| Plan Review Stops For Permit 13110215 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-01-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-06 |
Time |
14:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-06 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-06 14:50:23 | APPROVED WITH EXCEPTIONS | | | | | | REVISIONS REQUIRED | | | | | | 1) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED STRUCTURAL | | | DETAILS CLARIFYING THE INSTALLATION OF THE FRONT ENTRY | | | DOOR ASSEMBLY WITH THE GLASS BLOCK SIDELITES AND | | | TRANSOM. | | | | | | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE LOW SLOPE ROOFING | | | MATERIAL (FL# 9930 SINGLE PLY ROOF SYSTEM) THAT WAS | | | SUBMITTED HAS NUMEROUS SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT MAXIMUM | | | DESIGN PRESSURES AND LIMITATIONS FOR EACH DECK TYPE. | | | THIS PROJECT HAS BOTH WOOD AND CONCRETE DECK TYPES. | | | PLEASE SPECIFY THE SPECIFIC SYSTEM THAT WILL BE | | | INSTALLED FOR EACH DECK TYPE AND THE MAXIMUM DESIGN | | | PRESSURE FOR EACH. SUBMIT ALL ENHANCED FASTENING | | | CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED. THE REQUIRED UPLIFTS FOR ROOF | | | ZONES 1, 2 AND 3 ARE -37.9 PSF, -63.6 PSF AND - 95.7 | | | PSF FOR THIS PROJECT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-01-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-06 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-04 |
Time |
10:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-06 10:59:58 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL OF THE ENTRY DOOR | | | ASSEMBLY SHOWN WITH GLASS BLOCK SIDELITES AND TRANSOM. | | | PROVIDE ALL DETAILS AS TO HOW THIS ASSEMBLY IS TO BE | | | INSTALLED. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1.3 | | | | | | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR THE GLASS BLOCK | | | AT THE ENTRY DOOR HAS A SMALL MISSILE IMPACT RATING AND | | | WILL REQUIRE IMPACT PROTECTION. SUBMIT PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS FOR STORM PANELS OR PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR | | | LARGE MISSILE IMPACT RATED GLASS BLOCK. DCA RULE 9N-3 | | | | | | 3) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE LOW SLOPE ROOFING | | | MATERIAL (FL# 9930 SINGLE PLY ROOF SYSTEM) THAT WAS | | | SUBMITTED HAS NUMEROUS SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT MAXIMUM | | | DESIGN PRESSURES AND LIMITATIONS FOR EACH DECK TYPE. | | | THIS PROJECT HAS BOTH WOOD AND CONCRETE DECK TYPES. | | | PLEASE SPECIFY THE SPECIFIC SYSTEM THAT WILL BE | | | INSTALLED FOR EACH DECK TYPE AND THE MAXIMUM DESIGN | | | PRESSURE FOR EACH. SUBMIT ALL ENHANCED FASTENING | | | CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED. THE REQUIRED UPLIFTS FOR ROOF | | | ZONES 1, 2 AND 3 ARE -37.9 PSF, -63.6 PSF AND - 95.7 | | | PSF FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-10 |
Time |
14:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-10 06:44:10 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE C PER FBC | | | R301.1.4.3. PLEASE REVISE PLANS. | | | | | | 2) THE WIND VELOCITY PRESSURES FOR WALL ZONES 4 & 5 ON | | | SHEET S-4 ARE HIGHER THAN REQUIRED FOR A STRUCTURE | | | LOCATED IN EXPOSURE B OR C WITH A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF | | | LESS THAN 15 FEET AND A WINDSPEED OF 132 MPH VASD. SEE | | | FBCR 301.2.1 AND R301.2.1.3 | | | | | | 3) SPECIFY THE WIND VELOCITY PRESSURES FOR THE LOW | | | SLOPE ROOF ZONES 1, 2, AND 3 ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 4) TRUSS NOTE (G) ON SHEET S-4 INCORRECTLY SPECIFIES A | | | 140 MPH 3 SECOND GUST AND 120 MPH SUSTAINED WINDSPEED | | | AND EXPOSURE B FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE A SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE PLAN THAT SHOWS | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR 401.3. | | | | | | 6) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR 806.2 FOR REQUIRED TOTAL | | | NET FREE VENTILATING AREA OF THE ENCLOSED ATTIC SPACE. | | | INDICATE ON THE PLANS THE SIZE AND LOCATIONS OF THE | | | ATTIC VENTS ON THE PLANS WITH CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 7) THE MINIMUM THICKNESS FOR STUCCO ON A VERTICAL WALL | | | ON METAL LATH OVER A SOLID BASE IS 7/8 " PER FBCR 703.6 | | | AND ASTM C 926. PLEASE REVISE THE PARAPET WALL SECTIONS | | | ON A-6. | | | | | | 8) FBC 703.6.3 REQUIRES A BOND BREAK BETWEEN THE STUCCO | | | AND THE WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER. PLEASE REVISE THE | | | PARAPET WALL SECTIONS ON A-6. | | | | | | 9) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | | EXTERIOR DOORS, WINDOWS, STRUCTURAL MULLIONS, GLASS | | | BLOCK, ROOFING MATERIAL AND STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS THAT | | | WILL BE USED ON THIS PROJECT AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | | 9N-3. | | | | | | 10) CITY AMENDMENT 107.3.4.1 REQUIRES THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 11) THE VALUE FOR THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN INCREASED FROM | | | $150,000.00 TO $197,000.00 BASED ON LATEST ICC | | | VALUATION DATA. CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 | | | | | | NOTE: IN ORDER TO SPEED THE REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT | | | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW | | | ITEMS WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
Time |
18:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
Time |
18:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-11-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2013-11-20 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2013-11-20 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-13 15:21:58 | 11/13/13 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-01-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-06 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-18 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-18 16:58:19 | SENT TO R MCDOUGAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-10 |
Time |
14:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-11-06 |
Time |
06:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-07 06:29:24 | R-12. JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-01-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-09 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-09 |
Time |
14:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-09 15:49:07 | MU2014-375 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-01-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-04 |
Time |
13:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-04 |
Time |
10:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-04 13:07:23 | IMPACT FEE REVIEW IS REQUIRED. WHEN PLANS HAVE BEEN | | | APPROVED, ONE SET SHALL BE SIGNED OUT AND TAKEN TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY FOR AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW. THE PLANS WITH | | | THE IMPACT REVIEW STAMP AND A COPY OF THE PAID IMPACT | | | FEE RECEIPT SHALL BE RETURNED THE CITY BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
Time |
18:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
Time |
18:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-09 18:54:02 | IMPACT FEE REVIEW IS REQUIRED. WHEN PLANS HAVE BEEN | | | APPROVED, ONE SET SHALL BE SIGNED OUT AND TAKEN TO PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY FOR AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW. THE PLANS WITH | | | THE IMPACT REVIEW STAMP AND A COPY OF THE PAID IMPACT | | | FEE RECEIPT SHALL BE RETURNED THE CITY BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-01-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-04 |
Time |
11:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-01-04 |
Time |
10:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
Time |
18:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
Time |
17:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-09 17:59:46 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY MECHANICAL | | | | | | 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT | | | SIZING CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY FBCR M1401.3. | | | | | | 2) THE TRANSFER DUCTS FOR BEDROOM NUMBER 2 AND THE | | | MASTER BEDROOM ARE TOO SMALL. FBCR M1602.4 REQUIRES THE | | | TRANSFER DUCTS TO BE 1.5 TIMES THE SUPPLY DUCTS | | | ENTERING THE ROOM OR MASTER SUITE AND THE DOOR HAVING | | | AN UNRESTRICTED 1" UNDERCUT. THE TRANSFER DUCT FOR | | | BEDROOM #2 SHOULD BE 9" AND THE ONE AT THE MASTER SUITE | | | SHOULD BE 14". PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
Time |
17:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-12-09 |
Time |
17:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-11-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2013-11-20 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2013-11-20 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|