Plan Review Details - Permit 13050586
Plan Review Stops For Permit 13050586
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2014-07-31 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-07-31 Time 17:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-07-31 Time 17:14 Sent To Z
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2014-04-09 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-04-09 Time 15:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-04-09 Time 15:54 Sent To Z
Notes
2014-04-09 15:57:28****CORRECTIONS****
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL
  
 REVIEW #5 - REVISED PERGOLA DRAWING SUBMITTED, NO NEW
 SITE PLAN SUBMITTED
 FROM PREVIOUS LISTS:
  
 1. OK
  
 2. SITE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT,
 DIMENSIONS OF IMPROVEMENT, DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES,
 AND DISTANCE TO OTHER STRUCTURES, FBC R 302. SITE PLAN
 PROVIDED IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT APPEARS TO SHOW DIMENSIONS
 OF 100' (OR 180'?) X 330', WHICH IS LARGER THAN LOT
 SIZE.
  
 SURVEY NOT CONSISTENT WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. IS THE
 BRICK AREA TO BE EXTENDED? SEE ORIGINAL COMMENT AND
 PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION FOR BOTH PERGOLA AND ANY OTHER
 WORK TO BE INCLUDED ON THIS PERMIT SUCH AS INCREASE OF
 BRICK AREA. SURVEY FROM 2002 SHOW SCREENED BRICK PATIO
 AND ADJACENT BRICK PATIO AS SAME DIMENSION, SITE PLAN
 PROVIDED APPEARS TO SHOW A REDUCTION IN THE BRICK PATIO
 AND INCREASE IN WHAT WAS FORMERLY CALLED "SCREENED
 BRICK PATIO" AREA.
  
 3-4. OK
  
 5. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE VALUE OF LABOR AND MATERIALS FBC
 109. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE MAY CAUSE
 PLAN REVIEW DELAYS. AS SCOPE HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN, IT
 CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME WHETHER OR NOT VALUE
 GIVEN IS REASONABLE.
  
 OWNER HAS PROVIDED A VALUE OF $2500. AS SCOPE HAS NOT
 BEEN DETERMINED, THIS IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 NEW PLAN SHOWS A PERGOLA OF 15' X 17'. THE SITE PLAN
 SHOWS PERGOLA DIMENSIONS OF 16' X 16.7'. THE PERGOLA
 PLAN AND THE SITE PLAN DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE THE SAME,
 FBC 107.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2014-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-02-03 Time 19:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-02-03 Time 19:00 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-03 19:03:04****CORRECTIONS****
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LISTS:
  
 1. OK
  
 2. SITE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT,
 DIMENSIONS OF IMPROVEMENT, DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES,
 AND DISTANCE TO OTHER STRUCTURES, FBC R 302. SITE PLAN
 PROVIDED IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT APPEARS TO SHOW DIMENSIONS
 OF 100' (OR 180'?) X 330', WHICH IS LARGER THAN LOT
 SIZE.
  
 SURVEY NOT CONSISTENT WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. IS THE
 BRICK AREA TO BE EXTENDED? SEE ORIGINAL COMMENT AND
 PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION FOR BOTH PERGOLA AND ANY OTHER
 WORK TO BE INCLUDED ON THIS PERMIT SUCH AS INCREASE OF
 BRICK AREA. SURVEY FROM 2002 SHOW SCREENED BRICK PATIO
 AND ADJACENT BRICK PATIO AS SAME DIMENSION, SITE PLAN
 PROVIDED APPEARS TO SHOW A REDUCTION IN THE BRICK PATIO
 AND INCREASE IN WHAT WAS FORMERLY CALLED "SCREENED
 BRIUCK PATIO" AREA.
  
 3-4. OK
  
 5. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE VALUE OF LABOR AND MATERIALS FBC
 109. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE MAY CAUSE
 PLAN REVIEW DELAYS. AS SCOPE HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN, IT
 CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME WHETHER OR NOT VALUE
 GIVEN IS REASONABLE.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE A COST BREAKDOWN AND COMPLETE
 SCOPE FOR THIS PROJECT; NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2013-12-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2013-12-03 Time 14:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-12-03 Time 14:20 Sent To  
Notes
2013-12-03 14:24:03****CORRECTIONS****
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LISTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENT. SEE FBC 107. PLANS ARE TO INCLUDE WIND
 DESIGN CRITERIA FBC R 301. IF PLANS ARE NOT PREPARED BY
 A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. AS
 NO PLAN WAS SUBMITTED, A COMPLETE CHECKLIST CANNOT BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 PLAN IS TO CLEARLY SHOW MATERIALS AND SCOPE, ALL
 STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS.
  
 SOME ITEMS INDINCATED AS "METAL"; THIS IS NOT
 SUFFICIENT AS IT DOES NOT PROVIDE A STRENGTH CRITERIA
 OR MATERIAL. OTHER ITEMS SHOW DIMENSION OF 8X4X1, NOT
 CLEAR WHAT THIS MEANS (1 = 1"? NOMINAL?) OR WHAT
 MATERIAL IS PROPOSED. 3" SCREWS ARE SHOWN AS
 CONNECTORS, NOT CLEAR WHAT TYPE OF SCREWS ARE PROPOSED,
 STRENGTH CAPABILITY, OR TYPE.
  
 PLANS REQUIRED - ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY PLAN, FOUNDATION
 PLAN, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS IF NEEDED. NOT ENOUGH
 INFORMATION TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE. IF PLANS ARE
 NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL,
 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL SPANS AND
 CONNECTORS.
  
 PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC R 301.
  
 2. OK
  
 3. ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
 ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF
 THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 4. FBC R TABLE 302.1, PROJECTIONS WHICH ARE LESS THAN
 3' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A 1 HOUR
 FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. IF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT IS LESS
 THAN 3' FROM PROPERTY LINE, PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING.
  
 CANNOT DETERMINE COMPLIANCE AS DISTANCE TO PROPERTY
 LINE NOT PROVIDED.
  
 5. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE VALUE OF LABOR AND MATERIALS FBC
 109. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE MAY CAUSE
 PLAN REVIEW DELAYS. AS SCOPE HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN, IT
 CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME WHETHER OR NOT VALUE
 GIVEN IS REASONABLE.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE A COST BREAKDOWN AND COMPLETE
 SCOPE FOR THIS PROJECT; NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2013-10-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2013-10-19 Time 09:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-10-19 Time 09:38 Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-19 09:51:48****CORRECTIONS****
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1. PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENT. SEE FBC 107. PLANS ARE TO INCLUDE WIND
 DESIGN CRITERIA FBC R 301. IF PLANS ARE NOT PREPARED BY
 A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. AS
 NO PLAN WAS SUBMITTED, A COMPLETE CHECKLIST CANNOT BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 PLAN IS TO CLEARLY SHOW MATERIALS AND SCOPE, ALL
 STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS.
  
 SOME ITEMS INDINCATED AS "METAL"; THIS IS NOT
 SUFFICIENT AS IT DOES NOT PROVIDE A STRENGTH CRITERIA
 OR MATERIAL. OTHER ITEMS SHOW DIMENSION OF 8X4X1, NOT
 CLEAR WHAT THIS MEANS (1 = 1"? NOMINAL?) OR WHAT
 MATERIAL IS PROPOSED. 3" SCREWS ARE SHOWN AS
 CONNECTORS, NOT CLEAR WHAT TYPE OF SCREWS ARE PROPOSED,
 STRENGTH CAPABILITY, OR TYPE.
  
 PLANS REQUIRED - ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY PLAN, FOUNDATION
 PLAN, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS IF NEEDED. NOT ENOUGH
 INFORMATION TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE. IF PLANS ARE
 NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL,
 CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL SPANS AND
 CONNECTORS.
  
 PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC R 301.
  
 2. SITE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT,
 DIMENSIONS OF IMPROVEMENT, DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES,
 AND DISTANCE TO OTHER STRUCTURES, FBC R 302. SITE PLAN
 PROVIDED IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT APPEARS TO SHOW DIMENSIONS
 OF 100' (OR 180'?) X 330', WHICH IS LARGER THAN LOT
 SIZE.
  
 SURVEY NOT CONSISTENT WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. IS THE
 BRICK AREA TO BE EXTENDED? SEE ORIGINAL COMMENT AND
 PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION FOR BOTH PERGOLA AND ANY OTHER
 WORK TO BE INCLUDED ON THIS PERMIT SUCH AS INCREASE OF
 BRICK AREA. SURVEY FROM 2002 SHOW SCREENED BRICK PATIO
 AND ADJACENT BRICK PATIO AS SAME DIMENSION, SITE PLAN
 PROVIDED APPEARS TO SHOW A REDUCTION IN THE BRICK PATIO
 AND INCREASE IN WHAT WAS FORMERLY CALLED "SCREENED
 BRIUCK PATIO" AREA.
  
 3. ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
 ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF
 THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 4. FBC R TABLE 302.1, PROJECTIONS WHICH ARE LESS THAN
 3' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A 1 HOUR
 FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. IF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT IS LESS
 THAN 3' FROM PROPERTY LINE, PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING.
  
 CANNOT DETERMINE COMPLIANCE AS DISTANCE TO PROPERTY
 LINE NOT PROVIDED.
  
 5. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE VALUE OF LABOR AND MATERIALS FBC
 109. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE MAY CAUSE
 PLAN REVIEW DELAYS. AS SCOPE HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN, IT
 CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME WHETHER OR NOT VALUE
 GIVEN IS REASONABLE.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE A COST BREAKDOWN AND COMPLETE
 SCOPE FOR THIS PROJECT; NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-05-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2013-05-30 Time 14:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-05-21 Time 15:35 Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-30 14:40:46****CORRECTIONS****
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL
  
 1. PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENT. SEE FBC 107. PLANS ARE TO INCLUDE WIND
 DESIGN CRITERIA FBC R 301. IF PLANS ARE NOT PREPARED BY
 A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. AS
 NO PLAN WAS SUBMITTED, A COMPLETE CHECKLIST CANNOT BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 2. SITE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT,
 DIMENSIONS OF IMPROVEMENT, DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES,
 AND DISTANCE TO OTHER STRUCTURES, FBC R 302. SITE PLAN
 PROVIDED IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT APPEARS TO SHOW DIMENSIONS
 OF 100' (OR 180'?) X 330', WHICH IS LARGER THAN LOT
 SIZE.
  
 3. ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
 ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF
 THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN.
  
 4. FBC R TABLE 302.1, PROJECTIONS WHICH ARE LESS THAN
 3' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A 1 HOUR
 FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. IF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT IS LESS
 THAN 3' FROM PROPERTY LINE, PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING.
  
 5. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE VALUE OF LABOR AND MATERIALS FBC
 109. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE MAY CAUSE
 PLAN REVIEW DELAYS. AS SCOPE HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN, IT
 CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME WHETHER OR NOT VALUE
 GIVEN IS REASONABLE.
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-07-18 Time 07:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2014-04-25 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-04-25 Time 09:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2014-04-09 Time 10:45 Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-09 15:57:57TO ZONING
  
2014-04-09 10:46:30INCOMING SENT TO SAMANTHA'S DESK. JW
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2014-02-05 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2014-02-05 Time 19:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2014-01-24 Time 10:52 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-03 19:04:08TO ZONING
  
2014-01-24 10:56:12SENT TO S HILL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2013-12-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2013-12-03 Time 14:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-11-12 Time 15:58 Sent To  
Notes
2013-11-12 15:58:27TO ZONING
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2013-10-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2013-10-19 Time 09:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-09-13 Time 18:47 Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-13 18:47:54TO ZONING
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2013-05-30 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2013-05-30 Time 14:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2013-05-17 Time 10:30 Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-17 10:31:03SENT TO ZONING SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2014-08-05 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2014-08-05 Time 15:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2014-08-05 Time 14:59 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2014-04-11 Cont ID  
Sent By JRoach Date 2014-04-11 Time 10:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2014-04-11 Time 10:00 Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-11 10:03:01ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 04.11.2014
 PERMIT NO.: 13050586
 ADDRESS: 2905 CAFFIA WAY
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: ILAN KOTTLER
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.818.1999
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW PERGOLA.
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE NEW PLAN DRAWN DOES NOT MATCH THE SURVEY. THE
 SURVEY INDICATES THAT THERE IS 26.7 FEET BETWEEN THE
 HOUSE AND THE REAR PROPERTY LINE; THE REVISED PLANS
 PROPOSE A 17 FOOT LONG PERGOLA, WHICH MEANS THAT THE
 DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PERGOLA AND THE REAR PROPETY LINE
 WOULD ONLY BE 9.7 FEET. PURSUANT TO THE SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT, THE MINIMUM SETBACK
 SHALL BE 10 FEET. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH
 THE SURVEY.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
  
 2/4/14 - ZONING RECEIVED. SENT TO JR FOR REVIEW. LL
2014-04-10 10:41:164/10/14 RESUB ZONING, SENT TO JR SG
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2014-02-05 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2014-02-05 Time 19:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2014-02-04 Time 08:05 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-05 19:46:03ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 02.05.2014
 PERMIT NO.: 13050586
 ADDRESS: 2905 CAFFIA WAY
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: ILAN KOTTLER
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.818.1999
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW PERGOLA.
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE NEW PLAN DRAWN DOES NOT MATCH THE SURVEY. THE
 SURVEY INDICATES THAT THERE IS 26.7 FEET BETWEEN THE
 HOUSE AND THE REAR PROPERTY LINE; THE REVISED PLANS
 PROPOSED A 17.75 FOOT LONG PERGOLA, WHICH MEANS THAT
 THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PERGOLA AND THE REAR PROPETY
 LINE WOULD ONLY BE 8.95 FEET. PURSUANT TO THE SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT, THE MINIMUM SETBACK
 SHALL BE 10 FEET.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
  
2014-02-04 08:06:062/4/14 - ZONING RECEIVED. SENT TO JR FOR REVIEW. LL
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2013-11-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2013-11-21 Time 14:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2013-11-13 Time 09:20 Sent To B
Notes
2013-11-13 09:21:1811/13/13 - ZONING RECEIVED. SENT TO JR FOR REVIEW. LL
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2013-10-09 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2013-10-09 Time 08:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2013-09-17 Time 11:08 Sent To B
Notes
2013-10-09 09:07:43ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 10.09.2013
 PERMIT NO.: 13050586
 ADDRESS: 2905 CAFFIA WAY
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: HELINE KOTTLER
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.471.7735
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: PERGOLA
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. PURSUANT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REGUALTIONS FOR THE
 CLASSICS AT BEAR LAKES RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 (RPD), THE PERGOLA SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) FEET FROM THE REAR PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES TO THE PROPOSED
 PERGOLA, AS WELL AS THE SIZE OF THE PERGOLA (PLAN
 SUBMITTED WAS ILLEGIBLE).
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) SETS OF PLANS SHOWING THE
 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED PERGOLA; ONLY ONE (1) SURVEY
 HAD THE LOCATION DRAWN ON IT.
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) SETS OF PLANS OF THE PERGOLA,
 INCLUDING WHAT IT IS PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF, THE
 HEIGHT, ETC. NO CONSTRUCTION PLANS WERE PROVIDED.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1448
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
  
2013-09-17 11:09:10ZONING RECEIVED. ROUTED TO JR FOR REVIEW.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2013-05-30 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2013-05-30 Time 09:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2013-05-30 Time 09:14 Sent To B
Notes
2013-05-30 09:14:21ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 05.30.2013
 PERMIT NO.: 13050586
 ADDRESS: 2905 CAFFIA WAY
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: HELINE KOTTLER
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.471.7735
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: PERGOLA
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISOS
 ___________________________________________
  
 THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN PASSED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
 PROVISOS:
  
 1. PURSUANT TO THE DEVELOPMENT REGUALTIONS FOR THE
 CLASSICS AT BEAR LAKES RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 (RPD), THE PERGOLA SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) FEET FROM THE REAR PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES TO THE PROPOSED
 PERGOLA, AS WELL AS THE SIZE OF THE PERGOLA (PLAN
 SUBMITTED WAS ILLEGIBLE).
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) SETS OF PLANS SHOWING THE
 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED PERGOLA; ONLY ONE (1) SURVEY
 HAD THE LOCATION DRAWN ON IT.
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) SETS OF PLANS OF THE PERGOLA,
 INCLUDING WHAT IT IS PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF, THE
 HEIGHT, ETC. NO CONSTRUCTION PLANS WERE PROVIDED.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1448
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved