|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 12040143
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 12040143 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2012-06-11 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2012-06-11 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-06-11 11:54:21 | PROVISO | | | | | | ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: | | | | | | PLEASE INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA TO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | WITH FBC1609, WIND LOADS. CRITERIA SHOULD INCLUDE: | | | | | | V(ULT) WIND SPEED | | | EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION | | | RISK CATEGORY | | | | | | RISK CATEGORY II, WIND SPEED 160MPH DOES NOT COMPLY | | | WITH THE MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THIS LOCATION: | | | | | | BASED ON LOCATION INFORMATION, THE FOLLOWING IS THE | | | MINIMUM CRITERIA REQUIRED: | | | | | | RISK CATEGORY 1 -154MPH | | | RISK CATEGORY II - 168 REQUIRED. | | | | | | REVISE PLAN PRIOR TO FIRST INSPECTION TO INCLUDE CODE | | | COMPLIANT WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-05-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2012-05-03 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2012-05-03 |
Time |
16:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-05-03 16:33:09 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A VERIFIABLE CONTRACT SIGNED BY OWNER. | | | PERMIT VALUE IS TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND | | | ENGINEERING, FBC 108.3. | | | | | | 2. CODE HAS CHANGED TO FBC2010 EFFECTIVE MARCH 15. | | | PLEASE REVISE AND ELIMINATE REFERENCES TO FBC 2007. | | | | | | 3. WIND DESIGN CRITERIA STATES: "IN COMPLIANCE W/FBC | | | 2010 HIGH VELOCITY . . . DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE FBC 2007 160MPH WIND LOAD REQ;UIREMENTS . . . WIND | | | IMPORTANCE FACTOR 1.0 . . . MEETS WIND LOAD | | | REQUIREMENTS ASCE7-10 160MPH EXPOSURE C . . . " | | | | | | THIS STATEMENT IS CONFLICTING. PALM BEACH COUNTY IS NOT | | | LOCATED IN THE HVHZ. FBC2007 160 IMPORTANCE FACTOR 1 IS | | | NOT THE SAME AS ASCE7-10 160MPH EXPOSURE C. ASCE7-10 | | | 160MPH DOES NOT HAVE AN IMPORTANCE FACTOR OF 1 (NOW | | | CALLED RISK CATEGORY). | | | | | | PLEASE INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA TO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | WITH FBC1609, WIND LOADS. CRITERIA SHOULD INCLUDE: | | | | | | V(ULT) WIND SPEED | | | EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION | | | RISK CATEGORY | | | | | | ANY OTHER UNNECESSARY INFORMATION SHOULD BE REMOVED AS | | | IT IS CONFUSING. IF ENGINEER ELECTS TO KEEP IT ON THE | | | PLAN, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH OTHER | | | INFORMATION AND COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-06-12 |
Time |
11:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-06-12 |
Time |
11:56 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-04-30 |
Time |
10:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-04-30 |
Time |
10:09 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2012-04-30 10:14:30 | MISC 3 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2012-07-06 |
Time |
11:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2012-06-11 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-06-11 11:54:43 | 6/11 TO ELECTRICAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-05-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2012-05-03 |
Time |
16:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2012-04-05 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-04-05 15:56:45 | IN ZONING BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2012-07-03 |
Time |
17:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2012-06-15 |
Time |
09:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-03 17:46:02 | | | | | | | TO LINDA AS PROJECT MANAGER | | | GIVEN TO ES | | 2012-06-15 09:47:29 | GIVEN TO LF |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2012-04-27 |
Time |
18:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2012-04-09 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-05 17:43:13 | PLANNING: **** FAILED **** | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. RESPOND TO COMMENT IN WRITING. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNS. THIS IS GENERAL | | | COMMERCIAL ZONING, THE MAXIMUM TOTAL AMOUNT OF SIGNS IS | | | A TOTAL OF THREE (3). PROVIDE ALL EXISTING SIGNS, | | | INCLUDING THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE. SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | FACADE AND CALCULATE ALLOWABLE VS PROVIDED SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF SIGN. REFER TO THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, SECTIONS 94-408 (D), AND | | | 94-409. | | | | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING DIVISION | | | TEL: (561) 822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | TO LINDA AS PROJECT MANAGER | | | GIVEN TO ES | | | GIVEN TO LF | | 2012-04-13 13:28:53 | TO LINDA AS PROJECT MANAGER | | 2012-04-09 16:03:14 | GIVEN TO ES |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
