|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 13090771
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 13090771 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-10-11 |
Time |
15:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-10-11 |
Time |
14:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-10-09 |
Time |
18:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-10-09 |
Time |
18:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-10-09 18:14:30 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY | | | THE ENGINEER. FLORIDA STATUTES 471 AND FAC 61G15-23.002 | | | THE ONES THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE NOT SEALED AND ARE NOT | | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURES. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-10-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2013-10-03 |
Time |
08:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2013-10-03 |
Time |
08:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-10-03 08:51:09 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 13090771 | | | ADD: 342 ORANGE WAY | | | CONT: FLORIDA QUALITY ROOFING | | | TEL: (954)458-6095 | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW | | | DATE: OCT. 03/2013 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 9487-R2 SYSTEM # W-6 MPD OF | | | -75.0 PSFLIMITATION # 4 ALLOWS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING | | | BY EITHER AN ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT USING RAS 117 | | | CALCULATIONS, CONSIDEERED A "C" EXPOSURE WITH -95.7 PSF | | | PRESSURE. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-09-25 |
Time |
10:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-09-25 |
Time |
10:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-25 10:59:37 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL 301 | | | | | | 1. SEE ITEM 4 ON WHAT APPEARS TO BE APPENDIX PAGE 1. | | | ENHANCED FASTENING TO BE DETERMINED BY A QUALIFIED | | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | | | | | 2. PRODUCT APPROVAL IS ILLEGIBLE. SUBMIT TWO LEGIBLE | | | COPIES FOR REVIEW. FBC 107 | | | | | | 3. CONTRACTOR STATES THAT SYSTEM TYPE E IS PROPOSED. I | | | AM UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SHEETS | | | SUBMITTED. FBC 107. PROPOSED ENHANCED FASTENING | | | PROPOSED NOT REVIEWED AS IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH SYSTEM | | | IS TO BE INSTALLED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-10-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-10-09 |
Time |
18:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-10-07 |
Time |
13:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-10-09 13:02:38 | TO MCDOUGAL |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
