Plan Review Details - Permit 13100426
Plan Review Stops For Permit 13100426
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2014-11-14 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-11-14 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-11-14 Time 16:17 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2014-09-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-09-06 Time 11:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-09-06 Time 11:27 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-06 11:44:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST ARE BELOW FOR REFERENCE.
  
 THE LETTER FROM THE BUILDING OWNER IS PENDING REVIEW BY
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. MY APOLOGIES FOR THE DELAY.
  
 I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER
 ACKNOWLEDGING THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDING OWNER
 TO FOLLOW THESE GUIDELINES AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL
 OF THE DESIGN (SEE PREVIOUS LIST).
  
 REPONSE LETTER IS FROM THE SURVEYOR. AS SURVEYORS ARE
 NOT LICENSED TO DO DESIGN WORK, OR TO DO INSTALLATIONS,
 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT I CONSIDER "WHAT IF SCENARIOS"
 DESIGN WORK WHICH SHOULD BE OVERSEEN BY AN ARCHITECT OR
 AN ENGINEER KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT LIFE SAFETY AND FLOOD
 LOAD RESISTANCE. IT WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR THE
 LICENSED ENGINEER OR THE LICENSED CONTRACTOR TO BE
 DEALING WITH THESE CODE ISSUES. FAILURE TO UTILIZE THE
 PROFESSIONALS WHO ARE LICENSED TO DO THIS TYPE OF
 DESIGN HAS SIGNIFICANTLY DELAYED THIS PROJECT. AT THIS
 POINT I CONSIDER THE CODE ISSUES ALMOST RESOLVED. FOR
 FUTURE COMMERCIAL PROJECTS, PLEASE HAVE A KNOWLEDGEABLE
 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL INVOLVED FROM THE BEGINNING TO
 AVOID RISK TO THE OCCUPANTS.
  
 RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE PRODUCT HAS BEEN
 TESTED. THIS IS NOT THE CASE, BUT THIS ISSUE WILL BE
 RESOLVED UPON APPROVAL OF THE INSPECTION LETTER. THE
 MANUFACTURER UNDERSTANDS THE ISSUES AND HAS NOT ONLY
 AGREED THAT THE REQUIREMENT IS APPROPRIATE, BUT IS
 CONSIDERING SUGGESTING THIS FOR OTHER JOBS WITH A
 SIMILAR INSTALLATION.
  
  
 1. SEE THE UL LISTING FOR THE FIRE CURTAIN. THIS WAS
 DESIGNED TO BE INSTALLED IN AN AIR DUCT, NOT AN
 EXTERIOR WALL.
  
 THE MANUFACTURER OF THE FIRE CURTAIN HAS STATED THAT
 THEY CANNOT PROVIDE ANY ASSURANCE THAT THE FIRE CURTAIN
 WOULD OPERATE AFTER EXPOSURE TO THE ELEMENTS OR A FLOOD
 EVENT.
  
 THEREFORE, THE PROPOSED APPLICATION DOES NOT COMPLY
 WITH FBC CHAPTER 7. HOWEVER, PER BUILDING OFFICIAL,
 THIS APPLICATION WILL BE APPROVED UNDER ALTERNATIVE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS 104.11 UNDER THE FOLLOWING
 CONDITIONS:
  
 THE FIRE CURTAINS WILL BE INSPECTED AND TESTED BY A
 DBPR LICENSED PROFESSIONAL UNDER THE FOLLOWING
 CONDITIONS:
  
 ANNUALLY
 AFTER A FIRE EVENT
 AFTER A FLOOD EVENT
  
 THE BUILDING OWNER SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF COMMITMENT
 STATING SUCH. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT AS
 LONG AS THE VENTS AND FIRE CURTAINS ARE INSTALLED IN
 THE FIRE RATED WALLS AND REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
 THE BUILDING MANAGEMENT AND BUILDING OWNERS. THIS
 LETTER IS TO BE FILED WITH THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 CLERK'S OFFICE.
  
 THE ENGINEER IS TO WRITE A LETTER ACKNOWLEDGING THE
 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDING OWNER TO FOLLOW THESE
 GUIDELINES AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2014-08-01 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-08-01 Time 16:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-08-01 Time 16:03 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-01 16:23:32****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. SEE THE UL LISTING FOR THE FIRE CURTAIN. THIS WAS
 DESIGNED TO BE INSTALLED IN AN AIR DUCT, NOT AN
 EXTERIOR WALL.
  
 THE MANUFACTURER OF THE FIRE CURTAIN HAS STATED THAT
 THEY CANNOT PROVIDE ANY ASSURANCE THAT THE FIRE CURTAIN
 WOULD OPERATE AFTER EXPOSURE TO THE ELEMENTS OR A FLOOD
 EVENT.
  
 THEREFORE, THE PROPOSED APPLICATION DOES NOT COMPLY
 WITH FBC CHAPTER 7. HOWEVER, PER BUILDING OFFICIAL,
 THIS APPLICATION WILL BE APPROVED UNDER ALTERNATIVE
 MATERIALS AND METHODS 104.11 UNDER THE FOLLOWING
 CONDITIONS:
  
 THE FIRE CURTAINS WILL BE INSPECTED AND TESTED BY A
 DBPR LICENSED PROFESSIONAL UNDER THE FOLLOWING
 CONDITIONS:
  
 ANNUALLY
 AFTER A FIRE EVENT
 AFTER A FLOOD EVENT
  
 THE BUILDING OWNER SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER OF COMMITMENT
 STATING SUCH. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT AS
 LONG AS THE VENTS AND FIRE CURTAINS ARE INSTALLED IN
 THE FIRE RATED WALLS AND REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
 THE BUILDING MANAGEMENT AND BUILDING OWNERS. THIS
 LETTER IS TO BE FILED WITH THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 CLERK'S OFFICE.
  
 THE ENGINEER IS TO WRITE A LETTER ACKNOWLEDGING THE
 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDING OWNER TO FOLLOW THESE
 GUIDELINES AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2014-05-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-05-20 Time 09:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-05-20 Time 09:35 Sent To  
Notes
2014-05-20 09:39:32****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 3RD REVIEW
  
 1. A REVIEW WILL NOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME AS SOMEONE
 OTHER THAN THE ENGINEER HAS ALTERED THE PLAN. PLANS ARE
 DATED 12/2013, PREVIOUS COMMENT LIST WAS DONE IN
 1/2014.
  
 ENGINEER IS TO STATE ON THE PLAN THAT HE IS TAKING
 RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN/ALTERATION OF THE LIFE
 SAFETY SYSTEM. BEFORE A SECOND PLAN REVIEW IS DONE, I
 WOULD LIKE FOR HIM TO HAVE THE BENEFIT OF READING THE
 COMMENTS AND ISSUES RAISED ON THE PLAN PREPARED BY HIM.
  
 IF HE AGREES WITH THE CHANGES DONE TO HIS DESIGN, HE IS
 TO INCORPORATE THESE CHANGES INTO HIS PLAN, PROVIDE NEW
 DRAWINGS, AS WELL AS A STATEMENT THAT HE HAS DESIGNED
 TO MAINTAIN THE LIFE SAFETY FEATURES BUILT INTO THIS
 HIGH RISE BUILDING.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2014-01-08 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-01-08 Time 15:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-01-08 Time 15:08 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-08 15:08:40****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 2ND REVIEW
  
 1. INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN APPLICATION, ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE AND PLAN WERE EXPLAINED IN AN EMAIL. HAVE
 ENGINEER REVISE PLAN OR HAVE SURVEYOR PROVIDE
 EXPLANATION ON ELEVATION CERTIFICATE TO CORRELATE.
  
 3. FROM PREVIOUS LIST, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED:
  
 ON THE PLAN, INDICATE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE FOR THIS
 EXISTING BUILDING, SEE FBC 2010 EXISTING BUILDING
 101.5. NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
 DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE OR TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE
 CHECKLIST.
  
