Plan Review Details - Permit 14090270
Plan Review Stops For Permit 14090270
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2015-01-27 Time 10:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2015-01-27 Time 10:02 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2014-12-22 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-12-22 Time 16:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-12-22 Time 12:35 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-22 16:58:142ND REVIEW: FBC 2010
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 BUILDING
  
 1) ( REPEAT COMMENT ) THE WIND DESIGN DATA ON SHEET S-3
 OF THE PLANS IS INCORRECT. THE WIND SPEED IS 170 MPH
 AND THE 2010 FBC REFERENCES ASCE 7-10. FBC R301.2.1 AND
 FBC-R CHAPTER 43 THE LOAD SCHEDULE ON S-3 WAS NOT
 CORRECTED.
  
 2) ( REPEAT COMMENT ) SPECIFY HOW THE BALCONY FLOOR AND
 WALLS WILL BE WATERPROOFED AND HOW THE RAIN WATER WILL
 BE DISCHARGED FROM THE SLAB FLOOR OF THE BALCONY THAT
 WILL BE BUILT INTO THE ROOF OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE.
 FBC 107.2.1
  
 3) SPECIFY THE SIZE OF THE SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR ON THE
 PLANS. FBC 107.2.1 THE OPENING WIDTH FOR THE GARAGE
 DOOR WAS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS AS 9'-8" WIDE AND
 HEIGHT WAS NOT SPECIFIED. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE
 GARAGE DOOR THAT WAS SUBMITTED HAS A MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 9
 FEET. THE OPENING IS TOO LARGE FOR A 9 FOOT WIDE DOOR.
  
 4) ( REPEAT COMMENT ) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORM THAT
 WAS SUBMITTED DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS FOR THE EXTERIOR
 WALL AND CEILING INSULATION. PLEASE CORRECT. THE PLANS
 SPECIFY AN UNVENTED ATTIC WITH R-20 INSULATION APPLIED
 UNDER THE ROOF DECK AND MINIMUM R-4.2 INSULATION ON THE
 WALLS. THE ENERGY FORM HAS
  
 5) ( REPEAT COMMENT ) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT
 APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 THAT HAVE BEEN
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD. FBC 107.3.4.1 THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT APPROVALS
 WERE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE:
 - SLIDING GLASS DOORS
 - OUT SWING METAL DOORS (#8 & #9)
 - OUT SWING WOOD FRONT ENTRY DOOR (#7)
 - THE BALCONY WATERPROOFING MATERIAL ( CONCRETE AND
 WOOD DECKS )
 - THE 53 INCHES WIDE CASEMENT WINDOWS ( NOA NO.
 11-1114.22 HAS A MAXIMUM WIDTH LIMITATION OF 36 INCHES)
  
 6) REVISE THE STRUCTURAL PLANS TO SHOW THE FOUNDATION,
 COLUMNS AND BEAMS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THE
 CANTILEVERED BALCONY BASED ON THE CALCULATIONS AND
 DETAILS FROM THE ENGINEER. FBC 107.2.1
  
 7) THE SLOPE OF THE BALCONY ROOFS COVERED WITH MODIFIED
 BITUMEN ROOFING ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1/4"
 PER FOOT. FBC-R905.11.1 THE PLAN SPECIFIES 1/8" PER
 FOOT SLOPE.
  
 8) THE MODIFIED ROOF COVERING NOTE ON SHEETS A-1 AND
 S-2 HAS AN ARROW POINTING TO THE BALCONY WITH THE WOOD
 DECK, BUT INCORRECTLY STATES CONCRETE DECK. THE
 CANTILEVER CONCRETE DECK IS THE ONE ON THE OPPSITE SIDE
 OF THE SECOND FLOOR. FBC 107.2.1
  
 IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE PROVIDE A
 RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH REVIEW COMMENT WAS
 ADDRESSED.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-10-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-10-08 Time 08:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-10-07 Time 10:52 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-07 11:36:311ST REVIEW: FBC 2010
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6714
 [email protected]
  
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW:
  
 BUILDING
  
 1) THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE FOR THE ADDITION IS
 INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED ON SHEET CVR AS TYPE III-B AND IT
 SHOULD BE TYPE V-B. FBC 602
  
 2) THE OCCUPANCY TYPE FOR THIS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
 IS R-3 PER FBC 310.
  
 3) THE WIND DESIGN DATA ON SHEET S-3 OF THE PLANS IS
 INCORRECT. THE WIND SPEED IS 170 MPH AND THE 2010 FBC
 REFERENCES ASCE 7-10. FBC R301.2.1 AND FBC-R CHAPTER 43
  
