 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 13090329
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 13090329 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-06-25 |
Time |
08:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-06-25 |
Time |
07:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-04-09 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-09 16:49:51 | ) PROVISO: | | | ROOFING ON THE MAIN ROOF WAS COMPLETED A FEW YEARS AGO. | | | ROOFING CONTRACTOR WILL BE NEEDED FOR ROOF FLASHING OF | | | NEW A/C CURBS, STANDS, ROOF HATCH AND ANY FLASHING WORK | | | AT PARAPET WALL. ROOFING CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT A | | | SEPARATE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR TIE IN OF THE | | | EXISSTING ROOF. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-03-31 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2015-03-31 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-03-31 15:40:26 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 13090329 | | | ADD: 5011 BROADWAY | | | CONT: TO BE DETERMINED | | | TEL: (305)331-1400 | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 | | | EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 4TH REVIEW | | | DATE: TUES. MARCH 30/ 2015 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | NOTICE!!!!!! CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES | | | STATES THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE A FEE OF | | | FOUR TIMES THE FEE FOR | | | PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE REJECTED (3) OR MORE TIMES | | | FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1) SHEET A-1: COMPLIED> | | | , | | | 1B) 4TH REQUEST: SHEET A1 BUILDING DESIGN.THE RESPONSE | | | COMMENTS STATE THE PLANS WERE UPDATED TO A 5-B W/ | | | SPRINKLERS, REQUIRING NO FIRE RATING. REVISED DATE | | | 3/16/15 STILL SHOWS THE BUILDING AS A TYPE III-B FIRE | | | SPRINKLERED, PROTECTED. | | | | | | THE MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION | | | 107.3.5.1.1(3) TABLE 503. | | | SHEET A1 INDICATES THIS BUILDING IS DESIGNED AS A TYPE | | | III-B FIRE SPRINKLERED PROTECTED (1 HOUR FIRE RATING). | | | SEE 2007 CODE COMMENTARY FBC-B TABLE 601 OFTEN TYPE A | | | OR B ARE REFEFFED TO AS PROTECTED AND UNPROTECTED | | | CONSTRUCTION, RESPECTIVELY. PLEASE NOTE THIS | | | TERMINOLOGY DOES NOT REFER TO WHETHER THE BUILDING IS | | | SPRINKLERED OR NOT. | | | THE A REFERS TO REQUIRED FIRE RATINGS FOR EXTERIOR | | | WALLS PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME, ROOF CONSTRUCTION AND | | | SECONDARY MEMBERS. 2010 FBC-B TABLE 601 FOOTNOTE B | | | PROVIDES REDUCTION IN HOURS, A TYPE BUILDING ALL | | | REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 1 HOUR FIRE RATING OF ROOF FRAMING | | | MEMBERS, SEE BUILDING TYPE IIIA FOOTNOTES ,B, C &D. | | | SHEET A8 THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS DOES NOT INDICATE ANY | | | RATING ON STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. | | | | | | 1C) 4TH REQUEST. THE RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SHOP DRAWINGS ARE ATTACHED. NOTE NO FIRE | | | SPRINKLER PLANS ARE ATTACHED. THERE ARE (2) SETS OF | | | FIRE ALAARM PLANS FOLDED NOT PART OF THE SUBMITTAL SET. | | | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 | | | EDITION | | | 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. | | | 107.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: | | | 107.3.5.1.1 BUILDING | | | 5. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS SHALL INCLUDE: | | | SCHEMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS | | | STANDPIPES | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS | | | FIRE PROTECTION NOTES INDICATE THAT THE BUILDING IS TO | | | BE FIRE SPRINKLERED, THE 2010 FBC-B 903.2.7 NEW WORK | | | REQUIRES SPRINKLERS FOR MERCANTILE AREAS WITH A FIRE | | | AREA GREATER THAN 12,000 SQ FT. NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS | | | WERE SUBMITTED. 107.3.5.1.1( 5) FIRE SUPPRESSION. NOTES | | | ON THE PLAN DO NOT CONSTITUTE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | | SECTION. THERE HAS TO BE A DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE | | | SIZING OF THE UNDER GROUND FIRE MAIN THAT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO COME INTO THIS BUILDING. NO SIZING HAS BEEN | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 1D) PROVISO: | | | ROOFING ON THE MAIN ROOF WAS COMPLETED A FEW YEARS AGO. | | | ROOFING CONTRACTOR WILL BE NEEDED FOR ROOF FLASHING OF | | | NEW A/C CURBS, STANDS, ROOF HATCH AND ANY FLASHING WORK | | | AT PARAPET WALL. ROOFING CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT A | | | SEPARATE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR TIE IN OF THE | | | EXISSTING ROOF. | | | | | | | | | 2-4) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5) PROVISO: NEW COOLERS AND FREZZERS ARE UNDER SEPARATE | | | PERMIT. NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 6) PROVISO: AWNINGS ARE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT, NOT | | | PART OF THIS REVIEW AS WELL AS SIGNS. | | | | | | 7-12 COMPLIED. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-11-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-11-10 |
Time |
14:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-11-10 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-10 11:09:10 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 13090329 | | | ADD: 5011 BROADWAY | | | CONT: TO BE DETERMINED | | | TEL: (305)331-1400 | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 | | | EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW | | | DATE: MON. NOV. 11/ 2014 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | NOTICE!!!!!! CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES | | | STATES THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE A FEE OF | | | FOUR TIMES THE FEE FOR | | | PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE REJECTED (3) OR MORE TIMES | | | FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1) SHEET A-1: | | | 1A) COMPLIED> | | | MISSING TO WHAT EDITION OF CODE THIS BUILDING DESIGN | | | AND PERMIT WERE DESIGNED TO, 2010 FBC-B, 2010 FL | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE & 2010 FL ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | 1B) 3RD REQUEST: | | | THE MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION | | | 107.3.5.1.1(3) TABLE 503. | | | SHEET A1 INDICATES THIS BUILDING IS DESIGNED AS A TYPE | | | III-B FIRE SPRINKLERED PROTECTED (1 HOUR FIRE RATING). | | | SEE 2007 CODE COMMENTARY FBC-B TABLE 601 OFTEN TYPE A | | | OR B ARE REFEFFED TO AS PROTECTED AND UNPROTECTED | | | CONSTRUCTION, RESPECTIVELY. PLEASE NOTE THIS | | | TERMINOLOGY DOES NOT REFER TO WHETHER THE BUILDING IS | | | SPRINKLERED OR NOT. | | | THE A REFERS TO REQUIRED FIRE RATINGS FOR EXTERIOR | | | WALLS PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME, ROOF CONSTRUCTION AND | | | SECONDARY MEMBERS. 2010 FBC-B TABLE 601 FOOTNOTE B | | | PROVIDES REDUCTION IN HOURS, A TYPE BUILDING ALL | | | REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 1 HOUR FIRE RATING OF ROOF FRAMING | | | MEMBERS, SEE BUILDING TYPE IIIA FOOTNOTES ,B, C &D. | | | SHEET A8 THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS DOES NOT INDICATE ANY | | | RATING ON STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. | | | | | | 1C) 3RD REQUEST. | | | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 | | | EDITION | | | 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. | | | 107.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: | | | 107.3.5.1.1 BUILDING | | | 5. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS SHALL INCLUDE: | | | SCHEMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS | | | STANDPIPES | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS | | | FIRE PROTECTION NOTES INDICATE THAT THE BUILDING IS TO | | | BE FIRE SPRINKLERED, THE 2010 FBC-B 903.2.7 NEW WORK | | | REQUIRES SPRINKLERS FOR MERCANTILE AREAS WITH A FIRE | | | AREA GREATER THAN 12,000 SQ FT. NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS | | | WERE SUBMITTED. 107.3.5.1.1( 5) FIRE SUPPRESSION. NOTES | | | ON THE PLAN DO NOT CONSTITUTE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | | SECTION. THERE HAS TO BE A DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE | | | SIZING OF THE UNDER GROUND FIRE MAIN THAT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO COME INTO THIS BUILDING. NO SIZING HAS BEEN | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 1D) NO WRITTEN RESPONCE. 2ND REQUEST, | | | IS THERE GOING TO BE A NEW ROOF TO BE PUT ON UNDER THIS | | | PROJECT, IF SO THIS WILL BECOME A LEVEL III ALTERATION | | | AND WILL AFFECT FUTURE REVIEWS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS, | | | THERE IS A NOTE THAT THE BACK OF THE BUILDING A NEW | | | ROOF STRUCTURE AND ROOF TO BE APPLIED. SHEET A-12 NOTE | | | ONE INDICATES TO ONLY TO REPAIR ALL NEW PENETRATIONS. | | | REVIEW 2010 EXST BLDG CODE SECTION 611.1.1 NOT MORE | | | THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL ROOF AREA OR ROOF SECTION | | | OF ANY EXISTING BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE | | | REPAIRED, REPLACED OR RECOVERED IN ANY 12 MONTH PERIOD | | | UNLESS THE ENTIRE ROOFING SYSTEM OR ROOF SECTION | | | CONFORMS TO REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CODE. | | | | | | 2) SHEET A-3: | | | 2A-B) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 2C) 3D REQUEST. SEMI-COMPLIED. | | | FRONT ENTRY DOORS, INDICATE THEY ARE HORIZONTAL SLIDING | | | DOORS, PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B 1008.1.10 / | | | 1008.1.10 PANIC AND FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. DOORS SERVING A | | | GROUP H OCCUPANCY AND DOORS SERVING ROOMS OR SPACES | | | WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 OR MORE IN A GROUP A OR E | | | OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH A LATCH OR LOCK | | | UNLESS IT IS PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE, NOT | | | JUST BREAK AWAY PANELS. SHEET A-7 INDICATES BREAK OUT | | | PANELS BUT TO DATE NO PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE BEEN | | | SUBMITTED SHOWING PANIC OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. | | | | | | 3) SHEET A-4: | | | 3A-B) COMPLIED> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3C) COMPLIED. ; | | | | | | 4) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 5) PROVISO: | | | SHEET A-8: | | | 5A) NEW COOLERS AND FREZZERS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 5B) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 6) PROVISO: | | | SHEET A-9 AWNINGS ARE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT, NOT PART | | | OF THIS REVIEW AS WELL AS SIGNS. | | | | | | 7) S1 & S2: | | | 7A) 3RD REQUEST: | | | SHEET A-8 & A-11 DETAIL B & E INDICATES BACK OF HOUSE | | | FREZER LOCATION, EXISTING CBS WALLS W/ NEW ROOF | | | STRUCTURE AND ROOFING. THE S-1 SHOWS THIS AREA WITH | | | VARIOUS DETAILS. | | | 7A)(1) THE EXTERIOR WALL SECTION D/S2 IS A CUT SECTION | | | THRU THE WALL BUT THE DETAIL IS FOR A HEADER THRU A | | | WALL OPENING, WRONG DETAIL NOT FOR A WALL SECTION. | | | 107.2.1.3 DISCREPANCY IN PLANS. | | | | | | 7A)(2) NONE OF THE DETAILS ON SHEET S-2 SHOW SIMILAR | | | WALL, CONCRETE ROOF SECTION AND BEAM TO BE POURED INTO | | | THE EXISTING CBS WALL AS SHOWN ON SHEET A-8 DETAIL E. | | | NEITHER IS THERE SHOWN VERTICAL COLUMN PLACEMENT TYING | | | THE FOOTER THRU TO THE ROOF SLAB MAKING THE MWFRS MAIN | | | WIND FORCE RESISTING SYSTEM. MISSING DETAILS OR | | | MISLABELED. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 7A)(3) SHEET S-1 THE CHICKEN COOLER & FREZZER DOES NOT | | | HAVE ANY WALL TAGS IDENTIYING DWTAILS FOR CONSTRUCTION, | | | COLUMNS, BEAMS & ROOF FRAMING/ SLAB MEMBERS. MISSING | | | DETAILS OR MISLABELED. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 7B) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 8) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 9) 2ND REQUEST ,2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF | | | OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING | | | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. | | | 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION | | | SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | (31)(A) EXTERIOR AUTOMATIC BYPASS DOORS SEMI COMPLIED, | | | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS FOR BREAK AWAY DOORS BUT THEY | | | DO NOT COMPLY WITH | | | 2010 FBC-B 1008.1.10 PANIC AND FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. | | | DOORS SERVING A GROUP H OCCUPANCY AND DOORS SERVING | | | ROOMS OR SPACES WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 OR MORE IN | | | A GROUP A OR E OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH A | | | LATCH OR LOCK UNLESS IT IS PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT | | | HARDWARE. | | | | | | (D) ROOFING SYSTEMS, NO PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR WOOD | | | DECKS | | | | | | NOA 13-0424.11 | | | P-12 | | | DECK TYPE:31 CONRETE DECK, INSULATED | | | MAX DESIGN PRESS: -162 PSF LIMITAQTION #9 | | | FOR RECOVER VERIFY ONLY ONE ROOF & PULL TEST | | | | | | (G) NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. PRE-ENGINEERED A/C | | | STANDS | | | | | | 10) THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL DEAL WITH ROOFING REPORTS | | | BE ADVISED OF THE INFORMATION THAT WILL NEED TO BE | | | HIGHLIGHTED BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT; THIS ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | (FLAT ROOF) NEW FLAT ROOF OVER FREZZER COMPARTMENT. | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF PITCH. ___ | | | CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SYSTEM TO BE USED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE ___ | | | . | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD | | | THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED | | | , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO | | | ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 11) NEW COMMENT. SHEET A-9 THE NORTH ELEVATION SHOWS A | | | EXTERIOR WALL MOUNED LADDER THAT ALLOWS ENTRY INTO THE | | | MECHANICAL MEZZANINE. THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE HOW | | | ACCESS TO THE ROOF TOP A/C UNITS. 2010 FBC-B 1509.6 | | | EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES ON ROOFS OR ELEVATED | | | STRUCTURES. | | | WHERE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES REQUIRING ACCESS ARE | | | INSTALLED ON ROOFS OR ELEVATED STRUCTURES AT A HEIGHT | | | EXCEEDING 16 FEET (4877 MM), SUCH ACCESS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED BY A PERMANENT APPROVED MEANS OF ACCESS, THE | | | EXTENT OF WHICH SHALL BE FROM GRADE OR FLOOR LEVEL TO | | | THE EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES? LEVEL SERVICE SPACE. SUCH | | | ACCESS SHALL NOT REQUIRE CLIMBING OVER OBSTRUCTIONS | | | GREATER THAN 30 INCHES (762 MM) HIGH. | | | | | | 12) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE | | | REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
Time |
07:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
Time |
06:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 06:04:43 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 13090329 | | | ADD: 5011 BROADWAY | | | CONT: TO BE DETERMINED | | | TEL: (305)331-1400 | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 | | | EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW | | | DATE: TUE. FEB. 25 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | 1) SHEET A-1: | | | 1A) COMPLIED> | | | MISSING TO WHAT EDITION OF CODE THIS BUILDING DESIGN | | | AND PERMIT WERE DESIGNED TO, 2010 FBC-B, 2010 FL | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE & 2010 FL ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | 1B) 2ND REQUEST: | | | OCCUPANCY, EXIT & PLUMBING FACILITY DATA, MISSING THE | | | MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 107.3.5.1.1(3) | | | TABLE 503. | | | LIFE SAFETY SHEET LS1 INDICATES THIS BUILDING IS | | | DESIGNED AS A TYPE III PROTECTED (1 HOUR FIRE RATING) | | | SEE FBC-B TABLE 601 FOR REQUIRED FIRE RATINGS FOR | | | EXTERIOR WALLS PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME, ROOF | | | CONSTRUCTION AND SECONDARY MEMBERS. 2010 FBC-B TABLE | | | 601 FOOTNOTE B PROVIDES REDUCTION IN HOURS, A TYPE | | | BUILDING ALL REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 1 HOUR FIRE RATING OF | | | ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS, SEE BUILDING TYPE IIIA FOOTNOTES | | | ,B, C &D. | | | SHEET A8 DOES NOT INDICATE ANY RATING ON STRUCTURAL | | | MEMBERS. | | | | | | 1C) 2ND REQUEST. | | | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 | | | EDITION | | | 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. | | | 107.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: | | | 107.3.5.1.1 BUILDING | | | 5. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS SHALL INCLUDE: | | | SCHEMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS | | | STANDPIPES | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS | | | FIRE PROTECTION NOTES INDICATE THAT THE BUILDING IS TO | | | BE FIRE SPRINKLERED, THE 2010 FBC-B 903.2.7 NEW WORK | | | REQUIRES SPRINKLERS FOR MERCANTILE AREAS WITH A FIRE | | | AREA GREATER THAN 12,000 SQ FT. NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS | | | WERE SUBMITTED. 107.3.5.1.1( 5) FIRE SUPPRESSION. | | | | | | 1D) 2ND REQUEST, | | | IS THERE GOING TO BE A NEW ROOF TO BE PUT ON UNDER THIS | | | PROJECT, IF SO THIS WILL BECOME A LEVEL III ALTERATION | | | AND WILL AFFECT FUTURE REVIEWS AND CODE REQUIREMENTS, | | | THERE IS A NOTE THAT THE BACK OF THE BUILDING A NEW | | | ROOF STRUCTURE AND ROOF TO BE APPLIED. SHEET A-12 NOTE | | | ONE INDICATES TO ONLY TO REPAIR ALL NEW PENETRATIONS. | | | REVIEW 2010 EXST BLDG CODE SECTION 611.1.1 NOT MORE | | | THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL ROOF AREA OR ROOF SECTION | | | OF ANY EXISTING BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE | | | REPAIRED, REPLACED OR RECOVERED IN ANY 12 MONTH PERIOD | | | UNLESS THE ENTIRE ROOFING SYSTEM OR ROOF SECTION | | | CONFORMS TO REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CODE. | | | | | | 2) SHEET A-3: | | | 2A-B) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 2C) 2ND REQUEST, | | | FRONT ENTRY DOORS, INDICATE THEY ARE HORIZONTAL SLIDING | | | DOORS, PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B 1008.1.10 / | | | 1008.1.10 PANIC AND FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. DOORS SERVING A | | | GROUP H OCCUPANCY AND DOORS SERVING ROOMS OR SPACES | | | WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 OR MORE IN A GROUP A OR E | | | OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH A LATCH OR LOCK | | | UNLESS IT IS PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. | | | | | | 3) SHEET A-4: | | | 3A-B) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 3C) 2ND REQUEST; | | | NOTE 88 INDICATES THE USE OF PROPANE TANKS ON SITE (2) | | | 100 GALLON ABOVE GROUND LP TANKS. [F] 414.6 OUTDOOR | | | STORAGE, DISPENSING AND USE. | | | THE OUTDOOR STORAGE, DISPENSING AND USE OF HAZARDOUS | | | MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE | | | PREVENTION CODE. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE MSDS SHEETS. F] 414.6.1 WEATHER | | | PROTECTION. | | | WHERE WEATHER PROTECTION IS PROVIDED FOR SHELTERING | | | OUTDOOR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE OR USE AREAS, SUCH | | | AREAS SHALL BE CONSIDERED OUTDOOR STORAGE OR USE WHEN | | | THE WEATHER PROTECTION STRUCTURE COMPLIES WITH SECTIONS | | | 414.6.1.1 THROUGH 414.6.1.3. | | | | | | 4) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 5) PROVISO: | | | SHEET A-8: | | | 5A) NEW COOLERS AND FREZZERS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 5B) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 6) PROVISO: | | | SHEET A-9 AWNINGS ARE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT, NOT PART | | | OF THIS REVIEW AS WELL AS SIGNS. | | | | | | 7) S1 & S2: | | | 7A) 2ND REQUEST: | | | NEITHER S1 OR S2 SHOW A NEW ROOFING SYSTEM, SHEET A-8 & | | | A-11 DETAIL A INDICATES BACK OF HOUSE FREZER LOCATION, | | | EXISTING CBS WALLS W/ NEW ROOF STRUCTURE AND ROOFING. | | | PART OF THE MWFRS NO INFORMATION AS TO DESIGN ON ANY | | | ARCHITECTURAL NOR STRUCTURAL SHEETS. | | | | | | 7B) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 8) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 9) 2ND REQUEST ,2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF | | | OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING | | | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. | | | 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION | | | SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | (31)(A) EXTERIOR AUTOMATIC BYPASS DOORS SEMI COMPLIED, | | | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS FOR BREAK AWAY DOORS BUT THEY | | | DO NOT COMPLY WITH | | | 2010 FBC-B 1008.1.10 PANIC AND FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. | | | DOORS SERVING A GROUP H OCCUPANCY AND DOORS SERVING | | | ROOMS OR SPACES WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 OR MORE IN | | | A GROUP A OR E OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH A | | | LATCH OR LOCK UNLESS IT IS PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT | | | HARDWARE. | | | | | | (D) ROOFING SYSTEMS | | | NO PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR WOOD DECKS | | | | | | NOA 13-0424.11 | | | P-12 | | | DECK TYPE:31 CONRETE DECK, INSULATED | | | MAX DESIGN PRESS: -162 PSF LIMITAQTION #9 | | | FOR RECOVER VERIFY ONLY ONE ROOF & PULL TEST | | | | | | (G) NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. PRE-ENGINEERED A/C | | | STANDS | | | | | | 10) THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL DEAL WITH ROOFING REPORTS | | | BE ADVISED OF THE INFORMATION THAT WILL NEED TO BE | | | HIGHLIGHTED BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT; THIS ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | (FLAT ROOF) | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF PITCH. ___ | | | CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SYSTEM TO BE USED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE ___ | | | . | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD | | | THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED | | | , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO | | | ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 11) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE | | | REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A | | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE | | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2013-10-01 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2013-09-30 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-10-01 10:20:27 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 13090329 | | | ADD: 5011 BROADWAY | | | CONT: TO BE DETERMINED | | | TEL: (305)331-1400 | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 | | | EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW | | | DATE: TUES. FEB. 25/2014 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) SHEET A-1: | | | 1A) COMPLIED. | | | MISSING TO WHAT EDITION OF CODE THIS BUILDING DESIGN | | | AND PERMIT WERE DESIGNED TO, 2010 FBC-B, 2010 FL | | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE & 2010 FL ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | | | | | | | 1B) 2ND REQUEST , | | | OCCUPANCY, EXIT & PLUMBING FACILITY DATA, MISSING THE | | | MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 107.3.5.1.1(3) | | | TABLE 503. | | | LIFE SAFETY SHEET LS1 INDICATES THIS BUILDING IS | | | DESIGNED AS A TYPE III PROTECTED/ IIIA (1 HOUR FIRE | | | RATING) SEE FBC-B TABLE 601 FOR REQUIRED FIRE RATINGS | | | FOR EXTERIOR WALLS PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME, ROOF | | | CONSTRUCTION AND SECONDARY MEMBERS, SEE FOOTNOTE B . | | | SHEET A8 NOR S-2 STRUCTURAL NOTES # 9, DOES NOT | | | INDICATE ANY RATING ON STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. | | | | | | 1C) 2ND REQUEST, | | | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 | | | EDITION | | | 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. | | | 107.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: 107.3.5.1.1 BUILDING | | | 5. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS SHALL INCLUDE: | | | SCHEMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS | | | STANDPIPES | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS | | | | | | FIRE PROTECTION NOTES INDICATE THAT THE BUILDING IS TO | | | BE FIRE SPRINKLERED, THE 2010 FBC-B 903.2.7 NEW WORK | | | REQUIRES SPRINKLERS FOR MERCANTILE AREAS WITH A FIRE | | | AREA GREATER THAN 12,000 SQ FT. NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS | | | WERE SUBMITTED. 107.3.5.1.1( 5) FIRE SUPPRESSION. | | | 1D) IS THERE GOING TO BE A NEW ROOF TO BE PUT ON UNDER | | | THIS PROJECT, IF SO THIS WILL BECOME A LEVEL III | | | ALTERATION AND WILL AFFECT FUTURE REVIEWS AND CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS, THERE IS A NOTE THAT THE BACK OF THE | | | BUILDING A NEW ROOF STRUCTURE AND ROOF TO BE APPLIED. | | | SHEET A-12 NOTE ONE INDICATES TO ONLY TO REPAIR ALL NEW | | | PENETRATIONS. REVIEW 2010 EXST BLDG CODE SECTION | | | 611.1.1 NOT MORE THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL ROOF AREA | | | OR ROOF SECTION OF ANY EXISTING BUILDING OR STRUCTURE | | | SHALL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR RECOVERED IN ANY 12 | | | MONTH PERIOD UNLESS THE ENTIRE ROOFING SYSTEM OR ROOF | | | SECTION CONFORMS TO REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CODE. | | | | | | 2) SHEET A-3: | | | 2A-B) COMPLIED> | | | | | | 2C) 2ND REQUEST. FRONT ENTRY DOORS, INDICATE THEY ARE | | | HORIZONTAL SLIDING DOORS, PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE | | | WITH FBC-B 1008.1.10 | | | 1008.1.10 PANIC AND FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. | | | DOORS SERVING A GROUP H OCCUPANCY AND DOORS SERVING | | | ROOMS OR SPACES WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 OR MORE IN | | | A GROUP A OR E OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED WITH A | | | LATCH OR LOCK UNLESS IT IS PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT | | | HARDWARE. | | | NOA 13-0530 ARE A BREAK OUT DOOR, SHEET # 4 SHOWS | | | HORIZONTAL MUTTINS, SHEET # 7 A 3 POINT KEYED DOOR. | | | | | | 3) SHEET A-4: | | | 3A) PLANS SHOW THE CUSTOMER SERVICE COUNTER WITH A | | | SYMBLE FOR ACCESSIBLILITY SIDE APPROACH BUT NO COUNTER | | | HEIGHT IS GIVEN, SHEET A-10 DETAIL B INDICATES THE | | | COUNTER HEIGHT OF 42 " PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH 2010 | | | ACCESS CODE 904.4.1 OR 904.4.2. | | | | | | 3B) PLEASE REVIEW THE SIDE APPROACH FOR THE DRINKING | | | FOUNTAINS, THIS IS ONLY A EXCEPTION FOR CHILDRENS USE, | | | SEE 2010 FL ACCESS CODE 602.2. 602.2 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE. | | | UNITS SHALL HAVE A CLEAR FLOOR OR GROUND SPACE | | | COMPLYING WITH 305 POSITIONED FOR A FORWARD APPROACH | | | AND CENTERED ON THE UNIT. KNEE AND TOE CLEARANCE | | | COMPLYING WITH 306 SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE PLANS SHOULD | | | SHOW A FORWARD APPROACH AND CENTERED ON THE UNIT. | | | | | | 3C) 2ND REQUEST, | | | NOTE 88 INDICATES THE USE OF PROPANE TANKS ON SITE (2) | | | 100 GALLON ABOVE GROUND LP TANKS. [F] 414.6 OUTDOOR | | | STORAGE, DISPENSING AND USE. | | | THE OUTDOOR STORAGE, DISPENSING AND USE OF HAZARDOUS | | | MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE | | | PREVENTION CODE. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE MSDS SHEETS. F] 414.6.1 WEATHER | | | PROTECTION. | | | WHERE WEATHER PROTECTION IS PROVIDED FOR SHELTERING | | | OUTDOOR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE OR USE AREAS, SUCH | | | AREAS SHALL BE CONSIDERED OUTDOOR STORAGE OR USE WHEN | | | THE WEATHER PROTECTION STRUCTURE COMPLIES WITH SECTIONS | | | 414.6.1.1 THROUGH 414.6.1.3. | | | | | | 4) COMPLIED> | | | SHEET A7DOOR & WINDOW ELEVATION FRONT ENTRY BY-PASS | | | DOORS INDICATE A TRANSOM ABOVE, DETAIL 8 INDICATES THE | | | USE OF A 4X6 STEEL TUBE, THE STRUCTURAL PLANS DO NOT | | | INDICATE SUCH A DETAIL NOR DESIGN CONDITIONS. | | | 2010 FBC-B 1715.5.5 MULLIONS OCCURRING BETWEEN | | | INDIVIDUAL WINDOW AND GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLIES. 1715.5.5.1 | | | MULLIONS. 1715.5.5.2 LOAD TRANSFER. | | | 1715.5.5.3 DEFLECTION & 1715.5.5.4 STRUCTURAL SAFETY | | | FACTOR. | | | | | | 5) PROVISO: | | | SHEET A-8: | | | 5A) NEW COOLERS AND FREZZERS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | 5B) 2ND REQUEST, | | | SHEET A8 & A11 BOTH INDICATE A NEW CONCRETE SLAB FOR | | | THE ROOF DECK, TO SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS, NO ROOF DECK | | | DETAIL? | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOF PLAN INDICATING WHICH PORTIONS OF | | | THE ROOFFRAMING ARE BAR JOIST AND WHICH ARE 2X? AND | | | THERE SPACING? 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6) PROVISO> | | | SHEET A-9 AWNINGS ARE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT, NOT PART | | | OF THIS REVIEW AS WELL AS SIGNS. | | | | | | 7) S1 & S2: | | | 7A) NEITHER S1 OR S2 SHOW A NEW ROOFING SYSTEM, SHEET | | | A-1 & A-11 DETAIL A INDICATES BACK OF HOUSE FREZER | | | LOCATION, EXISTING CBS WALLS W/ NEW ROOF STRUCTURE AND | | | ROOFING. PART OF THE MWFRS NO INFORMATION AS TO DESIGN | | | ON ANY ARCHITECTURAL NOR STRUCTURAL SHEETS. | | | | | | 7B)COMPLIED> | | | WIND DESIGN. | | | | | | 8) COMPLIED> | | | 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS | | | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, | | | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. | | | | | | 9) 2ND REQUEST, 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF | | | OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING | | | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. | | | 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION | | | SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS.-AUTOMATIC BYPASS, | | | | | | (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES | | | NO ROOFING APPAROVALS FOR WOOD DECK W/ WOOD JOIST | | | | | | NOA 13-0424.11 | | | GAF CONVENTIONAL BUILT UP ROOF SYSTEM W/ CONCRETE DECK | | | P. 12 | | | DECK TYPE 31: CONCRETE DECK, INSULATED | | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE -162 PSF LIMITATION # 9 | | | IF A ROOF OVER VERIFY ONE ROOFING SYSTEM, AND PULL TEST | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | (G) NO PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 10) SEMI-COMPLIED. | | | THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL DEAL WITH ROOFING REPORTS BE | | | ADVISED OF THE INFORMATION THAT WILL NEED TO BE | | | HIGHLIGHTED BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT; THIS ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | (FLAT ROOF) | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF PITCH. ___ | | | CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SYSTEM TO BE USED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE ___ | | | . | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD | | | THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED | | | , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED | | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO | | | ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | | | 11) 2ND REQUEST. | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
Time |
11:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-07 14:29:13 | THE EXTENT OF THIS REVIEW WAS LIMITED ONLY TO THE | | | VERIFICATION OF THE PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED CORRECTIONS | | | FROM DAVE HAYES' REVIEW | | 2015-05-07 11:48:26 | REVIEW BY MIKE ALBARRAN PX3353 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-11-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-11-03 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2014-11-03 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-04 09:39:52 | 11/3/2014 | | | PROJECT: TROPICAL SUPERMARKET | | | PERMIT#: 13090329 | | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC, 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC | | | ,2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, | | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) RISER DIAGRAM AND PANEL SCHEDULES DOES NOT MATCH UP | | | WITH RISER DIAGRAM KEY NOTES. VOLTAGE OF ELECTRICAL | | | SYSTEM IN NOTE A IS INDICATED AT 277/480V 3PH 4 WIRE | | | BUT EVERYWHERE ELSE IS INDICATED AT 120/208V 3PH 4 | | | WIRE. REVISE PLANS ACORDINGLY. 2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO | | | THE FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 2) THE RISER DIAGRAM KEY NOTES, LETTER AND NUMBER | | | IDENTIFICATION MARKERS ARE BARELY LEGIBLE. | | | CLARIFICATION REQUIRED. 2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC | | | 107.2.1 | | | | | | 3) VERIFY THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE DISCONNECTING MEANS | | | HAS A FAULT CURRENT RATING THAT IS SUFFICIENT AT | | | NOMINAL CIRCUIT VOLTAGE FOR THE CURRENT THAT MUST BE | | | INTERRUPTED. NEC 110.9 | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE SAFETY LABELING FOR ARC FLASH PROTECTION FOR | | | THE PANEL BOARDS AND MAIN DISCONNECTING MEANS. NEC | | | 110.16, 110.22 | | | | | | 5) CLARIFY LOCATION AND SOURCE FOR ROOFTOP | | | REFRIGERATION RACK DISCONNECT. RISER DIAGRAM INDICATES | | | A TAP RULE IS UTILIZED TO FEED AN 800AMP DISCONNECT | | | FROM A 1600AMP MTS GROUPED WITH SERVICE EQUIPMENT THAT | | | THEN FEEDS THE REFRIGERATION RACK. CLARIFICATION IS | | | REQUIED. INDICATE ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS, WHERE IS THE | | | REFRIGERATION RACK DISCONNECT LOCATED? HOW IS IT FED | | | AND FROM WHERE? 2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 6) VERIFY SUFFICIENT ACCESS AND WORKING SPACE IS | | | PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED ABOUT ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, | | | SPECIFICALLY AT THE MEZNINNINE, TO PERMIT READY AND | | | SAFE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF SUCH EQUIPMENT. NEC | | | 110.26 | | | | | | 7) PROVIDE A COMPLETE LIGHTING SUMMARY INDICATING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 505.3. | | | | | | 8) EMERGENCY ILLUMINATION SHALL INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED | | | MEANS OF EGRESS LIGHTING, ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS, AND | | | ALL OTHER LIGHTS SPECIFIED AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE | | | REQUIRED ILLUMINATION. EMERGENCY LIGHTING SYSTEMS SHALL | | | BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED SO THAT THE FAILURE OF ANY | | | INDIVIDUAL LIGHTING ELEMENT, SUCH AS THE BURNING OUT OF | | | A LAMP, CANNOT LEAVE IN TOTAL DARKNESS ANY SPACE THAT | | | REQUIRES EMERGENCY ILLUMINATION. NEC 700.16 | | | | | | 9) THE BRANCH CIRCUIT FEEDING THE UNIT EQUIPMENT SHALL | | | BE THE SAME BRANCH CIRCUIT AS THAT SERVING THE NORMAL | | | LIGHTING IN THE AREA AND CONNECTED AHEAD OF ANY LOCAL | | | SWITCHES. THE BRANCH CIRCUIT THAT FEEDS UNIT EQUIPMENT | | | SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AT THE DISTRIBUTION PANEL. | | | EMERGENCY LUMINAIRES THAT OBTAIN POWER FROM A UNIT | | | EQUIPMENT AND ARE NOT PART OF THE UNIT EQUIPMENT SHALL | | | BE WIRED TO THE UNIT EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY 700.9 AND | | | BY ONE OF THE WIRING METHODS OF NEC CHAPTER 3. NEC | | | 700.12(F) | | | | | | 10) VERIFY ALL ELECTRIC UNDER THE HOOD TO BE | | | DISONNECTED UPON ACTIVATION OF THE FIRE SUPRESSION | | | SYSTEM. NFPA 1, SECTION 50.4.6.1 | | | | | | 11) PROVIDE THE SIGN WITH AT LEAST ONE OUTLET SUPPLIED | | | BY A BRANCH CIRCUIT RATED AT LEAST 20 AMPERES THAT | | | SUPPLIES NO OTHER LOAD. NEC 600.5 | | | | | | 12) VERIFY THE SIGN HAS AN EXTERNALLY OPERABLE SWITCH | | | OR CIRCUIT BREAKER THAT WILL OPEN ALL UNGROUNDED | | | CONDUCTORS WITHIN SIGHT OF THE SIGN OR OUTLINE LIGHTING | | | SYSTEM THAT IT CONTROLS. NEC 600.6(A)(1) | | | | | | 13) VERIFY THE SIGN IS CONTROLLED BY A TIMER AS | | | REQUIRED BY FBC-E 505.2.4. | | | | | | 14) PROVIDE A DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRE | | | ALARM SYSTEM. NFPA 72, 10.5.5 | | | | | | 15) A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATIONS ACCOMPANIED BY | | | MANUFACTURERS EQUIPMENT SUBMITTALS, AND SHOP DRAWINGS | | | IS REQUIRED FOR GENERATOR, HOOD, FIRE ALARM, SECURITY | | | SYSTEM, CCTV, ACCESS CONTROL, NETWORK, POS, AND | | | COMMUNICATION. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ | | | 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF | | | | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO | | | SUBMITTAL PACKAGE AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | | SHEETS FOR COMPARATIVE REVIEW. | | | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] | | | | | 2014-10-15 11:41:01 | NEW SHEETS SUBMITTED. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2013-10-29 |
Time |
18:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2013-10-29 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-10-29 18:15:47 | AS PER THE PLANS, A SEPARATE PERMIT AND SUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE ALARM. | | | SENT BACK TO BIN FOR FURTHER REVIEWS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-07-06 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-07-06 |
Time |
16:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-06 16:29:21 | RESTAMPED BY FIRE PREVENTION |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-03-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-03-26 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-03-26 |
Time |
13:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2014-10-23 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2014-10-23 |
Time |
11:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-23 12:28:54 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | THE TWO PREVIOUS RECORDED FIRE COMMENTS NOTED THAT THE | | | PLAN WAS FAILED DUE TO NO SPRINKLER OR FIRE ALARM | | | DRAWINGS ARE INCLUDED. | | | | | | SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM PLANS WERE NOT SUBMITTED AS A | | | PART OF THIS SUBMITTAL AND HAS BEEN DENIED. PLEASE NOTE | | | THE PREVIOUS SUBMIITED COMMENTS OF FIRE AND PROVIDE THE | | | DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
wjolin |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
wjolin |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
Time |
11:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 13:29:49 | 5011 BROADWAY | | | PERMIT #13090329 | | | REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | | | | ENGINEERED FIRE SPRINKLER CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR A GENERAL BUILDING PERMIT. AFTER THE | | | BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED, THE SUBCONTRACTORS CAN | | | THEN SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS (CONFORMING TO THE ENGINEERED | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS) FOR A SUB-PERMIT. FOR ISSUANCE | | | OF A GENERAL BUILDING PERMIT, SECTION 105.3.1.2(2) OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE REQUIRES SEALED FIRE | | | PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR THE DESIGN OR | | | ALTERATION OF 50 OR MORE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS. PER | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, FIRE | | | PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | | | | PROVIDE AN EXTERIOR KEY SAFE TO ALLOW EMERGENCY | | | RESPONDERS NON-FORCIBLE ENTRY INTO THE BUILDING DURING | | | NON-BUSINESS HOURS. A KEY SAFE CAN BE ORDERED FROM | | | WWW.KNOXBOX.COM. | | | | | | WESLEY JOLIN | | | ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | | FIRE INVESTIGATOR & INSPECTOR | | | OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | [email protected] | | | (561) 805-6730 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lphilmor |
Date |
2013-09-20 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lphilmor |
Date |
2013-09-19 |
Time |
15:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-20 14:16:43 | 5011 BROADWAY | | | PERMIT # | | | REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE DRAWING NOTE INDICATING ALL CONSTRUCTION AND | | | DEMOLITION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | NFPA 241. TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY. SMOKING SHALL BE | | | PROHIBITED EXCEPT IN DESIGNATED EXTERIOR AREAS. ALL | | | OTHER DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION AREAS SHALL HAVE "NO | | | SMOKING" SIGNS POSTED. WHERE SMOKING IS PERMITTED, SAFE | | | RECEPTACLES FOR SMOKING MATERIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | 2. UPDATE THE CODE LIST TO REFERENCE THE 2010 EDITION | | | OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE WHICH CONTAINS THE | | | 2009 EDITION OF BOTH NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 WITH FLORIDA | | | AMENDMENTS | | | 3. PER NFPA 101, 2010 ED - 36.2.5.2.1 DEAD-END | | | CORRIDORS ARE NOT TO EXCEED 20 FT. | | | 4. SHOW LOCATION OF TYPE K FIRE EXTINGUISHER. | | | 5.PLANS INDICATE THAT THE BUILDING WILL HAVE AN | | | APPROVED AUTOMATIC SUPERVISED SPRINKLER SYSTEM, BUT NO | | | SPRINKLER LAYOUT IS PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | LAUREN PHILMORE | | | FIRE INSPECTOR II / INVESTIGATOR I | | | OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | [email protected] | | | (561) 804-4783 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
Time |
12:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2014-10-27 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2014-10-27 |
Time |
11:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-27 11:45:26 | 1) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL GAS | | | EQUIPMENT / APPLIANCES. EQUIPMENT / APPLIANCES SHALL BE | | | LISTED AND LABELED PER THE 2010 FL. GAS CODE SEC. | | | 301.3. | | | 2) THE GAS PIPING IS UNDERSIZED FOR THE TOTAL LOAD | | | CONNECTED THERETO. THE MAXIMUM LOAD FOR A 1" LINE AT 50 | | | FT. WITH 552,000 BTU LOAD IS 480,000 BTU'S. THE MINIMUM | | | SIZE SHALL BE 1 1/4" PER TABLE 402.4 (26 ) OF THE 2010 | | | FGC. | | | 3) THE SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THE 2010 FGC SEC.408.4.408.4 SEDIMENT TRAP. | | | WHERE A SEDIMENT TRAP IS NOT INCORPORATED AS PART OF | | | THE APPLIANCE , A SEDIMENT TRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED | | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE APPLIANCE SHUTOFF VALVE AS CLOSE TO | | | THE INLET OF THE APPLIANCE AS PRACTICAL. THE SEDIMENT | | | TRAP SHALL BE EITHER A TEE FITTING HAVING A CAPPED | | | NIPPLE OF ANY LENGTH INSTALLED VERTICALLY IN THE | | | BOTTOMMOST OPENING OF THE TEE OR OTHER DEVICE APPROVED | | | AS AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT TRAP. ILLUMINATING APPLIANCES, | | | RANGES, CLOTHES DRYERS AND OUTDOOR GRILLS NEED NOT BE | | | SO EQUIPPED. | | | 4) SUBMIT DETAILS FOR THE ANCHORING OF THE LP TANKS. | | | TANKS SHALL BE ANCHORED TO WITHSTAND THE WIND LOADS PER | | | THE 2010 FBC SEC.1609. | | | 5) THE LOCATION OF THE LP TANKS IN RELATION TO BUILDING | | | OPENINGS LOCATED BELOW THE RELIEF VALVE OF THE TANKS | | | AND THE DISTANCE AWAY FROM ANY SOURCE OF IGNITION SHALL | | | COMPLY W/NFPA 58, SEC.6.3.7 (1) AND (2). SHOW THE | | | DISTANCE OGF THE LP TANKS FROM THE DOOR AND ANY SOURCE | | | OF IGNITION. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | 2014-10-15 11:39:47 | NEW SHEET P-4 SUBMITTED. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
Time |
08:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
Time |
08:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 08:19:01 | GAS PLAN ON SHEET P4 CODE COMPLIANT, | | | WILL REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lwagner |
Date |
2013-09-18 |
Time |
14:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lwagner |
Date |
2013-09-18 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-18 14:28:53 | FBC 2010 FUEL GAS REVIEW #1 | | | DENIED: | | | | | | 1. SHEET P-4: PLEASE SHOW THE POSITION OF THE 2ND STAGE | | | REGULATOR. | | | | | | 2. SHEET P-4: PLEASE INCLUDE THE FBC 2010 FUEL GAS CODE | | | TABLE USED FOR THE GAS CALCULATIONS. IF TABLE 402.4(26) | | | IS BEING USED, THE SUPPLY PIPE WOULD REQUIRE 1" PIPE | | | FOR 542,000 BTU AT 30 FEET. | | | | | | REVIEW BY | | | LARRY WAGNER | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | PHONE # 805-6692 | | | EMAIL [email protected] | | | FAX # 805-6676 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
09:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2015-06-03 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2015-04-17 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-03-19 |
Time |
08:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-11-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-11-25 |
Time |
17:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2014-10-14 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-15 11:33:24 | RE-SUBMITTAL SENT TO C4 SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2014-03-10 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2014-01-31 |
Time |
09:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-01-31 09:16:26 | INCOMING SENT TO C-04 BOX. JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-10-30 |
Time |
17:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-09-11 |
Time |
08:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-13 08:54:46 | SENT TO C4 SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-06-17 |
Time |
15:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-06-17 |
Time |
15:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-14 |
Time |
12:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-03-19 |
Time |
12:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-14 12:22:54 | REVIEW BY CHRIS COLE | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE AN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON THE PLAN AND SUBMIT | | | SPECS FOR THE EXHAUST FAN AT THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. | | | 2) PROVIDE WIND LOAD ENGINEERING FOR TIE DOWN OF THE | | | RTU CURBS, THE REFRIGERATION CONDENSER STAND, AND THE | | | ROOF TOP EXHAUST AND SUPPLY FANS. | | | INCLUDE THE UNIT ATTACHMENT DETAILS TO THE CURBS AND | | | STANDS, AND SUBMIT A FL. PRODUCT APPROVAL OR MIAMI-DADE | | | NOA FOR THE CONDENSER STAND. | | | 3) PURSUANT TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS, AND | | | SECTION 304.11 FMC-2010, PROVIDE EITHER A 42" HIGH | | | PARAPET OR GUARD AT ANY ROOF EDGES WITHIN 10' OF THE | | | HVAC EQUIPMENT. | | | 4) PLACE NOTES ON THE PLAN INDICATING SEPARATE PERMITS | | | WILL BE OBTAINED FOR THE KITCHEN HOODS, AND FOR THE | | | REFRIGERATION. | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER COLE | | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6719 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-11-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2014-11-03 |
Time |
08:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2014-10-31 |
Time |
14:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-31 14:51:19 | PASS PROVISO | | | COMMERCIAL HOOD AND REFRIGERATION ARE NOT INCLUDED IN | | | THIS REVIEW. | | | SEPARATE APPLICATION, PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIRED. | | | | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL FROM THE ENGINEER ON CURB TIE DOWN TO | | | ROOF | | | AND RTU TIE DOWN TO CURB PER SECTION 301.12 WIND | | | RESISTANCE. | | | 2010 FBC (M) ( AT FIRST INSPECTION) | | | | | | REFER TO SECTION 304.11 GUARDS. | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER | | | [email protected] | | | OFFICE 561-805-6732 | | | FAX 561-805-6676 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2014-03-10 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2014-03-10 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-10 14:20:08 | 1) REFER TO SECTION 503.2.4.4 SHUT OFF DAMPER CONTROLS. | | | 2010 FLORIDA ENERGY CODE. | | | 2) HOOD, WALK IN COOLERS AND REFRIGERATION | | | REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLANS. | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER | | | [email protected] | | | OFFICE 561-805-6732 | | | FAX 561-805-6676 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2013-10-10 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2013-10-10 |
Time |
08:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-10-10 10:26:53 | PLANS DENIED | | | 1) EXHAUST FAN #4 IS NOT ON VENTILATION | | | SCHEDULE. PAGE M-4 OF THE PLAN. | | | 2) PLAN SHOW EXHAUST FAN 4 DISCHARGING | | | OVER FISH COOLER ON PAGE M-1 OF PLAN. | | | REFER TO SECTION 501.2 EXHAUST DISCHARGE | | | 2010 FBC (M) | | | 3) REFER TO SECTION 503.2.4.4 SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS | | | ( FOR FRESH AIR AND EXHAUST) 2010 FLORIDA ENERGY CODE. | | | 4) HOOD AND COOLERS AND REFRIGERATION REQUIRE SEPARATE | | | APPLICATION PLANS AND PERMITS | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER | | | [email protected] | | | OFFICE 561-805-6732 | | | FAX 561-805-6676 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-07-06 |
Time |
14:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-07-06 |
Time |
14:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-17 |
Time |
09:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-17 10:43:50 | 1) SHT. A-6 - THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR THE DRINKING | | | FOUNTAIN DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE 2010 FL. | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE SEC.602. THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE SHALL | | | BE CENTERED ON THE UNIT. THE PLANS SHOW THE CLEAR FLOOR | | | SPACE CENTERED ON BOTH DRINKING FOUNTAINS AS A WHOLE. | | | THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE SHALL BE CENTERED ON THE LOW UNIT | | | PER THIS CODE SECTION.AS DESIGNED THERE IS NOT 15 | | | INCHES TO THE CENTER OF THE LOW UNIT. | | | 2) THE VENT FOR THE FLOOR DRAIN IN THE MEZZANINE SHALL | | | CONNECT TO THE HORIZONTAL DRAIN ABOVE THE CENTERLINE OF | | | THE HORIZONTAL DRAIN PIPE. AS DRAWN, IT IS A FLAT, DRY | | | VENT WHICH IS PROHIBITED BY THE PLUMBING CODE.SEC. | | | 905.3. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME SO WE CAN DISCUSS THESE ITEMS TO GET | | | THEM RECTIFIED SO I CAN APPROVE THE PLUMBING PORTION OF | | | THE REVIEW. THANK YOU. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2014-10-27 |
Time |
13:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2014-10-27 |
Time |
11:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-27 13:10:26 | WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. | | | 1) SHT. A-6 - THE ELEVATION DETAILS ON THE PLAN ARE | | | NOTED AS BEING ON SHT. A-5. REVISE ALL THE DETAILS TO | | | SHOW SHT. A-6 WHICH IS THE PAGE WHERE THEY ARE LOCATED. | | | 2) NONE OF THE ELEVATIONS ON SHT. A-6 CORRELATE WITH | | | THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | 3) THE FLUSH VALVE ON THE WATER CLOSET IN THE WOMEN'S | | | RESTROOM SHALL BE ON THE WIDE SIDE OF THE WATER CLOSET | | | PER THE 2010 FBC, ACCESSIBILITY, SEC. 604.6. | | | 4) THE TOILET PAPER DISPENSER SHALL BE LOCATED A | | | MINIMUM OF 7" AND A MAXIMUM OF 9" IN FRONT OF THE WATER | | | CLOSET MEASURED TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE DISPENSER. | | | 5) SHOW THE DIMENSIONS OF THE REQUIRED CLEAR FLOOR | | | SPACE FOR THE LAVATORY AND THE WATER CLOSET IN THE | | | TOILET ROOMS. COMPLY WITH SECS. 305.3 AND 604.3.1. | | | 6) SHT. A-6 - ELEVATION 9/A-5 - THIS ELEVATION DOESN'T | | | CORRELATE WITH ANY OF THE TOILET ROOMS. DELETE THIS | | | ELEVATION. | | | 7) SHT. A-6- ELEVATION "C" - SHOW THE HEIGHT OF THE | | | SPOUT ON THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN FOR STANDING PERSONS PER | | | THE 2010 FL. ACCESSIBILITY CODE SEC. 602.7. | | | 8) SHT. A-6 - KNEE AND TOE CLEARANCES FOR THE | | | ACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAIN SHALL BE A MIN. OF 30 | | | INCHES WIDE PER THE 2010 FAC SECS. 305.3, 306.2.5, | | | 306.3.5. THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE SHALL BE CENTERED ON THE | | | UNIT. AS DESIGNED, THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS DO NOT COMPLY | | | WITH THESE CODE SECTIONS. | | | 9) THE VENT FOR THE DUMPSTER SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2010 | | | FLORIDA PLUMBING CODE SEC.905.3. A FLAT, DRY VENT IS | | | NOT PERMITTED. | | | 10) THE DISCHARGE FROM THE REFRIGERATED CASES SHALL NOT | | | DISCHARGE TO THE GREASY WASTE SYSTEM PER THE 2010 FPC | | | SEC.1003.2. | | | 11) ANY INDIRECT WASTE THAT EXCEEDS 2 FT. IN LENGTH | | | HORIZONTALLY OR 4 FT. IN TOTAL DEVELOPED LENGTH SHALL | | | BE TRAPPED PER THE 2010 FBC SEC.802.2. | | | 12) SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE GREASE TRAP IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 1003.5.1. | | | 13) SHT. P-1 - REFERS TO DETAIL 3/P-1 FOR FRENCH DRAIN | | | DETAIL.THERE IS NO SUCH DETAIL ON THE PLAN. | | | 14) THE FLOOR DRAIN IN THE THE MEZZANINE EXCEEDS THE | | | DISTANCE FROM A VENT PER TABLE 906.1. 2010 FPC . | | | 15) LABEL THE MOP SINK AS SUCH ON THE SANITARY RISER. | | | 16) SHT. P-2- SHOW ALL THE INDIRECT WASTES TO THE FLOOR | | | DRAINS ON SHT. P-2. | | | 17) SHT. P-4 - ALL HOSE BIBBS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH | | | SHUTOFF VALVES PER SEC. 606.2 (2) OF 2010 FPC. | | | 18) SUBMIT INFO ON THE TRAP PRIMER VALVES FOR THE FLOOR | | | DRAINS. THE WATER RISER SHOWS SHUTOFF VALVES ON THE | | | TRAP PRIMER LINES. 1002.4.TRAP SEAL PRIMER VALVES SHALL | | | COMPLY W/ ASSE 1018 OR ASSE 1044. | | | 19) THE TRAP SEAL LINE FOR THE FLOOR DRAIN BY ESPRESSO | | | MACHINE IS NOT SHOWN ON THE WATER RISER. | | | 20) SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WATER HEATER.SHOW THE | | | SIZE OF THE PAN AND PAN DRAIN ON THE DETAIL. THE PAN | | | AND DRAIN SHALL COMPLY W/ SEC. 504.7.1 | | | 21) A MEANS OF CONTROLLING INCREASED PRESSURE DUE TO | | | THERMAL EXPANSION SHALL BE PROVIDED PER 2010 FPC | | | SEC.607.3 | | | 22) THE HOT WATER RECIRCULATING LINE SHALL COMPLY W/ | | | 2010 FPC SEC.607.2 & SEC. 504.6 OF THE FL. ENERGY CODE. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2014-02-25 |
Time |
08:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 08:31:51 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 13090329 | | | ADD: 5011 BROADWAY | | | CONT: TO BE DETERMINED | | | TEL: (305)331-1400 | | | | | | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W | | | * WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 | | | EDITION | | | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW | | | DATE: TUE. FEB. 25 | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) 2ND REQUEST, | | | SHEET P-1 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SIZING OF | | | THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR SIZE. 2010 FBC-PLUMBING TABLE | | | 1003.5.1. | | | | | | 2) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 3) THE FISH FREEZER IS NOT INDICATED TO HAVE A TRAP | | | PRIMER NOR ANY OTHER WASTE WATER THAT WOULD PROVIDE | | | LIQUIDS TO SEAL THE TRAP. | | | 2010 FBC-P 1002.4 TRAP SEALS. | | | EACH FIXTURE TRAP SHALL HAVE A LIQUID SEAL OF NOT LESS | | | THAN 2 INCHES (51 MM) AND NOT MORE THAN 4 INCHES (102 | | | MM), OR DEEPER FOR SPECIAL DESIGNS RELATING TO | | | ACCESSIBLE FIXTURES. WHERE A TRAP SEAL IS SUBJECT TO | | | LOSS BY EVAPORATION, A TRAP SEAL PRIMER VALVE SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED. TRAP SEAL PRIMER VALVES SHALL CONNECT TO THE | | | TRAP AT A POINT ABOVE THE LEVEL OF THE TRAP SEAL. A | | | TRAP SEAL PRIMER VALVE SHALL CONFORM TO ASSE 1018 OR | | | ASSE 1044. | | | | | | | | | | | | JAMES A. WITMER CBO | | | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | TEL: 561-805-6715 | | | FAX: 561-805-6676 | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-09-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lwagner |
Date |
2013-09-18 |
Time |
15:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lwagner |
Date |
2013-09-18 |
Time |
12:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-18 13:55:04 | FBC 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | | FBC 2010 ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | FBC 2010 PLUMBING REVIEW #1 | | | DENIED: | | | | | | 1. SHEET P-1: PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | GREASE INTERCEPTOR SIZE. | | | *NOTE: A 750 GALLON GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL TYPICALLY | | | REQUIRE 30 MINUTES RETENTION TIME ALLOWING 25 GALLONS | | | FLOW. WITH THE AMOUNT OF DRAINS CONNECTED, THERE | | | APPEARS TO BE MORE THAN 25 GALLONS PER MINUTE FLOW TO | | | THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR. | | | | | | 2. SHEET P-1 & P-2: AN AIR GAP IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | DAIRY, FISH, MEAT, PRODUCE, AND KITCHEN COOLER FLOOR | | | DRAINS OR EXCEPTION. | | | 802.1.2 FLOOR DRAINS IN FOOD STORAGE AREAS. | | | FLOOR DRAINS LOCATED WITHIN WALK-IN REFRIGERATORS OR | | | FREEZERS IN FOOD SERVICE AND FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS SHALL | | | BE INDIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY DRAINAGE SYSTEM | | | BY MEANS OF AN AIR GAP. WHERE A FLOOR DRAIN IS LOCATED | | | WITHIN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FREEZING, THE WASTE LINE | | | SERVING THE FLOOR DRAIN SHALL NOT BE TRAPPED AND SHALL | | | INDIRECTLY DISCHARGE INTO A WASTE RECEPTOR LOCATED | | | OUTSIDE OF THE AREA SUBJECT TO FREEZING. | | | | | | EXCEPTION: WHERE PROTECTED AGAINST BACKFLOW BY A | | | BACKWATER VALVE, SUCH FLOOR DRAINS SHALL BE INDIRECTLY | | | CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY DRAINAGE SYSTEM BY MEANS OF | | | AN AIR BREAK OR AN AIR GAP. | | | | | | 3. FLOOR DRAINS THAT ARE NOT WASTE RECEIVERS REQUIRE | | | TRAP PRIMERS. | | | 1002.4 TRAP SEALS. | | | EACH FIXTURE TRAP SHALL HAVE A LIQUID SEAL OF NOT LESS | | | THAN 2 INCHES (51 MM) AND NOT MORE THAN 4 INCHES (102 | | | MM), OR DEEPER FOR SPECIAL DESIGNS RELATING TO | | | ACCESSIBLE FIXTURES. WHERE A TRAP SEAL IS SUBJECT TO | | | LOSS BY EVAPORATION, A TRAP SEAL PRIMER VALVE SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED. TRAP SEAL PRIMER VALVES SHALL CONNECT TO THE | | | TRAP AT A POINT ABOVE THE LEVEL OF THE TRAP SEAL. A | | | TRAP SEAL PRIMER VALVE SHALL CONFORM TO ASSE 1018 OR | | | ASSE 1044. | | | | | | 4. SHEET P-4 ALL HOSE BIBBS WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE SHUT | | | OFF VALVES. | | | 606.2 LOCATION OF SHUTOFF VALVES. | | | ...ON THE WATER SUPPLY PIPE TO EACH SILLCOCK IN OTHER | | | THAN ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES. | | | | | | | | | REVIEW BY | | | LARRY WAGNER | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | PHONE # 805-6692 | | | EMAIL [email protected] | | | FAX # 805-6676 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-08-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-08-27 |
Time |
16:45 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-08-27 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-27 17:00:04 | CONDITIONAL APPROVAL | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC CONDITIONS APPLY TO THE ZONING | | | APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY | | | FOR THE RENOVATION OF THE SUPERMARKET AT 5011 BROADWAY: | | | A. A LANDSCAPE PERMIT, WHICH INCLUDES A LANDSCAPE PLAN, | | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | | DIVISION FOR REVIEW. | | | B. THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHOWN ON THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT SHALL BE INSTALLED AND PASS A FINAL | | | LANDSCAPE INSPECTION (502). | | | C. AN IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION FOR REVIEW. | | | D. THE IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE APPROVED IRRIGATION PERMIT AND PASS A PLUMBING | | | FINAL INSPECTION (703). | | | E. A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, WHICH | | | COMPLIES WITH THE BROADWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT | | | REGULATIONS, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CONSTRUCTION | | | SERVICES DIVISION FOR REVIEW. | | | F. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT AND PASS A | | | FINAL INSPECTION (104). | | | G. A PARKING LOT PERMIT, INCLUDING THE NEW STRIPING AND | | | CURBING, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CONSTRUCTION | | | SERVICES DIVISION FOR REVIEW. | | | H. THE PARKING LOT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THE APPROVED PARKING LOT PERMIT AND PASS A FINAL | | | INSPECTION (104). | | | I. A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION FOR | | | REVIEW. | | | J. THE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT AND PASS A FINAL | | | INSPECTION (104). | | | K. THE BROADWAY FACADE SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS, | | | ALONG A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS FACADE LENGTH, | | | BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE GROUND IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-221(D)(5) OF THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OR AN ALTERNATIVE AMOUNT | | | OF GLAZING IN ACCORDANCE WITH A VARIANCE THAT HAS BEEN | | | APPROVED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AFTER FILING OF | | | AN APPLICATION. THE FINAL GLAZING LAYOUT SHALL BE | | | APPROVED AS EITHER A REVISION TO PERMIT NO. 13090329 OR | | | AS A SEPARATE STOREFRONT PERMIT AS DETERMINED BY THE | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | | | 2) THE FOLLOWING SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE | | | REQUIRED: | | | | | | A. AWNINGS | | | B. SIGNAGE | | | C. SITE LIGHTING | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-07-10 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-06-30 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-30 16:46:53 | FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS SHOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE | | | EXTERIOR WALL ALONG BROADWAY AND ITS REPLACEMENT WITH | | | STOREFRONT GLAZING AND A NEW WALL. THE BMUD REGULATIONS | | | REQUIRE THAT STOREFRONTS HAVE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS, ALONG | | | A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS FACADE LENGTH, BETWEEN | | | TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE GROUND - SECTION | | | 94-221(D)(5). THE GLAZING CALCULATION PROVIDED ON SHEET | | | A-9 SHOWS ONLY 46.97 PERCENT GLAZING. THE PLANS DO NOT | | | SHOW THE PROVISION OF THE MINIMUM 70 PERCENT GLAZING | | | BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION | | | OF THE NEW EASTERN WALL OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 2) THE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL FORM FOR THIS PERMIT OR | | | PERMITS FOR THIS ITEMS LISTED BELOW SHALL BE COMPETED | | | AND RETURNED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION PRIOR TO ZONING | | | APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT: | | | A. LANDSCAPE - RENOVATIONS EXCEED 50% OF THE BUILDING | | | VALUE SO COMPLIANT LANDSCAPE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT THE CITY REQUIRES THAT A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SIGN | | | AND SEAL LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE MAKE SURE TO INCLUDE A | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FOR THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND | | | INSTALLATION SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | B. IRRIGATION | | | C. PARKING LOT - CURBING AND STRIPING. | | | D. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE REQUIRES A 12 FOOT 6 INCH OPENING (NO | | | DIMENSION PROVIDED). THE OVERALL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE | | | DEPTH DOES NOT MEET CITY STANDARDS. DUMPSTERS FOR FOOD | | | SERVICE BUSINESSES SHALL BE FULLY ENCLOSED AND | | | AIR-CONDITIONED - SECTION 94-221(D)(10). IF THE | | | BUILDING CODE INVALIDATES THE REQUIREMENT TO | | | AIR-CONDITION THE ENCLOSURE (VERIFICATION SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED), THEN A FAN MAY BE USED. HOWEVER, THE FAN | | | (MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT) SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH SECTION 94-221(D)(8). | | | E. BICYCLE PARKING - THE BICYCLE RACK STYLE SHOWN ON | | | SHEET A-3 CONFORMS TO CITY STANDARDS; HOWEVER, TWO | | | ELEMENTS (TO PARK FOUR BICYCLES REQUIRES 6.5 FEET FROM | | | THE BUILDING WITH THE FIRST ELEMENT INSTALLED 24 INCHES | | | FROM THE BUILDING) NOT 5.5 FEET AS SHOWN. PLEASE NOTE | | | THAT THE AMOUNT OF BICYCLE PARKING IS BASED ON THE | | | REQUIRED PARKING FOR A PROPERTY. WHILE THIS SITE IS | | | NON-CONFORMING AS TO PARKING, THE USE REQUIRES 45 | | | PARKING SPACES, WHICH TRANSLATES INTO THREE REQUIRED | | | BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. THIS ONLY REQUIRES TWO ELEMENTS | | | (EACH SUPPORTS TWO BICYCLES), SO INSTALLING ONE ELEMENT | | | INSTEAD OF TWO AT EACH LOCATION WOULD PROVIDE THE | | | MINIMUM REQUIRED ROOM FOR A CUSTOMER, OR EMPLOYEE, TO | | | PARK A BICYCLE. IF THE OWNER WISHES TO PROVIDE MORE | | | ELEMENTS NOW OR IN THE FUTURE (IF IT IS NOTED THAT | | | THERE IS A DEMAND FOR BICYCLE PARKING), THEN THEY COULD | | | CONTINUE DOWN THE "NEW CONCRETE WALKWAY" AS LONG AS | | | THERE IS AT LEAST SIX (6) FEET OF DEPTH PROVIDED FOR | | | EACH "BICYCLE PAD". SHEETS A-3, A-3 AND A-4 NEED TO BE | | | CORRECTLY SHOW THE CORRECT BICYCLE PARKING LAYOUT AS | | | PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE BICYCLE PARKING. | | | | | | 3) THE FOLLOWING SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE | | | REQUIRED: | | | | | | A. AWNINGS | | | B. SIGNAGE | | | C. SITE LIGHTING | | | | | | 4) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE CODE REQUIRED EIGHT (8) | | | FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG BROADWAY. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE | | | WIDENING OF THE SIDEWALK DOES NOT PERMIT THE NARROWING | | | OF THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND TO LESS THAN THE | | | REQUIRED FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE | | | WIDTH SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE PLANTED AREA OF THE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND, AND NOT INCLUDE THE CURBING. THE SITE | | | PLAN SHOWS A 29.75 FOOT WIDE DRIVEWAY ONTO 49TH STREET | | | THAT CAN BE NARROWED TO PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL TERMINAL | | | ISLAND WIDTH. THESE ITEMS SHALL BE CORRECTLY DEPICTED | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE AND PARKING LOT PERMITS. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-05-05 |
Time |
15:53 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-05-05 |
Time |
08:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-05 15:54:19 | FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE BROADWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT | | | REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT ALL PROPERTIES SHALL BE | | | BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS | | | IN ARTICLE XXIV, CONCURRENTLY WITH EXTERIOR BUILDING | | | IMPROVEMENTS EXCEEDING $10,000 - SECTION 94-219(D)(9). | | | ADDITIONALLY, THE PERMIT VALUE OF $400,000 EXCEEDS 50% | | | OF THE BUILDING VALUE ($407,097 ACCORDING TO PAPA), SO | | | THE SITE IS REQUIRED TO BE BROUGHT INTO LANDSCAPE | | | COMPLIANCE. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS A | | | SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A REGISTERED | | | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, NOT AN ENGINEER. ADDITIONALLY, THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS SHOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE | | | EXTERIOR WALL ALONG BROADWAY AND ITS REPLACEMENT WITH | | | STOREFRONT GLAZING AND A NEW WALL. THE BMUD REGULATIONS | | | REQUIRE THAT STOREFRONTS HAVE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS, ALONG | | | A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS FACADE LENGTH, BETWEEN | | | TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE GROUND. PLEASE PROVIDE THE | | | FACADE GLAZING CALCULATIONS BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET | | | TO VERIFY THAT THE 70 PERCENT HAS BEEN MET - SECTION | | | 94-221(D)(5). THE GLAZING CALCULATION PROVIDED ON SHEET | | | A-9 SHOWS ONLY 46.97 PERCENT GLAZING. | | | | | | 3) REVISED COMMENT: SHEET A-3 SHOWS THE EMERGENCY SWING | | | FOR DOOR TYPE A AS SWINGING FROM THE MIDDLE OUT. THE | | | DOOR SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION AND THE DOOR ELEVATION ON | | | SHEET A-7 SHOW THE SIDE LITES WITH THE HINGED SWING. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY AND CORRECT DRAWINGS AS NECESSARY. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TYPE OF CONFIGURATION DOES MEET | | | THE INTENT OF SECTION 94-221(D)(6)F FOR A GROCERY | | | STORE. | | | | | | 4) REVISED COMMENT: DUMPSTERS FOR FOOD SERVICE | | | BUSINESSES SHALL BE FULLY ENCLOSED AND AIR-CONDITIONED | | | - SECTION 94-221(D)(10). PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF OF THE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-221(D)(8). | | | | | | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: SIDEWALKS ALONG BROADWAY SHALL BE A | | | MINIMUM IF EIGHT FEET IN CLEAR WIDTH, WHERE THE | | | BUILDING DOES NOT CURRENTLY EXIST. THIS SHALL BE | | | INCLUDED WITH THE LANDSCAPE AND PAVING PERMITS - | | | SECTION 94-221(B)(6). | | | | | | 6) THE FOLLOWING SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE ZONING WILL | | | APPROVE THIS PERMIT: | | | A. LANDSCAPE - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY REQUIRES THAT | | | A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SIGN AND SEAL LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | THE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE INTERIOR RENOVATION PERMIT | | | WERE SIGNED AND SEALED BY AN ENGINEER. THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS ARE NOT REVIEWED AS PART OF THE BUILDING | | | RENOVATION, BUT AS PART OF A SEPARATE PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | PLEASE MAKE SURE TO INCLUDE A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE | | | FOR THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND INSTALLATION SHOWN ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | B. IRRIGATION | | | C. PARKING LOT | | | D. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE REQUIRES A 12 FOOT 6 INCH OPENING (NO | | | DIMENSION PROVIDED). THE OVERALL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE | | | DEPTH DOES NOT MEET CITY STANDARDS. | | | | | | 7) THE FOLLOWING SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE | | | REQUIRED: | | | | | | A. AWNINGS | | | B. SIGNAGE | | | C. SITE LIGHTING | | | | | | 8) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING A BICYCLE | | | RACK. HOWEVER, THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT THE WAVE TYPE | | | OF BICYCLE RACK. THE CITY PERMITS POST AND LOOP, | | | INVERTED "U" AND "A" TYPE BICYCLE RACKS. PLEASE CONTACT | | | ZONING STAFF FOR THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS, TO INCLUDE | | | THE PAD SIZE. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-11-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-11-25 |
Time |
15:29 |
Rev Time |
5.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-11-24 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-25 15:30:51 | FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. | | | | | | 1) THE BROADWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT REGULATIONS REQUIRE | | | THAT ALL PROPERTIES SHALL BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS IN ARTICLE XXIV, | | | CONCURRENTLY WITH EXTERIOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS | | | EXCEEDING $10,000 - SECTION 94-219(D)(9). ADDITIONALLY, | | | THE PERMIT VALUE OF $400,000 EXCEEDS 50% OF THE | | | BUILDING VALUE ($407,097 ACCORDING TO PAPA), SO THE | | | SITE IS REQUIRED TO BE BROUGHT INTO LANDSCAPE | | | COMPLIANCE. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS A | | | SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A REGISTERED | | | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, NOT AN ENGINEER. ADDITIONALLY, THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 2) THE PRINCIPAL PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING IS | | | NOT FACING THE BROADWAY FRONTAGE LINE AS REQUIRED BY | | | SECTION 94-221(D)(4). | | | | | | 3) THE PLANS SHOW THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXTERIOR WALL | | | ALONG BROADWAY AND ITS REPLACEMENT WITH STOREFRONT | | | GLAZING AND A NEW WALL. THE BMUD REGULATIONS REQUIRE | | | THAT STOREFRONTS HAVE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS, ALONG A | | | MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS FACADE LENGTH, BETWEEN TWO | | | AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE GROUND. PLEASE PROVIDE THE | | | FA?ADE GLAZING CALCULATIONS BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET | | | TO VERIFY THAT THE 70 PERCENT HAS BEEN MET - SECTION | | | 94-221(D)(5). | | | | | | 4) WINDOW AND DOOR OPENINGS SHALL BE VERTICAL OR SQUARE | | | IN PROPORTION. - THE WINDOWS FACING BROADWAY (NORTH | | | PORTION OF FACADE) ARE NOT VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN | | | PROPORTION - SECTION 94-221(D)(6)B. | | | | | | 5) MULTIPLE WINDOWS IN THE SAME ROUGH OPENING SHALL BE | | | SEPARATED BY A FOUR-INCH WIDE POST AND SIT ON ONE | | | CONTINUOUS SILL. - THE WINDOWS FACING BROADWAY (NORTH | | | PORTION OF FACADE) ARE NOT SEPARATED BY A FOUR-INCH | | | WIDE POST - SECTION 94-221(D)(6)D. | | | | | | 6) ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE HINGED, EXCEPT GARAGE | | | DOORS - THE AUTOMATIC DOOR, AS SPECIFIED, DOES NOT MEET | | | THIS CRITERIA. PREVIOUS PLANS HAD SHOWN A SLIDING GLASS | | | DOOR THAT HAD HINGES FOR EMERGENCY USE - SECTION | | | 94-221(D)(6)F. | | | | | | 7) MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS SHALL BE | | | SCREENED FROM VIEW ON ALL SIDES TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF | | | THE STRUCTURE BY LANDSCAPING OR BUILT ELEMENTS DESIGNED | | | AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE. - NO | | | SIGHT LINE FOR THE PROPERTIES TO THE WEST OR SOUTH TO | | | VERIFY THAT THIS REQUIREMENT IS MET FOR THE ROOFTOP | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND NO INFORMATION ON WHERE AND | | | HOW THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER WILL BE SCREENED IS PROVIDE | | | - SECTION 94-221(D)(8). | | | | | | 8) FLAT ROOFS SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A PARAPET NO LESS | | | THAN 42 INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW A 42 | | | INCH HIGH PARAPET AROUND THE ENTIRE FLAT ROOF - SECTION | | | 94-221(D)(9). | | | | | | 9) DUMPSTERS FOR FOOD SERVICE BUSINESSES SHALL BE FULLY | | | ENCLOSED AND AIR-CONDITIONED - SECTION 94-221(D)(10). | | | | | | 10) AUTOMATIC FOOD AND DRINK MACHINES AND THE ICE | | | MACHINE MAY NOT BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING - | | | SECTION 94-219(D)(10). | | | | | | 11) THE PROPANE TANK AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING SHALL | | | BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-444(B) | | | | | | 12) SIDEWALKS ALONG BROADWAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM IF | | | EIGHT FEET IN CLEAR WIDTH. THIS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH | | | THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT - SECTION 94-221(B)(6). | | | | | | 13) THE FOLLOWING SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVAL | | | OF THIS PERMIT: | | | A. LANDSCAPE - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY REQUIRES THAT | | | A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SIGN AND SEAL LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | THE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE INTERIOR RENOVATION PERMIT | | | WERE SIGNED AND SEALED BY AN ENGINEER. | | | B. IRRIGATION | | | C. PARKING LOT | | | D. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE REQUIRES A 12 FOOT 6 INCH OPENING, NOT 10 | | | FEET AS SHOWN. THE OVERALL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SIZE DOES | | | NOT MEET CITY STANDARDS. | | | | | | 14) THE FOLLOWING SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE | | | REQUIRED: | | | | | | A. AWNINGS - PLEASE NOTE: AWNINGS AT THE SIDEWALK LEVEL | | | SHALL PROJECT A MINIMUM OF FOUR FEET FROM THE BUILDING | | | FA?ADE AND VALANCES SHALL NOT EXCEED EIGHT INCHES IN | | | HEIGHT. THE PROPOSED AWNINGS DO NOT COMPLY WITH EITHER | | | OF THESE STANDARDS. | | | B. SIGNAGE | | | C. SITE LIGHTING | | | | | | 15) STAFF SUGGESTS INCLUDING BICYCLE RACKS FOR BOTH | | | EMPLOYEE AND CUSTOMER USE. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | | | | | | | 2014-11-24 15:48:18 | IN REVIEW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-03-05 |
Time |
13:57 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-03-05 |
Time |
13:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 16:02:18 | FAILED | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE RENOVATIONS EXPAND THE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF THE SUPERMARKET IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE | | | FEET, THUS REQUIRING APPROVAL OF A CLASS B SPECIAL USE | | | PERMIT. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CLASS | | | B SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR THE SUPERMARKET | | | EXPANSION EXPIRED IN JANUARY OF 2011. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE BROADWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT | | | REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT ALL PROPERTIES SHALL BE | | | BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS | | | IN ARTICLE XXIV, CONCURRENTLY WITH EXTERIOR BUILDING | | | IMPROVEMENTS EXCEEDING $10,000. ADDITIONALLY, THE | | | PERMIT VALUE OF $400,000 EXCEEDS 50% OF THE BUILDING | | | VALUE ($407,097 ACCORDING TO PAPA), SO THE SITE IS | | | REQUIRED TO BE BROUGHT INTO LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE. THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS A SEPARATE | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL | | | BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A REGISTERED LANDSCAPE | | | ARCHITECT, NOT AN ENGINEER. ADDITIONALLY, THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN SHALL VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLAN CONTINUES TO FAIL TO MEET | | | MULTIPLE ELEMENTS OF THE BMUD REGULATIONS FOUND IN | | | SECTIONS 94-219 AND 94-221 OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. STAFF IS NOT GOING TO ITEMIZE | | | THE LIST AS IT IS TOO LONG, THE APPLICANT SHALL REVIEW | | | AND FOLLOW THE BROADWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT 2 | | | REGULATIONS TO ENSURE THAT THE DESIGN COMPLIES. THE | | | FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFIED BY STAFF AS | | | NOT BEING IN COMPLIANCE WHICH WERE NOT CHANGED FROM THE | | | PREVIOUS SET OF PLANS AT WHICH POINT THE ZONING STAFF | | | STOPPED THE REVIEW UNTIL THE APPLICANT RESUBMITS PLANS | | | THAT COMPLY WITH ALL ZONING REGULATIONS. | | | | | | A. THE PRINCIPAL PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE IS NOT FACING THE | | | BROADWAY FRONTAGE LINE - SECTION 94-221(D)(4). | | | B. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW ON | | | ALL SIDES TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE BY | | | LANDSCAPING OR BUILT ELEMENTS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL | | | PART OF THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE - SECTION | | | 94-221(D)(8). | | | | | | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: HE PARKING, DUMPSTER, SIGNS, | | | LANDSCAPE AND AWNINGS ARE REQUIRED TO MEET CITY CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL ALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE | | | PERMITS, WITH PLANS. | | | | | | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CORNER OF 49TH | | | AND BROADWAY IS A LOCATION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND | | | SHALL BE IMPROVED AS SUCH. THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS | | | PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561)822-1435. | | | | | 2014-02-10 16:14:07 | 2/10/14 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2013-10-02 |
Time |
14:29 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2013-10-02 |
Time |
14:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-10-02 15:12:34 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY, LESS THAN ONE YEAR | | | OLD, SHOWING ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EASEMENTS. | | | | | | 2) THE RENOVATIONS EXPAND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE | | | SUPERMARKET IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET, THUS | | | REQUIRING APPROVAL OF A CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CLASS B | | | SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR THE SUPERMARKET | | | EXPANSION EXPIRED IN JANUARY OF 2011. | | | | | | 3) THE BROADWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT REGULATIONS REQUIRE | | | THAT ALL PROPERTIES SHALL BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS IN ARTICLE XXIV, | | | CONCURRENTLY WITH EXTERIOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS | | | EXCEEDING $10,000. ADDITIONALLY, THE PERMIT VALUE OF | | | $400,000 EXCEEDS 50% OF THE BUILDING VALUE ($407,097 | | | ACCORDING TO PAPA), SO THE SITE IS REQUIRED TO BE | | | BROUGHT INTO LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE. THE SUBMITTED PLAN | | | DOES NOT MEET THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. THE | | | ZONING DIVISION HAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS | | | FOR THE SITE. | | | | | | 4) THE PLAN FAILS TO MEET MULTIPLE ELEMENTS OF THE BMUD | | | REGULATIONS FOUND IN SECTIONS 94-219 AND 94-221 OF THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. STAFF IS NOT | | | GOING TO ITEMIZE THE LIST AS IT IS TOO LONG - THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL FOLLOW THE CODE. | | | | | | 5) THE PARKING, DUMPSTER, SIGNS, LANDSCAPE AND AWNINGS | | | ARE REQUIRED TO MEET CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL | | | ALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS. | | | | | | 6) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CORNER OF 49TH AND BROADWAY IS | | | A LOCATION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND SHALL BE IMPROVED | | | AS SUCH. THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED | | | PLANS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561)822-1435. | | 2013-09-16 19:03:37 | 9/16/13 |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |