Plan Review Details - Permit 14040366
Plan Review Stops For Permit 14040366
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2014-11-04 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-11-04 Time 17:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-11-04 Time 16:37 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-08-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-08-18 Time 12:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-08-18 Time 11:31 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-18 11:33:03BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 SUBMITTAL: 14040366
 PERMIT: 14040366
 ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY
 CONT: TBD
 TEL: (561)856-6655
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
  
 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3
 COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS,
 SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
 1ST REVIEW
 DATE: MON. AUGUST 18/ 2014
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) THIS REVISION CAME IN FOR ORIGINALLY PAVER WALKWAY,
 ASPHALT AND STIPPING REVISION TO THE PERMIT. WITHIN
 THIS SUBMITTAL IS SIGHT LIGHTING FOR THE WALKWAY. THE
 SITE PLAN NOR THE ELECTICAL PLANS PROVIDE AT WHAT
 HEIGHT THE FIXTURES WILL BE INSTALLED. THE
 MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATION FOR THE COLUMIA LIGHTING
 FIXTURE A OUTDOOR SIGN AND FACADE LUMINAIRE SHEET 2
 INDICATES THESE FIXTURES CAN BE MOUNTED FORM 3'-3" TO
 5'-0" AWAY FROM THE WALL. THE CONCERN IS COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE 2010 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE 307.2. PROTRUDING
 OBJECTS.
  
  
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-10-23 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2014-10-23 Time 10:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2014-10-23 Time 10:16 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2014-10-15 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 2014-10-15 Time 13:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 2014-10-15 Time 13:54 Sent To B
Notes
2014-10-15 13:55:11SEE ZONING PROVISOS
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2014-07-29 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 2014-07-29 Time 11:10 Rev Time 0.25
Received By cranford Date 2014-07-29 Time 11:09 Sent To FIRE
Notes
2014-07-29 11:10:31SEE ZONING DEPT COMMENTS. PREVIOUS CONCERNS HAVE NOT
 BEEN ADDRESSED BY THIS SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-06-19 Cont ID  
Sent By mgonzale Date 2014-06-19 Time   Rev Time 0.25
Received By mgonzale Date 2014-06-19 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-06-19 15:59:19PLANS ARE NOT DETAILED.
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-07-30 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2014-07-30 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2014-07-30 Time 09:04 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2014-11-04 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-11-04 Time 17:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-08-29 Time 12:33 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-21 09:17:5510/21 TO ELEC BOX
  
2014-08-29 12:34:37INCOMING SENT TO ZONING, E, & B.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2014-08-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-08-18 Time 12:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-07-08 Time 12:50 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-15 12:56:458/15 TO JW DESK
  
2014-07-08 12:50:47TO ZONING
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2014-08-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-08-18 Time 12:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-04-09 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-11 14:30:18SENT TO ZONING SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2014-10-01 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2014-10-01 Time 13:34 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 2014-10-01 Time 13:34 Sent To ENG
Notes
2014-10-01 13:41:27PASSED W/PROVISOS
  
 1) PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION (104) FOR THE
 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION,
  
 A. THE FENCE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE NEW SIDEWALK
 AND NORTH OF THE EQUIPMENT AREA, CALLED OUT ON SHEET
 SK1, SHALL BE INSTALLED AFTER THE APPROVAL OF A PERMIT.
  
 B. TWO SIGNS WARNING OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS SHALL BE
 INSTALLED. ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED GENERALLY IN EACH
 LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET SK 1. THE SIGNS SHALL NOT BE
 PLACED SO AS TO BLOCK SIGHT LINES.
  
 C. THE LIGHTING SHALL BE INSTALLED.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2014-07-28 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2014-07-28 Time 14:24 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2014-07-28 Time 14:24 Sent To ENG
Notes
2014-07-28 15:34:15FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO THE COMMENTS IN WRITING.
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT:THE MODIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THIS
 PERMIT REQUIRE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF A MINOR PD
 AMENDMENT BY THE PLANNING DIVISION. THERE HAS BEEN NO
 RESUBMITTAL FOR THE OPEN MINOR PD AMENDMENT SINCE THE
 LATEST COMMENTS WERE ISSUED JUNE 6, 2013. COMMENTS
 OUTSTANDING FROM THAT REVIEW INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT
 LIMITED TO:
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE FULL, TO SCALE, DETAILS ON
 HOW THE SIDEWALK WILL FUNCTION, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS.
 THE BASE SITE PLAN THAT HAS BEEN USED TO SHOW THE NEW
 WALKWAY CONTINUES TO BE A COPY OF A SURVEY THAT IS NOT
 TO SCALE. THE BASE SITE PLAN (OR SURVEY) SHALL BE TO
 SCALE WITH THE WALKWAY INFORMATION DRAWN ON IT AT THE
 SAME SCALE AS THE BASE SITE PLAN. SCALED DIMENSIONS
 SHALL BE INCLUDED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 BASE LIGHTNING PLAN IS SUBMITTED TO SCALE.
  
 EXAMPLES OF SCALE INCONSISTENCIES:
  
 I. THE PATH IS LISTED AT 3 FEET WIDE. USING THIS AS A
 BASE, THE VEHICLE SHOWN IS 6 FEET, NOT 7 FEET WIDE AND
 THE TURNING RADIUS DETAILS ARE NOT THE LENGTH LISTED,
 THEREFORE, THE TURNING RADIUS AS SHOWN IS NOT
 ACCEPTABLE AS STAFF CAN NOT VERIFY THAT THE VEHICLES
 WILL NOT SWING INTO THE ADA PATH.
  
 II. THE EXPANDED CROSS HATCHED AREA WHERE THE ADA PATH
 MEETS THE BASE OF THE STEPS IS SHOWN AS 5 FEET SQUARE,
 YET WHEN USING THE 3 FOOT WIDE PATH AS A BASE, THE AREA
 MEASURES 8 FEET ON A SIDE.
  
 B. REPEAT COMMENT: ADDRESSING WHY THE WALKWAY CANNOT BE
 A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET IN WIDTH TO ALLOW ADEQUATE
 ROOM FOR TWO PEOPLE WITH BAGS CONTAINING WORKOUT GEAR
 TO PASS EACH OTHER WITHOUT FORCING ONE OF THE PEOPLE
 INTO THE VEHICLE TRAVEL LANE.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: UPON SUBMITTAL OF PLANS COMPLYING
 WITH COMMENT NO. 1, ZONING STAFF WILL PROVIDE A FULL
 PLAN REVIEW. STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THERE IS A DIMENSION
 LINE INCLUDED FOR A 21 FOOT DRIVE, WHICH INCLUDES A
 PORTION OF THE CURB. CURBS MAY NOT BE SHOWN AS PART OF
 THE DRIVE AISLE.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF A RECORDED
 CROSS ACCESS AGREEMENT/EASEMENT FOR THE PORTIONS OF THE
 ACCESS AND EGRESS ROUTES WHICH CROSS ONTO THE OFFICE
 TOWER PARCEL.
  
 4) IT APPEARS THAT THE LIGHTING, MOUNTED 1 FOOT OFF OF
 THE 6 FOOT TALL WALL, WILL ENCROACH INTO THE ALREADY
 NARROW PEDESTRIAN PATH AND PRESENT OBSTRUCTIONS FOR
 TALL PEDESTRIANS. ADDITIONALLY, THE LIGHTS SEEM TO BE
 AROUND EYE LEVEL FOR MANY PEDESTRIANS, WHICH CAN CREATE
 AN UNSAFE NIGHT BLINDNESS CONDITION. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 CROSS SECTION OF THE LIGHTS MOUNTED TO THE WALL TO
 VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED LIGHTING WILL NOT NEGATIVELY
 IMPACT PEDESTRIANS.
  
 5) SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 THE NEW FENCING AND LIGHTING SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
  
2014-07-09 09:41:277/9/14 ZONING SENT TO ES. SG
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-06-12 Cont ID  
Sent By ESchneid Date 2014-06-12 Time 11:44 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 2014-06-12 Time 11:44 Sent To ENG
Notes
2014-06-12 11:47:02FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO THE COMMENTS IN WRITING.
  
 1) THE MODIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PERMIT REQUIRE THE
 PRIOR APPROVAL OF A MINOR PD AMENDMENT BY THE PLANNING
 DIVISION. THERE HAS BEEN NO RESUBMITTAL FOR THE OPEN
 MINOR PD AMENDMENT SINCE THE LATEST COMMENTS WERE
 ISSUED JUNE 6, 2013. COMMENTS OUTSTANDING FROM THAT
 REVIEW INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
  
 A. PROVIDE FULL, TO SCALE, DETAILS ON HOW THE SIDEWALK
 WILL FUNCTION, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS. THE BASE SITE PLAN
 THAT HAS BEEN USED TO SHOW THE NEW WALKWAY CONTINUES TO
 BE A COPY OF A SURVEY THAT IS NOT TO SCALE. THE BASE
 SITE PLAN (OR SURVEY) SHALL BE TO SCALE WITH THE
 WALKWAY INFORMATION DRAWN ON IT AT THE SAME SCALE AS
 THE BASE SITE PLAN. SCALED DIMENSIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 B. ADDRESSING WHY THE WALKWAY CANNOT BE A MINIMUM OF
 SIX (6) FEET IN WIDTH TO ALLOW ADEQUATE ROOM FOR TWO
 PEOPLE WITH BAGS CONTAINING WORKOUT GEAR TO PASS EACH
 OTHER WITHOUT FORCING ONE OF THE PEOPLE INTO THE
 VEHICLE TRAVEL LANE.
  
 C. SPECIFIC RESPONSE WITH DETAILS ON HOW THE WALKWAY
 WILL BE LIGHTED (MORE THAN JUST "LIT PER FBC 2010") AND
 WHAT ADDITIONAL SECURITY PROCEDURES WILL BE IN PLACE.
 THIS AREA IS ISOLATED AT NIGHT AND ON WEEKENDS WHEN THE
 OFFICE TOWER IS CLOSED WITH NO NATURAL SURVEILLANCE
 FROM INSIDE OR OUTSIDE OF CITYPLACE. SAFE SIGHTING
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE ENTIRE WALKWAY, NOT JUST
 AGAINST THE WALL.
  
 THERE HAD BEEN FOLLOW UP DISCUSSIONS WITH THE MINOR PD
 AMENDMENT APPLICANT AFTER STAFF NOTED THAT THE MELLOW
 MUSHROOM IS USING THE DRIVE AREA ADJACENT TO THE
 PROPOSED STRIPED ADA WALKWAY AS AN AREA FOR TAKEOUT
 PICK UP. IT WAS CONVEYED TO THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT
 APPLICANT THAT A TURNING RADIUS IS REQUIRED TO SHOW
 THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT AREA THAT A CUSTOMER TURNING
 INTO THE PICKUP LANE WILL NOT ENCROACH INTO THE STRIPED
 ADA WALKWAY. PLANS SHALL BE SHOWN TO SCALE.
  
 2) UPON SUBMITTAL OF PLANS COMPLYING WITH COMMENT NO.
 1, ZONING STAFF WILL PROVIDE A FULL PLAN REVIEW. STAFF
 HAS NOTED THAT THERE IS A DIMENSION LINE INCLUDED FOR A
 21 FOOT DRIVE, WHICH INCLUDES A PORTION OF THE CURB.
 CURBS MAY NOT BE SHOWN AS PART OF THE DRIVE AISLE.
  
 3) PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF A RECORDED CROSS ACCESS
 AGREEMENT/EASEMENT FOR THE PORTIONS OF THE ACCESS AND
 EGRESS ROUTES WHICH CROSS ONTO THE OFFICE TOWER PARCEL.
  
 4) SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 THE WORK ON THE OFFICE TOWER PARCEL, TO INCLUDE WALKWAY
 STRIPING AND LIGHTING. THE SAME PLANS MAY BE USED FOR
 BOTH APPLICATIONS.
  
 5) THE NEW FENCING SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN REQUIRES A
 SEPARATE PERMIT, INCLUDING FENCE DETAILS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
2014-04-11 14:44:254/11/14 ZONING RECEIVED, SENT TO ES. SG


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved