| Plan Review Stops For Permit 12010283 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-06-20 |
Time |
08:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-06-18 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
08:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
08:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-01 08:56:36 | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS | | | CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | I AM IN RECEIPT OF THE LETTER FROM GABRIEL GOSLINE AND | | | THE RESPONSES FROM JOHN AVERKAMP. I AGREE THAT THE | | | GARAGE CAN BE CONVERTED INTO AN APARTMENT AS LONG AS IT | | | MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING CODE. THE GARAGE | | | WAS APPARENTLY CONVERTED INTO AN APARTMENT WITHOUT THE | | | PROPER PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS SOMETIME IN THE PAST. | | | SINCE THE CONVERSION WAS DONE WITHOUT THE PROPER | | | PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS, THERE ARE TWO OPTIONS. IT CAN | | | BE CONVERTED BACK TO A GARAGE OR IT CAN BE PERMITTED AS | | | A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY FROM A GARAGE TO AN APARTMENT. | | | THE DETACHED GARAGE IS A GROUP U OCCUPANCY AND THE | | | APARTMENT IS A GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCY. IF YOU WISH TO HAVE | | | THE APARTMENT, THEN THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WILL NEED TO | | | BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 1) THIS STRUCTURE WAS ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED AS A | | | GARAGE. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THIS STRUCTURE WAS | | | LEGALLY CONVERTED TO AN APARTMENT AS INDICATED ON THE | | | PLANS. UNLESS YOU CAN PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE CHANGE | | | FROM GARAGE TO APARTMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED, | | | INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, THIS | | | WILL BE CONSIDERED A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY FROM AN | | | EXISTING GARAGE TO A RESIDENCE. FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | SECTION 406. | | | | | | 2) FBC EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 907.2 WIND LOADS, | | | REQUIRES STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY | | | WHERE SUCH CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF OCCUPANCY RESULTS IN | | | HIGHER WIND IMPORTANCE FACTORS BASED ON THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING TABLE 1604.5, SHALL BE ANALYZED | | | AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE WIND LOAD | | | PROVISIONS OF THE FBC. PROVIDE TWO SETS OF A SIGNED AND | | | SEALED WIND LOAD ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 3) COMPLIED. | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION | | | OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE DISTANCE TO PROPERTY | | | LINES AND OTHER STRUCTURES LOCATED ON THE SAME PARCEL. | | | FBC R302 | | | | | | 5) THE PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE TAKEN TO PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY FOR AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | | REVIEW COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-10-05 |
Time |
15:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-10-05 |
Time |
13:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-10-05 15:59:45 | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS | | | CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | I AM IN RECEIPT OF THE LETTER FROM GABRIEL GOSLINE AND | | | THE RESPONSES FROM JOHN AVERKAMP. I AGREE THAT THE | | | GARAGE CAN BE CONVERTED INTO AN APARTMENT AS LONG AS IT | | | MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING CODE. THE GARAGE | | | WAS APPARENTLY CONVERTED INTO AN APARTMENT WITHOUT THE | | | PROPER PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS SOMETIME IN THE PAST. | | | SINCE THE CONVERSION WAS DONE WITHOUT THE PROPER | | | PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS, THERE ARE TWO OPTIONS. IT CAN | | | BE CONVERTED BACK TO A GARAGE OR IT CAN BE PERMITTED AS | | | A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY FROM A GARAGE TO AN APARTMENT. | | | THE DETACHED GARAGE IS A GROUP U OCCUPANCY AND THE | | | APARTMENT IS A GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCY. IF YOU WISH TO HAVE | | | THE APARTMENT, THEN THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WILL NEED TO | | | BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 1) THIS STRUCTURE WAS ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED AS A | | | GARAGE. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THIS STRUCTURE WAS | | | LEGALLY CONVERTED TO AN APARTMENT AS INDICATED ON THE | | | PLANS. UNLESS YOU CAN PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE CHANGE | | | FROM GARAGE TO APARTMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED, | | | INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, THIS | | | WILL BE CONSIDERED A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY FROM AN | | | EXISTING GARAGE TO A RESIDENCE. FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | SECTION 406. | | | | | | 2) FBC EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 907.2 WIND LOADS, | | | REQUIRES STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY | | | WHERE SUCH CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF OCCUPANCY RESULTS IN | | | HIGHER WIND IMPORTANCE FACTORS BASED ON THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING TABLE 1604.5, SHALL BE ANALYZED | | | AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE WIND LOAD | | | PROVISIONS OF THE FBC. PROVIDE TWO SETS OF A SIGNED AND | | | SEALED WIND LOAD ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 3) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED | | | BY THE 2007 FBC ENERGY GLITCH AMENDMENTS SECTION | | | N1100.0.7 FOR THE PROPOSED APARTMENT. | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION | | | OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE DISTANCE TO PROPERTY | | | LINES AND OTHER STRUCTURES LOCATED ON THE SAME PARCEL. | | | FBC R302 | | | | | | 5) THE PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE TAKEN TO PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY FOR AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | | REVIEW COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-04-30 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-04-30 |
Time |
16:15 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
| Notes |
| 2012-04-30 15:44:56 | COMMENTS FROM FIRST TWO REVIEWS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. PLEASE RESPOND TO COMMENTS. | | | | | | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS | | | CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON THE APPLICATION IS TO | | | RENEW EXTERIOR ONLY AND LISTS THE VALUE OF THE WORK AS | | | $2000.00. THE PLANS THAT WERE SUBMITTED SHOW A COMPLETE | | | REMODEL WITH A BATHROOM AND KITCHEN. THE PERMIT VALUE | | | FOR THE AMOUNT OF WORK SHOWN ON THE PLANS IS MUCH MORE | | | THAN $2000.00. CITY AMENDMENTS 108.3. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 2) THIS STRUCTURE WAS ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED AS A | | | GARAGE. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THIS STRUCTURE WAS | | | LEGALLY CONVERTED TO AN APARTMENT AS INDICATED ON THE | | | PLANS. UNLESS YOU CAN PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE CHANGE | | | FROM GARAGE TO APARTMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED, | | | INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, THIS | | | WILL BE CONSIDERED A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY FROM AN | | | EXISTING GARAGE TO A RESIDENCE. FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | SECTION 406. | | | | | | 3) CITY AMENDMENTS 108.3 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, | | | VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL | | | REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRIC, | | | PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, ARCHITECTURAL | | | AND DESIGN FEES, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT. PLEASE ADJUST | | | VALUE TO REFLECT SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 4) FBC EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 907.2 WIND LOADS, | | | REQUIRES STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY | | | WHERE SUCH CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF OCCUPANCY RESULTS IN | | | HIGHER WIND IMPORTANCE FACTORS BASED ON THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING TABLE 1604.5, SHALL BE ANALYZED | | | AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE WIND LOAD | | | PROVISIONS OF THE FBC. PROVIDE TWO SETS OF A SIGNED AND | | | SEALED WIND LOAD ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 5) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED | | | BY THE 2007 FBC ENERGY GLITCH AMENDMENTS SECTION | | | N1100.0.7 FOR THE PROPOSED APARTMENT. | | | | | | 6) THE NEW BATHROOM IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A DOOR THAT HAS | | | A 29 INCH CLEAR OPENING PER FBC 11-4.22.2. | | | | | | 7) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION | | | OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE DISTANCE TO PROPERTY | | | LINES AND OTHER STRUCTURES LOCATED ON THE SAME PARCEL. | | | FBC R302 | | | | | | 8) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R303.3 FOR REQUIRED | | | BATHROOM MECHANICAL VENTILATION. | | | | | | 9) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R303.8 FOR REQUIRED HEATING | | | FACILITIES. | | | | | | 10) FBC R703.6.3 WHICH REQUIRES A BOND BREAK BETWEEN | | | THE WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER AND THE STUCCO ON THE | | | EXTERIOR WALLS. | | | | | | 11) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A KEY PLAN AND INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE FOR THE STORM PANELS. FBC R301.2.1.2 | | | | | | 12) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR NEW | | | EXTERIOR FRENCH DOORS, STORM PANELS, TRUSS ANCHORS, | | | STRAPS AND CONNECTORS AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. | | | (THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE | | | FRENCH DOORS AND SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS DO NOT HAVE | | | COMPLETE DRAWINGS. PLEASE SHRINK THE DRAWINGS TO FIT ON | | | THE 8.5" X 11" PAPER.) | | | | | | 13) PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PER CITY AMENDMENTS | | | 106.3.3. | | | | | | 14) PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW | | | EACH REVIEW COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-03-29 11:14:00 | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW WERE NOT | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-02-08 |
Time |
10:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-02-08 |
Time |
06:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-02-08 08:11:30 | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS | | | CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON THE APPLICATION IS TO | | | RENEW EXTERIOR ONLY AND LISTS THE VALUE OF THE WORK AS | | | $2000.00. THE PLANS THAT WERE SUBMITTED SHOW A COMPLETE | | | REMODEL WITH A BATHROOM AND KITCHEN. THE PERMIT VALUE | | | FOR THE AMOUNT OF WORK SHOWN ON THE PLANS IS MUCH MORE | | | THAN $2000.00. CITY AMENDMENTS 108.3. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 2) THIS STRUCTURE WAS ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED AS A | | | GARAGE. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THIS STRUCTURE WAS | | | LEGALLY CONVERTED TO AN APARTMENT AS INDICATED ON THE | | | PLANS. UNLESS YOU CAN PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE CHANGE | | | FROM GARAGE TO APARTMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED, | | | INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, THIS | | | WILL BE CONSIDERED A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY FROM AN | | | EXISTING GARAGE TO A RESIDENCE. FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | SECTION 406. | | | | | | 3) CITY AMENDMENTS 108.3 FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, | | | VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL | | | REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRIC, | | | PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, ARCHITECTURAL | | | AND DESIGN FEES, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT. PLEASE ADJUST | | | VALUE TO REFLECT SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | | | 4) FBC EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 907.2 WIND LOADS, | | | REQUIRES STRUCTURES SUBJECT TO A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY | | | WHERE SUCH CHANGE IN THE NATURE OF OCCUPANCY RESULTS IN | | | HIGHER WIND IMPORTANCE FACTORS BASED ON THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING TABLE 1604.5, SHALL BE ANALYZED | | | AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE WIND LOAD | | | PROVISIONS OF THE FBC. PROVIDE TWO SETS OF A SIGNED AND | | | SEALED WIND LOAD ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 5) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED | | | BY THE 2007 FBC ENERGY GLITCH AMENDMENTS SECTION | | | N1100.0.7 FOR THE PROPOSED APARTMENT. | | | | | | 6) THE NEW BATHROOM IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A DOOR THAT HAS | | | A 29 INCH CLEAR OPENING PER FBC 11-4.22.2. | | | | | | 7) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY SHOWING THE LOCATION | | | OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND THE DISTANCE TO PROPERTY | | | LINES AND OTHER STRUCTURES LOCATED ON THE SAME PARCEL. | | | FBC R302 | | | | | | 8) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R303.3 FOR REQUIRED | | | BATHROOM MECHANICAL VENTILATION. | | | | | | 9) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R303.8 FOR REQUIRED HEATING | | | FACILITIES. | | | | | | 10) FBC R703.6.3 WHICH REQUIRES A BOND BREAK BETWEEN | | | THE WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER AND THE STUCCO ON THE | | | EXTERIOR WALLS. | | | | | | 11) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A KEY PLAN AND INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE FOR THE STORM PANELS. FBC R301.2.1.2 | | | | | | 12) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR NEW | | | EXTERIOR FRENCH DOORS, STORM PANELS, TRUSS ANCHORS, | | | STRAPS AND CONNECTORS AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. | | | | | | 13) PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PER CITY AMENDMENTS | | | 106.3.3. | | | | | | 14) PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW | | | EACH REVIEW COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-06-18 |
Time |
16:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-06-18 |
Time |
16:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-03-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-03-27 |
Time |
14:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-03-27 |
Time |
14:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-01-30 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-01-30 |
Time |
15:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-01-30 16:01:16 | 12010283 | | | 1805 FLORIDA AVE | | | INTERIOR RENOVATION OF BACK COTTAGE | | | | | | INDICATE LOCATION OF THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND MAIN | | | DISCONNECT. NEC 215.5 | | | REMODELING OF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED TO | | | INCLUDE INTERCONNECTED SMOKE DETECTORS IF THEY DO NOT | | | ALREADY EXIST WITHIN THE RESIDENCE. IF THE RESIDENCE | | | HAS GAS APPLIANCES, AN ATTACHED GARAGE OR A FIRE PLACE | | | A CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED WITHIN TEN FEET | | | OF EACH ROOM USED FOR SLEEPING. FBC R313 | | | INDICATE THAT ALL NEW RECEPTACLES WILL BE TAMPER | | | RESISTANT. NEC 406.11 | | | ALL NEW GENERAL PURPOSE BRANCH CIRCUITS MUST BE | | | PROTECTED WITH ARC FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTERS. NEC | | | 210.12 | | | AN INTERSYSTEM BONDING STRIP IS REQUIRED AT THE MAIN | | | SERVICE GROUND NEC 250.94 | | | ADD RECEPTACLES SO THAT NO WALL SPACE IS MORE THAN 6 | | | FEET FROM A RECEPTACLE AND ALL WALL SPACES MORE THAN 2 | | | FEET IN WIDTH HAVE A RECEPTACLE I.E. KITCHEN. NEC | | | 210.52 | | | AT LEAST ONE GFCI PROTECTED RECEPTACLE IS REQUIRED | | | OUTSIDE FRONT AND BACK. NEC 210.52 | | | | | | | | | ROBERT LECKY | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6718 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2013-06-19 |
Time |
14:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2013-06-19 |
Time |
14:42 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2013-06-19 14:43:12 | APPROVED WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE WINDOW ON SOUTH | | | ELEVATION TO BE CHANGED TO A VERTICAL ORIENTATION. FM | | | LEFT MESSAGE WITH PROPERTY OWNER 6-19-13. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2012-01-26 |
Time |
14:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2012-01-26 |
Time |
14:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-07-09 |
Time |
15:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-06-07 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-06-10 10:58:59 | SENT TO R MCDOUGAL |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-01-28 |
Time |
08:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-17 |
Time |
15:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-09-17 15:47:47 | SENT TO MCDOUGAL'S DESK FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-05-09 |
Time |
09:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-04-20 |
Time |
16:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
Time |
11:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-03-16 |
Time |
09:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-03-19 09:03:27 | IN ZONING BOX, WITH #12010282 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-02-08 |
Time |
10:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-01-17 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-01-17 11:01:04 | THIS APPLICATION IS RIDING WITH #12010282 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-07-09 |
Time |
15:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-07-09 |
Time |
15:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
Time |
11:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
Time |
11:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-03-29 11:15:09 | AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED BY PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-02-07 |
Time |
16:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-02-07 |
Time |
16:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-02-07 16:49:04 | AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED BY PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
09:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-01 09:48:39 | PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR A WINDOW UNIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-02-07 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-02-07 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-02-07 16:47:34 | NO MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED AND NO MECHANICAL PERMIT | | | APPLIED FOR. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-06-18 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-06-18 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-10-05 |
Time |
13:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-10-05 |
Time |
13:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-10-05 13:29:33 | PLANS HAVE BEEN REDLINED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR | | | P3108.2.1. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-04-30 |
Time |
16:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-04-30 |
Time |
16:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-04-30 16:14:43 | THE COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST TWO REVIEWS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. SEE BELOW. | | | | | | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS | | | | | | DENIED BY PLUMBING | | | | | | 1) THE BATH ROOM FIXTURES ARE NOT PROPERLY VENTED. PER | | | FBCR P3108.2.1, NOT MORE THAN ONE WET-VENTED FIXTURE | | | DRAIN SHALL DISCHARGE UPSTREAM OF THE DRY-VENTED | | | FIXTURE DRAIN CONNECTION. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
Time |
11:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-03-29 |
Time |
11:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-03-29 11:05:17 | PLUMBING DENIED | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW WERE NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-02-07 |
Time |
16:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-02-07 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-02-07 16:32:24 | 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS | | | | | | DENIED BY PLUMBING | | | | | | 1) THE BATH ROOM FIXTURES ARE NOT PROPERLY VENTED. PER | | | FBC R3108.2, NOT MORE THAN ONE WET-VENTED FIXTURE DRAIN | | | SHALL DISCHARGE UPSTREAM OF THE DRY-VENTED FIXTURE | | | DRAIN CONNECTION. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2013-06-19 |
Time |
14:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2013-06-19 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-06-19 14:44:58 | UNIT APPROVED IN COTTAGE BECAUSE OF CONVERSION OF | | | DUPLEX IN FRONT BUILDING TO SINGLE FAMILY. SAME DENSITY | | | ON SITE. PER DOUG WISE/ANGELLA VANN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2012-05-07 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2012-05-07 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2012-03-23 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2012-03-23 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2012-01-26 |
Time |
14:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2012-01-26 |
Time |
14:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-01-26 14:52:40 | SUBMITTAL REQUIRES SURVEY. |
|
|