Plan Review Details - Permit 14011133
Plan Review Stops For Permit 14011133
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2014-05-07 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2014-05-07 Time 11:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2014-05-02 Time 17:19 Sent To  
Notes
2014-05-05 17:19:58TO ZONING
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2014-04-30 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2014-04-30 Time 15:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-09 10:58:01SENT TO ZONING. JW
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2014-02-21 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2014-02-21 Time 15:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2014-01-21 Time 13:34 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-23 13:35:22REVISION SENT TO ZONING SHELF FOR ERIC'S REVIEW. JG.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2014-05-07 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2014-05-07 Time 11:07 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2014-05-07 Time 11:07 Sent To PC
Notes
2014-05-07 11:53:10PASSED W/PROVISO
  
 1) THERE ARE SHRUBS SHOWN ON TOP OF THE SIDEWALK
 LEADING TO THE REAR DOORS OF BUILDING J-6. THE PLANS
 HAVE BEEN RED LINED TO REQUIRE THAT THE NO PLANTING
 OCCUR ON THE SIDEWALK.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS, WHILE NOT AFFECTING THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVAL, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN THE
 FUTURE TO IMPROVE THE AESTHETICS OF THE PALM BEACH
 OUTLETS.
  
 1) STAFF IS DISAPPOINTED TO SEE THAT THERE WAS NO
 OPPORTUNITY TO INSTALL THE GROUND COVER IN THE OPEN
 AREA EAST OF BUILDING J-6 AS HAD BEEN SHOWN IN PREVIOUS
 VERSIONS OF THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN.
  
 2) STAFF IS DISAPPOINTED TO SEE THAT THE PALM TREES
 WITHIN THE FOUNDATION PLANTING OF BUILDING J-2 AND THE
 EAST SIDE OF BUILDING J-5 WERE NOT KEPT AS PART OF THE
 FINAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
2014-05-06 09:41:025/6/14 ZONING RECEIVED, SENT TO ES. SG
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2014-04-30 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2014-04-30 Time 15:53 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 2014-04-30 Time 15:53 Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-30 15:51:49FAILED
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE GAP BETWEEN TREES IN THE BUFFER
 AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE IS GREATER THAN 30
 FEET. THIS IS ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO
 THE NORTH WHERE THE TREE SPACING HELPS OFFSET THE LONG
 EXPANSE OF THE WALL.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET LP-7 CALLS OUT 7 RELOCATED
 ROYAL PALM TREES ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD. ONLY
 6 ARE SHOWN. PLEASE CORRECT PLANS AND PROVIDE WHERE THE
 EXTRA RELOCATED ROYAL PALM TREE WAS INSTALLED.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: BUFFER CALCULATIONS:
  
 A. CONGRESS BUFFER STATES 54 TREES PROVIDED, YET ONLY
 53 TREES WHEN TOTALING THE DATA. STAFF HAS NOTED THAT
 THE PERMIT SET DOES NOT MATCH PREVIOUS PLAN SETS ALONG
 THIS BUFFER. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE TREE COUNTS ARE
 STILL ACCURATE.
 B. PALM BEACH LAKES BUFFER STATES 7 RELOCATED ROYAL
 PALM TREES YET ONLY 6 ARE SHOWN.
  
 4) IT APPEARS THAT THE EASEMENT AND PIPE LAYERS WERE
 LAID ON TOP OF THE LANDSCAPE AND CURBING LAYERS. THE
 EASEMENTS AND PIPES OBSTRUCT THE PARKING LOT ISLAND AND
 CURBING LAYERS WHICH MAKES THE AFFECTED AREAS OF THE
 PLANS DIFFICULT TO INTERPRET. PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS WITH
 THE UTILITY LAYERS SUBSERVIENT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND
 CURBING LAYERS.
  
 5) THERE ARE SHRUBS SHOWN ON TOP OF THE SIDEWALK
 LEADING TO THE REAR DOORS OF BUILDING J-6.
  
