| Plan Review Stops For Permit 13120266 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-01-29 |
Time |
10:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-01-29 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2013-12-27 |
Time |
16:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2013-12-27 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-02-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-02-03 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-02-03 |
Time |
11:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-01-29 |
Time |
10:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-01-29 |
Time |
09:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-29 10:12:41 | THIS RESUBMITAL APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN MADE WITH TOTAL | | | DISREGARD TO MY NOTES AS NONE OF THE PREVIOUSLY MADE | | | COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | PLEASE SUBMITT CORRECTED SHEETS IN ADDITION TO THE | | | EXISTING FOR COMPARISON. IN LIEU OF CONDUCTOR | | | INSULATION AS REQUESTED, A NOTE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF NEC 300.5(B) SHALL BE SUFFICIENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-01-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-01-09 |
Time |
18:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-01-08 |
Time |
19:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-09 18:36:06 | THIS APPLICATION FAILED THE FIRST REVIEW AS OUTLINED | | | BELOW: | | | 1. PG. 1.1 LIGHTING: AS PER NEC 600.5 EVERY COMMERCIAL | | | BLDG. SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE OUTLET FOR SIGNAGE AT | | | EACH ENTRANCE | | | 2. PG. 2.1 POWER PLAN, I WAS UNABLE TO FIND A WATER | | | COOLER WHICH IS USUALLY IN THIS TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT, | | | NOR COULD I VERIFY IT WITH THE PANEL SCHEDULES. I WAS | | | VERIFYING THAT IT HAD BEEN SERVED WITH A GFI PROTECTED | | | CIRCUIT. | | | 3. PG. 2.2 ROOF POWER PLAN: NEC 210.63 REQUIRES THAT | | | THERE BE A SERVICE OUTLET WITHIN 25' OF THE CONDENSING | | | UNITS. NEC 210.8 REQUIRES THAT THE OUTLET BE GFI | | | PROTECTED. NEC 406.8 REQUIRES THAT THE OUTLET BE "WR" | | | WEATHER RESISTANT RATED AND THAT IT HAVE AN IN-USE TYPE | | | COVER. | | | 4. PG. 3.1 RISER & DETAILS: YOU FAIL TO PROVIDE THE | | | CONDUCTOR INSULATION AND RACEWAY TYPES. | | | 5. PG. 4.1 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: THIS PAGE HAS A | | | MALFUNCTION WHICH DOES NOT LET ME PROPERLY OPEN THE | | | PAGE OR MANEUVER WITHIN THE MINIMIZED VIEW TO PROPERLY | | | REVIEW IT. | | | 6. PG. 5.1 FIRE ALARM: AS NOTED, THIS IS NOT SUFFICIENT | | | DOCUMENTATION OR DESIGN FOR A FIRE ALARM SUBMISSION. AS | | | SEPARATE FIRE ALARM PERMIT AND SUBMITTAL PACKAGE SHALL | | | BE SECURED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-01-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
wjolin |
Date |
2014-01-17 |
Time |
08:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
wjolin |
Date |
2014-01-17 |
Time |
08:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
wjolin |
Date |
2014-01-07 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
wjolin |
Date |
2014-01-07 |
Time |
13:23 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-07 14:06:14 | 1250 NORTHPOINT PKWY | | | PERMIT # 13120266 | | | REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | | | | SHEET A0.02 -PER SECTION 7.2.1.6.2, ACCESS-CONTROLLED | | | EGRESS DOORS ARE PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT ALL SEVEN OF | | | THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET: | | | 1. A SENSOR SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE EGRESS SIDE, | | | ARRANGED TO DETECT AN OCCUPANT APPROACHING DOORS THAT | | | ARE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS UPON | | | DETECTION OF AN APPROACHING OCCUPANT OR LOSS OF POWER | | | TO THE SENSOR. | | | 2. LOSS OF POWER TO THE PART OF THE ACCESS CONTROL | | | SYSTEM THAT LOCKS THE DOORS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK | | | THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS. | | | 3. THE DOORS SHALL BE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE | | | DIRECTION OF EGRESS FROM A MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE | | | LOCATED VERTICALLY 40 TO 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND | | | WITHIN 60 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF THE SECURED DOORS. | | | 4. THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL BE READILY | | | ACCESSIBLE AND CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT READS | | | PUSH TO EXIT. | | | 5. WHEN OPERATED, THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL | | | RESULT IN DIRECT INTERRUPTION OF POWER TO THE LOCK, | | | INDEPENDENT OF THE ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM ELECTRONICS, | | | AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED FOR NOT LESS THAN | | | 30 SECONDS. | | | 6. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL | | | AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF | | | EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE | | | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET. | | | 7. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER | | | SYSTEM OR AUTOMATIC DETECTION SYSTEM SHALL | | | AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF | | | EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE | | | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET. | | | | | | SHEET E5.1 - PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTION ABOVE DOORS WITH | | | MAGNETIC HOLD OPEN DEVICES. | | | | | | | | | LAUREN PHILMORE | | | FIRE INSPECTOR II/INVESTIGATOR 1 | | | OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | [email protected] | | | (561) 804-4783 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2014-02-13 |
Time |
15:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2014-02-03 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2014-01-31 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2014-01-16 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-01-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2014-01-10 |
Time |
08:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2013-12-06 |
Time |
13:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2013-12-16 |
Time |
13:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2013-12-16 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-12-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lwagner |
Date |
2013-12-19 |
Time |
14:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lwagner |
Date |
2013-12-19 |
Time |
14:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-01-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2014-01-23 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2014-01-23 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2014-02-13 |
Time |
14:11 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-02-13 |
Time |
14:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-13 14:12:12 | ZONING PROVISO - PRIOR TO THE FINAL (104) ISSUANCE, A | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT, INC. A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE REQUREMENTS, SHALL | | | BE SUBMITTED AND THE LANDSCAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND | | | PASS INSPECTION. | | 2014-02-10 16:15:47 | 2/10/14 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-01-31 |
Time |
13:43 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-01-31 |
Time |
13:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-31 13:53:14 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION | | | ($875,000) EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE | | | ($903,251) ACCORDING TO THE P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S | | | OFFICE; THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF | | | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE | | | LANDSCAPE ON THE SITE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL | | | APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE | | | ZLDR. IF THE SITE CONFORMS TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) | | | COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE | | | SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE | | | SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE | | | ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE | | | PERMIT AND IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING | | | MATERIAL TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMITY. | | | | | | JANUARY 31, 2014 - SPOKE WITH KEN REGARDING THE VALUE | | | OF THE SITE. THE RECENT PURCHASE IS NOT SUFFICIENT | | | EVIDENCE THAT THE CONSTRUCTION IS LESS THAN 50% OF THE | | | VALUE OF THE BUILDING. ALSO DISCUSSED WAS THAT IF THE | | | EXISTING LANDSCAPE WAS BROUGHT INTO CONFORMANCE (IF IT | | | IS NOT ALREADY SO) TO THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN FROM | | | WHEN THE BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED, THEN THE COMMENT IS | | | SATISFIED. BOTH KEN AND THE CITY ARE LOOKING FOR A COPY | | | OF THE ORIGINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 2) THE BUILDING ITSELF MEETS ZONING. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | 2014-01-27 14:19:27 | 1/27/14 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ajones |
Date |
2013-12-18 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2013-12-18 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-18 22:35:27 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($875,000) EXCEEDS 50% | | | OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE ($903,251) ACCORDING TO THE | | | P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE, PURSUANT | | | TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE | | | SITE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE | | | REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. IF THE | | | SITE CONFORMS TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE SHALL BE | | | INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL. IF THE SITE DOES | | | NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN PRIOR TO THE ZONING | | | APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND | | | IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING MATERIAL | | | TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMITY. | | | | | | 2) THE BUILDING ITSELF MEETS ZONING. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
|
|
