|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 13120246
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 13120246 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-03-07 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-02-24 |
Time |
14:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-02-24 |
Time |
14:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-24 14:26:22 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | 4TH REVIEW - | | | | | | PER CONTRACTOR, DIRECT DECK PROPOSED. | | | | | | CONTRACTOR STILL NEEDS TO SELECT AN ASSEMBLY. FIRST | | | SUBMITTAL INDICATED AN ASSEMBLY WHICH HAD A DP | | | LIMITATION OF -90. | | | | | | 2ND SUBMITTAL HAD ENHANCED FASTENING FOR EXPOSURE C FOR | | | MECHANICALLY FASTENED. | | | | | | 3RD SUBMITTAL HAD A LETTER AND OTHER INFO REGARDING | | | DIRECT DECK, BUT CONTRACTOR HAS NOT YET SELECTED A | | | DIRECT DECK ASSEMBLY WHICH WILL MEET ***EXPOSURE D** | | | PRESSURES. ADDITIONALLY, THE ENGINEER'S CALCULATIONS | | | ARE BASED ON EXPOSURE C, BUT THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN | | | EXPOSURE D CONDITIONS, SEE FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL 301. | | | | | | 4TH SUBMITTAL HAD A DETAIL (DRAWING). ON THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL, INDICATE WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS PROPOSED | | | TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL 301. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-01-11 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-01-11 |
Time |
11:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-11 11:13:56 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | PROPOSED ASSEMBLY HIGHLIGHTED BY CONTRACTOR HAS AN | | | ALLOWABLE DP OF -90. EXISTING DECK IS WOOD PLAN, DECK | | | REQUIRED BY ASSEMBLY SELECTED IS PLYWOOD. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW - | | | | | | PER CONTRACTOR, DIRECT DECK PROPOSED, SO THE ENGINEER'S | | | CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING IS NOT REQUIRED. | | | | | | CONTRACTOR STILL NEEDS TO SELECT AN ASSEMBLY. FIRST | | | SUBMITTAL INDICATED AN ASSEMBLY WHICH HAD A DP | | | LIMITATION OF -90. | | | | | | 2ND SUBMITTAL HAD ENHANCED FASTENING FOR EXPOSURE C FOR | | | MECHANICALLY FASTENED. | | | | | | 3RD SUBMITTAL HAD A LETTER AND OTHER INFO REGARDING | | | DIRECT DECK, BUT CONTRACTOR HAS NOT YET SELECTED A | | | DIRECT DECK ASSEMBLY WHICH WILL MEET ***EXPOSURE D** | | | PRESSURES. ADDITIONALLY, THE ENGINEER'S CALCULATIONS | | | ARE BASED ON EXPOSURE C, BUT THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN | | | EXPOSURE D CONDITIONS, SEE FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL 301. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-12-21 |
Time |
14:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-12-21 |
Time |
14:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-21 14:14:31 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. ENGINEERING IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH PROPOSED | | | CONSTRUCTION. ENGINEERING IS FOR SELF ADHERED ASSEMBLY, | | | NO ASSEMBLY NUMBER PROVIDED BUT ALLOWABLE DESIGN | | | PRESSURE IS -112 (ON ENGINEERING). | | | | | | PROPOSED ASSEMBLY HIGHLIGHTED BY CONTRACTOR HAS AN | | | ALLOWABLE DP OF -90. EXISTING DECK IS WOOD PLAN, DECK | | | REQUIRED BY ASSEMBLY SELECTED IS PLYWOOD. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-12-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-12-05 |
Time |
17:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-12-05 |
Time |
17:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-05 17:16:46 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. ROOF FORM IS ILLEGIBLE. PLEASE SUBMIT LEGIBLE | | | COPIES. | | | | | | 2. SPECIFY TYPE OF WOOD DECK - PLYWOOD OR PLANK. | | | | | | 3. PROPOSED DESIGN PRESSURES ARE NOT CLEAR BUT APPEAR | | | TO BE 76.019 IN THE CORNER, PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | EXPOSURE WAS LEFT BLANK; THIS IS EXPOSURE D. IT IS NOT | | | CLEAR HOW PRESSURES LOWER THAN EXPOSURE C HAVE BEEN | | | DETERMINED. ZONE 3, EXPOSURE D, HAS A DP OF -127.3 | | | USING TABLES FBC RESIDENTIAL 2010 301.2(2), (3). | | | | | | 4. DRAIN INSTALLATION REQUIRES A PLUMBING PERMIT. | | | PROVIDE PLAN AND PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-02-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-02-24 |
Time |
14:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-02-20 |
Time |
14:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-21 14:34:22 | TO SH DESK. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-12-21 |
Time |
14:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-12-14 |
Time |
07:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-14 07:28:47 | SENT TO S HILL |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