 6) PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE TREE AND SHRUB TYPES AND
 COUNTS AGREE WITH THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENTS. THE COVER
 SHEET WITH THIS PERMIT SHOWS DIFFERENT SPECIES AND
 NUMBERS THAN THE LAST LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED AND THE
 LAST LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED. SEE COMMENT 2 FOR AN
 INSTANCE WHERE THE LABEL IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE NUMBER
 OF PALMS SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
  
 7) THANK YOU FOR SHOWING GROUND COVER IN THE FIRST AND
 SECOND MEDIAN ISLANDS WHEN ENTERING FROM PALM BEACH
 LAKES BOULEVARD VIA ENTRANCE A AND IN THE FIRST MEDIAN
 ISLAND WHEN ENTERING FROM PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD
 VIA ENTRANCE C.
  
 8) STAFF IS DISAPPOINTED TO SEE THAT THERE WAS NO
 OPPORTUNITY TO INSTALL THE GROUND COVER IN THE OPEN
 AREA EAST OF BUILDING J-6, AS WELL AS NOTING THAT THE
 PREVIOUSLY SHOWN HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
  
 9) STAFF IS DISAPPOINTED TO SEE THAT THE PALM TREES
 WITHIN THE FOUNDATION PLANTING OF BUILDING J-2 AND THE
 EAST SIDE OF BUILDING J-5 NOT KEPT AS PART OF THE
 LANDSCAPE DESIGN.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-02-21 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2014-02-21 Time 13:14 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 2014-02-21 Time 13:14 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-21 15:08:30FAILED
  
 1) IT IS STAFF'S UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PARKING AREAS
 THAT HAVE BEEN INCLUDED FOR THE OPENING OF THE OUTLETS
 INCLUDES MORE AREAS AROUND BUILDINGS E, F AND H THAN IS
 SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. THE FULL EXTENT OF THE
 PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE THAT IS ADJACENT TO OPEN PARKING
 FIELDS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND INSTALLED.
  
 2) THERE IS A TREE SHOWN IN THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO
 THE POLICE/FIRE PARKING SPACES EAST OF BUILDING J-5.
  
 3) THE PLANS SHALL BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THE BUILDING J
 ENTRY FOUNTAIN AND THE EQUIPMENT VAULT. ALL FOUNTAIN
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, SHALL BE
 SCREENED.
  
 4) THE CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS SHOW GROUND COVER AND
 TREES IN THE LANDSCAPED ISLAND WEST OF THE VALET STAND.
 STAFF IS NOT APPROVING THE LATEST REVISION TO REMOVE
 THIS LANDSCAPE.
  
 5) THE CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS SHOW PALM TREES
 FLANKING THE CONGRESS AVENUE ENTRY DRIVE. STAFF IS NOT
 APPROVING THE LATEST REVISION TO REMOVE THE ENTRY PALM
 TREES.
  
 6) THE CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS SHOW A HEDGE NOT
 CONTINUING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE NORTHERN PROPERTY
 LINE ALONG THE WALL (SHEET LP-3). THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE A HEDGE IN THE BUFFER.
 STAFF IS NOT APPROVING THE LATEST REVISION TO REMOVE
 THE HEDGE.
  
 7) THE REMOVAL OF THE GROUND COVER IN THE OPEN AREA
 EAST OF BUILDING J-6 REDUCES THE AESTHETIC APPEARANCE
 OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING SOMETHING
 OTHER THAN SOD AS UNDERSTORY TO THE TREES PROVIDES
 CONTINUITY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
  
 8) THE REMOVAL OF THE PALM TREES WITHIN THE FOUNDATION
 PLANTING OF BUILDING J-2 AND THE EAST SIDE OF BUILDING
 J-5 REDUCES THE AESTHETIC APPEARANCE OF THE PROJECT.
 PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING THE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN PALM
 TREES TO SOFTEN THE HARD EDGE OF THE BUILDING FACADE
 AND TO PROVIDE CONTINUITY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
  
 9) THE REMOVAL OF THE PALM TREES AND GROUND COVER FROM
 THE FIRST MEDIAN ISLAND WHEN ENTERING FROM PALM BEACH
 LAKES BOULEVARD VIA ENTRANCE A REDUCES THE AESTHETIC
 APPEARANCE OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING
 THE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN PALM TREES AND GROUND COVER.
  
 10) THE REMOVAL OF THE GROUND COVER FROM THE SECOND
 MEDIAN ISLAND WHEN ENTERING FROM PALM BEACH LAKES
 BOULEVARD VIA ENTRANCE A REDUCES THE AESTHETIC
 APPEARANCE OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING
 THE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN GROUND COVER.
  
 11) THE REMOVAL OF THE GROUND COVER FROM THE FIRST
 MEDIAN ISLAND WHEN ENTERING FROM PALM BEACH LAKES
 BOULEVARD VIA ENTRANCE C REDUCES THE AESTHETIC
 APPEARANCE OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING
 THE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN GROUND COVER.
  
 12) PLEASE INCLUDE THE NAMES OF TREES "FB" AND "BB" IN
 THE EXISTING TREE LEGEND (SHOWN IN NORTH BUFFER SHEET
 LP-3).
  
 13) ONE OF THE CRI TAGS DOES NOT POINT TO THE CORRECT
 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL FOR THE BUILDING J-2 FOUNDATION
 PLANTING.
  
 14) THE GAP BETWEEN TREES IN THE BUFFER AT THE
 NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE IS GREATER THAN 30 FEET.
 THIS IS ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO THE
 NORTH WHERE THE TREE SPACING HELPS BLOCK THE LONG
 EXPANSE OF THE WALL.
  
 15) SHEET LP-7 CALLS OUT 7 RELOCATED ROYAL PALM TREES
 ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD. ONLY 6 ARE SHOWN.
 PLEASE CORRECT PLANS AND PROVIDE WHERE THE EXTRA
 RELOCATED ROYAL PALM TREE WAS INSTALLED.
  
 16) BUFFER CALCULATIONS:
  
 A. CONGRESS BUFFER STATES 54 TREES PROVIDED, YET ONLY
 53 TREES WHEN TOTALING THE DATA. STAFF HAS NOTED THAT
 THE PERMIT SET DOES NOT MATCH PREVIOUS PLAN SETS ALONG
 THIS BUFFER. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE TREE COUNTS ARE
 STILL ACCURATE.
 B. PALM BEACH LAKES BUFFER STATES 10 EXISTING TREES.
 WERE THE TREES THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO REMAIN BUT
 ACCIDENTALLY REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION FACTORED INTO
 THE COUNT OF 10?
 C. PALM BEACH LAKES BUFFER STATES 7 RELOCATED ROYAL
 PALM TREES YET ONLY 6 ARE SHOWN.
  
 17) LIVE OAK TREES ARE SHOWN IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO GAS
 LINES, FIRE LINES, EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, THE 50 FOOT
 DRAINAGE EASEMENT, ETC. PLEASE VERIFY THAT ROOT
 BARRIERS WERE INSTALLED WITH THESE TREES.
  
 18) PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE TREE AND SHRUB TYPES AND
 COUNTS ARGEE WITH THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENTS. THE COVER
 SHEET WITH THIS PERMIT SHOWS DIFFERENT SPECIES AND
 NUMBERS THAN THE LAST LANDSCAPE PLAN SUMITTED AND THE
 LAST LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2014-04-30 Cont ID  
Sent By ESchneid Date 2014-04-30 Time 15:47 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2014-04-30 Time 15:47 Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-30 15:53:05PASSED
  
 A FINAL AS BUILT LANDSCAPE PLAN IS REQUIRED WITH THE
 FINAL MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT.
2014-04-09 12:42:344/9/14 RESUB ZONING, SENT TO ES. SG
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-02-21 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2014-02-21 Time 15:08 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 2014-02-21 Time 15:08 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-21 15:12:44FAILED
  
 THE APPROVED CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE
 REFLECTED ON AN UPDATED MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENT.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved