| Plan Review Stops For Permit 14040460 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-08-28 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-16 10:28:26 | NEED ADDRESS FOR BUILDING LOCATED FACING DOBBINS | | | STREET. SEE RESPONSE FROM SCOTT BELOW. JG. | | | | | | GOOD MORNING SCOTT, | | | THERE ARE TWO BUILDINGS IN THIS LOT. ONE IS FACING | | | GARDEN AVE AND THE OTHER ONE IS FACING DOBBINS ST. CAN | | | YOU PLEASE PROVIDE AN ADDRESS FOR THE BUILDING FACING | | | DOBBINS STREET. ON THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED UNDER PERMIT | | | #14040460 THE PLANS SHOW WINDOWS REPLACEMENT FOR | | | BUILDING 651 DOBBINS STREET. IS THIS A CORRECT ADDRESS. | | | PAPA DOESN'T RECOGNIZE THIS ADDRESS. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR DILIGENCE. | | | | | | | | | | | | JULIO, | | | 651 DOBBINS ST IS THE CORRECT AND VALID ADDRESS FOR | | | THAT BUILDING AND I DID VERIFY THAT IT IS IN THE PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY SYSTEM. PAPA CAN BE A BIT DECEPTIVE IN | | | THAT IT DOESN'T SHOW ALL OF THE ADDRESSES FOR A PARCEL. | | | ONLY THE ONE DESIGNATED AS PRIMARY IS DISPLAYED, IN | | | THIS CASE 4518 GARDENS AVE. | | | | | | SCOTT ALEF | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS ST., WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | PHONE: 561-494-1094 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-08-28 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-08-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-08-04 |
Time |
08:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-08-04 |
Time |
08:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-08-04 09:06:54 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, FIFTH BUILDING REVIEW | | | CHECKLIST. | | | CODE: 2010 FBC. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN CALLED MIGUEL DEAVILA ON 7/28/14 TO | | | EXPLAIN TO HIM WHAT WE NEED TO FINISH PROCESSING THE | | | PERMIT. AFTER RESUBMITTAL ON 7/31/14 THE SAME ITEMS ARE | | | NOT ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 1- ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF | | | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. SEC. 107.2.1 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. (REPEAT COMMENT. FOUR TIMES) | | | | | | ****NOTE: THIS IS THE FOURTH TIME THIS IS BEING | | | REQUESTED. ONLY A COUPLE OF DRAWINGS WERE RESUBMITTED | | | WITH THE DESIGNER'S NAME AND SIGNATURE. ALL THE | | | DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE THE DESIGNERS NAME AND SIGNATURE. | | | THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR THE ROOF BUILT UP ARE STILL | | | MISSING THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE DESIGNER. | | | | | | 2- WINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: | | | A) SHEET 3.0: SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING BEDROOM | | | WINDOW #2 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604.1 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING | | | BUILDING. (REPEAT COMMENT. FIVE TIMES). | | | | | | ****NOTE: THIS IS THE FIFTH TIME THIS IS BEING | | | REQUESTED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-07-28 |
Time |
17:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-07-28 |
Time |
17:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-28 17:27:39 | | | | 7-28-14: ROBERT BROWN CALLED MR. MIGUEL DEAVILA TO | | | EXPLAIN TO HIM WHAT WE NEED FROM HIM TO FINISH | | | PROCESSING THE PERMIT. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIRED | | | ITEMS: | | | | | | | | | 1- ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF | | | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. SEC. 107.2.1 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. | | | | | | 2- WINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: | | | A) SHEET 3.0: SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING BEDROOM | | | WINDOW #2 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604.1 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-07-15 |
Time |
13:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-07-15 |
Time |
13:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-15 14:02:34 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATIONS, BUILDING REVIEW SECOND | | | CHECKLIST. | | | CODE: 2010 FBC. | | | | | | | | | 1- ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF | | | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. SEC. 107.2.1 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. | | | | | | **** RESPONSE TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED. | | | NOT ALL DRAWINGS HAVE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE | | | PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. RESUBMIT ALL | | | DRAWINGS WITH THE DESIGNER'S NAME AND SIGNATURE. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: | | | A) EXTERIOR DOORS. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED | | | FROM JELD WEN. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE ANY | | | REFERENCE TO THE APPROVED FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | UNABLE TO VERIFY IF IT WAS APPROVED OR NOT. | | | | | | ****RESPONSE TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: | | | | | | REPORT NO 2031 SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL NUMBER. ALL THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE | | | A NUMBER. THIS REPORT NEEDS NEEDS THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL NUMBER IN ORDER TO VERIFY STATUS. PROVIDE THE | | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER THAT CORRESPONDS TO | | | THIS DOOR REPORT. IF THERE IS NOT FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL NUMBER, THEN, DOOR MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY FOR | | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL BY SUBMITTING ALL THE REQUIRED | | | DOCUMENTATION TO THE LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | 3- WINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: | | | A) SHEET 3.0: SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING BEDROOM | | | WINDOW #2 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604.1 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | **** RESPONSE TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED: | | | THERE IS NOT INFORMATION GIVEN ON THE TYPE AND SIZE OF | | | THE EXISTING BEDROOM WINDOW #2. IT ONLY GIVES THE SIZE | | | AND TYPE OF THE PROPOSED WINDOW. UNABLE TO VERIFY | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE BEDROOM EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. | | | 604.1 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. IN ADDITION, | | | CLARIFY WHY WINDOW SCHEDULE SHOWS WINDOW #1 AS "IMPACT | | | EGRESS". WINDOW #1 IS LOCATED IN THE LIVING ROOM AND IS | | | NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE EGRESS WINDOWS. IS THE IMPACT | | | EGRESS WINDOW MEANT TO BE THE ONE IN THE BEDROOM?. | | | REVISE WINDOW SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | *** PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER CLEARLY ADDRESSING | | | EACH COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | (561)805-6712 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-06-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-06-10 |
Time |
17:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-06-10 |
Time |
17:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-06-10 17:15:07 | | | | ****** REVISION TO THE ORIGINAL CHECKLIST DATED 5/28/14 | | | ***** | | | | | | | | | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | (REVISED): | | | CODE: 2010 FBC. | | | | | | 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS NO REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE REQUESTED THE FIRST TIME | | | BECAUSE PLANS SUBMITTED WERE NOT CLEAR. PLANS SHOW | | | FRAMING FOR A NEW ROOF THAT WAS ALREADY BUILT AND RED | | | TAGGED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR FOR BUILDING WITHOUT | | | PERMIT. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T SHOW AN EXISTING | | | CONDITION AND A PROPOSED CONDITION. THIS BUILDING WAS | | | BUILT IN 1952 AND ACCORDING TO CITY RECORDS THERE ARE | | | NOT BUILDING PERMITS FOR THIS PROPERTY. THEREFORE, IT | | | WAS MY IMPRESSION THAT ROOF WAS DAMAGED OVER THE YEARS | | | AND THAT'S WHY IT WAS REPAIRED/REBUILT. | | | SEC. 107.2.1 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. | | | | | | 2- ROOF BUILT UP: ENGINEERING ANALYSIS NOT REQUIRED AT | | | THIS TIME. | | | ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WAS REQUESTED THE FIRST TIME | | | BECAUSE OF THE SAME REASON EXPLAINED ON ITEM #1 ABOVE. | | | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. | | | | | | 3- DESIGNER TO REVISE INFORMATION ON SHEET 6.0 | | | A) REVISE DIMENSION "A". ACCORDING TO FOOTNOTE ON | | | FIGURE R301.2(7) THE MINIMUM DIMENSION FOR "A" IS 4'-0" | | | NOT 3'-0". | | | | | | B) REVISE THE DESIGN CRITERIA: CURRENT ASCE EDITION | | | THAT CORRESPONDS TO FBC 2010 IS ASCE 7-10 NOT ASCE | | | 7-05. (SEE CHAPTER 43: REFERENCED STANDARDS FOR CURRENT | | | EDITION). | | | | | | 4- ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF | | | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. SEC. 107.2.1 | | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. | | | | | | 5- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO | | | LOW. SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. VALUATION TO | | | INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND | | | PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. UPDATE THE | | | VALUATION AS REQUIRED TO INCLUDE THE ROOF BUILT UP, | | | REPLACEMENT OF DOOR AND WINDOWS, AND DESIGNER FEES. | | | | | | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: | | | A) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS | | | AND DETAILS. (NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED | | | CONNECTOR). | | | | | | B) EXTERIOR DOORS. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED | | | FROM JELD WEN. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE ANY | | | REFERENCE TO THE APPROVED FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | UNABLE TO VERIFY IF IT WAS APPROVED OR NOT. | | | | | | 7- WINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: | | | A) SHEET 3.0: SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING BEDROOM | | | WINDOW #2 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604.1 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | B) SHEET 4.0: CURRENT ASCE EDITION THAT CORRESPONDS TO | | | FBC-2010 IS ASCE 7-10 NOT ASCE 7-05. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. (SEE CHAPTER 43: REFERENCED STANDARDS FOR | | | CURRENT EDITION). | | | | | | | | | *** PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER CLEARLY ADDRESSING | | | EACH COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | (561)805-6712 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
JGOMEZ |
Date |
2014-05-28 |
Time |
17:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-05-28 |
Time |
17:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-05-28 17:49:08 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | CODE: 2010 FBC. | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 101.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | | | 2- ROOF BUILT UP: | | | PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED STRUCTURAL EVALUATION BY | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 506.2.2.1 OF | | | 2010 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TO | | | PROVIDE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SHOWING THAT PROPOSED | | | STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS | | | SUBMITTED WILL MEET THE LATERAL AND UPLIFT LOADS | | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC. | | | | | | 3- DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TO REVISE INFORMATION ON SHEET | | | 6.0 | | | A) REVISE THE ROOF ZONES ON THE GABLE ROOF PLAN. THE | | | WHOLE GABLE END FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 5'-0" IS | | | CONSIDERED ROOF ZONE #3. SEE FIGURE R803.2.3.1 OF 2010 | | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | B) REVISE THE DESIGN CRITERIA: CURRENT ASCE EDITION | | | THAT CORRESPONDS TO FBC 2010 IS ASCE 7-10 NOT ASCE | | | 7-05. | | | | | | 4- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO | | | LOW. SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. VALUATION TO | | | INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND | | | PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. UPDATE THE | | | VALUATION AS REQUIRED TO INCLUDE THE ROOF BUILT UP, | | | REPLACEMENT OF DOOR AND WINDOWS, DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | | FEES. | | | | | | 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: | | | A) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS | | | AND DETAILS. (NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED | | | CONNECTOR). | | | | | | B) EXTERIOR DOORS. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED | | | FROM JELD WEN. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE ANY | | | REFERENCE TO THE APPROVED FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | UNABLE TO VERIFY IF IT WAS APPROVED OR NOT. | | | | | | 6- WINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: | | | A) SHEET 3.0: SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING BEDROOM | | | WINDOW #2 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604.1 OF 2010 FBC-EXISTING | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | B) SHEET 4.0: CURRENT ASCE EDITION THAT CORRESPONDS TO | | | FBC-2010 IS ASCE 7-10 NOT ASCE 7-05. REVISE AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | *** PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER CLEARLY ADDRESSING | | | EACH COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | (561)805-6712 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-04-30 |
Time |
19:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-04-30 |
Time |
19:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-30 19:28:05 | ACCORDING TO THE SCOPE OF WORK AS DESCRIBED ON THE | | | PERMITS, THERE ARE NO ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS OTHER | | | THAN FOR | | | SMOKE DETECTORS AS PER | | | FBC-EXISTING SECTION 704.4.3 | | | SHALL BE REQUIRED | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-08-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-08-04 |
Time |
09:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-07-31 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-08-04 08:58:58 | RESUBMITTAL. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-07-28 |
Time |
17:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-07-21 |
Time |
17:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-28 17:19:54 | RE-SUBMITTAL SENT TO JULIO'S DESK FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-07-15 |
Time |
17:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-07-03 |
Time |
10:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-03 10:09:47 | INCOMING SENT TO J. GOMEZ . JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-06-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-06-10 |
Time |
17:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-06-10 |
Time |
17:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-05-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-05-28 |
Time |
17:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-04-14 |
Time |
06:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-15 06:34:17 | INCOMING SENT TO R07 BOX. JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-05-15 |
Time |
07:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-05-15 |
Time |
07:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-05-15 |
Time |
07:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-05-15 |
Time |
07:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-05-15 07:24:56 | ASSIGNED TO JGOMEZ TO COMPLETE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-05-28 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-05-28 |
Time |
10:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-06-03 10:01:04 | SHINGLES NOA 13-1104.12 SUBMITTED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2014-04-22 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2014-04-22 |
Time |
15:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-22 15:23:23 | 4/22/14 - 2014 VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION (TO DATE) DOES NOT | | | EXCEED 50 PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE. LL | | | | | | | | 2014-04-21 15:11:11 | 4/21/14 |
|
|
