Plan Review Details - Permit 14080071
Plan Review Stops For Permit 14080071
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2014-09-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-09-18 Time 12:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-09-18 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-08-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-08-24 Time 14:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-08-24 Time 14:00 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-24 14:24:20BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 14080071
 ADD: 1601 FORUM PLACE SUITE # 900
 CONT: TBD
 TEL: (561)756-1983
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
  
 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3
 COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS,
 SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
 1ST REVIEW
 DATE: SUN. AUG. 24/ 2014
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) SHEET D1.1 SHOWS THE REMOVAL OF A ENTRY DOOR TO THE
 SUITE LOCATED ADJACENT TO STAIR # 2. SHEET A1.109 SHOWS
 THE DELETION OF THIS ENTRANCE INTO THE TENANT SPACE AND
 A ELECTRICAL CLOSET CREATED. TH IS IS A HIGH RISE
 OFFICE BUILDING AND WITH THE REMOVAL OF THAT ONE ENTRY
 TENANTS HAVE TO TRANSVERSE THE ELEVATOR LOBBY TO GAIN
 ENTRY INTO EITHER STAIRWELL. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A
 FULL FLOOR LEVEL II ALTERATION AND WILL NEED TO COMPLY
 WITH THE 2010 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING SECTION
 703.2.2 SUPPLEMENTAL SHAFT AND FLOOR OPENING ENCLOSURE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 WHERE THE WORK AREA ON ANY FLOOR EXCEEDS 50 PERCENT OF
 THAT FLOOR AREA, THE ENCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 703.2 SHALL APPLY TO VERTICAL OPENINGS OTHER THAN
 STAIRWAYS THROUGHOUT THE FLOOR.
 PLEASE REVIEW MEMO BELOW:
  
 ELEVATOR LOBBY MEMORANDUM
  
 TO: ALL INTERESTED PERSONS
  
 FROM: DOUG WISE, CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIRECTOR,
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
  MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF FIRE RESCUE, FIRE
 MARSHAL
  
 RE: ELEVATOR LOBBIES IN EXISTING HIGH RISE
 CONSTRUCTION
  
 DATE: JANUARY 3, 2011
  
 IT HAS RECENTLY BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THAT MANY
 EXISTING HIGH RISE STRUCTURES IN OUR COMMUNITY WERE
 INITIALLY CONSTRUCTED OR HAVE BEEN SUBSEQUENTLY
 MODIFIED SO AS TO BE WITHOUT ?ELEVATOR LOBBIES?.
 ELEVATOR LOBBIES ARE FIRE RATED ENCLOSURES, ENCLOSING
 THE ELEVATOR SHAFT ITSELF WITH EACH FLOOR ABOVE THE
 FIRST FLOOR. THE LACK OF AN ELEVATOR LOBBY CAN, UNDER
 CERTAIN CONDITIONS, CONSTITUTE A SERIOUS CONCERN BY
 CREATING INCREASED POTENTIAL FOR SPREAD OF SMOKE OR
 FIRE THOUGH AN EXISTING HIGH RISE STRUCTURE DURING A
 FIRE EVENT.
 RESEARCH BY CITY STAFF INDICATES THE REQUIREMENT FOR
 RATING OF ELEVATOR SHAFT ENCLOSURES WAS CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED IN THE 1929 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING
 CODE IN SECTIONS 1807 AND 1907 RESPECTIVELY, FOR TYPE I
 AND TYPE II STRUCTURES OVER THREE (3) STORIES, AS TWO
 (2) HOURS MINIMUM, AND ONE (1) HOUR FOR TYPE III
 STRUCTURES (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1). BY 1965 THE
 SOUTHERN STANDARD BUILDING CODE IN EFFECT IN THE CITY
 REQUIRED ELEVATOR ENCLOSURES WHICH ENCLOSED NOT MORE
 THAN THREE (3) ELEVATORS TO BE ENCLOSED IN TWO (2) HOUR
 RATED ENCLOSURES IN A SINGLE SECTION WHICH WAS SECTION
 701.3 (SEE EXHIBIT 2). INTERESTINGLY, THE TERM
 ?ELEVATOR LOBBY? ITSELF DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE BUILDING
 CODE ITSELF UNTIL SOMETIME BETWEEN THE 1973 AND 1978
 EDITIONS. HOWEVER, AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, THE
 REQUIREMENT FOR FIRE RATING ELEVATOR SHAFT ENCLOSURES
 AND ALL OPENINGS THERETO DATES AS FAR BACK AS 1929. THE
 1965 CODE ALSO REQUIRED THAT, ?THE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM
 ONE FLIGHT OF STAIRS TO THE NEXT SHALL NOT PASS
 DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF ELEVATOR DOORS.? THIS CRITERIA IS
 CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT WHICH PROVIDES
 THAT ONLY ONE OF THE TWO REQUIRED STAIRS MAY OPEN INTO
 THE ELEVATOR LOBBY AND THAT EACH TENANCY IN A MULTIPLE
 TENANT CONDITION SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH STAIRS, AT
 LEAST ONE OF WHICH MAY BE ACCESSED WITHOUT PASSING
 THROUGH THE ELEVATOR LOBBY.
 TO SUMMARIZE CITY STAFF?S RESEARCH, THE REQUIREMENT FOR
 FIRE RATING OF AN ELEVATOR SHAFT ENCLOSURE HAS BEEN
 IDENTIFIED TO EXIST IN EVERY BUILDING CODE ADOPTED IN
 THIS CITY FROM THE 1930?S TO THE PRESENT DAY WITH ONLY
 ONE NOTABLE EXCEPTION. ON OCTOBER 1, 2005 WITH THE
 ENACTMENT OF THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, THE
 REQUIREMENT WAS AMENDED TO ALLOW THE ELIMINATION OF THE
 FIRE RATED ENCLOSURE IF THE CORRIDOR INTO WHICH THE
 ELEVATOR OPENED WAS NOT REQUIRED ITSELF TO BE RATED
 (SEE EXHIBIT 3). THIS REQUIREMENT WAS AMENDED AGAIN ON
 DECEMBER 8, 2006 WITH THE FIRST ?BLUE PAGE? AMENDMENTS
 TO THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (SEE EXHIBIT 4) WHICH
 RE-INSTITUTED THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE RATED ELEVATOR
 LOBBY WITH THE SPECIFIC LIMITED EXCEPTIONS THAT EXIST
 TODAY (SEE EXHIBIT 5). THIS MEANS THAT BUILDINGS WHICH
 DO NOT MEET THE CURRENT (OR 1929) CODE MAY BE DEEMED
 ?LEGALLY-EXISTING NON-CONFORMING? IF A PERMIT WHICH
 DEMONSTRATES THE ELIMINATION OF SUCH A LOBBY CAN BE
 EVIDENCED WHICH WAS ISSUED ONLY DURING THE
 ABOVE-REFERENCED NARROW ?WINDOW? OF TIME BETWEEN
 OCTOBER 1, 2005 AND DECEMBER 8, 2006. HOWEVER, EVEN
 LEGALLY-EXISTING NON-CONFORMITIES MUST ALSO BE
 ADDRESSED AS RENOVATIONS OCCUR IN ACCORDANCE THE TERMS
 THAT FOLLOW.
 TO BETTER PREPARE BUILDING OWNERS, MANGERS, OPERATORS,
 AND DESIGN PROFESSIONALS TO ANTICIPATE AND ADDRESS
 THESE SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS, THE CONSTRUCTION
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND FIRE PREVENTION DEPARTMENT
 PROPOSE TO ADDRESS THE ABSENCE OF AN ELEVATOR LOBBY
 (WHEN REQUIRED) AS FOLLOWS:
  
 1. IF A TENANT IMPROVEMENT IS SUBMITTED WHICH PROPOSES
 TO RECONFIGURE THE ENTIRE EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR, AN
 ELEVATOR LOBBY, OR COMPLIANCE WITH ONE OF THE SIX (6)
 EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED UNDER THE PRESENT CODE WILL BE
 REQUIRED. THIS IS REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THE
 ABSENCE OF AN ELEVATOR LOBBY CAN BE DEMONSTRATED WITH A
 VALID PERMIT ISSUED BETWEEN OCTOBER 1, 2005 AND
 DECEMBER 8, 2006.
 2. IF A TENANT IMPROVEMENT IS SUBMITTED WHICH PROPOSES
 TO RECONFIGURE A PORTION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR
 AREA, WITH NO WORK BEING PROPOSED IN THE AREA OF THE
 ELEVATOR LOBBY, AND NO ELEVATOR LOBBY IS FOUND TO EXIST
 ON THE FLOOR, AND A VALID PERMIT CAN BE EVIDENCED WHICH
 WAS ISSUED BETWEEN OCTOBER 1, 2005 AND DECEMBER 8,
 2006, THE TENANT IMPROVEMENT PERMIT MAY BE APPROVED AND
 THE BUILDING SHALL REMAIN AS LAWFULLY CONFIGURED UNTIL
 THE MAJORITY OF THE EXISTING FLOOR PLAN, OR THE
 ELEVATOR LOBBY AREA ITSELF UNDERGOES RENOVATION.
 3. IF A TENANT IMPROVEMENT IS SUBMITTED WHICH PROPOSES
 TO RECONFIGURE A PORTION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR
 AREA, WITH NO WORK BEING PROPOSED IN THE AREA OF THE
 ELEVATOR LOBBY, AND NO ELEVATOR LOBBY IS FOUND TO EXIST
 ON THE FLOOR, AND NO VALID PERMIT CAN BE EVIDENCED
 WHICH WAS ISSUED BETWEEN OCTOBER 1, 2005 AND DECEMBER
 8, 2006, THE TENANT IMPROVEMENT PERMIT MAY BE APPROVED.
 THE BUILDING OWNER WILL BE NOTIFIED OF AN UNSAFE
 CONDITION ON THE EXISTING STRUCTURE BY THE CITY FIRE
 MARSHAL?S OFFICE AND ASKED TO UNDERTAKE APPROPRIATE
 ACTIONS TO CORRECT THE SITUATION.
 4. IF ANY RECONFIGURATION IS PROPOSED WHICH AFFECTS THE
 ELEVATOR LOBBY AREA ITSELF, AN ELEVATOR LOBBY, OR
 COMPLIANCE WITH ONE OF THE SIX (6) EXCEPTIONS LISTED IN
 THE CODE SHALL BE REQUIRED.
  
 IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT CITY STAFF REMAINS COMMITTED TO
 ASSISTING BUILDING OWNERS, MANAGERS, AND DESIGN
 PROFESSIONALS IN SUCCEEDING IN CREATING AND MAINTAINING
 SAFE PLACES TO LIVE AND WORK IN OUR COMMUNITY. WE ARE
 READY AND WILLING TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN
 UNDERSTANDING THE OFTEN COMPLEX CRITERIA THAT AFFECT
 EXISTING AND NEW HIGH RISE BUILDINGS. IT MUST BE STATED
 THAT THE SIMPLE INSTALLATION OF A HOIST-WAY
 PRESSURIZATION SYSTEM MAY BE ONE POTENTIAL METHOD TO
 ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR AN ELEVATOR LOBBY THROUGHOUT AN
 ENTIRE BUILDING. ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE IS TO INSTALL FIRE
 SHUTTERS AT THE ELEVATOR DOOR OPENINGS. THESE
 METHODOLOGIES MAY OFFER THE ADDED POTENTIAL TO INCREASE
 THE LEASABLE FLOOR AREA WITHIN THESE BUILDINGS.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US DIRECTLY IF WE CAN
 ASSIST YOU FURTHER IN UNDERSTANDING THESE CRITERIA AND
 HELP YOU TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF YOUR RESIDENTS,
 TENANTS, AND PROPERTY.
 DOUG WISE 805-6650 [email protected] FORMER BUILDING
 OFFICIAL
 MIKE CARSILLO 804-4709 [email protected] FORMER FIRE
 MARSHALL
  
 TO DATE THIS LETTER STILL STANDS UNDER THE 2010 FL
 EXISTING BUILDING CODE.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION &
 REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL
 LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH
 A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE
 SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE
 FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR
 YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2014-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2014-09-16 Time 11:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2014-09-16 Time 11:20 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-08-22 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2014-08-22 Time 14:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2014-08-22 Time 13:59 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-22 15:09:2714080071
 1601 FORUM PLACE # 900
 TENANT BUILD OUT
  
 PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
 PROVIDE A LIGHTING DENSITY SUMMARY ON THE ELECTRIC PLAN
 WHICH SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING ENERGY
 CODE REQUIREMENTS. FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 505.5;
 505.5.3; T. 505.5.3
  
 PROVIDE A SAFETY LABELING SCHEDULE FOR FLASH PROTECTION
 FOR THE ELECTRIC SERVICE, PANEL BOARDS AND MAIN
 DISCONNECTING MEANS. NEC 110.16, 110.22
  
 VERIFY SAFE WORKING CLEARANCE HAS BEEN PROVIDED AT THE
 PANEL BOARDS AND DISCONNECTS. NEC 110.26
  
 PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL MOUNTING DETAIL FOR ANY
 TRANSFORMERS BEING SUSPENDED BY THE BUILDING STRUCTURE.
 FBC 1604.1
  
 PROVIDE A FIRE STOP DETAIL FOR ALL WALL AND FLOOR
 PENETRATIONS OF FIRE RATED ASSEMBLIES. NEC 300.21
  
 VERIFY THE ELECTRICAL DISCONNECTING MEANS AND PANEL
 BOARDS HAVE A FAULT CURRENT RATING THAT IS SUFFICIENT
 AT NOMINAL CIRCUIT VOLTAGE FOR THE CURRENT THAT MUST BE
 INTERRUPTED. NEC 110.9
  
 PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS AND LISTING FOR PREWIRED OFFICE
 MODULAR PARTITIONS. NEC 90.7, 605.2
  
 PROVIDE A NOTE ON PLANS REGARDING THE LIMITATIONS OF
 USE FOR MULTI-WIRE BRANCH CIRCUITS. NEC 210.4, 605.8(D)
  
 PROVIDE A NOTE ON PLANS REGARDING THE VOLTAGE
 LIMITATIONS AND SEPARATION WITH BARRIERS REQUIRED FOR
 SWITCHES AND ADJACENT DEVICES. NEC 404.8
  
  
 NOTE: SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLANS ARE REQUIRED FOR FIRE
 ALARM SYSTEMS, SECURITY, VOICE, AND DATA SYSTEMS
  
 ROBERT LECKY, CBO
 ELECTRICAL PLANS REVIEW
 561-373-3701
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2014-08-05 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2014-08-05 Time 14:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2014-09-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-09-18 Time 13:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-09-05 Time 11:05 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2014-08-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-08-24 Time 14:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-08-04 Time 14:21 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-04 14:21:37ROUTE TO C06
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2014-09-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-09-18 Time 12:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-09-18 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-18 12:00:17BUILDING APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION!
 THIS PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED PROVISIONALLY. FAILURE TO
 CORRECT THE LISTED DEFICIENCIES
 IN THIS PLAN PRIOR TO INSPECTION WILL RESULT IN FAILED
 INSPECTION(S) AND THE ASSESSMENT OF
 RE-INSPECTION FEE(S). REVISIONS REQUIRE ADDITIONAL
 REVIEWS WITH ASSOCIATED FEES.
  
 SHEET M2.0 REVISION # 1 SEE CU-1 IS LOCATED WITHIN A
 PLENUM. PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH:
 2010 FBC-MECHANICAL 602.2.1 MATERIALS WITHIN PLENUMS.
 EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS
 602.2.1.1 THROUGH 602.2.1.6, MATERIALS WITHIN PLENUMS
 SHALL BE NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR SHALL
 HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25 AND A
 SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE
 THAN 50 WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 OR UL
 723.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2014-09-16 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2014-09-16 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2014-09-17 Time 06:51 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-16 15:35:48PLAN DENIED
 REFER TO SECTION 501.2 EXHAUST DISCHARGE 2010 FBC (M)
 AND 602.2.1 MATERIALS WITHIN PLENUM'S . AIR
 CONDITIONING
 CONDENSER CAN NOT BE INSTALLED IN A RETURN AIR PLENUM
  
 PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER
 [email protected]
 OFFICE 561-805-6732
 FAX 561-805-6676
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-08-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jdariton Date 2014-08-18 Time 14:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jdariton Date 2014-08-18 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-18 14:28:198/18/14
 NOTES:
 1.SHOW ON PLANS THE LOCATION OF THE CONDENSING UNIT FOR
 DS-1 SYSTEM.
 2.CLARIFY IF THE CFM'S FOR THE SYSTEM IS 1070 OR 325
 CFM'S AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 3.PROVIDE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY
 THE FEC SEC.101.4.7.2.
 4.SHOW DISCHARGE LOCATION OF THE CONDENSATE DRAINAS
 REQUIRED BY FMC,SEC305 AND SEC.1503.7 OF THE FBC.
 5.COMPLY WIT FMC SEC.307.2.3 WHICH REQUIRES UNIT TO BE
 PROVIDED WITH AN AUXILIARY DRAIN PAN, OR AS AN
 ALTERNATIVE, A FLOAT SWITCH DEVICE WICH WILL SHOT DOWN
 THE SYSTEM IN CASE OF CONDENSATE STOPPAGE.
  
 REVIEWED BY JOHN ARITON. PLEASE CALL HAROLD MOSER AT
 561-805-6732 FO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2014-09-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-09-18 Time 12:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-09-18 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-08-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-08-24 Time 14:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-08-24 Time 14:00 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-24 14:39:59PLUMBING PROVISO:
 2010 FBC-PLUMBING :
 608.3 DEVICES, APPURTENANCES, APPLIANCES AND APPARATUS.
 ALL DEVICES, APPURTENANCES, APPLIANCES AND APPARATUS
 INTENDED TO SERVE SOME SPECIAL FUNCTION, SUCH AS,
 COOLING, OR STORAGE OF ICE OR FOODS, AND THAT CONNECT
 TO THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
 PROTECTION AGAINST BACKFLOW AND CONTAMINATION OF THE
 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM.
 608.16.10 COFFEE MACHINES AND NONCARBONATED BEVERAGE
 DISPENSERS. THE WATER SUPPLY CONNECTION TO COFFEE
 MACHINES AND NONCARBONATED BEVERAGE DISPENSERS SHALL BE
 PROTECTED AGAINST BACKFLOW BY A BACKFLOW PREVENTER
 CONFORMING TO ASSE 1022 OR BY AN AIR GAP.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By ajones Date 2014-08-05 Time 17:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ajones Date 2014-08-05 Time 17:26 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved