Plan Review Details - Permit 13090744
Plan Review Stops For Permit 13090744
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2013-12-04 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-04 Time 15:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-02 Time 06:59 Sent To  
Notes
2013-12-02 11:53:222010 FBC
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY AND A SITE PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION. (WAS NOT
 ADDRESSED.)
  
 2) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE
 ENGINEER'S LETTER AND DRAWING OF THE EXISTING
 FOUNDATION, STEM WALL AND SLAB THAT WAS INSTALLED
 WITHOUT A PERMIT OR INSPECTIONS. PLEASE SPECIFY THE
 METHODS THAT WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE FOOTER
 THICKNESS AND WIDTH, THE REINFORCING STEEL IN THE STEM
 WALL AND THE 6 X 6 W.W.F. IN THE 4" SLAB. HOW WAS THE
 COMPACTION OF THE SOIL UNDER THE SLAB VERIFIED? WERE
 ANY PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN DURING THE CONSTRUCTION? IS THIS
 DESIGN BASED ON A PREVIOUS SET OF DRAWINGS FOR THIS
 PROJECT? WAS AN EXCAVATION ADJACENT TO THE FOOTER USED?
 IS THERE ANY RECORD OF A SOIL COMPACTION TEST FOR THE
 FOOTINGS OR SLAB? CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1.3
  
 3) FBC R314.3.1 REQUIRES SMOKE ALARMS TO BE INSTALLED
 AS REQUIRED FOR NEW DWELLINGS WHEN ADDITIONS OR
 ALTERATIONS REQUIRING PERMITS OCCUR. SHOW COMPLIANCE.
 THE REVISED PLANS SHOW A SMOKE ALARM IN THE FAMILY
 ROOM, WHICH IS NOT REQUIRED. BECAUSE THE FLOOR PLAN
 DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ENTIRE DWELLING, A NOTE ON THE
 PLANS STATING THAT SMOKE ALARMS WILL BE INSTALLED IN
 EACH SLEEPING ROOM AND OUTSIDE EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING
 AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE BEDROOMS AS
 REQUIRED BY FBC R314 WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ADDRESS THIS
 REQUIREMENT.
  
 4) COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 5) FORM 402-2010 SPECIFIES CERTAIN PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
 THAT MUST BE MET. THE EXTERIOR WALL INSULATION FOR
 FRAME IS REQUIRED TO BE R-13 AND R-11 IS SPECIFIED ON
 THE FORM. R-11 IS INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED ON THE FORM FOR
 CONCRETE OR MASONRY " MASS" WALLS, THIS ADDITION DOES
 NOT HAVE EXTERIOR CONCRETE OR MASONRY WALLS. THERE ARE
 NO WALLS THAT ARE "ADJACENT" TO UNCONDITIONED SPACE.
 SEE FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 402.1. PLEASE SUBMIT
 CORRECTED ENERGY FORMS.
  
 6) COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 7) COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 8) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE TAMKO MODIFIED ROOFING
 SYSTEM NOA NO. 12-0716.18 HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NOA NO.
 12-1003.05. PLEASE SUBMIT THE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL
 THAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD. DCA RULE 9N-3 AND CITY AMENDMENTS
 107.3.4.1 (WAS NOT ADDRESSED.)
  
 9) SPECIFY THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY, THE FASTENING OPTION
 AND THE MINIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES THAT WILL BE USED TO
 INSTALL THE TAMKO ROOFING SYSTEM. PROVIDE TWO SETS OF
 SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED
 FASTENING FOR THE PERIMETER AND CORNER ROOF AREAS, AS
 REQUIRED BY LIMITATION #7 ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE NOA.
 FBC R905.1 (WAS NOT ADDRESSED.)
  
 10) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK SPECIFIED ON THE APPLICATION
 OF $1500.00 IS TOO LOW. FOR PERMITTING FEE PURPOSES THE
 VALUE IS TO BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE INCLUDING
 STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, DESIGN FEES, OVERHEAD AND
 PROFIT AS WOULD BE CHARGED BY A CONTRACTOR. PLEASE
 PROVIDE AN ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION COST VALUE. CITY
 AMENDMENTS 109.3 (WAS NOT ADDRESSED.)
  
 11) IN ORDER TO SPEED PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A
 RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS WAS ADDRESSED.
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-09-30 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2013-09-30 Time 09:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-09-28 Time 09:24 Sent To Z
Notes
2013-09-28 10:33:082010 FBC
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY AND A SITE PLAN
 SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION.
  
 2) THE PLANS SPECIFY THAT THE FOOTING, STEM WALL AND
 SLAB ARE EXISTING, HOWEVER, THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S
 RECORDS DO NOT SHOW ANYTHING AT THE AREA OF THIS
 PROPOSED ADDITION. THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS DO
 NOT INDICATE THAT THIS WORK WAS PERMITTED OR INSPECTED.
 A PERMIT FOR AN ADDITION (PERMIT # 07060979) WAS
 APPLIED FOR BY THE OWNER IN 2007. THIS PERMIT WAS NEVER
 ISSUED AND HAS EXPIRED. PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE
 FOOTING, STEM WALL AND SLAB WERE PERMITTED AND PASSED
 INSPECTIONS. OTHERWISE THEY SHALL BE REMOVED OR
 EVALUATED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO THE SATISFACTION
 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH'S BUILDING DIVISION.
 CITY AMENDMENTS 109.4 & SECTION 114
  
 3) FBC R314.3.1 REQUIRES SMOKE ALARMS TO BE INSTALLED
 AS REQUIRED FOR NEW DWELLINGS WHEN ADDITIONS OR
 ALTERATIONS REQUIRING PERMITS OCCUR. SHOW COMPLIANCE.
  
 4) THE PLANS SHOW A 2" X 6" RAFTERS IN A SINGLE ROOF /
 CEILING ASSEMBLY WITH R-30 INSULATION. R-30 BATT
 INSULATION IS 9.5" TO 10" THICK DEPENDING ON THE BRAND.
 A 2 X 6 WILL ONLY PROVIDE 5.5" OF SPACE BETWEEN THE
 CEILING AND ROOF SHEATHING, WHICH IS NOT ENOUGH SPACE
 FOR THE INSULATION AND AN AIR SPACE. PLEASE CORRECT.
 NOTE. THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORM REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF
 R-30 INSULATION. FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 402.1
  
 5) FORM 402-2010 SPECIFIES CERTAIN PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
 THAT MUST BE MET. THE EXTERIOR WALL INSULATION FOR
 FRAME IS REQUIRED TO BE R-13 AND R-11 IS SPECIFIED ON
 THE FORM. R-11 IS INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED ON THE FORM FOR
 CONCRETE OR MASONRY " MASS" WALLS, THIS ADDITION DOES
 NOT HAVE EXTERIOR CONCRETE OR MASONRY WALLS. THERE ARE
 NO WALLS THAT ARE "ADJACENT" TO UNCONDITIONED SPACE.
 PLEASE CORRECT. FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 402.1
  
 6) THE MAXIMUM DESIGN NEGATIVE PRESSURE FOR THE WINDOW
 IS SPECIFIED AS - 50 PSF ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL
 (FL5418) AND THE REQUIRED NEGATIVE PRESSURE SPECIFIED
 ON THE PLAN IS -50.61 PSF. THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE
 WINDOW ARE REQUIRED EXCEED THE REQUIRED PRESSURES. FBC
 R301.2.1
  
 7) THE PLANS SPECIFY A SIMONTON "STORM BREAKER" SERIES
 WINDOW AND THE PRODUCT APPROVAL EVALUATION AND
 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS IS FOR THE "SAFEPOINT"
 SERIES. PLEASE CLARIFY. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1
  
 8) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE TAMKO MODIFIED ROOFING
 SYSTEM NOA NO. 12-0716.18 HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NOA NO.
 12-1003.05. PLEASE SUBMIT THE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL
 THAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD. DCA RULE 9N-3 AND CITY AMENDMENTS
 107.3.4.1
  
 9) SPECIFY THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY, THE FASTENING OPTION
 AND THE MINIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES THAT WILL BE USED TO
 INSTALL THE TAMKO ROOFING SYSTEM. PROVIDE TWO SETS OF
 SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED
 FASTENING FOR THE PERIMETER AND CORNER ROOF AREAS, AS
 REQUIRED BY LIMITATION #7 ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE NOA.
 FBC R905.1
  
 10) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK SPECIFIED ON THE APPLICATION
 OF $1500.00 IS TOO LOW. FOR PERMITTING FEE PURPOSES THE
 VALUE IS TO BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE INCLUDING
 STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, DESIGN FEES, OVERHEAD AND
 PROFIT AS WOULD BE CHARGED BY A CONTRACTOR. PLEASE
 PROVIDE AN ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION COST VALUE. CITY
 AMENDMENTS 109.3
  
 11) IN ORDER TO SPEED PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A
 RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW
 COMMENTS WAS ADDRESSED.
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2013-09-28 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2013-09-28 Time 10:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-09-28 Time 10:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2013-12-04 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2013-12-04 Time 15:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-11-22 Time 11:32 Sent To  
Notes
2013-11-25 11:33:09SENT TO ZONING SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2013-10-10 Cont ID  
Sent By dkittred Date 2013-10-01 Time 08:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-09-24 Time 10:40 Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-24 10:40:37R23
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-09-28 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2013-09-28 Time 09:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2013-09-28 Time 09:20 Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-28 09:22:42AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2013-11-26 Cont ID  
Sent By dkittred Date 2013-11-26 Time 09:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dkittred Date 2013-11-26 Time 08:03 Sent To B
Notes
2013-11-26 09:53:17PLANS SENT TO RM 11/26/13. DK
  
2013-11-26 09:52:31PLANNING & ZONING REVIEW: ***FAILED***
  
 11/26/13
 1. RESUBMITTAL DID NOT INCLUDE SURVEY/PLOT PLAN OF THE
 ADDITION. THIS ITEM IS REQUIRED FOR P & Z TO CONDUCT
 THEIR REVIEW OF SETBACK COMPLIANCE.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:
  
 DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
 SENIOR PLANNER
 PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
 PHONE: (561)-822-1443
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
2013-11-26 08:04:0311/26/13 - ZONING RECEIVED. SENT TO DK FOR REVIEW. LL
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-10-01 Cont ID  
Sent By dkittred Date 2013-10-01 Time 08:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dkittred Date 2013-09-30 Time 15:51 Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-01 08:20:22PLANNING & ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED***
  
 1. NO SITE PLAN OR SURVEY WAS SUBMITTED TO INDICATE
 SETBACKS OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION. PLEASE SUBMIT THESE
 ITEMS FOR REVIEW.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:
  
 DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
 SENIOR PLANNER
 PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
 PHONE: (561)-822-1443
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
2013-09-30 10:54:519/30/13


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved