| Plan Review Stops For Permit 12070303 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2012-10-10 |
Time |
10:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2012-10-10 |
Time |
10:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-10-10 10:04:15 | PROVISO - SURVEYOR TO INCLUDE SOURCE OF | | | LATITUDE/LONGITUDE INFORMATION IN COMMENTS PER ELEVATIN | | | CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS, ITEM A5. REVISE ELEVATION | | | CERTIFICATE AND PROVIDE AT FORM BOARD INSPECTION | | | ("BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION") ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. | | | | | | IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED | | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RMCDOUGA |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
Time |
10:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-09-26 10:17:15 | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) SUBMIT 2 SETS OF CORRECTED ELEVATION CERTIFICATES | | | ARE REQUESTED IN PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | | | FROM SECOND REVIEW: 1) THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE | | | CONTAINS SEVERAL MISTAKES. THE BUILDING'S OWNER IS | | | INCORRECT ON THE FORM. THE PLAT NUMBER SHOULD BE 2, | | | INSTEAD OF 3. THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE ARE INCORRECT. | | | THE FLOOD ZONE IS A5. SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE | | | CORRECTED ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WITH THE SURVEYOR'S | | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE ON THEM AS REQUIRED BY FS 472.025. | | | | | | FROM FIRST REVIEW: 1) THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN AN A5 | | | FLOOD ZONE AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK IS MORE | | | THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE | | | ( PBC PROPERTY APPRAISER ). THE CITY'S FLOOD PLAIN | | | ORDINANCE REQUIRES THE STRUCTURE TO HAVE A MINIMUM | | | FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION OF 7.5 FEET B.F.E. SECTION | | | 94-546 OF THE CITY OF WPB MUNICIPAL CODE. SPECIFY THE | | | FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION ON THE PLANS AND PROVIDE AN | | | ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. | | | | | | 2) NOTE: THE PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY FOR IMPACT FEES BEFORE THE PERMIT IS | | | ISSUED. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-17 |
Time |
16:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-17 |
Time |
13:23 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2012-08-17 15:52:00 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE CONTAINS SEVERAL MISTAKES. | | | THE BUILDING'S OWNER IS INCORRECT ON THE FORM. THE PLAT | | | NUMBER SHOULD BE 2, INSTEAD OF 3. THE LATITUDE AND | | | LONGITUDE ARE INCORRECT. THE FLOOD ZONE IS A5. SUBMIT | | | TWO COPIES OF THE CORRECTED ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WITH | | | THE SURVEYOR'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE ON THEM AS REQUIRED | | | BY FS 472.025. | | | | | | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE | | | ARCH SERIES 2500 ALUMINUM SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS HAS BEEN | | | SUPERSEDED. THE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THIS | | | WINDOW IS NOA NO. 12-0118.18. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COPIES | | | OF THE CURRENT NOA THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED | | | BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. DCA RULE 9N-3 AND CITY | | | AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-24 |
Time |
08:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-18 |
Time |
11:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-23 10:58:24 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN AN A5 FLOOD ZONE AND THE | | | VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK IS MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF | | | THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE ( PBC PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER ). THE CITY'S FLOOD PLAIN ORDINANCE REQUIRES | | | THE STRUCTURE TO HAVE A MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION | | | OF 7.5 FEET B.F.E. SECTION 94-546 OF THE CITY OF WPB | | | MUNICIPAL CODE. SPECIFY THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION ON | | | THE PLANS AND PROVIDE AN ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. | | | | | | 2) THE SURVEY THAT WAS SUBMITTED INDICATES THE PROPERTY | | | LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE B. HOWEVER, THE A5 FLOOD ZONE | | | ALSO EXTENDS THROUGH THE PROPERTY. PLEASE CORRECT THE | | | SURVEY. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND FBC R322.1. | | | | | | 3) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE ON | | | THE FORMS (1100A-08) THAT ARE USED WITH THE 2007 FBC. | | | SUBMIT TWO SETS OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS ON FORM 405, | | | WHICH IS THE FORM USED WITH THE 2010 FBC. 2010 FBC | | | ENERGY CONSERVATION 401.2. | | | | | | 4) SPECIFY THE SEER FOR THE COOLING EQUIPMENT ON THE | | | MANUAL J CALCULATIONS. THE SEER ON THE CALCULATIONS IS | | | REQUIRED TO MATCH THE ONES ON THE MECHANICAL PLANS. FBC | | | 2010 FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 503.2.3 | | | | | | 5) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ARCH WINDOWS SERIES | | | 2500 ALUMINUM SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED. | | | SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | | REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. | | | | | | 6) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE | | | AMARR GARAGE DOOR ( FL 5302.5 ) IS FOR THE 2007 FBC AND | | | ASCE 7-98. SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF GARAGE DOOR PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS FOR THE 2010 FBC AND ASCE 7-10. DCA RULE 9N-3 | | | | | | 7) THE TRUSS DRAWINGS AND LAYOUT PLAN THAT WERE | | | SUBMITTED ARE DESIGNED USING ASCE 7-05 WITH 140 MPH | | | WIND SPEED. THE PROJECT IS UNDER THE 2010 FBC WHICH | | | REFERENCES ASCE 7-10 AND THE WIND SPEED IS 170 MPH, | | | EXPOSURE C FOR THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVISE. THE TRUSS | | | DRAWINGS AND LAYOUT FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES CAN BE | | | GIVEN TO THE FIELD INSPECTOR TO BRING IN AT THE TIME OF | | | THE ROOF FRAMING INSPECTION RATHER THAN BEING SUBMITTED | | | AT PLAN REVIEW FOR PERMIT. THE PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE TRUSS ENGINEER AND REVIEWED | | | AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT. | | | CITY AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-10-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
MGONZALE |
Date |
2012-10-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2012-10-04 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2012-10-04 16:19:32 | PASSED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2012-08-28 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2012-08-21 |
Time |
17:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-08-28 12:02:41 | NEED TO RESPOND TO PLANNING'S COMMENTS | | 2012-08-21 17:23:55 | NEW DRIVEWAY AND APRON, ENGINEERING NEEDS TO REVIEW. | | | LMF |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-20 15:44:52 | SEPARATE APPLICATION, DRAWINGS AND REVIEW IS REQUIRED | | | FOR THE GAS PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-10-15 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-10-15 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-10-15 11:24:19 | COUNTY #MU-2012-18873. | | 2012-10-15 09:04:51 | INCOMING FROM IMPACT FEES TO MD, DESK. JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-10-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-10-04 |
Time |
15:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-10-04 15:40:02 | SUBMITTED, ENGINEERING, ZONING AND LANDSCAPE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-09-05 |
Time |
10:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-28 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2012-08-14 |
Time |
14:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-08-14 14:12:14 | INCOMING SENT TO R MCDOUGALS'S DESK. JW |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-17 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-08 |
Time |
11:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-08-08 11:51:15 | TO RM DESK | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2012-08-03 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-07-11 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-10-15 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-10-15 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-10-15 11:21:28 | PER LUIS MARTINEZ |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
Time |
09:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
Time |
09:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-09-26 09:11:36 | IMPACT FEE REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-17 |
Time |
16:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-17 |
Time |
16:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
15:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
15:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-20 15:46:12 | AN IMPACT FEE PLAN REVIEW IS REQUIRED BY PALM PEACH | | | COUNTY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RMCDOUGA |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
Time |
08:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-26 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-17 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-16 |
Time |
15:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-08-17 13:23:49 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY MECHANICAL | | | | | | 1) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE | | | CLAIMING THE CEILING FAN AND WHOLE HOUSE FAN CREDIT | | | OPTIONS. THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDED | | | TO CLAIM THESE CREDITS. PLEASE SHOW HOW THE | | | REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET OR REVISE THE ENERGY CALCS. | | | FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION 405.6 | | | | | | 2) ON SHEET M.1, THE DUCT SUPPLYING AIR TO THE 10 X 10 | | | GRILL IN THE GREAT ROOM IS NOT SHOWN. SPECIFY THE SIZE | | | AND LOCATION OF THE DUCT THAT IS SUPPLYING AIR TO THIS | | | GRILL. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND FBCR M1601.1 | | | (PREVIOUS COMMENT THAT WAS NOT ADDRESSED) | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-20 14:38:37 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY MECHANICAL | | | | | | 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF 2010 ENERGY CALCULATIONS ON | | | FORM 405. THE ONES THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE ON THE 2007 | | | FBC FORM 1100A-08. FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION | | | 405.4.2 | | | | | | 2) SPECIFY THE HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT THAT WILL | | | BE INSTALLED ON THE MANUAL J CALCULATIONS AND SPECIFY | | | THE SEER OF THE COOLING EQUIPMENT. FBC ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION SECTION 403.6 | | | | | | 3) ON SHEET M.1, THE DUCT SUPPLYING AIR TO THE 10 X 10 | | | GRILL IN THE GREAT ROOM IS NOT SHOWN. SPECIFY THE SIZE | | | AND LOCATION OF THE DUCT THAT IS SUPPLYING AIR TO THIS | | | GRILL. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND FBCR M1601.1 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
15:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2012-10-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-10-05 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-10-05 15:27:49 | CONTACTING APPLICANT - REQUIRES SEPERATE LANDSCAPE | | | PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
L FRANCO |
Date |
2012-09-20 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-09-20 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-09-20 10:02:57 | APPLICANT DID NOT ADDRESS PREVIOUS COMMENTS BY ZONING. | | | PLEASE REFER TO LINDA MIA FRANCO'S ZONING COMMENTS MADE | | | ON 8/23/12. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-08-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2012-08-23 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2012-08-23 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
ENG |
|
| Notes |
| 2012-08-23 09:13:12 | | | | PLANNING: ***** FAILED, STAFF SPOKE TO THE CONTRACTOR | | | BLAS CONTRERAS, AND EXPLAINED THE COMMENTS BELOW THAT | | | WERE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE 2ND SUBMITTAL, ALSO THE | | | REDUCTION OF THE DRIVEWAY AND EXISTING APRON ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY, REQUIRES A ENGINEERING REVIEW AND ROW | | | PERMIT APPROVAL. **** | | | | | | 1. RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. WAS THE DRIVEWAY | | | ALREADY DONE? | | | | | | 2. SEC. 94-482. - PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN | | | THREE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS. | | | | | | (A) LOCATION AND SURFACE. REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING | | | SPACES FOR LESS THAN THREE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE UNITS | | | ARE LOCATED. REQUIRED PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN A FRONT | | | YARD; HOWEVER, THE LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR 75 | | | PERCENT OF THE FRONT YARD AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH | | | LIVING PLANT MATERIAL (SUCH AS GRASS, GROUND COVER, | | | SHRUBS, HEDGES, VINES OR TREES). | | | NOTWITHSTANDING THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPH, LOCATIONS | | | WHERE OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES, DRIVEWAYS, PATIOS | | | AND/OR WALKWAYS IN THE FRONT YARD EXCLUSIVELY CONSIST | | | OF A PERMEABLE PAVER SYSTEM, 60 PERCENT OF THE FRONT | | | YARD AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH LIVING PLANT | | | MATERIAL (SUCH AS GRASS, GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, HEDGES, | | | VINES OR TREES). | | | | | | THE FRONT YARD CALCULATIONS ARE THE FIRST 25 FEET OF | | | LOT DEPTH FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY X THE WIDTH OF THE | | | PROPERTY (SURVEY SHOWS 65.27 FEET) X 75% = 1,223.81 | | | SQ.FT. THEREFORE, YOUR MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 1,000 | | | SQ. FT. SHOW DATA ON PLAN. | | | | | | 3. CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-482(D)(5), | | | | | | SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINES; REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT. | | | | | | (1) NEW OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES AND DRIVEWAYS WITHIN | | | A FRONT YARD OR A CORNER SIDE YARD SHALL BE SET BACK A | | | MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET FROM A FRONT AND/OR CORNER SIDE | | | PROPERTY LINE AND THREE FEET FROM A SIDE OR REAR | | | PROPERTY LINE, EXCEPT FOR THAT PORTION OF THE DRIVEWAY | | | ADJOINING THE APRON. | | | | | | (2) EXPANSIONS TO EXISTING OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES | | | AND DRIVEWAYS WITHIN A FRONT YARD OR A CORNER SIDE YARD | | | SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET FROM A FRONT | | | AND/OR CORNER SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND THREE FEET FROM A | | | SIDE OR REAR PROPERTY LINE, EXCEPT FOR THAT PORTION OF | | | THE DRIVEWAY ADJOINING THE APRON. | | | | | | (3) EXISTING OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES AND DRIVEWAYS | | | WHICH ARE NOT SET BACK A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET FROM A | | | FRONT OR CORNER SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND THREE FEET FROM | | | A SIDE OR REAR PROPERTY LINE MAY BE REPAIRED AS PART OF | | | NORMAL MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | (4) EXISTING OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES AND DRIVEWAYS | | | WHICH ARE NOT SET BACK A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET FROM A | | | FRONT AND/OR CORNER SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND THREE FEET | | | FROM A SIDE OR REAR PROPERTY LINE MAY BE REPLACED IN | | | THE EXACT LOCATION OR WITH A GREATER SETBACK THAN | | | CURRENTLY EXISTS. | | | | | | (5) FOR CIRCULAR DRIVEWAYS THE INTERIOR ARC MAY BE AN | | | IRREGULAR SHAPE, BUT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF | | | FIVE FEET, AS DEPICTED IN FIGURE XV-1. THE INTERIOR ARC | | | SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH LIVING PLANT MATERIAL. | | | | | | THE PROPOSED CIRCULAR DRIVE CONFIGURATION DOES NOT MEET | | | REGULATIONS. THE MAXIMUM DRIVE WIDTH IS 10 FEET ON EACH | | | INGRESS/EGRESS AREA ON EACH SIDE AND THE SIDE SETBACK | | | IS 3 FEET. REFER TO FIGURE XV-1. | | | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL: THE REDUCTION OF THE DRIVEWAY AND | | | EXISTING APRON ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, REQUIRES A | | | ENGINEERING REVIEW AND ROW PERMIT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF NEW ADDITION ON SURVEY. THE | | | DIMENSION ON SHEET S.P ON THE WEST PROPERTY LINE SHOW | | | 113.3 INCHES VS. SURVEY 112.37 FEET AND NO DIMENSION IS | | | SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN FOR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. | | | REVISE PLANS/SURVEY TO MATCH. | | | | | | 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR): AS THE VALUE OF | | | THE PROPOSED WORK EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE | | | (LISTED AS "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH THE P.B.C. PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF | | | THE ZLDR. | | | INCLUDE INFORMATION SUCH AS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENT | | | IN THE LANDSCAPE TABULATION, PURSUANT TO SECTION | | | 94-442(2)A: AT LEAST ONE SHADE, FLOWERING OR FRUIT TREE | | | SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 1,200 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN | | | SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF | | | THE ZLDR. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING DIVISION | | | TEL: (561) 822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2012-07-30 |
Time |
18:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2012-07-27 |
Time |
17:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-27 17:04:44 | PLANNING: ***** FAILED **** | | | | | | 1. RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. WAS THE DRIVEWAY | | | ALREADY DONE? | | | | | | 2. SEC. 94-482. - PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN | | | THREE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS. | | | | | | (A) LOCATION AND SURFACE. REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING | | | SPACES FOR LESS THAN THREE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE UNITS | | | ARE LOCATED. REQUIRED PARKING MAY BE LOCATED IN A FRONT | | | YARD; HOWEVER, THE LESSER OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR 75 | | | PERCENT OF THE FRONT YARD AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH | | | LIVING PLANT MATERIAL (SUCH AS GRASS, GROUND COVER, | | | SHRUBS, HEDGES, VINES OR TREES). | | | NOTWITHSTANDING THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPH, LOCATIONS | | | WHERE OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES, DRIVEWAYS, PATIOS | | | AND/OR WALKWAYS IN THE FRONT YARD EXCLUSIVELY CONSIST | | | OF A PERMEABLE PAVER SYSTEM, 60 PERCENT OF THE FRONT | | | YARD AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH LIVING PLANT | | | MATERIAL (SUCH AS GRASS, GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, HEDGES, | | | VINES OR TREES). | | | | | | THE FRONT YARD CALCULATIONS ARE THE FIRST 25 FEET OF | | | LOT DEPTH FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY X THE WIDTH OF THE | | | PROPERTY (SURVEY SHOWS 65.27 FEET) X 75% = 1,223.81 | | | SQ.FT. THEREFORE, YOUR MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 1,000 | | | SQ. FT. SHOW DATA ON PLAN. | | | | | | 3. CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-482(D)(5), | | | | | | SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINES; REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT. | | | | | | (1) NEW OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES AND DRIVEWAYS WITHIN | | | A FRONT YARD OR A CORNER SIDE YARD SHALL BE SET BACK A | | | MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET FROM A FRONT AND/OR CORNER SIDE | | | PROPERTY LINE AND THREE FEET FROM A SIDE OR REAR | | | PROPERTY LINE, EXCEPT FOR THAT PORTION OF THE DRIVEWAY | | | ADJOINING THE APRON. | | | | | | (2) EXPANSIONS TO EXISTING OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES | | | AND DRIVEWAYS WITHIN A FRONT YARD OR A CORNER SIDE YARD | | | SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET FROM A FRONT | | | AND/OR CORNER SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND THREE FEET FROM A | | | SIDE OR REAR PROPERTY LINE, EXCEPT FOR THAT PORTION OF | | | THE DRIVEWAY ADJOINING THE APRON. | | | | | | (3) EXISTING OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES AND DRIVEWAYS | | | WHICH ARE NOT SET BACK A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET FROM A | | | FRONT OR CORNER SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND THREE FEET FROM | | | A SIDE OR REAR PROPERTY LINE MAY BE REPAIRED AS PART OF | | | NORMAL MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | (4) EXISTING OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES AND DRIVEWAYS | | | WHICH ARE NOT SET BACK A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET FROM A | | | FRONT AND/OR CORNER SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND THREE FEET | | | FROM A SIDE OR REAR PROPERTY LINE MAY BE REPLACED IN | | | THE EXACT LOCATION OR WITH A GREATER SETBACK THAN | | | CURRENTLY EXISTS. | | | | | | (5) FOR CIRCULAR DRIVEWAYS THE INTERIOR ARC MAY BE AN | | | IRREGULAR SHAPE, BUT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF | | | FIVE FEET, AS DEPICTED IN FIGURE XV-1. THE INTERIOR ARC | | | SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH LIVING PLANT MATERIAL. | | | | | | THE PROPOSED CIRCULAR DRIVE CONFIGURATION DOES NOT MEET | | | REGULATIONS. THE MAXIMUM DRIVE WIDTH IS 10 FEET ON EACH | | | INGRESS/EGRESS AREA ON EACH SIDE AND THE SIDE SETBACK | | | IS 3 FEET. REFER TO FIGURE XV-1. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF NEW ADDITION ON SURVEY. THE | | | DIMENSION ON SHEET S.P ON THE WEST PROPERTY LINE SHOW | | | 113.3 INCHES VS. SURVEY 112.37 FEET AND NO DIMENSION IS | | | SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN FOR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. | | | REVISE PLANS/SURVEY TO MATCH. | | | | | | 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR): AS THE VALUE OF | | | THE PROPOSED WORK EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE | | | (LISTED AS "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH THE P.B.C. PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF | | | THE ZLDR. | | | INCLUDE INFORMATION SUCH AS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENT | | | IN THE LANDSCAPE TABULATION, PURSUANT TO SECTION | | | 94-442(2)A: AT LEAST ONE SHADE, FLOWERING OR FRUIT TREE | | | SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 1,200 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN | | | SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF | | | THE ZLDR. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING DIVISION | | | TEL: (561) 822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
