| Plan Review Stops For Permit 13010327 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-05-15 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-05-15 |
Time |
09:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-04-17 |
Time |
14:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-04-17 |
Time |
14:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-04-17 15:08:26 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. SEE FBC TABLE 602 REGARDING FIRE RESISTANCE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND REVISE PLANS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE; BOTH | | | DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES AS WELL AS DISTANCE TO | | | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN PROPOSED SHED AND | | | EXISTING BUILDING. INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO | | | SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE SUCH AS BUILDING TYPE (FBC CHAPTER | | | 6), AREA, OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (FBC CHAPTER 3). | | | | | | PER CONVERSATION WITH CONTRACTOR, THIS WILL BE | | | REDLINED. | | | | | | 2. SEE FBC TABLE 602. TYPE IIB STRUCTURE, 5' FROM | | | PROPERTY LINE REQUIRES A 1 HOUR RATED WALL. THE DETAIL | | | PROVIDED IS FOR A NON BEARING WALL, EXPOSURE TO INSIDE | | | ONLY. FBC 705.5, RATED WALLS LESS THAN 10' FROM THE | | | PROPERTY LINE ARE TO BE RATED FROM BOTH INSIDE AND | | | OUTSIDE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
Time |
13:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-26 13:16:30 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | 2/22/2013 RESUBMITTAL | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. SEE FBC TABLE 602 REGARDING FIRE RESISTANCE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND REVISE PLANS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE; BOTH | | | DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES AS WELL AS DISTANCE TO | | | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN PROPOSED SHED AND | | | EXISTING BUILDING. INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO | | | SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE SUCH AS BUILDING TYPE (FBC CHAPTER | | | 6), AREA, OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (FBC CHAPTER 3). | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW: | | | | | | SEE FBC TABLE 602. TYPE IIB STRUCTURE, 5' FROM PROPERTY | | | LINE REQUIRES A 1 HOUR RATED WALL. PROVIDE A DETAIL OR | | | CHANGE PROPOSED LOCATION. | | | | | | DISTANCE TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN THE TWO | | | STRUCTURES ON THE SAME LOT NOT PROVIDED. NO INFORMATION | | | REGARDING THE EXISTING BUILDING WAS PROVIDED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL OF THE FOUR | | | SIDES OF THE PROPOSED SHED WHICH INCLUDES OPENINGS | | | (DOORS AND/OR WINDOWS) AND ORIENTATION OF THE PROPOSED | | | SHED (INDICATE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST ELEVATIONS). | | | SEE FBC TABLE 602, TABLE 705.8. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
Time |
12:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
Time |
12:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-26 12:50:44 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | 2/13/2013 RESUBMITTAL | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. OK | | | | | | 2. SEE FBC TABLE 602 REGARDING FIRE RESISTANCE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND REVISE PLANS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE; BOTH | | | DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES AS WELL AS DISTANCE TO | | | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN PROPOSED SHED AND | | | EXISTING BUILDING. INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO | | | SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE SUCH AS BUILDING TYPE (FBC CHAPTER | | | 6), AREA, OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (FBC CHAPTER 3). | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW: | | | | | | SEE FBC TABLE 602. TYPE IIB STRUCTURE, 3' FROM PROPERTY | | | LINE REQUIRES A 2 HOUR RATED WALL. PROVIDE A DETAIL OR | | | CHANGE PROPOSED LOCATION. | | | | | | DISTANCE TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN THE TWO | | | STRUCTURES ON THE SAME LOT NOT PROVIDED. NO INFORMATION | | | REGARDING THE EXISTING BUILDING WAS PROVIDED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL OF THE FOUR | | | SIDES OF THE PROPOSED SHED WHICH INCLUDES OPENINGS | | | (DOORS AND/OR WINDOWS) AND ORIENTATION OF THE PROPOSED | | | SHED (INDICATE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST ELEVATIONS). | | | SEE FBC TABLE 602, TABLE 705.8. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
14:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-01 15:06:29 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE ENGINEERING FOR THE SHED, FBC 1609. IF THE | | | SHED HAS A DCA APPROVAL, PROVIDE THE APPROVAL FROM THE | | | WEBSITE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. THIS SHOULD INCLUDE | | | THE COVER SHEET AND ALL DRAWINGS STAMPED BY THE STATE. | | | | | | 2. SEE FBC TABLE 602 REGARDING FIRE RESISTANCE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND REVISE PLANS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE; BOTH | | | DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES AS WELL AS DISTANCE TO | | | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN PROPOSED SHED AND | | | EXISTING BUILDING. INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO | | | SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE SUCH AS BUILDING TYPE (FBC CHAPTER | | | 6), AREA, OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (FBC CHAPTER 3). |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-04-17 |
Time |
09:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-04-11 |
Time |
13:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-04-12 13:25:35 | SENT TO ZONING BOX. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-04-17 |
Time |
15:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-04-01 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-04-01 09:08:31 | TO ZONING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-22 |
Time |
13:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-22 13:45:02 | TO MD DESK | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-26 |
Time |
12:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-13 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-14 16:02:33 | SENT TO ZONING SHELF FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
15:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-01-14 |
Time |
15:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-01-14 15:06:35 | ZONING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-04-09 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-04-02 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2013-04-09 13:11:59 | FIVE FOOT MINIMUM SETBACKS DEPICTED ON THE PLAN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-02-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-22 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-22 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-22 14:39:33 | PLANNING AND ZONING: **** FAILED **** | | | | | | 1. BASED ON THE RESPONSE COMMENTS SUBMITTED; THE | | | PROPOSED REAR SETBACK REDUCTION REQUIRES A VARIANCE VIA | | | THE CITY'S ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. PLEASE CONTACT | | | STAFF TO SCHEDULE A PRE APPLICATION MEETING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME | | | AND/OR CONSULT THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ONLINE @WWW.MUNICODE.COM. | | | | | | MURRIAH DEKLE, MPA, PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-20 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-15 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-20 16:32:53 | PLANNING AND ZONING: **** FAILED **** REPEAT COMMENTS | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING AND SUBMIT AS | | | PART OF THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET. THE SUBMITTAL OF THE | | | REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1. THE PROPOSED LOCATION DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED | | | BUILDING SETBACKS AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 94-304 (B)(2) | | | PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. | | | 2. THE PROPOSED LOCATION APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE | | | REQURIED CAR PARKING AREA. PLEASE BE ADVISED; THE | | | PROPERTY MUST PROVIDE THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING | | | SPACES AS REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-486 OF THE CITY'S | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO PROVIDE CLARIFICATION | | | REGARDING: | | | A. THE INTENDED USE FOR THE BUILDING. | | | B. THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME | | | AND/OR CONSULT THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ONLINE @WWW.MUNICODE.COM. | | | | | | MURRIAH DEKLE, MPA, PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | TEL: (561) 822-1442 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-01-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-01-17 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-01-14 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2013-01-17 15:25:15 | PLANNING AND ZONING: **** FAILED **** | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING AND SUBMIT AS | | | PART OF THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET. THE SUBMITTAL OF THE | | | REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | 1. THE PROPOSED LOCATION DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED | | | BUILDING SETBACKS AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 94-304 (B)(2) | | | PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. | | | 2. THE PROPOSED LOCATION APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE | | | REQURIED CAR PARKING AREA. PLEASE BE ADVISED; THE | | | PROPERTY MUST PROVIDE THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING | | | SPACES AS REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-486 OF THE CITY'S | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO PROVIDE CLARIFICATION | | | REGARDING: | | | A. THE INTENDED USE FOR THE BUILDING. | | | B. THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME | | | AND/OR CONSULT THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ONLINE @WWW.MUNICODE.COM. | | | | | | MURRIAH DEKLE, MPA, PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | TEL: (561) 822-1442 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|