Plan Review Details - Permit 13090625
Plan Review Stops For Permit 13090625
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2014-01-04 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-01-04 Time 14:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-01-04 Time 14:37 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-04 14:42:22PROVISO - PROVIDE ROOF SHINGLE PRODUCT APPROVAL AT
 INSPECTION
  
 DOUBLE UNDERLAYMENT REQUIRED
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2013-12-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2013-12-09 Time 12:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-12-09 Time 12:23 Sent To E
Notes
2013-12-09 12:24:58****PROVISO****
 ****REVISION REQUIRED****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR ALL COMPONENTS &
 CLADDING (ROOF, WINDOW, DOOR). THEY ARE TO BE REVIEWED
 BY DOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC 107, FAC9N-3, FBC R 301.
  
 SUBMIT AS A REVISION (WITH APPLICABLE REVISION FEES)
 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
  
  
  
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-10-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2013-10-17 Time 07:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-10-17 Time 07:25 Sent To E
Notes
2013-10-17 07:33:49****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 1. SHOW DISTANCE FROM EXISTING RESIDENCE TO PROPOSED
 NEW TOOL STORAGE, FBC 107. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THE
 PLACEMENT OF THE SHED RELATIVE TO THE RESIDENCE WILL
 AFFECT DOOR OPERATION FOR THE SHED OR EMERGENCY MEANS
 OF ESCAPE FOR RESIDENCE. FBC 107.
  
 2. PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR ALL COMPONENTS &
 CLADDING (ROOF, WINDOW, DOOR). THEY ARE TO BE REVIEWED
 BY DOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC 107, FAC9N-3, FBC R 301.
  
 PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT
 ISSUANCE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION
 (WITH APPLICABLE REVISION FEES) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
  
  
  
  

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2013-12-16 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2013-12-16 Time 12:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2013-12-16 Time 12:19 Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-10-28 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2013-10-28 Time 12:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2013-10-28 Time 12:03 Sent To I
Notes
2013-10-28 12:16:18THERE SEEMS TO BE A PLACEMENT CONFLICT WITH THE
 PLACEMENT OF THE PROPOSED SHED, THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS
 SHOW THE SHED ON THE EASEMENT FOR A FAR GREATER LENGTH
 THAN THE AVAILABLE SPACE CLEARANCE REQUIRED FOR
 SEPARATION.
 ADDRESS THE ZONING ISSUE AND RESUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
  
 SENT TO SH DESK

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2014-01-04 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-01-04 Time 14:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-12-20 Time 11:42 Sent To  
Notes
2013-12-20 11:42:45SUBMITTAL SENT TO S. HILL DESK FOR REVIEW. JG.

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2013-12-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jlmitch Date 2013-12-19 Time 08:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jlmitch Date 2013-11-20 Time 13:16 Sent To  
Notes
2013-12-16 12:33:52SENT TO SH DESK
  
2013-12-09 12:25:2912/9 TO ELECTRICAL
  
2013-11-21 13:17:22SENT TO ZONING SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG.

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2013-10-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jlmitch Date 2013-10-28 Time 17:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jlmitch Date 2013-09-20 Time 17:10 Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-20 17:11:08SENT TO ZONING SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2013-11-25 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 2013-11-25 Time 16:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2013-11-25 Time 16:26 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-09-25 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 2013-09-25 Time 14:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 2013-09-25 Time 14:40 Sent To B
Notes
2013-09-25 14:42:44** FAILED **
  
 PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING. RESPOND TO THE COMMENTS
 IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE APPLICABLE:
  
 1.) THE PROPOSED 10 FT. X 25 FT. SHED SHALL NOT BE
 LOCATED WITHIN THE 6 FT. UTILITY EASEMENT AT THE REAR
 OF THE PROPERTY.
  
 2.) THE PROPOSED SHED SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DISTANCE
 SEPARATION OF 6 FT. FROM THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. (ZLDR
 S. 94-304(B)(3))
  
 3.) AN UPDATED SURVEY SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE SUBMITTED
 SURVEY DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY.
  
 4.) THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY WITH THE LOCATION
 OF THE PROPOSED SHED IN THE SURVEY AND IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED.
  
 5.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT LINDA LOUIE
 AT (561) 822-1442.
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved