| Plan Review Stops For Permit 14040174 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-20 |
Time |
09:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-04-30 |
Time |
07:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-04-30 |
Time |
07:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-30 07:38:37 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS, FS 471. | | | | | | 2. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE ACCURATE | | | INFORMATION ON THE "RESUBMITTAL" FORM. THE CONTRACTOR | | | FOR THIS JOB IS "LIN R ROGERS." AS DOCUMENTS ARE FILED | | | BY CONTRACTOR NAME, PROVIDING A NAME OTHER THAN | | | CONTRACTOR IN THE "CONTRACTOR" LINE MAY RESULT IN THE | | | PLANS BEING MISFILED. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-04 |
Time |
09:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-04 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-04 09:29:50 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. THE ENGINEERING PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED (NOW WITH THE | | | VOIDED OLD SET OF PLANS) DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS AND | | | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THE SAME POLE IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 12/4/14 ENGINEERING FOR CALCS ARE NOW WITH THE NEW, | | | MOST RECENT SET OF PLANS. ENGINEER TO CONFIRM THAT THIS | | | IS THE POLE PROPOSED. | | | | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD IS TO REVIEW DELEGATED ENGINEERING, | | | SEE FAC61G15. THIS MAY BE DONE BY INCORPORATING A | | | REFERENCE TO THE ENGINEERING INTO THE PLAN, A SHOP | | | DRAWING REVIEW STAMP, OR BY LETTER. | | | | | | 2. OK | | | | | | 3. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE POLE ENGINEERING WAS APPROVED | | | WITH PROVISO. FIXTURE CALCS WERE TO BE SUBMITTED AS A | | | REVISION SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION. THIS | | | MAY BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME (BUT IS NOT REQUIRED). | | | | | | 4. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE COLLATED | | | SETS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. IF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | POLE CALCS ARE TO BE A PART OF THE ISSUED PERMIT, | | | PLEASE INCLUDE WITH THE NEW SETS. PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE | | | ANY OLD SHEETS FROM THE PACKAGE. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-01 09:58:50 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. THE ENGINEERING PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED (NOW WITH THE | | | VOIDED OLD SET OF PLANS) DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS AND | | | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THE SAME POLE IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | ENGINEER OF RECORD IS TO REVIEW DELEGATED ENGINEERING, | | | SEE FAC61G15. THIS MAY BE DONE BY INCORPORATING A | | | REFERENCE TO THE ENGINEERING INTO THE PLAN, A SHOP | | | DRAWING REVIEW STAMP, OR BY LETTER. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB. VALUE | | | IS TO INCLUDE LABOR, MATERIALS, ENGINEERING, OVERHEAD | | | AND PROFIT FBC 109. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE POLE ENGINEERING WAS APPROVED | | | WITH PROVISO. FIXTURE CALCS WERE TO BE SUBMITTED AS A | | | REVISION SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION. THIS | | | MAY BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME (BUT IS NOT REQUIRED). | | | | | | 4. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE COLLATED | | | SETS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. IF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | POLE CALCS ARE TO BE A PART OF THE ISSUED PERMIT, | | | PLEASE INCLUDE WITH THE NEW SETS. PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE | | | ANY OLD SHEETS FROM THE PACKAGE. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-07-07 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-07-03 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-03 15:50:49 | PROVISO - SUBMIT FIXTURE CALCS AS A REVISION SUBJECT TO | | | FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-06-20 |
Time |
18:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-06-20 |
Time |
18:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-06-20 18:48:11 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. FBC 1609, PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR THE LIGHT | | | POLE AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED BY THE ELECTRICAL | | | REVIEWER. INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2015-04-01 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-04-01 |
