| 2014-09-25 17:11:02 | SUBMITTED UNDER PERMIT 14050863 |
| | |
| | APPROVED WITH PROVISO UNDER 14050863: |
| | |
| | ****PROVISO**** |
| | ****ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK**** |
| | ****REVISION REQUIRED PRIOR TO FIRST INSPECTION**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FS 471, SEE THE LETTER WRITTEN BY DOUG KUBOSH AND |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED BY CHRISTOPHER PLY DATED 9/17/2014. |
| | DOUG KOBOSH, GENERAL MANAGER OF ALLIANCE COMPOSITES, IS |
| | NOT LICENSED TO PRACTICE ENGINEERING. THE LETTER SHOULD |
| | BE WRITTEN BY THE ENGINEER, NOT AN UNLICENSED |
| | INDIVIDUAL. IF THIS INDIVIDUAL IS LICENSED, IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHY HE DID NOT SIGN AND SEAL THE LETTER AND |
| | CALCS. |
| | |
| | SEE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15 23.002, TITLE |
| | BLOCK REQUIREMENTS. IS THE ENGINEER PRACTICING |
| | ENGINEERING THROUGH ALLIANCE COMPOSITES INCORPORATED, |
| | AND THIS NAME AND ADDRESS SERVE AS A TITLE BLOCK? IF HE |
| | IS, AN ENGINEERING BUSINESS NUMBER IS REQUIRED; REVISE |
| | TO INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION. |
| | |
| | IF THE ENGINEER IS NOT PRACTICING ENGINEERING THROUGH |
| | ALLIANCE COMPOSITES INCORPORATED AND THIS IS NOT HIS |
| | TITLE BLOCK, PROVIDE A TITLE BLOCK ON THE REVISED |
| | LETTER. |
| | |
| | LETTER STATES THAT THE DESIGN IS BASED ON TYPE 2 SOIL |
| | CONDITIONS. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT SOILS CLASSIFICATION |
| | METHOD WRITER IS REFERRING TO. ENGINEER IS TO REVIEW |
| | SOILS REPORT AND REFER TO SOILS REPORT IN THE LETTER. |
| | |
| | THE LETTER STATES THAT CALCULATIONS INDICATE COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH FBC 2010 AND ASCE 7 10. |
| | |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR POLE TYPE B2 STATE THAT CALCS ARE |
| | BASED ON ASCE 7 10 AND THAT RESULT IS TEST LOAD. |
| | REGARDING THE CALCULATIONS, IT IS UNCLEAR HOW TEST LOAD |
| | CORRELATES WITH THE SPEC FOR THE POLE, OR HOW THIS |
| | SHOWS THAT THE PROPOSED POLE WILL RESIST THE DESIGN |
| | WIND LOADS. CALCS DO NOT PROVIDE A CONCLUSION. |
| | |
| | STRESS CALCS (TENON OR SIDE ARM MOUNT), WIND FORCE ON |
| | POLE AND WIND FORCE ON LUMINAIRE, DATED 10/27/09 BUT |
| | SEALED 9/5/2014 ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO 2009. SEE |
| | DEC STATEMENT, CANNOT USE THIS EXEMPTION FOR LIGHT |
| | POLES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY (DOT ONLY). |
| | |
| | POLE SPECIFICATIONS TYPE B2 DECLARES 180MPH BUT CALCS |
| | USE 142.3MPH. NEITHER STATE ULTIMATE OR ASD AS REQUIRED |
| | BY FBC 1603.4.1. HEIGHT ON 2ND PAGE IS SHOWN AS 30FT |
| | BUT TEST HEIGHT IS 29 FT; POLE TYPE C IS 20FT BUT TEST |
| | HT = 14FT. CALCS INCLUDE AN IMPORTANCE FACTOR OF .77 |
| | BUT FIRST PAGE STATES IT COMPLIES WITH 180 MPH DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA. EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION NOT INCLUDED. SEE FBC |
| | 1603.1.4 REGARDING WIND DESIGN INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | POLE TYPE B2 WAS USED AS AN EXAMPLE. THE OTHER THREE |
| | POLES HAVE SIMILAR ISSUES WITH THE CALCULATIONS. SPECS |
| | FOR THE LIGHT FIXTURES WERE NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | REVISE THE LETTER AND CALCULATIONS AND SUBMIT AS A |
| | REVISION ALONG WITH THE LIGHT FIXTURE SPECS. THIS IS |
| | ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. |
| | |
| | |