City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Permit 14010169

Plan Review Stops For Permit 14010169

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2014-01-25			Cont ID
Sent By	jwitmer			Date	2014-01-25	Time	12:47	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jwitmer			Date	2014-01-25	Time	11:49	Sent To	Z

Notes

2014-01-25 12:47:10

	BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
	REVISION: 14010169
	PERMIT: 13010720
	ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY # 104
	CONT: TBD
	CONTACT: JORGE BENAVIDES
	TEL: (561)632-1900

	2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
	* WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS

	2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3
	COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS,
	SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
	OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.

	1ST REVIEW
	DATE: SATURDAY JAN. 25/ 2014
	ACTION: DENIED

	1) SKETCH SK-1 PLEASE PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OCCUPANTS
	THAT ARE EXITING THE REAR OF THE BUILDING, WHEN EXITING
	THE BUILDING, THE 3RD PART OF A EXIT, THE EXIT
	DISCHARGE TO THE PUBLIC STREET, THE RIGHT OF WAY NEEDS
	TO BE MAINTAINED. PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE 392 OCCUPANTS
	FROM THE SECCOND FLOOR EXITING THROUGH THE BACK OF
	HOUSE EXIT PASSAGE WAY ARE ACCOUNTED FOR AND WHAT
	PORTION OF THE 1ST FLOOR ARE GOING THROUGH THE NEW EAST
	DOOR WAY?

	1A) PLEASE PROVIDE THE WIDTH OF THE NEW STAIRS? PROVIDE
	HOW MANY OCCUPANTS THE STAIRS WILL HANDLE 2010 FBC-B
	1005.1. 1027.2 EXIT DISCHARGE CAPACITY.
	THE CAPACITY OF THE EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL BE NOT LESS
	THAN THE REQUIRED DISCHARGE CAPACITY OF THE EXITS BEING
	SERVED.

	1B) IT APPEARS THE THE 192 OCCUPANTS THAT EXIT TTHROUGH
	THE SOUTH STAIRWELL TRAVEL OUT A PAIR OF DOUBLE DOORS
	AND ARE LED TO A WALKWAY THAT IS 36" WIDE. THIS SAME
	WALKWAY CONTINUES TO CONNECT TO THE NEW STAIR AND
	LANDING TO THE NORTH WHICH WILL BE RECEIVING THE 200
	OCCUPANTS THAT WILL BE EXITING THE NORTH STAIR, EVEN
	THOUGH THIS IS OUTSIDE, IT IS A CONVERGENCE A 36 INCH
	WIDE WALKWAY CAN ONLY HANDE 180 OCCUPANTS. 2010 FBC-B
	1005.1 1027.2 EXIT DISCHARGE CAPACITY.
	THE CAPACITY OF THE EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL BE NOT LESS
	THAN THE REQUIRED DISCHARGE CAPACITY OF THE EXITS BEING
	SERVED.

	1C) THIS WHOLE EGRESS PATH IS PART OF WHAT APPEARS TO
	BE A EGRESS COURT 1027.5 WHEN WE LOOK AT THE PROPERTY
	IT APPEARS THAT YOU TRANSVERSE PROPERTY LINES, HOW WILL
	THIS BE HANDLED SINCE ,THE EXIT DISCHARGE IS NO LONGER
	IN THERE CONTROL.

	1D) 1027.5.1 WIDTH. THE WIDTH OF EGRESS COURTS SHALL BE
	DETERMINED AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1005.1, BUT SUCH
	WIDTH SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 44 INCHES (1118 MM),
	EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. EGRESS COURTS SERVING GROUP
	R-3 AND U OCCUPANCIES SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 36 INCHES
	(914 MM) IN WIDTH. THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF EGRESS COURTS
	SHALL BE UNOBSTRUCTED TO A HEIGHT OF 7 FEET (2134 MM).

	JAMES A. WITMER CBO
	SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
	TEL: 561-805-6715
	FAX: 561-805-6676
	E-MAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG			ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2014-02-12		Cont ID
Sent By	Mgonzale			Date	2014-02-12	Time	Rev Time	1.00
Received By	mgonzale			Date	2014-02-12	Time	Sent To	Z

Notes

2014-02-12 15:16:38	RESPOND TO COMMENTS:

	#1 PLAN DOES NOT MEET ADA - CLEAR WIDTH REQUIREMENTS
	403.5.1 CLEAR WIDTH. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN 403.5.2 AND
	403.5.3, THE CLEAR WIDTH OF WALKING SURFACES SHALL BE
	36 INCHES (915 MM) MINIMUM.

	#2 PLAN DOES NOT MEET ADA - PASSING SPACES
	403.5.3 PASSING SPACES. AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A
	CLEAR WIDTH LESS THAN 60 INCHES (1525 MM) SHALL PROVIDE
	PASSING SPACES AT INTERVALS OF 200 FEET (61 M) MAXIMUM.
	PASSING SPACES SHALL BE EITHER: A SPACE 60 INCHES (1525
	MM) MINIMUM BY 60 INCHES (1525 MM) MINIMUM; OR, AN
	INTERSECTION OF TWO WALKING SURFACES PROVIDING A
	T-SHAPED SPACE COMPLYING WITH 304.3.2 WHERE THE BASE
	AND ARMS OF THE T-SHAPED SPACE EXTEND 48 INCHES (1220
	MM) MINIMUM BEYOND THE INTERSECTION.

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2014-03-27			Cont ID
Sent By	wjolin			Date	2014-03-27	Time	10:13	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	wjolin			Date	2014-03-25	Time	17:11	Sent To

Notes

2014-03-27 10:13:40	PLEASE REFER TO BUILDING REVIEWER COMMENTS AS FIRE AND
	BUILDING REVIEWER HAVE SAME CONCERNS ABOUT EXIT
	CAPACITY OF THE NEW SIDEWALK AND EXISTING COURTYARD
	AREA.

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	1	Status	N	Date	2014-02-19			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	2014-03-27	Time	10:13	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	wjolin			Date	2014-01-07	Time	07:13	Sent To	FIRE

Notes

2014-03-12 12:15:22	REMOVED INADVERTANT I STOP OUT AND ADDED FIRE REVIEW
	STOP.
2014-01-07 07:13:47	SENT TO ZONING BOX

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2014-02-19			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	2014-02-19	Time	16:11	Rev Time	0.50
Received By	eschneid			Date	2014-01-27	Time	09:08	Sent To

Notes

2014-02-19 16:19:12	FAILED

	PROVIDE RESPONSES IN WRITING.

	1) PROVIDE FULL, TO SCALE, DETAILS ON HOW THE SIDEWALK
	WILL FUNCTION, INCLUDING DIMENSIONS.

	2) PROVIDE A VEHICLE TURNING RADIUS DRAWING VERIFYING
	THAT THE ADA PATH THAT IS IN THE DRIVE AISLE WILL NOT
	BE ENCROACHED UPON BY A VEHICLE USING THE MELLOW
	MUSHROOM PIZZA PICK UP DRIVE. IF VEHICLES WILL ENCROACH
	THE ADA PATH, THEN A NEW LOCATION FOR THE PATH WILL BE
	NEEDED.

	3) PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE WALK BE A MINIMUM
	OF SIX (6) FEET IN WIDTH TO ALLOW ADEQUATE ROOM FOR TWO
	PEOPLE WITH BAGS CONTAINING WORKOUT GEAR TO PASS EACH
	OTHER WITHOUT FORCING ONE OF THE PEOPLE INTO THE
	VEHICLE TRAVEL LANE.

	4) PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE WALKWAY WILL BE
	LIGHTED (MORE THAN JUST "LIT PER FBC 2010") AND WHAT
	ADDITIONAL SECURITY PROCEDURES WILL BE IN PLACE. THIS
	AREA IS ISOLATED AT NIGHT AND ON WEEKENDS WHEN THE
	OFFICE TOWER IS CLOSED WITH NO NATURAL SURVEILLANCE
	FROM INSIDE OR OUTSIDE OF CITYPLACE.

	5) THE WALKWAY PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED THROUGH THE
	MINOR AMENDMENT PROCESS. PLEASE ADDRESS THE WALKWAY
	COMMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
	AMENDMENT.

	CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
2014-01-27 14:13:28	1/27/14 - ZONING RECEIVED REVISION. SENT TO ES FOR
	REVIEW. LL