Time |
16:05 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-01 16:06:07 | 4/1/2015 APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION. | | | COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING. FBC-E | | | 505.2.4 | | | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-11-21 |
Time |
13:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-11-21 |
Time |
13:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-21 13:48:18 | ROUTE TO MISC. 1 | | | | | | 11/21/14 APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION. | | | THIS APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ALL THE REQUIRED | | | DOCUMENTATION: | | | 1.PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS FOR THE POLES AS WELL AS FOR THE | | | PROPOSED HEADS. | | | 2. PROVIDE ENGINEERED WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS OF THE | | | POLES WITH THE RESPECTIVE HEADS ATTACHED. FBC-1609 | | | 3. COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FBC-ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING. FBC-E | | | 505.2.4 | | | 4. VERIFY EXISTING WIRING COMPLIES WITH NEC 300.5(B). | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT DAVID HAYES (561) 805-6717 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-09-15 |
Time |
10:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-09-15 |
Time |
10:03 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-15 10:05:48 | DATE: 09/15/2014 | | | PROJECT: WELLS FARGO | | | PERMIT#: 14040174 | | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC | | | 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC | | | 2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, | | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | | 1ST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | ACTION: PROVISO | | | | | | ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING NOT EXEMPTED BY FBC 505.1 SHALL | | | HAVE AUTOMATIC CONTROLS TO TURN OFF AT DAYLIGHT OR WHEN | | | NOT REQUIRED. CONTROLS SHALL BE PHOTOSENSOR & TIME | | | CLOCK OR ASTRONOMICAL TIME SWITCH. ALL TIME SWITCHES | | | SHALL BE CAPABLE OF RETAINING PROGRAMING DURING A LOSS | | | OF POWER FOR A MINIMUM OF 10 HOURS. FBC-E 505.2.4 | | | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
Time |
11:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
Time |
11:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-08 11:03:41 | DATE: 7/8/2014 | | | PROJECT: WELLS FARGO | | | PERMIT#: 14040174 | | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC | | | 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC | | | 2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, | | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | | 1ST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | ACTION: PROVISO | | | | | | ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING NOT EXEMPTED BY FBC 505.1 SHALL | | | HAVE AUTOMATIC CONTROLS TO TURN OFF AT DAYLIGHT OR WHEN | | | NOT REQUIRED. CONTROLS SHALL BE PHOTOSENSOR & TIME | | | CLOCK OR ASTRONOMICAL TIME SWITCH. ALL TIME SWITCHES | | | SHALL BE CAPABLE OF RETAINING PROGRAMING DURING A LOSS | | | OF POWER FOR A MINIMUM OF 10 HOURS. FBC-E 505.2.4 | | | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-06-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-06-13 |
Time |
12:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-06-13 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-06-13 12:05:03 | FAILED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES RAISED ON THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW. SINCE THIS INVOLVES THE PLACEMENT OF NEW POLES, | | | A "B" STOP WAS CREATED AND THUS ROUTED THERE FOR | | | REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-04-14 |
Time |
15:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-04-14 |
Time |
15:35 |
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-14 15:45:18 | THIS APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ALL THE REQUIRED | | | DOCUMENTATION AND NOTES AS MENTIONED BELOW: | | | 1. YOU SHALL PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS FOR THE POLES AS WELL | | | AS FOR THE PROPOSED HEADS. | | | 2. YOU SHALL PROVIDE ENGINEERED WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS | | | OF THE POLES WITH THE RESPECTIVE HEADS ATTACHED. | | | 3. YOU SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR | | | LIGHTING. | | | 4. IF YOU WILL BE USING EXISTING WIRING, YOU MUST | | | VERIFY THAT IT COMPLIES WITH NEC 300.5(B). | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT MIKE ALBARRAN (561) 805-6718 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-05-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-20 |
Time |
09:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-11 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-12 09:37:16 | SENT TO S. HILLS DESK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-04-30 |
Time |
07:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-04-01 |
Time |
16:04 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-11-03 |
Time |
15:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-03 15:12:31 | INCOMING SENT TO ZONING BOX. JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-09-29 |
Time |
13:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-08-29 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-08-29 11:09:02 | SENT TO D HAYES. JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
Time |
11:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-07-03 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-03 15:50:13 | TO DAH |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-06-05 |
Time |
11:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-06-05 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-08 11:05:04 | 06/05/14 PER S. HILL | | 2014-06-20 18:50:13 | 6/20 TO ZONING | | | | | 2014-06-15 14:33:39 | 6/15 TO MISC 2 | | | | | 2014-06-05 09:29:49 | INCOMING SENT TO ELECTRICAL BOX . JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-04-14 |
Time |
15:46 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-14 15:47:15 | SMALL DENIED "R" | | 2014-04-04 10:53:07 | ROUTED TO ELECTRICAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2015-04-30 |
Time |
07:40 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-04-20 |
Time |
16:17 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-20 16:20:30 | PASSED | | | | | | A SHEET SHOWING THAT THE PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS AT | | | THE MIDPOINT OF LAKE AVENUE AND WILL NOT EXCEED 0.5 | | | FOOTCANDLES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-11-18 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-11-18 |
Time |
12:39 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-18 17:08:04 | FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A RECENT SURVEY, LESS THAN | | | ONE YEAR OLD, WHICH INCLUDES THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | EXISTING TREES ALONG LAKE AVENUE AND THE EXISTING LIGHT | | | POLES. THE SURVEY SHALL BE TO SCALE WITH ALL DIMENSION | | | LINES SHOWN. THE PLANS PROVIDED WERE SIGNED AND SEALED | | | BY AN ENGINEER AND NOT A SURVEYOR. THE SUBMITTED PLANS | | | DO NOT MATCH THE OBSERVED SITE CONDITIONS (EXISTING | | | TREES NOT SHOWN ON PLANS) AND THE PROPERTY LINE DOES | | | NOT MATCH AN OLDER PLAN FOR THE SITE. THE SETBACKS AND | | | ROAD CENTER LINE ARE IN QUESTIONS WITHOUT A SURVEY. | | | | | | 2) REVISED COMMENT: IT IS STATED THAT AN EXISTING TREE | | | WILL BE REMOVED TO INSTALL NEW POLE G1. YOU MAY NOT | | | REMOVE A REQUIRED BUFFER TREE TO INSTALL A LIGHT POLE | | | UNLESS THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS APPROVED A TREE | | | ALTERATION PERMIT. THE REMOVED TREE SHALL BE | | | RELOCATED/REPLACED WITHIN THE BUFFER. STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | THAT THE POLES SHALL BE PLACED TO AVOID REMOVING OR | | | RELOCATING TREES. | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SOUTHERN A2 POST IS ON PARCEL | | | 74434404000020010. A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR | | | THE WORK ON THE 2ND PARCEL IS REQUIRED. THE SAME PLANS | | | MAY BE USED FOR BOTH. ZONING WILL NOT APPROVE THIS | | | PERMIT APPLICATION UNTIL THE APPLICATION FOR THE OTHER | | | PROPERTY IS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 4) THE FOLLOWING PREVIOUS COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN | | | ADDRESSED, BUT ARE PENDING FINAL VERIFICATION BASED ON | | | THE SURVEY. | | | | | | A. THE SITE PLAN (OR MARKED UP SURVEY) SHALL SHOW THE | | | PROPOSED NEW AND REPLACEMENT LIGHT POLES WITH THEIR | | | DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | NEW AND REPLACEMENT POLES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF | | | 5 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | B. THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE | | | CENTERLINE OF LAKE AVENUE. HALF OF LAKE AVENUE ABUTTING | | | THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE SITE IS RESIDENTIALLY ZONED. | | | THE PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE | | | MIDPOINT OF LAKE AVENUE AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 | | | FOOTCANDLES. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-09-29 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-09-29 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-29 13:18:09 | FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A RECENT SURVEY, LESS THAN | | | ONE YEAR OLD, WHICH INCLUDES THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | EXISTING TREES ALONG LAKE AVENUE AND THE EXISTING LIGHT | | | POLES. THE SURVEY SHALL BE TO SCALE WITH ALL DIMENSION | | | LINES SHOWN. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE PLAN (OR MARKED UP SURVEY) | | | SHALL SHOW THE PROPOSED NEW AND REPLACEMENT LIGHT POLES | | | WITH THEIR DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT NEW AND REPLACEMENT POLES SHALL BE LOCATED A | | | MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: ONE OF THE NEW POLES ALONG LAKE | | | AVENUE APPEARS THAT IT WOULD CONFLICT WITH AN EXISTING | | | TREE. THE POLES SHALL BE PLACED TO AVOID TREES AND | | | THEIR CANOPY GROWTH. | | | | | | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SOUTHERN A2 POST APPEARS THAT IT | | | IS NOT ON PARCEL 74434404000020020, BUT RATHER PARCEL | | | 74434404000020010. THIS WILL BE VERIFIED WITH THE | | | SURVEY. IF THE POST IS ON THE NEIGHBORING PARCEL, THEN | | | A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE WORK ON THE 2ND | | | PARCEL IS REQUIRED. THE SAME PLANS MAY BE USED FOR | | | BOTH. | | | | | | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL CLEARLY | | | SHOW THE CENTERLINE OF LAKE AVENUE. HALF OF LAKE AVENUE | | | ABUTTING THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE SITE IS RESIDENTIALLY | | | ZONED. THE PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | TO THE MIDPOINT OF LAKE AVENUE AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 | | | FOOTCANDLES. THE PROVIDED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN HAS BEEN | | | UPDATED TO LOWER THE LIGHT LEVELS, BUT WITHOUT THE | | | REQUIRED DIMENSIONS OR THE SURVEY, STAFF IS UNABLE TO | | | VERIFY IF THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN MET. | | | | | | 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | SO THAT GLARE DOES NOT SPILL INTO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | (DRIVERS VISION). PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION HOW GLARE | | | WILL BE CONTROLLED. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-07-07 |
Time |
08:44 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-07-07 |
Time |
08:44 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-07-07 10:21:19 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE A RECENT SURVEY, LESS THAN ONE YEAR OLD, | | | WHICH INCLUDES THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING TREES | | | ALONG LAKE AVENUE AND THE EXISTING LIGHT POLES. THE | | | SURVEY SHALL BE TO SCALE WITH ALL DIMENSION LINES | | | SHOWN. | | | | | | 2) THE SITE PLAN (OR MARKED UP SURVEY) SHALL SHOW THE | | | PROPOSED NEW AND REPLACEMENT LIGHT POLES WITH THEIR | | | DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | NEW AND REPLACEMENT POLES SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF | | | 5 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 3) ONE OF THE NEW POLES ALONG LAKE AVENUE APPEARS THAT | | | IT WOULD CONFLICT WITH AN EXISTING TREE. THE POLES | | | SHALL BE PLACED TO AVOID TREES AND THEIR CANOPY GROWTH. | | | | | | 4) THE SOUTHERN A2 POST APPEARS THAT IT IS NOT ON | | | PARCEL 74434404000020020, BUT RATHER PARCEL | | | 74434404000020010. THIS WILL BE VERIFIED WITH THE | | | SURVEY. IF THE POST IS ON THE NEIGHBORING PARCEL, THEN | | | A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE WORK ON THE 2ND | | | PARCEL IS REQUIRED. THE SAME PLANS MAY BE USED FOR | | | BOTH. | | | | | | 5) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE | | | CENTERLINE OF LAKE AVENUE. HALF OF LAKE AVENUE ABUTTING | | | THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE SITE IS RESIDENTIALLY ZONED. | | | THE PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE | | | MIDPOINT OF LAKE AVENUE AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 | | | FOOTCANDLES. THE PROVIDED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SEEMS TO | | | INDICATE HIGHER LIGHT LEVELS. | | | | | | 6) THE LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE DESIGNED SO THAT GLARE | | | DOES NOT SPILL INTO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY (DRIVERS VISION). | | | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION HOW GLARE WILL BE | | | CONTROLLED. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
|
|