 4) THE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING NOTES ON SHEETS S-2 AND
 S-3 DO NOT SPECIFY THAT 8D RING SHANK NAILS ARE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE CORRECT. FBC-R803.2.3.1 SHEATHING
 FASTENINGS.
 WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING SHALL BE FASTENED TO
 ROOF FRAMING WITH 8D RING-SHANK NAILS AT 6 INCHES ON
 CENTER AT EDGES AND 6 INCHES ON CENTER AT INTERMEDIATE
 FRAMING. RING-SHANK NAILS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING
 MINIMUM DIMENSIONS:
 1. 0.113 INCH NOMINAL SHANK DIAMETER.
 2. RING DIAMETER OF 0.012 OVER SHANK DIAMETER.
 3. 16 TO 20 RINGS PER INCH.
 4. 0.280 INCH FULL ROUND HEAD DIAMETER.
 5. 2 INCH NAIL LENGTH.
 WHERE ROOF FRAMING WITH A SPECIFIC GRAVITY, 0.42 < G <
 0.49 IS USED, SPACING OF RING-SHANK FASTENERS SHALL BE
 4 INCHES ON CENTER IN NAILING ZONE 3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 FIGURE R803.2.3.1 WHERE VASD AS DETERMINED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R301.2.1.3 IS 130 MPH OR
 GREATER.
  
 5) PLEASE REVISE THE ROOF ZONE PRESSURES ON SHEET S-2
 SO THAT THEY MATCH THE CORRECT PRESSURES WHICH AS
 SPECIFIED ON SHEETS CVR AND A-2. FBC - R301.2.1
  
 6) SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED STRUCTURAL DETAILS AND
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE CANTILEVERED 5 FOOT REINFORCED
 CONCRETE BALCONY SLAB FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED
 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. FBC 107.2.1.3
  
 7) SPECIFY HOW THE BALCONY FLOOR AND WALLS WILL BE
 WATERPROOFED AND HOW THE RAIN WATER WILL BE DISCHARGED
 FROM THE SLAB FLOOR OF THE BALCONY THAT WILL BE BUILT
 INTO THE ROOF OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. FBC 107.2.1
  
 8) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE WATER PROOFING OF THE WALLS
 AND SHOW HOW THE RAIN WATER WILL BE DIVERTED OFF OF THE
 ROOF WHERE THE EXISTING SLOPED ROOF MEETS THE WALL OF
 THE NEW TWO STORY ADDITION. FBC 107.2.1
  
 9) THE WINDOW AND SLIDING GLASS JAMB DETAILS 2 AND 12
 ON A-3 DO NOT SHOW BUCKS THAT PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT OF
 THE WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES AS REQUIRED BY FBC -
 R612.10.2.1 MASONRY, CONCRETE OR OTHER STRUCTURAL
 SUBSTRATE.
 WHERE THE WOOD SHIM OR BUCK THICKNESS IS LESS THAN 11/2
 INCHES (38 MM), WINDOW AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE
 ANCHORED THROUGH THE MAIN FRAME OR BY JAMB CLIP OR
 SUBFRAME SYSTEM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS
 PUBLISHED INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. ANCHORS SHALL BE
 SECURELY FASTENED DIRECTLY INTO THE MASONRY, CONCRETE
 OR OTHER STRUCTURAL SUBSTRATE MATERIAL. UNLESS
 OTHERWISE TESTED, BUCKS SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE
 INTERIOR FACE OF THE WINDOW OR DOOR FRAME SUCH THAT
 FULL SUPPORT OF THE FRAME IS PROVIDED. SHIMS SHALL BE
 MADE FROM MATERIALS CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING APPLICABLE
 LOADS, LOCATED AND APPLIED IN A THICKNESS CAPABLE OF
 SUSTAINING APPLICABLE LOADS. ANCHORS SHALL BE PROVIDED
 TO TRANSFER LOAD FROM THE WINDOW OR DOOR FRAME TO THE
 ROUGH OPENING SUBSTRATE.
 WHERE THE WOOD BUCK THICKNESS IS 11/2 INCHES (38 MM) OR
 GREATER, THE BUCK SHALL BE SECURELY FASTENED TO
 TRANSFER LOAD TO THE MASONRY, CONCRETE OR OTHER
 STRUCTURAL SUBSTRATE AND THE BUCK SHALL EXTEND BEYOND
 THE INTERIOR FACE OF THE WINDOW OR DOOR FRAME. WINDOW
 AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE ANCHORED THROUGH THE MAIN
 FRAME OR BY JAMB CLIP OR SUBFRAME SYSTEM OR THROUGH THE
 FLANGE TO THE SECURED WOOD BUCK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 MANUFACTURERS PUBLISHED INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
 UNLESS OTHERWISE TESTED, BUCKS SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE
 INTERIOR FACE OF THE WINDOW OR DOOR FRAME SUCH THAT
 FULL SUPPORT OF THE FRAME IS PROVIDED. SHIMS SHALL BE
 MADE FROM MATERIALS CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING APPLICABLE
 LOADS, LOCATED AND APPLIED IN A THICKNESS CAPABLE OF
 SUSTAINING APPLICABLE LOADS. ANCHORS SHALL BE PROVIDED
 TO TRANSFER LOAD FROM THE WINDOW OR DOOR FRAME ASSEMBLY
 TO THE SECURED WOOD BUCK.
  
 10) SPECIFY THE SIZE OF THE SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR ON
 THE PLANS. FBC 107.2.1
  
 11) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORM THAT WAS SUBMITTED DOES
 NOT MATCH THE PLANS FOR THE EXTERIOR WALL AND CEILING
 INSULATION. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 12) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED
 BY DCA RULE 9N-3 THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED
 IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. FBC 107.3.4.1 THE
 FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE:
 SLIDING GLASS DOORS
 OUT SWING METAL DOORS (#8 & #9)
 OUT SWING WOOD FRONT ENTRY DOOR (#7)
 THE BALCONY WATERPROOFING MATERIAL
 THE 53 INCHES WIDE CASEMENT WINDOWS ( NOA NO.
 11-1114.22 HAS A MAXIMUM WIDTH LIMITATION OF 36 INCHES)
  
 13) PART OF A FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR A JELD-WEN
 FIBERGLASS DOOR WAS SUBMITTED. THE FL# AND INSTALLATION
 INSTRUCTIONS WERE MISSING. THE DESIGNER OF RECORDS
 REVIEW STAMP WAS NOT ON THE SUBMITTAL. THERE IS NO
 FIBERGLASS DOORS SPECIFIED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON
 SHEET A-1. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1
  
 14) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE PROVIDE
 A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH REVIEW COMMENT
 WAS ADDRESSED.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-10-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-10-08 Time 10:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-10-08 Time 10:24 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-08 10:25:52APPROVED WITH EXCEPTIONS. PLANS HAVE BEEN RED LINED.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2015-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2015-01-27 Time 10:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2015-01-22 Time 13:30 Sent To  
Notes
2015-01-23 13:32:33SENT TO R MCDOUGAL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2014-12-23 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 2014-12-23 Time 11:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-12-04 Time 12:13 Sent To Z
Notes
2014-12-04 12:19:28R12
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2014-10-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-10-08 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-09-09 Time 13:37 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-09 13:22:28R08
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2015-01-27 Time 16:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2015-01-27 Time 16:38 Sent To  
Notes
2015-01-27 16:39:03MU2015 - 2035
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2015-01-27 Time 08:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2015-01-27 Time 08:59 Sent To  
Notes
2015-01-27 08:59:50IMPACT FEES
  
 PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL
 233-5025. UPON APPROVAL, YOU MAY CHECK OUT ONE PLAN AND
 TAKE TO THAT OFFICE FOR REVIEW. PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED
 WITH A COPY OF RECEIPT AS APPLICABLE.
  
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-10-07 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-10-07 Time 10:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-10-07 Time 10:53 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-07 10:55:28IMPACT FEES
  
 PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL
 233-5025. UPON APPROVAL, YOU MAY CHECK OUT ONE PLAN AND
 TAKE TO THAT OFFICE FOR REVIEW. PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED
 WITH A COPY OF RECEIPT AS APPLICABLE.
  
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-09-26 Cont ID  
Sent By rbergsma Date 2014-09-26 Time   Rev Time 0.75
Received By rbergsma Date 2014-09-26 Time   Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-09-25 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2014-09-25 Time 14:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2014-09-25 Time 14:54 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-01-27 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-12-23 Time 11:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-12-23 Time 11:15 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-23 11:15:50ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS
  
 SLOPED ROOF
 1) ENTEGRA ESTATE "S" CONCRETE ROOF TILE NOA NO.
 11-0510.02
 2) 3M, AH-160 ROOF TILE ADHESIVE
 3) POLYGLASS POLYSTICK UNDERLAYMENTS
  
 CONCRETE DECK BALCONY
 1) GAF RUBEROID MODIFIED BITUMEN NOA NO. 14-0905.01
  
 WOOD DECK BALCONY
 1) GAF RUBEROID MODIFIED BITUMEN NOA NO. 14-0611.01
 (NEEDS TO SELECT AN ASSEMBLY AND SUBMIT RAS 117
 CALCULATIONS )
  
  
2014-12-15 12:54:05ROOFING
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2014-12-05 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-12-23 Time 11:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2014-12-05 Time 15:51 Sent To B
Notes
2014-12-05 15:58:29NOTES:
  
 - REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PERMIT #14120297.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-09-15 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 2014-09-15 Time 11:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2014-09-15 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-15 11:22:17** FAILED **
  
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE
 COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE
 APPLICABLE:
  
 1.) THERE SEEMS TO BE CONFLICTING INFORMATION IN THE
 BUILDING AND SETBACK DIMENSIONS IN THE SURVEY AND THE
 IN SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1). PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 2.) MEASUREMENTS IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1) ARE
 INCONSISTENT WITH THE SCALE PROVIDED (1/8 INCH = 1
 FT.). PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 3.) SCALE THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS.
  
 4.) ILLUSTRATE THE LOCATION OF THE NEW A/C UNITS IN THE
 SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1). THE A/C UNITS CANNOT PROJECT
 MORE THAN 4 FT. INTO A SETBACK. (ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2))
  
 5.) THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($165,000) EXCEEDS
 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE ($134,540) ACCORDING TO
 THE P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE,
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE
 SITE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE
 REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. IF THE
 SITE CONFORMS TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A
 LANDSCAPE PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE
 INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES
 NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING
 APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND
 IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL
 TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMITY.
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS
 MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. CONTACT LINDA LOUIE
 @ (561) 822-1458 IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS.
  
  
  
  
2014-09-11 15:17:159/11/14


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved