| Plan Review Stops For Permit 14040255 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
Time |
13:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
Time |
13:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-08 14:02:12 | SITE SPECIFIC ENGINEERING RATIONAL ANALYSIS FOR FRONT | | | ENTRY DOOR. | | | PROVISO: SHUTTERS OR STORM PANELS ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2014-06-24 |
Time |
21:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2014-06-24 |
Time |
21:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-06-24 21:45:49 | REVIEW WILL NOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL FEES ARE PAID | | | | | | REVISION FEES HAVE NOT BEEN PAID. REVIEW CANNOT BE | | | COMPLETED UNTIL THE REVISION FEES ARE PAID. | | | | | | COMMENCED THE REVIEW OF THE FRONT ENTRY DOOR SUBMITTAL | | | BEFORE REALIZING THAT THE REVISION FEES HAVE NOT BEEN | | | PAID. NO REVIEW SHOULD HAVE BEEN PERFORMED BEFORE | | | PAYMENT OF FEES. THERE IS AN OUTSTANDING FEE OF $1,463 | | | UNDER REVISION TRACKING # 14040255. | | | | | | AS THE REVIEW HAD BEEN STARTED IN ERROR, THE INITIAL | | | OBSERVATIONS ARE BEING PASSED AS A COURTESY: | | | | | | 1) TIMOTHY MESSLER, P.E., STATES IN HIS LETTER THAT | | | EXHIBIT C IS A PRODUCT APPROVAL (NOA# 14-0303.07) FOR A | | | DOOR OF SIMILAR CONSTRUCTION. THAT IS NOT CORRECT, AS | | | THAT DOOR IS 2.835 INCHES THICK AND IS MADE FROM | | | MAHOGANY, WHILE THE PROPOSED DOOR IS 1.75 INCHES THICK | | | AND SPECIFIED AS SOUTHERN FIR. PLEASE PROVIDE AN | | | ALTERNATE PRODUCT APPROVAL TO SUPPORT YOUR | | | COMPARISON/RATIONAL ANALYSIS. ALSO THE DOOR IN THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS APPROVED CONFIGURATIONS THAT | | | INCLUDE EITHER SIDE LIGHTS OR A TRANSOM, WHILE THE | | | PROPOSED DOOR HAS BOTH AND THE ENGINEER HAS PROVIDED NO | | | STATEMENT REGARDING THAT DIFFERENCE IN CONFIGURATION. | | | | | | 2) EXHIBIT A AND B STATE THE THICKNESS OF THE PROPOSED | | | DOOR AS 1.75 INCHES, BUT THEY DO NOT STATE THE | | | THICKNESS OF THE DOOR FRAME AND SIDE LIGHT FRAME | | | MEMBERS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO SPAN VERTICALLY FROM THE | | | THRESHOLD UP TO THE LINTEL/HEADER. NO COMPARISON WITH A | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR A DOOR OF SIMILAR CONSTRUCTION CAN | | | BE PERFORMED WITHOUT KNOWING THE THICKNESS OF THOSE | | | FRAME MEMBERS. | | | | | | 3) THE SUBMITTED COPY OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS | | | MISSING DRAWING SHEETS 5, 6, 10, AND 11. | | | | | | 4) THE SUBMITTED COPY OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS HARDLY | | | LEGIBLE AS IT HAS BEEN PRINTED REDUCED SCALE SO THAT | | | FOUR 8.5 X 11 PAGES FIT ON ONE 8.5 X 11 SHEET | | | | | | THE REVIEW WAS NOT COMPLETED DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF | | | FEES. | | | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652 ROBERT BROWN | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
2014-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-04-29 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-04-29 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-29 11:10:59 | | | | ***REVIEW IN PROGRESS... PENDING BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | (ROBERT BROWN) APPROVAL OF SITE SPECIFIC ENTRY DOOR | | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-04-07 |
Time |
15:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-04-07 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-07 16:11:03 | BUILDING REVISION COMMENTS. | | | CODE: 2010 FBC. | | | | | | 1- A) REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED FOR THE MAIN | | | HOUSE. THE AREA-WEIGHTED AVERAGE MAXIMUM FENESTRATION | | | SHGC PERMITTED SHALL BE 0.50. SEE SECTION 402.5 OF 2010 | | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. THIS IS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | | 405.2. ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED SHOW 0.640. | | | | | | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: | | | A) ENTRY DOORS WITH SIZE (3'-6" X 8'-0") AND WITH | | | SIDELITES AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND TYPE OF DOOR (WOOD) AS | | | SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 3- NEW ITEM: ENTRY DOOR WITH HURRICANE SHUTTERS. | | | PROVIDE HURRICANE SHUTTERS COMPLETE INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-04-16 |
Time |
16:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-04-16 |
Time |
14:57 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-16 16:42:53 | ONLY THE FIRST PLANS ARE ARCHIVED IN TO FILENET, SO | | | DETERMINING THE EXTENT OF THIS REVISION IS IMPOSSIBLE | | | WITH WHAT I HAVE IN FRONT OF ME. THEREFORE I REVIEWED | | | THE CLOUDED AREAS AND COMMENTED ACCORDINGLY, AS STATED | | | BELOW: | | | ELECTRICAL NOTE: | | | 1. AS PER NEC 210.8(A)2, OUTLETS IN THE GARAGE, UTILITY | | | AND WORK ROOM ETC. SHALL BE GFCI PROTECTED. | | | 2. AS PER NEC 314.27, BOXES USED FOR HANGING FIXTURES | | | IN THE CEILING SHALL BE LISTED TO SUPPORT A MINIMUM OF | | | 50 LBS. | | | ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-06-12 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-06-18 08:37:21 | 6/16/14 CUSTOM MADE ENTRY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED SENT TO ROBERT BROWN'S DESK FOR | | | REVIEW. JG. | | 2014-06-12 11:55:26 | SENT TO J. GOMEZ DESK. JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-04-22 |
Time |
14:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-24 14:01:31 | 1) ENTRY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL INFORMATION SENT TO | | | ROBERT BROWN FOR REVIEW. JG. | | | | | | 2) REVISION RESUBMITTAL SENT TO JULIO'S DESK FOR | | | REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-04-16 |
Time |
16:43 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-03-25 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-16 17:02:23 | SENT TO SMALL DENIED BIN "C" | | 2014-04-07 15:50:58 | REVISION SENT TO R9 SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-06-18 |
Time |
08:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-06-18 |
Time |
08:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-05-14 |
Time |
08:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-05-14 |
Time |
08:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-05-14 08:52:02 | COMMENTS TO REVISED PLUMBING RISER SUBMITTED BY THE | | | ARCHITECT ON 5/1/14 VIA E-MAIL | | | CODE: 2010 FBC. | | | | | | | | | REVISION: SECOND PLUMBING REVIEW CHECKLIST. | | | CODE: 2010 FBC. | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE CLEAR AND ACCURATE PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM | | | THAT MATCHES REVISED FLOOR PLAN. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC. | | | REPEAT COMMENT. PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM DOESN'T MATCH | | | FLOOR PLANS. ALSO, THIS IS A TWO STORY HOUSE. PLUMBING | | | RISER SUBMITTED ONLY SHOWS ONE FLOOR. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-04-29 |
Time |
16:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2014-04-29 |
Time |
16:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-29 17:02:46 | REVISION, PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | CODE: 2010 FBC. | | | | | | 1- PROVIDE CLEAR AND ACCURATE PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM | | | THAT MATCHES REVISED FLOOR PLAN. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY | | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2014-04-15 |
Time |
09:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2014-04-14 |
Time |
15:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-15 09:38:05 | 4/15/14 - SENT BACK TO R09. DK | | 2014-04-15 09:37:46 | 4/15/14 - CALLED CONTRACTOR TO INFORM OF ZONING | | | COMMENTS AND SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT REQUIRED. DK | | | | | 2014-04-15 09:37:12 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 4/15/14 | | | | | | PLAN SUBMITTED WAS A REVISION TO ORIGINALLY APPROVED | | | PERMIT #12090646. ZONING APPROVED CHANGES, HOWEVER, | | | ORIGINAL PERMIT HAD A PROVISO THAT SEPARATE LANDSCAPE | | | PERMIT MUST BE SUBMITTED WHICH IS STILL VALID AND | | | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | ***PREVIOUS PROVISO**** (1/23/2013) | | | "PLEASE BE ADVISED; THE LANDSCAPE PLANS THAT WERE | | | SUBMITTED MUST BE UPDATED TO INCLUDE LANDSCAPE DATA | | | DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442 OF THE | | | ZLDR. AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED, THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING | | | MUST OBTAIN VIA A SEPARATE PERMIT" | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | 2014-04-14 11:35:08 | 4/14/14 |
|
|
