Plan Review Details - Permit 13110342
Plan Review Stops For Permit 13110342
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2014-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-02-08 Time 11:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-02-08 Time 11:18 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-10 07:28:53APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION, REVISION REQUIRED
 SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF CORRECTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS THAT
 MATCH PLANS.
  
 NOTE:
 THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD
 AREA, DESIGNATED FLOOD ZONE A5. THE MINIMUM ELEVATION
 IS 7 FEET BFE PLUS THE ADDITIONAL 6" OF FREEBOARD
 REQUIRED BY CITY ORDINANCE. BASED ON CITY BUILDING
 DEPARTMENT RECORDS THE CUMULATIVE TOTAL COSTS OF WORK
 ON THIS BUILDING INCLUDING $32,000.00 FOR THE PROPOSED
 WORK IS $ 105,889.00. THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITTED AN
 APPRAISAL FROM CHARLEEN MCMANUS, SRA, OF ANDERSON &
 CARR, INC. STATING THE MARKET VALUE OF THE BUILDING
 IMPROVEMENTS TO BE $ 320,000.00. BECAUSE THE TOTAL OF
 PREVIOUS IMPROVEMENTS AND THE PROPOSED WORK IS LESS
 THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE MARKET VALUE, THIS IS NOT
 CONSIDERED A SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT. ACCORDING TO THE
 PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECORDS THE STRUCTURE WAS BUILT IN
 1935 AND HAS HAD NO SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO
 THE DATE OF THE INITIAL FIRM (MARCH 1, 1979) .
 THEREFORE THIS IS BUILDING IS CONSIDERED TO BE
 PRE-FIRM. BASED ON TABLE 6-1A IN FEMA PUBLICATION P-758
 NEITHER THE LATERAL ADDITION NOR THE REMODEL IS
 REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH NFIP REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW
 CONSTRUCTION.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2014-01-31 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-31 Time 14:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-30 Time 10:02 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-31 16:07:062010 FBC
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 1) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 PROPOSED ADDITION AND AREA BEING CONVERTED TO HABITABLE
 SPACE AS REQUIRED BY THE 2010 FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION.
 THE ENERGY FORMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED BY THE
 PREPARER AND THE OWNER/AGENT.
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
 [email protected]
  
  
 NOTE:
 THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD
 AREA, DESIGNATED FLOOD ZONE A5. THE MINIMUM ELEVATION
 IS 7 FEET BFE PLUS THE ADDITIONAL 6" OF FREEBOARD
 REQUIRED BY CITY ORDINANCE. BASED ON CITY BUILDING
 DEPARTMENT RECORDS THE CUMULATIVE TOTAL COSTS OF WORK
 ON THIS BUILDING INCLUDING $32,000.00 FOR THE PROPOSED
 WORK IS $ 105,889.00. THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITTED AN
 APPRAISAL FROM CHARLEEN MCMANUS, SRA, OF ANDERSON &
 CARR, INC. STATING THE MARKET VALUE OF THE BUILDING
 IMPROVEMENTS TO BE $ 320,000.00. BECAUSE THE TOTAL OF
 PREVIOUS IMPROVEMENTS AND THE PROPOSED WORK IS LESS
 THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE MARKET VALUE, THIS IS NOT
 CONSIDERED A SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT. ACCORDING TO THE
 PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECORDS THE STRUCTURE WAS BUILT IN
 1935 AND HAS HAD NO SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO
 THE DATE OF THE INITIAL FIRM (MARCH 1, 1979) .
 THEREFORE THIS IS BUILDING IS CONSIDERED TO BE
 PRE-FIRM. BASED ON TABLE 6-1A IN FEMA PUBLICATION P-758
 NEITHER THE LATERAL ADDITION NOR THE REMODEL IS
 REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH NFIP REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW
 CONSTRUCTION.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-01-02 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-02 Time 13:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-19 Time 14:19 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-02 10:13:172010 FBC
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 1) THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD
 AREA ( FLOOD ZONE A5 ). THE REQUIRED FINISH FLOOR
 ELEVATION IS 7'-6". BASED ON FEMA REGULATIONS AND THE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE THIS ADDITION IS
 CONSIDERED A SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT. (THE VALUE OF THE
 PROPOSED WORK PLUS PREVIOUS WORK DONE TO THE STRUCTURE
 EXCEEDS 50 PER CENT OF THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE
 STRUCTURE ($ 69,910.00 PER PBC PROPERTY APPRAISER).
 THEREFORE, THE ADDITION, THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE
 EQUIPMENT SERVING THEM ARE REQUIRED TO BE AT OR ABOVE
 THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7'-6". SPECIFY THE FINISHED
 FLOOR ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE
 PROPOSED ADDITION ON THE PLANS. IF THE ELEVATIONS ARE
 BELOW THE REQUIRED MINIMUM 7'-6" BFE INDICATE HOW THIS
 ISSUE WILL BE ADDRESSED.
  
