURVEY SHOWS AREAS OF HIGH (UNACCEPTABLE)
	MOISTURE, BUT NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED AS TO HOW
	THIS WILL BE RESOLVED. SEE FBC 2010 EXISTING BUILDING
	611.3(1), REMOVAL OF EXISTING ROOF REQUIRED WHRE THE
	EXISTING ROOF OR ROOF COVERING IS WATER SOAKED (SEE
	CODE FOR FULL TEXT OF THIS SECTION),

	2. SEE FBC 2010 EXISTING BUILDING 611.1.1, NOT MORE
	THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL ROOF AREA OR ROOF SECTION
	OF AN EXISTING BUILDING SHALL BE REPAIRED. ENGINEER IS
	TO DETERMINE THE PERCENTAGE OF EXISTING ROOF OR ROOF
	COVERING IS REQUIRED TO BE REPAIRED PRIOR TO THE
	PROPOSED RECOVER.

	3. THIS ADDRESS HAS AN EXPIRED PERMIT, 08080132. IF IT
	IS DETERMINED THAT A REROOF IS REQUIRED RATHER THAN A
	ROOF RECOVER, A MECHANICAL PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED AS
	WELL AS A DETAIL AS TO HOW THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
	WILL BE INSTALLED, FBC 107, FBC 1509.7.

	TWO OF THE FOUR MECHANICAL UNITS ARE LOCATED IN AREAS
	OF UNACCEPTABLE MOISTURE. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT
	THESE AREAS CAN BE REPAIRED, REINSTALLATION OF THE
	MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY BE REQUIRED. IF THIS IS THE
	CASE, A MECHANICAL SUB PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED AS WELL
	AS A DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION, FBC 1609, FBC 1509.7.

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	3	Status	N	Date	2015-05-27			Cont ID
Sent By	shill			Date	2015-05-27	Time	09:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	shill			Date	2015-05-22	Time		Sent To

Notes

2015-05-22 17:38:36

SENT TO S HILL

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	2	Status	N	Date	2015-04-28			Cont ID
Sent By	shill			Date	2015-04-28	Time	15:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	shill			Date	2015-04-17	Time		Sent To

Notes

2015-04-17 18:34:32

SENT TO S HILL

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	1	Status	N	Date	2015-04-16			Cont ID
Sent By	shill			Date	2015-04-16	Time	09:13	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	shill			Date	2015-04-15	Time	15:07	Sent To	B

Notes

***NONE***