| 2013-10-19 08:13:59 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 13090980 |
| | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY # 218 |
| | CONT: DAVIS CONSTRUCTION |
| | TEL: (561) 848-0577 |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| | |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | DATE: SATURDAY OCT. 19/2013 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A1 DETAILS, THE LOWER LEFT SMALL DETAIL |
| | INDICATES THE STEEL STUD AT 16 GAUGE, THE UPPER RIGHT |
| | LARGER DETAIL INDICATES 20 GAUGE STEEL STUDS AND THE |
| | LOWER RIGHT ALSO INDICATES THE USE OF 20 GAUGE STEEL |
| | STUDS. PLEASE CORRECT THE DISCREPANCY, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | IF 20 GAUGE STEEL STUDS TYPE STRUCTURAL 33 MILLS |
| | THICKNESS OR 20 GAUGE DRYWALL 30 MILLS THICK. 107.2.1.3 |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2) THE WAY THE LOWER RIGHT DETAIL IS DRAWN THE 1/2" |
| | ALLTHREAD IS PENETRATES A HORIZONTAL 2X6 SYP AND A NUT |
| | ON THE BOTTOM. THE WAY IT IS DETAILED IT APPEARS TO BE |
| | BLOCKING BETWEEN THE 3 5/8" STEEL STUDS JUST AS |
| | DEPICTED ON THE VERTICAL FRAMING AS BACKING. IT WOULD |
| | APPEAR THIS DETAIL NEEDS TO CLARIFY IF THE 2-X6 ARE |
| | FRAMING MEMBERS (PURLINS) THAT WOULD BE BELOW THE |
| | HORIZONTAL STEEL STUDS CARRYING THE STEEL STUDS? |
| | 107.2.1.3. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE IN WHICH WAY THE BAR JOIST ARE |
| | RUNNING, IT WOULD APPEAR THEY ARE PARRALLEL TO THE |
| | HORIZONTAL 3 5/8 INCH STEEL STUDS, ALSO PROVIDE AT WHAT |
| | SPACING THE BAR JOIST ARE APART, ASSUMED 5'-0" O.C. THE |
| | PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO IF THE WIDTH OF THE DROPPED |
| | SOFFIT, IT APPEARS TO BE APPROXIMATELY 16'-0" IN DEPTH, |
| | WOULD THERE BE 5 VERTICAL 1/2" ALLTHREADS FASTENED |
| | THROUGH THE SAME BAR JOIST? HAS THE ADDITIONAL LOADING |
| | BEEN FIGURED INTO THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF THE BAR |
| | JOIST? |
| | |
| | 4) THE BOTTOM RIGHT DETAIL PLEASE PROVIDE AS TO THE |
| | FINISH MATERIALS TO BE APPLIED TO THE DROPPED SOFFIT, |
| | THERE APPEARS TO BE TWO DIFFERNT TYPE OF MATERIALS, |
| | TYPE NOR THICKNESS HAS NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED ON THE |
| | PLANS. 107.2.1.3 ADITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| | ALSO REFER TO 2010 FBC-B 802.11.2. SET OUT |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 2010 FBC-B 803.11.2 SET-OUT CONSTRUCTION. |
| | WHERE WALLS AND CEILINGS ARE REQUIRED TO BE OF |
| | FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED OR NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION |
| | AND WALLS ARE SET OUT OR CEILINGS ARE DROPPED DISTANCES |
| | GREATER THAN SPECIFIED IN SECTION 803.11.1, CLASS A |
| | FINISH MATERIALS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 803.1.1 OR |
| | 803.1.2, SHALL BE USED EXCEPT WHERE INTERIOR FINISH |
| | MATERIALS ARE PROTECTED ON BOTH SIDES BY AN AUTOMATIC |
| | SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 903.3.1.1 |
| | OR 903.3.1.2, OR ATTACHED TO NONCOMBUSTIBLE BACKING OR |
| | FURRING STRIPS INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION |
| | 803.11.1. THE HANGERS AND ASSEMBLY MEMBERS OF SUCH |
| | DROPPED CEILINGS THAT ARE BELOW THE MAIN CEILING LINE |
| | SHALL BE OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS, EXCEPT THAT IN |
| | TYPES III AND V CONSTRUCTION, FIRE-RETARDANT-TREATED |
| | WOOD SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE CONSTRUCTION OF EACH |
| | SET-OUT WALL SHALL BE OF FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED |
| | CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED ELSEWHERE IN THIS CODE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AT WHAT PORTION OF THIS SOFFIT AND |
| | DROPPED CEILING ARE EXISTING AND WHAT PORTION IS TO BE |
| | CONSIDERED NEW WORK, THE VALUE OF THE WORK IS DECLARED |
| | AT $2499.00 DOLLARS, THIS VALUE MAY APPEAR TO BE LOW, |
| | OWNERS SIGNATURE AS WELL AS CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED |
| | AND NOTIRIZED. |
| | |
| | 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| | 108.3* BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. |
| | IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE |
| | CLAIMED VALUATION OF BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, |
| | ELECTRICAL, GAS, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS |
| | APPEARS TO BE UNDER ESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE |
| | PERMIT SHALL BE DENIED. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, |
| | VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL |
| | REPLACEMENT PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND |
| | SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE |
| | STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR |
| | FINISHES, NORMAL SITE WORK (EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR |
| | BUILDINGS), ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING |
| | COST, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. |
| | VALUATION REFRENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED |
| | DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES |
| | (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC) WITH REGIONAL ADJUSTMENTS |
| | FOR LOCATION AS PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE |
| | CONGRESS. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
