|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 14081130
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 14081130 |
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-09-19 |
Time |
07:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-09-19 |
Time |
07:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-09-08 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-09-08 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2014-09-12 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2014-09-12 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-12 15:13:41 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | SHOWING THE MAIN DOUBLE DOOR SWINGING INTO THE HALL, IN | | | THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL TO USE THE DEVICES, IT THEN | | | MUST/SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101, 2010 ED. | | | | | | 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS | | | OF EGRESS SHALL NOT LEAVE LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE | | | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, | | | OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL PROJECT NOT MORE | | | THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A | | | CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY | | | OPEN.....REMAINDER OF CODE CONDITIONS DO NOT APPLY. | | | | | | DIMENSIONS OF THE HALLWAY AND DOOR ARE NOT PROVIDED; | | | HOWEVER, IF DRAWN TO SCALE IT MAY PROVDE ENOUGH ROOM. | | | FINAL APPROVAL, IF INSTALLED, IS CONTINGENT ON REVEIW | | | AND VERIFICATION BY A FIRE INSPECTOR. INSPECTION WILL | | | FAIL IF THE INSTALLATION DOES NOT MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2014-08-28 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2014-08-28 |
Time |
12:09 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-08-28 12:32:08 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | THE DOUBLE ENTRY DOOR SWING EGRESS DOES NOT MEET # 3 OF | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF 7.2.1.6.2. | | | | | | (3) THE DOORS SHALL BE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE | | | DIRECTION OF EGRESS FROM A MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE | | | LOCATED (40IN TO 48IN) VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR AND | | | WITHIN (60IN) OF THE SECURED DOORS. | | | | | | THE DOORS AS SHOWN OPEN AGAINST EGRESS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-09-19 |
Time |
07:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-09-11 |
Time |
09:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-12 09:15:04 | SENT TO FIRE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-09-08 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-08-26 |
Time |
14:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-08-26 14:11:29 | TO FIRE | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