 2) THE ENGINEER'S SEAL THAT WAS USED IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
 AS OF JANUARY 1, 2002, THE WORD CERTIFICATE WAS
 REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED BY THE WORD LICENSE. FAC
 61G15-23.001
  
 3) THE ONLY ENGINEER'S NAME THAT APPEARS IN THE TITLE
 BLOCK ON SHEET 4 OF THE PLANS IS RICK BOYETTE.
 THEREFORE, HE SHOULD SIGN AND SEAL THAT SHEET AS THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK INDICATED ON
 THAT SHEET. FAC 61G-15-23.002
  
 4) THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY THAT IS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS
 IS INCORRECT. BECAUSE THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED ON THE
 INTER-COASTAL WATERWAY IT IS EXPOSURE CATEGORY D. FBCR
 301.2.1.4
  
 5) THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES IN THE SCHEDULE
 ON SHEETS 1 AND 2 NEED TO BE REVISED TO COMPLY WITH
 EXPOSURE D. FBCR 301.2.1
  
 6) PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR THE EXTERIOR DOOR
 OPENINGS THAT ARE TO BE FRAMED-IN WHEN THE GARAGE IS
 CONVERTED TO HABITABLE SPACE. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1.3
  
 7) THERE IS CONFLICTING INFORMATION ON THE PLANS FOR
 THE ROOF COVERING. THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS ON SHEETS 1
 AND 2 SHOW CONCRETE S-TILE AND THE WALL SECTIONS ON
 SHEET 7 SPECIFY ASPHALT SHINGLES. PLEASE CLARIFY. CITY
 AMENDMENTS 107.2.1
  
 8) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ROOF
 COVERING MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. IF
 CEMENT S-TILE IS USED INDICATE THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT
 THAT WILL BE USED TO INSTALL THE TILE IS CAPABLE OF
 RESISTING THE REQUIRED OVERTURN MOMENT. FBCR 905.3 IF
 AN ADHESIVE PRODUCT WILL BE USED, SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF
 ITS' PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 9) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS THAT WILL BE USED TO SECURE
 THE OVERHANG FRAMING AT THE GABLE END SHOWN IN THE
 DETAIL ON SHEET 6. FBCR 801.2
  
 10) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 CONVERTED GARAGE AND ADDITION. 2010 FBC ENERGY
 CONSERVATION 101.4.3
  
 11) THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS FOR THE
 STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS IN THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET 5 ARE
 INCORRECT. PLEASE UPDATE AND REVISE THE SCHEDULE. DCA
 RULE 9N-3
  
 12) ALSO ON SHEET 5, UPDATE REVISE NOTE 10 FROM THE
 2005 SIMPSON AND USP CATALOGS TO THE CURRENT ONES. FBCR
 301.2.1
  
 13) PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR STRUCTURAL
 MULLIONS. I DID NOT SEE ANYWHERE ON THE PLANS THAT
 WOULD REQUIRE MULLIONS. PLEASE CLARIFY. CITY AMENDMENTS
 107.2.1
  
 14) THE VALUE SPECIFIED ON THE APPLICATION OF
 $25,000.00 FOR THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A DETAILED COST VALUATION AND REFERENCE THE
 LATEST CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3
  
 15) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH
 OF THE REVIEW ITEMS WAS ADDRESSED. THIS WILL HELP
 REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME.
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
 [email protected]
2013-12-12 17:14:17IN BIN R10
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2014-01-31 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-31 Time 09:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-31 Time 09:44 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-31 09:48:34APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION. REDLINED NOTES ON PLANS.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-12-12 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2013-12-12 Time 16:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2013-12-12 Time 15:52 Sent To B
Notes
2013-12-12 17:13:23THE FOLLOWING ITEMS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED AND CORRECTED
 ACCORDINGLY:
 1. REARRANGE THE OUTLET SPACING TO COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NEC 210.52
 2. RELOCATE THE ELECTRICAL PANEL AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS
 TO COMPLY WITH NEC110.26. THE AREA IN FRONT OF THE
 PANEL HAS TO BE CLEAR ALL THE WAY TO THE FLOOR.
 3. AS PER FBC-R314.3.1, SMOKE DETECTOR COMPLIANCE IS
 REQUIRED THROUGH OUT THE HOME IF NOT ALREADY IN
 COMPLIANCE.
 4. THE LUMINAIRE IN THE ATTIC SHALL HAVE A PROTECTIVE
 GUARD AS PER NEC 410.11
 5. THE FLOOR PLAN LABELED "EXISTING" REFLECTS AN AHU
 WHICH APPEARS TO BE RELOCATED AS PART OF THE NEW WORK,
 INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE "NEW" AHU AND ITS
 CORRESPONDING CU.
 6. CORRECT THE LOAD TABLE AS SHOWN. MINIMUM OF 2 SMALL
 APPLIANCE OUTLETS ARE REQUIRED, ONLY ONE INDICATED
 7. CORRECT THE RISER DIAGRAM TO MATCH THE LOAD TABLE
 AND PANEL SCHEDULE AS INTENDED
 8. THE NOTE ON THE PL;ANS INDICATE THAT THE EXISTING
 SERVICE IS BEING UPGRADED TO 200AMP, PROVIDE BETTER
 DETAIL ON THIS.
  
 THIS REVIEW IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A PUNCH LIST FOR THE
 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, THEREFORE ADDITIONAL CORRECTIONS
 MAY BE REQUIRED. A THROUGH REVIEW OF THE PROJECT BY THE
 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS SUGGESTED PRIOR TO THE NEXT
 SUBMITTAL
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2014-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-02-10 Time 07:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-02-07 Time 17:52 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-07 17:52:46TO RM DESK
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2014-01-31 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-31 Time 16:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-17 Time 10:00 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-30 10:00:37TO R MCDOUGAL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2014-01-02 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-02 Time 13:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-11-12 Time 17:01 Sent To  
Notes
2013-11-13 17:02:55R10
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2014-01-30 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-30 Time 10:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-30 Time 10:00 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-30 10:01:47MU2014-1074 NO FEES DUE
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-30 Time 08:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-30 Time 08:27 Sent To  
Notes
2013-12-30 08:29:09AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY OF ONE OF THE
 APPROVED SETS OF PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2014-02-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-02-08 Time 11:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-02-08 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-08 11:28:40PER THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST THE MECHANICAL
 PERMIT, APPLICATION AND REVIEWS WILL BE DONE AS A
 SEPARATE PERMIT.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2014-01-30 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-30 Time 17:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-30 Time 17:46 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-30 17:56:372010 FBC
  
 DENIED BY MECHANICAL
  
 1) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF MECHANICAL PLANS. SPECIFY THE
 DUCT LAYOUT, SIZES, GRILL SIZES, CFMS AT EACH OUTLET,
 THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF RETURN GRILLS AND DUCTS. CITY
 AMENDMENTS 107.3.5.3
  
 2) PROVIDE AN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON THE PLANS. CITY
 AMENDMENTS 107.3.5.3
  
 3) SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE AIR HANDLER AND CONDENSER
 ON THE PLANS. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.3.5.3
  
 4) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR M1602.4 FOR BALANCED
 RETURN AIR.
  
 5) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS
 BASED ON BUILDING LOADS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 ACCA MANUAL J OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. FBCR M1401.3
  
 6) THE NAME, SIGNATURE AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE PERSON
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN IS REQUIRED ON THE PLANS.
 CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
 [email protected]
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2013-12-31 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-31 Time 16:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-30 Time 18:11 Sent To  
Notes
2013-12-31 17:30:09NO MECHANICAL PLANS WERE SUBMITTED AND NO MECHANICAL
 PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED. A SEPARATE PERMIT,
 APPLICATION AND REVIEW IS REQUIRED.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2014-01-31 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-31 Time 10:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-30 Time 10:02 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-31 10:38:31PLUMBING PLANS HAVE BEEN REDLINED. A REVISED PLUMBING
 RISER IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO BE REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BEFORE THE FINAL PLUMBING INSPECTION.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-30 Time 08:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-30 Time 08:32 Sent To  
Notes
2013-12-30 08:53:022010 FBC
  
 DENIED BI PLUMBING
  
 1) SHEET 7 OF THE PLANS THAT CONTAINS THE PLUMBING
 RISER IS SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER, HOWEVER,
 THE ENGINEER'S INFORMATION THAT IS REQUIRED BY FAC
 61G15-23.002 TO BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK IS MISSING.
 PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 2) BOTH OF THE TUBS ARE SHOWN CONNECTING TO A VENT
 STACK ABOVE THE ABOVE THE LAVATORIES WHICH IS NOT
 POSSIBLE UNLESS THEY WERE LOCATED ON THE FLOOR ABOVE.
 THEY SHOULD CONNECT TO THE HORIZONTAL DRAIN DOWN STREAM
 FROM THE VENT. PLEASE CORRECT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1
  
 3) THE MINIMUM SIZE FOR A WASHING MACHINE DRAIN IS 2"
 PER FBCR P3201.7. THE PLANS HAVE 1-1/2" PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 4) THE MINIMUM SIZE FOR A BATHTUB IS 1-1/2" PER FBCR
 P3201.7. THE PLANS HAVE 1-1/4" PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 5) THE STAND PIPE FOR THE CLOTHES WASHING MACHINE SHALL
 EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES AND A MAXIMUM OF 42
 INCHES ABOVE THE TRAP WEIR. FBCR P2706.2
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
 [email protected]
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-01-31 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-31 Time 14:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2014-01-31 Time 14:37 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-31 14:40:41ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED. SANTAFE
 TILE CORP. HANDMADE BARREL CLAY ROOF TILE - NOA NO.
 12-1210.03 AND 3M COMPANY AH-160 ROOF TILE ADHESIVE NOA
 NO. 13-0502.02
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2013-11-19 Cont ID  
Sent By Dkittred Date 2013-11-19 Time 14:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dkittred Date 2013-11-19 Time 13:21 Sent To  
Notes
2013-11-19 11:18:2711/19/13


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved