| Plan Review Stops For Permit 13100575 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-04-13 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-04-13 |
Time |
11:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
Time |
14:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
Time |
14:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-21 14:25:20 | RECORDS APPEAR TO INDICATE THE SECOND FLOOR SPACE IS AN | | | EXISTING DWELLING UNIT. IS IT THE INTENT OF THIS | | | APPLICATION FOR IMPROVEMENT TO CONVERT THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING INTO A TWO DWELLING BUILDING, OR IS THIS AN | | | EXTENSION OF LIVING AREA WITH A SINGLE STRUCTURE | | | CONSTITUTING ON DEWLLING? IF TWO UNITS, YOU MUST COMPLY | | | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE SEPARATION PER FBC R | | | 302.3 1-HR . THE SUMBITTED PLAN AND PROPERTY APPRAISER | | | RECORDS APPEAR TO INDICATE THE EXISTING SPACE PROPROSED | | | FOR IMPROVEMENT IS A STORAGE AREA. IN THAT CASE, THE | | | DESIGN PARAMETERS MUST CONSIDER FBC-E CHAPTER 9 CHANGE | | | OF OCCUPANCY. FBC 107.3.5.3 ? PROVIDE AN ENERGY | | | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE WINDOW OPENING | | | PROPOSED TO BE FILLED IN. THIS REVIEW IS INCOMPLETE | | | PENDING FURTHER CLARIFICATION OF THE INTENT OF THE | | | APPLICATION. | | 2014-02-18 13:58:44 | MCDOUGAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
Time |
08:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-25 09:00:19 | THE RESUBMITTED PLAN IS A DUPLICATE OF THE ORIGINAL | | | SUBMITTAL. NONE OF THE COMMENTS WERE ANSWERED. BE | | | ADVISED A THIRD REVIEW INDICATING THE SAME CONSISTENT | | | DEFICIENCIES WILL RESULT IN PLAN REVIEW PENALTIES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
Time |
11:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-06 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-07 11:57:39 | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | FBC 107.3.5.3 ? PROVIDE A SITE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE | | | SETBACKS AND BUILDING SEPARATION. INCLUDE THE USE OF | | | THE OTHER BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY. | | | FBC 107.3.5.3 ? PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN OF THE SECOND | | | FLOOR AND INDICATE THE USE OF THAT SPACE. RECORDS | | | APPEAR TO INDICATE THE SECOND FLOOR SPACE IS AN | | | EXISTING DWELLING UNIT. IS IT THE INTENT OF THIS | | | APPLICATION FOR IMPROVEMENT TO CONVERT THE EXISTING | | | BUILDING INTO A TWO DWELLING BUILDING? IF SO, YOU MUST | | | COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE SEPARATION PER | | | FBC R 302.3 1-HR . THE SUMBITTED PLAN AND PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER RECORDS APPEAR TO INDICATE THE EXISTING SPACE | | | PROPROSED FOR IMPROVEMENT IS A STORAGE AREA. IN THAT | | | CASE, THE DESIGN PARAMETERS MUST CONSIDER FBC-E CHAPTER | | | 9 CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. FBC 107.3.5.3 ? PROVIDE AN | | | ENERGY SUBMITTAL. THIS REVIEW IS INCOMPLETE PENDING | | | FURTHER CLARIFICATION OF THE INTENT OF THE APPLICATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-04-13 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-04-07 |
Time |
13:14 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-13 11:11:05 | REVIEW BY MIKE ALBARRAN. | | 2014-04-07 14:31:13 | AS INDICATED IN THE SCOPE OF WORK DESCRIBED ON THE | | | PLANS THIS PERMIT IS LIMITED ONLY TO THE FIRST/GROUND | | | FLOOR UNIT. HABITABLE SPACE IS BEING PROVIDED | | | THEREFORE, AS PER THE FBC-R 303.8 HEATING IS REQUIRED | | | FOR THIS UNIT. | | | | | | ROUTED TO JULIO | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-02-18 |
Time |
13:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-02-18 |
Time |
13:54 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-18 13:58:15 | THIS FILE WAS RETURNED TO ME FROM ZONING, AFFIRMING THE | | | NON-COMPLIANCE OF A THIRD METER ON THIS SITE. | | | THE SITE PLANS SHALL BE REVISED TO INCLUDE THE LOCATION | | | OF ALL THE SERVICES ON THIS PROPERTY. | | | YOU SHALL ALSO REVISE THE ELECTRICAL DRAWING TO MATCH | | | THE ACTUAL CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-02-18 |
Time |
13:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-02-18 |
Time |
13:52 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-02-12 |
Time |
15:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2014-02-12 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-12 15:56:29 | ACCORDING TO THE SUBMITTED PLANS, THERE IS NO WORK | | | BEING DONE IN THE UPSTAIRS APARTMENT. I HAVE BEEN | | | CALLED IN TO INSPECT INSIDE THAT UNIT AND WORK HAS BEEN | | | DONE. | | | FURTHERMORE, AS A RESULT OF A SITE VISIT, THE | | | CONDITIONS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS, DO NOT MATCH. | | | THIS FILE SHOULD BE ROUTED TO ZONING TO CONFIRM THE | | | LEGITIMACY OF THE THIRD METER FOR A THIRD DWELLING | | | UNIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
Time |
09:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
Time |
09:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-25 09:01:40 | THE RESUBMITTED PLAN IS A DUPLICATE OF THE ORIGINAL | | | SUBMITTAL. NONE OF THE COMMENTS WERE ANSWERED. BE | | | ADVISED A THIRD REVIEW INDICATING THE SAME CONSISTENT | | | DEFICIENCIES WILL RESULT IN PLAN REVIEW PENALTIES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
Time |
12:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
Time |
12:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-07 12:10:01 | FBC- 107.3.5.3 ? ELECTRIC SERVICE RISER WITH WIRE | | | SIZES, CONDUIT DETAIL AND GROUNDING DETAIL. PROVIDE | | | COMPLETE LOAD CALCULATIONS, PANEL SCHEDULES AND SHOW | | | CIRCUITS, WIRE SIZES, AND OCP. SHOW THE SERVICE TO THE | | | UPPER FLOOR. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-04-13 |
Time |
11:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-04-01 |
Time |
16:55 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-01 17:00:17 | SENT TO ZONING BOX. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-12-30 |
Time |
11:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-30 11:22:06 | SENT TO STEVE KENNEDY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
Time |
09:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-20 |
Time |
11:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-21 11:15:32 | SENT TO ZONING SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
Time |
12:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-10-17 |
Time |
16:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-04-17 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-04-17 |
Time |
11:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
Time |
14:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-21 14:20:48 | IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED. | | | THE PLANS ARE TO BE STAMPED AND RECEIPT PROVIDED. | | | CONTACT 561 233 5100. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-04-13 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-04-13 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-13 11:10:01 | APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION TO PROVIDE A MECHANICAL PLAN | | | AND ENERGY SUBMITTAL AS A REVISION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
Time |
14:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
Time |
14:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-21 14:14:55 | PROVIDE A MECHANICAL PLAN AND ENERGY SUBMITTAL PER FBC | | | 107. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
Time |
09:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
Time |
09:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-25 09:00:44 | THE RESUBMITTED PLAN IS A DUPLICATE OF THE ORIGINAL | | | SUBMITTAL. NONE OF THE COMMENTS WERE ANSWERED. BE | | | ADVISED A THIRD REVIEW INDICATING THE SAME CONSISTENT | | | DEFICIENCIES WILL RESULT IN PLAN REVIEW PENALTIES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mricard |
Date |
2013-11-04 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
Time |
12:11 |
Sent To |
P |
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-07 12:12:40 | PROVIDE A MECHANICAL PLAN. THIS REPLACES THE PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
Time |
14:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-02-21 |
Time |
14:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
Time |
09:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-25 |
Time |
09:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-25 09:01:11 | THE RESUBMITTED PLAN IS A DUPLICATE OF THE ORIGINAL | | | SUBMITTAL. NONE OF THE COMMENTS WERE ANSWERED. BE | | | ADVISED A THIRD REVIEW INDICATING THE SAME CONSISTENT | | | DEFICIENCIES WILL RESULT IN PLAN REVIEW PENALTIES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
Time |
12:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2013-11-07 |
Time |
12:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-07 12:02:09 | IDENTIFY THE SIZE OF THE WASTE LINE FROM THE SHOWER ON | | | DOWN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
DKittred |
Date |
2014-04-03 |
Time |
09:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2014-04-02 |
Time |
08:57 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-04-03 09:21:17 | 4/3/14 SENT TO MA (ELECTRICAL). DK | | | | | 2014-04-03 09:19:29 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 4/3/14 | | | | | | RENOVATION OF THE 1ST FLOOR OF THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE | | | HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION. RENOVATED | | | SPACE IS TO BE IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE MAIN HOUSE ONLY | | | AND IS NOT PERMITTED TO HAVE A KITCHEN OR BE RENTED AS | | | A SEPARATE UNIT. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | 2014-04-02 08:57:49 | 4/2/14 RESUB ZONING, SENTO TO DK.SG |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2014-02-18 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2014-02-13 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-18 11:29:13 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 2/18/14 | | | | | | 1. PLANS WERE RE-REVIEWED GENERATING COMMENTS ON THE | | | SUBMITTED REVISION. SEPARATE ELECTRICAL METER WILL NOT | | | BE PERMITTED FOR THE PROPOSED RENNOVATED SPACE AND | | | NEEDS TO BE UPDATED APPROPRIATELY ON THE PLANS. | | | RENNOVATED SPACE IS TO BE IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE | | | PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE AND IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE RENTED | | | OR UTILIZED AS A SEPARATE ACCESSORY APARTMENT. | | | | | | NOTE: A THIRD METER FOR THE PROPERTY INDICATES THIS | | | RENNOVATED SPACE WILL BE RENTED SEPARATELY WHICH IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT ALREADY EXISTS ON THE | | | SECOND FLOOR OF THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY | | | WHICH IS GRANDFATHERED-IN. NO ADDITIONAL ACCESSORY | | | APARTMENTS ARE PERMITTED AT THIS LOCATION. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | 2014-02-13 15:05:56 | 2/13/13 ZONING RECEIVED. SENT TO DK FOR REVIEW. SG | | 2014-02-12 15:59:43 | HAVING READ THE PREVIOUS ZONING NOTES, THERE WAS SOME | | | DOUBT AS TO THE POSSIBILITY OF THE REAR APARTMENT, THE | | | SUBMITTED DRAWING DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE CONDITIONS, | | | BUT THERE IS A THIRD METER ON THIS PROPERTY. PLEASE | | | VERIFY/CONFIRM THE LEGITIMACY OF THAT THIRD METER. ONCE | | | YOUR REVIEW IS COMPLETED, PLEASE RETURN IT TO MY DESK. | | | MA |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-01-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2014-01-10 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2014-01-10 |
Time |
09:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-10 09:34:23 | 1/10/14 - SENT BACK TO SK.(DK) | | 2014-01-02 12:13:04 | 1/2/14 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-11-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2013-11-22 |
Time |
17:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
2013-11-22 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-11-22 17:59:48 | 11/22/13 SENT TO SK. | | 2013-11-22 17:46:09 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 11/22/13 | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS PROVIDED ON 10/31/13 WERE NOT | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 1. RESUBMITTAL DOES NOT INCLUDE A SURVEY OR PLOT PLAN | | | INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 2. RESUBMITTAL NEEDS TO INCLUDE A STATEMENT OF THE | | | INTENT OF THE RENNOVATED SPACE. IT IS STILL UNCLEAR IF | | | THE APPLICANT INTENDS ON USING THE SPACE FOR AN | | | ACCESSORY APARTMENT OR DETACHED BEDROOM. IF THE | | | APPLICANT CAN NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR AN | | | ACCESSORY APARTMENT OR DOES NOT WISH TO UTILIZE THE | | | SPACE AS AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT THEN KITCHEN FACILITIES | | | NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANS. THE MOST THAT CAN BE | | | INCLUDED WITHOUT BEING CONSIDERED A KITCHEN FACILITY IS | | | AN UNDER COUNTER REFRIDGERATOR AND SMALL SINK. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | 2013-11-22 07:48:31 | 11/22/13 - ZONING RECEIVED. SENT TO DK FOR REVIEW. LL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-10-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
2013-10-31 |
Time |
10:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mricard |
Date |
2013-11-04 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-10-31 10:39:24 | SENT EMAIL TO APPLICANT REGARDING COMMENTS 10/31/13. DK | | | | | 2013-10-31 10:37:39 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 10/31/2013 | | | | | | 1. APPEARS THAT RENOVATIONS WILL BE FOR AN ACCESSORY | | | STRUCTURE IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. PLEASE PROVIDE A | | | SURVEY OR SITE PLAN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE | | | PROPOSED STRUCTURE BEING RENOVATED. | | | | | | 2. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE SF14 ZONING DISTRICT. | | | IF THE RENOVATION ARE TO CREATE AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT | | | ON THE PROPERTY THEN THE APPLICANT MUST DEMONSTRATE | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE ADDITIONAL STANDARDS IN ZLDR | | | SECTION 94-303. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THE PROPERTY WOULD | | | MEET THE ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OF HAVING A MINIMUM LOT | | | SIZE OF 6,000 SQ. FT. AND MINIMUM LOT DEPTH OF 60 FT. | | | APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT ALL ADDITIONAL | | | STANDARDS IN ZLDR SECTION 94-303 CAN BE MEET IN ORDER | | | TO HAVE AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT. | | | | | | 3. IF APPLICANT CAN NOT MEET ALL THE ADDITIONAL | | | STANDARDS THEN AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT WILL NOT BE | | | PERMITTED AND AT MINIMUM THE APPLICANT WILL NEED TO | | | REMOVE THE PROPOSED KITCHEN FACILITY FROM THE SUBMITTED | | | PLANS IN ORDER FOR THE RENOVATION TO BE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE ZONING CODE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DETACHED | | | BEDROOM COULD ONLY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRINCIPAL | | | STRUCTURE AND WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO BE RENTED | | | SEPARATELY. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | 2013-10-30 15:25:10 | 10/29/13 |
|
|