 TODD SCHERR?S RESPONSE EMAIL WAS: ?105.1, NOT
 101.5????? AND THEN EXPLAINS THAT THIS DOES NOT AFFECT
 OR ALTER CERTAIN ELEMENTS AND QUOTES FBC 105 REGARDING
 WHEN A PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE PURPOSE OF THIS IS NOT
 CLEAR.
  
 PLEASE READ COMMENT MORE CAREFULLY: ***FBC 2010
 EXISTING BUILDING 101.5*** HAVE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
 ADDRESS THIS COMMENT. A COMPLETE PLAN REVIEW WITH
 CORRECT CODE REFERENCES CANNOT BE DONE UNLESS A METHOD
 OF COMPLIANCE IS SELECTED.
  
 4. REGARDING COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING WIND
 DESIGN CRITERIA AND FLOOD DESIGN CRITERIA. FBC 1603.1.4
 WAS ADDRESSED BY ENGINEER, BUT OTHER INFORMATION FBC
 1603.1.7 AND 1612.5 WERE NOT ADDRESSED. EMAIL FROM TODD
 SCHERR STATES THAT 1603.1.7, 1612.5 ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
 DID THE ENGINEER SEE THE FIRST CORRECTION LIST? IS TODD
 SCHERER STATING THIS ON BEHALF OF THE ENGINEER? IF THE
 ENGINEER FEELS THIS DOES NOT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED,
 PLEASE HAVE HIM CONTACT ME PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL.
 OTHERWISE, INCORPORATE THE INFORMATION INTO THE PLAN.
  
 5. PLAN STATES THAT ALL WALLS ARE FIRE RATED.
  
 SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING THE USE OF A MECHANICAL
 DUCT FIRE DAMPER IN A FLOOD VENT AND THE ISSUE OF THE
 OPERATION OF THE FLOOD VENT WITH A DAMPER INSTALLED.
 NOTE THAT A VENT IS A PROTECTED (INTERIOR)
 INSTALLATION, WHERE IN THIS CASE AN EXTERIOR
 INSTALLATION IS PROPOSED. THE FIRE DAMPER IS UL LISTED
 FOR A SPECIFIC USE. THESE ISSUES HAVE NOT BEEN
 ADDRESSED.
  
 FIRE DAMPERS DO NOT RESTRICT THE PASSAGE OF SMOKE. SEE
 FIRE COMMENTS; PROPOSED DESIGN WOULD ALLOW SMOKE TO
 PENETRATE THE RATED ELEVATOR SHAFT.
  
 RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT VENTS IN THE STAIRWELL AND
 ELEVATOR SHAFTS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. ENGINEER?S PLAN
 STILL SHOWS VENTS IN THE ELEVATOR SHAFTS. SEE FBC 708
 REGARDING SHAFT ENCLOSURES. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH ITEMS
 ARE APPLICABLE DUE TO INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION.
  
 6. VALUE IS TOO LOW. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE ENGINEERING,
 MATERIALS, LABOR, OVERHEAD, AND PROFIT, SEE FBC 109.
  
 RESPONSE STATES THAT THIS IS NOT INCREASING THE VALUE
 OF THE BUILDING. SEE FBC 109, THE VALUE REFERENCED IN
 THE COMMENT IS TO BE THE VALUE OF THE PROJECT.
  
 7. AS A REVISED ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WAS NOT PROVIDED,
 COMMENTS REGARDING EC STILL APPLY:
  
 SEE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS, ITEM A5, IF
 LAT/LONG COORDINATES ARE PROVIDED BY A SURVEYOR,
 INDICATE THE METHOD USED TO DETERMINE THE
 LATITUDE/LONGITUDE IN THE COMMENTS AREA OF SECTION D,
 PLEASE REVISE.
  
  
 8. SEE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, ITEM A8 (C). PLEASE
 PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AS TO HOW IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED
 THAT THERE ARE 4200 SQUARE INCHES OF NET AREA. THE
 LOCATION PLAN SHOWS FIVE DOUBLE VENTS, 152 SI EACH, AND
 ELEVEN SINGLE VENTS, 76 SI EACH.
  
 ALSO PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO THE CALCULATIONS FOR
 EACH AREA WERE DETERMINED. FOR INSTANCE, MAINTENANCE &
 BUILDING STORAGE IS SHOWN AS 800 SF/1000 WITH TWO
 DOUBLE VENTS.
  
 9. PHOTOS PROVIDED APPEAR TO SHOW NEW DRYWALL (CORNER
 BEAAD VISIBLE IN MORE THAN ONE LOCATION). IT APPEARS
 THAT MORE WORK MAY HAVE BEEN PERFORMED OTHER THAN THE
 INSTALLATION OF THE FLOOD VENTS. IF THIS IS THE CASE,
 INCLUDE THE ADDITIONAL WORK ON THE PLAN.
  
 RESPONSE STATES THAT OTHER PERMITS EXIST ON SITE.
 PROVIDE THE PERMIT NUMBER FOR THIS WORK.
  
 10. SEE OTHER COMMENTS. LIFE SAFETY ASPECT OF THIS
 INSTALLATION TO BE EVALUATED. FIRE RATED WALLS TO BE
 SHOWN ON PLAN. THE PREVIOUS COMMENT PARTIALLY RESOLVED
 BY REMOVING EXIT STAIR VENTS, BUT IT APPEARS THAT THERE
 ARE OTHER RATED WALLS (STORAGE, ELEVATOR, ETC.) WHICH
 ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN. FBC 107, MORE
 INFORMATION REQUIRED.
  
 11. FROM PREVIOUS LIST, SEE THE ICC EVALUATION REPORT,
 ITEM 4.0, SMARTVENTS ARE DESIGNED TO BE INSTALLED INTO
 WALLS FROM THE EXTERIOR SIDE. INTERIOR INSTALLATIONS
 SHOWN, PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 ENGINEER DID NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT. EITHER HAVE A
 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SUBMIT FOR ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS
 AND METHODS FBC 104.11 OR REVISE.
  
 ALSO SEE THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS ON THE
 EVALUATION REPORT, TWO OPENINGS ON DIFFERENT WALLS
 REQUIRED.
  
 12. FIRE DAMPERS ARE SPECIFIED BY THE STRUCTURAL
 ENGINEER. THIS IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE UL LISTING AS
 DAMPERS ARE FOR INSTALLATION INTO AIR DUCTS. ALSO, IT
 APPEARS THAT THE FLOOD VENTS WILL NO LONGER BE OPERABLE
 IF DAMPERS CLOSE AS A STATIC DAMPER WAS SPECIFIED. SEE
 FBC 104.11, ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS AND METHODS, OR
 PROVIDE A PROPOSED INSTALLATION WHICH MEETS THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, UL LISTINGS,
 AND THE ICC EVALUATION REPORT.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-11-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2013-11-07 Time 18:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-11-07 Time 18:47 Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-22 18:03:14****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 **NO PLAN SUBMITTED - A PLAN PREPARED BY A DESIGN
 PROFEESIONAL IS REQUIRED, FS471/FS481. PLAN IS TO SHOW
 THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORK AS WELL AS ADDRESS THE
 FOLLOWING ISSUES**
  
 **PLEASE SEE ITEM #11 AND CONTACT ME IMMEDIATELY TO
 ADVISE AS TO HOW THE LIFE SAFETY ISSUE WILL BE
 RESOLVED**
  
 1. APPLICATION IS FOR 16 FLOOD VENTS, ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE A8B STATES THAT THERE ARE 21. PLEASE
 CORRELATE FBC 107.
  
 2. SEE PAGE 1 OF 2 OF THE ICC EVALUATION REPORT. ITEM
 2.0 STATES THAT THIS IS TO BE USED ON NON FIRE
 RESISTANT WALLS. ON THE PLAN, INCLUDE BUILDING TYPE FBC
 CHAPTER 6 AS WELL AS ANY EXISTING RATED WALLS, FBC
 CHAPTER 7. NOTE THAT VENTS APPEAR TO BE SHOWN IN THE
 STAIR AND ELEVATOR SHAFTS.
  
 3. ON THE PLAN, INDICATE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE FOR THIS
 EXISTING BUILDING, SEE FBC 2010 EXISTING BUILDING
 101.5. NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
 DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE OR TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE
 CHECKLIST.
  
 4. INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC 1603.1.4 AND FLOOD
 DESIGN DATA FBC 1603.1.7, SEE ALSO FBC 1612.5. IT IS
 NOT CLEAR WHETHER THIS BUILDING HAS REACHED THE
 SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT THRESHOLD (LIFETIME CUMULATIVE
 IMPROVEMENTS) BUT IT APPEARS THAT PROPERTY OWNER IS
 ATTEMPTING TO COMPLY WITH NFIP GUIDELINES.
  
 5. VALUE IS TOO LOW. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE ENGINEERING,
 MATERIALS, LABOR, OVERHEAD, PROFIT, SEE FBC 109.
  
 6. SEE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS, ITEM A5, IF
 LAT/LONG COORDINATES ARE PROVIDED BY A SURVEYOR,
 INDICATE THE METHOD USED TO DETERMINE THE
 LATITUDE/LONGITUDE IN THE COMMENTS AREA OF SECTION D,
 PLEASE REVISE.
  
 7. SEE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, ITEM A8 (C). PLEASE
 PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AS TO HOW IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED
 THAT THERE ARE 4200 SQUARE INCHES OF NET AREA. THE
 LOCATION PLAN SHOWS FIVE DOUBLE VENTS, 152 SI EACH, AND
 ELEVEN SINGLE VENTS, 76 SI EACH.
  
 ALSO PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO THE CALCULATIONS FOR
 EACH AREA WERE DETERMINED. FOR INSTANCE, MAINTENANCE &
 BUILDING STORAGE IS SHOWN AS 800 SF/1000 WITH TWO
 DOUBLE VENTS.
  
 8. PLAN TO INCLUDE THE MODEL NUMBER OF THE VENTS
 PROPOSED. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED INCLUDES SIX
 DIFFERENT MODELS.
  
 9. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF
 RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC 107.3.1.
  
 10. PHOTOS PROVIDED APPEAR TO SHOW NEW DRYWALL (CORNER
 BEAAD VISIBLE IN MORE THAN ONE LOCATION). IT APPEARS
 THAT MORE WORK MAY HAVE BEEN PERFORMED OTHER THAN THE
 INSTALLATION OF THE FLOOD VENTS. IF THIS IS THE CASE,
 INCLUDE THE ADDITIONAL WORK ON THE PLAN.
  
 11. IT APPEARS BASED ON THE LOCATION PLAN THAT FLOOD
 VENTS WERE INSTALLED BETWEEN THE OWNER STORAGE AND A
 STAIR, AND BETWEEN THE STAIR AND ELEVATORS. IS THIS A
 REQUIRED EXIT STAIR? PRESSURIZED STAIR? IT APPEARS THAT
 A LIFE SAFETY ISSUE MAY HAVE BEEN CREATED. PLEASE
 PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION, FBC CHAPTER 10, CHAPTER 7.
  
 12. SEE THE ICC EVALUATION REPORT, ITEM 4.0, SMARTVENTS
 ARE DESIGNED TO BE INSTALLED INTO WALLS FROM THE
 EXTERIOR SIDE. INTERIOR INSTALLATIONS SHOWN, PLEASE
 ADDRESS.
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2014-04-24 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2014-04-24 Time 16:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2014-04-24 Time 16:34 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2013-12-14 Cont ID  
Sent By wjolin Date 2013-12-14 Time 09:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By wjolin Date 2013-12-14 Time 08:39 Sent To M
Notes
2013-12-14 09:42:015600 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE
 PERMIT #13100426
 REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
  
 EXPLAIN THE RATIONALE FOR PLACING A FLOOD VENT BETWEEN
 THE ELEVATOR SHAFT AND ADJACENT TRASH ROOM. A FIRE IN
 THE TRASH ROOM COULD RESULT IN SMOKE TRANSFER TO THE
 ELEVATOR SHAFT AND OTHER FLOORS ABOVE. FIRE HISTORY
 CONFIRMS SMOKE IN ELEVATOR HOISTWAYS HAS PROVEN TO BE
 DEADLY . THIS DESIGN HAS SERIOUS LIFE SAFETY
 IMPLICATIONS. ARE THE PROJECT ENGINEERS ACCEPTING
 RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE LIFE SAFETY DESIGN OF THE
 BUILDING?
  
 THE PLANS INDICATE FIRE DAMPERS ARE TO BE INSTALLED
 WITH THE FLOOD VENTS. HAVE THESE PRODUCTS BEEN TESTED
 AND LISTED TO BE USED TOGETHER?
  
 WESLEY JOLIN
 FIRE INVESTIGATOR & INSPECTOR
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 [email protected]
 (561) 805-6730
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-11-19 Cont ID  
Sent By wjolin Date 2013-11-19 Time 11:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By wjolin Date 2013-11-19 Time 11:28 Sent To B
Notes
2013-11-19 11:38:445600 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE
 PERMIT #13100426
 REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
  
 SEVERAL OF THE VENT LOCATIONS APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN
 FIRE-RESISTANT RATED WALLS OF STAIR TOWERS, STORAGE
 ROOMS AND TRASH ROOMS ETC. UNPROTECTED OR NON-FIRE
 RATED OPENINGS AND PENETRATIONS ARE NOT PERMITTED BY
 THE FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY CODES AS THIS WILL ALLOW
 PASSAGE OF HEAT AND SMOKE.
  
 PER NFPA 101 SECTION 7.1.3.2.1, PENETRATIONS INTO, AND
 OPENINGS THROUGH, AN EXIT ENCLOSURE ASSEMBLY SHALL BE
 LIMITED TO DOOR ASSEMBLIES FROM NORMALLY OCCUPIED
 SPACES AND CORRIDORS, REQUIRED EXIT DOOR OPENINGS,
 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT SERVING THE EXIT ENCLOSURE, DUCTWORK
 AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR INDEPENDENT STAIR
 PRESSURIZATION, WATER OR STEAM PIPING NECESSARY FOR THE
 HEATING OR COOLING OF THE EXIT ENCLOSURE, SPRINKLER
 PIPING, STANDPIPES, AND PENETRATIONS FOR FIRE ALARM
 CIRCUITS, WHERE THE CIRCUITS ARE INSTALLED IN METAL
 CONDUIT AND THE PENETRATIONS ARE PROTECTED.
  
 WESLEY JOLIN
 FIRE INVESTIGATOR & INSPECTOR
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 [email protected]
 (561) 805-6730
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2014-11-14 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-11-14 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-10-28 Time 11:44 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-28 11:44:43SENT TO S. HILL'S DESK. JW
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status   Date 2014-11-14 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-11-14 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-08-13 Time 18:39 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-13 18:39:47SENT TO S HILL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2014-08-01 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-08-01 Time 16:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-07-11 Time 09:07 Sent To  
Notes
2014-07-14 09:07:42RE-SUBMITTAL SENT TO SAMANTHA'S DESK FOR REVIEW. JG.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2014-04-17 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2014-05-20 Time 10:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-04-16 Time 08:56 Sent To FIRE
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2014-01-18 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2014-01-18 Time 07:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2013-12-04 Time 16:38 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-08 15:08:59TO MECHANICAL
  
2013-12-04 16:40:36SENT TO FIRE SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2013-11-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2013-11-19 Time 17:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-10-11 Time 10:22 Sent To  
Notes
2013-11-07 20:31:3711/7 TO FIRE
  
2013-10-12 10:24:15SENT TO BUILDING UNDER $5000 BOX
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2014-01-18 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2014-01-18 Time 07:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2014-01-18 Time 07:52 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved