| 2014-03-28 16:01:57 | REROOF, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- STEEL DECK: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS USING THE |
| | RESULTS OF THE WITHDRAWAL TEST REPORT (TAS 105) AS |
| | REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #6 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA |
| | 13-0424.13 SUBMITTED. INFORMATION SUBMITTED ARE NOT RAS |
| | 117 CALCULATIONS. SEC. 1609 OF 2010 FBC. ***NOTE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1(C) BELOW. |
| | |
| | B) CLARIFY WHY THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE WOOD DECK |
| | ARE DONE BASED ON BUILDING EXPOSURE "D", WHILE THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE STEEL DECK ARE DONE BASED ON |
| | BUILDING EXPOSURE "B". WHY TWO DIFFERENT BUILDING |
| | EXPOSURES ON THE SAME BUILDING?. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ***NOTE: ACCORDING TO SEC. 1609 THIS BUILDING IS |
| | LOCATED IN EXPOSURE"C". |
| | |
| | C) CAREFULLY READ THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY ON PAGE 14 OF |
| | NOA 13-0424.13 SUBMITTED. THIS ASSEMBLY REQUIRES THE |
| | INSULATION TO BE MECHANICALLY FASTENED. THE RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS APPLY TO THE INSULATION FASTENING. |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1(A) ABOVE. SEC. 1609 FBC. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2- WOOD DECK: |
| | A)REVISE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS. BASE SHEET FASTENING |
| | DOESN'T WORK FOR ROOF ZONES # 2 AND #3 FOR THE |
| | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. PROVIDE THE RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH |
| | ITEM #1(B) ABOVE. SEC. 1609 FBC. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL, LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT, AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES. SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $84,760 FOR 13,000 S.F. OF |
| | ROOF AREA =/- . THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $2115.39. |
| | |
| | ***NOTES: ANY ROOF EQUIPMENT REMOVAL OR RETROFIT ROOF |
| | DRAINS REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |