Plan Review Details - Permit 11120505
Plan Review Stops For Permit 11120505
Review Stop AD ADDRESSING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2011-12-20 Cont ID  
Sent By jnguyen Date 2011-12-20 Time 16:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jnguyen Date 2011-12-20 Time 15:37 Sent To  
Notes
2011-12-20 16:26:37THIS PERMIT HAD MULTIPLE LOCATIONS, SO THEREFORE I
 REFERENCED IT TO THE VERY FIRST APPROXIMATE LOCATION AT
 775 @ N AUSTRALIAN AVE (UNOFFICIAL ADDRESS NOT USED FOR
 MAILING PURPOSES).
  
 JOHN NGUYEN
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
 OFFICE: (561) 822-1239
 FAX: (561) 822-1249
 [email protected]
2011-12-20 12:02:19NEED ADDRESS FROM JOHN BECAUSE OF VARIOUS LOCATIONS
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2011-12-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2011-12-29 Time 14:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2011-12-29 Time 14:57 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2012-02-22 Cont ID  
Sent By mgonzale Date 2012-02-22 Time   Rev Time 1.00
Received By mgonzale Date 2012-02-22 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-02-22 13:20:08PASSED WITH PROVISOS:
  
 #1 CALL 811 BEFORE DIGG TO IDENTIFY ANY BURRIED PUBLIC
 UTILITIES AT VARIOUS SITES.
  
 #2 DRIVEWAY APRON DETAIL (SHEET C5-3) FOR GATE ENTRY
 DOES NOT REFLECT 3000PSI CONCRETE. PLEASE NOTE FLARES
 SHOWN AT 10' COULD BE REDUCED TO MEET CITY OF WPB
 STANDARD DRIVEWAY DETAIL GC-6.
  
 #3 WORK ALONG I-95 ENTRANCE RAMPS MAY REQUIRE AN FDOT
 PERMIT.
  
 MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ
 CSD ENGINEERING REVIEW
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 1ST FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2012-01-03 Cont ID  
Sent By wjolin Date 2012-01-03 Time 12:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By wjolin Date 2012-01-03 Time 12:22 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2012-05-16 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 2012-05-15 Time 15:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2012-04-26 Time 12:26 Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-16 16:05:45FAILED STATUS UNTILL CONTRACTOR SIGNS ON
2012-04-26 12:31:03C-11.JW
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2012-02-23 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2012-02-23 Time 17:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2011-12-20 Time 10:36 Sent To  
Notes
2011-12-21 10:38:28C11
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2012-05-15 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2012-05-15 Time 20:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2012-05-07 Time 16:32 Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-15 20:28:28ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 05.15.2012
 PERMIT NO.: 11120505
 ADDRESS: 775 NORTH AUSTRALIAN AVENUE
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: JEREMY COVEY
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.494.1112
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: ACCESS RESTRICTION AROUND CLEAR LAKE
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISOS
 ___________________________________________
  
 THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN PASSED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
 PROVISOS:
  
 1. A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT SHALL BE REQUIRED.
 PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,
 ALONG WITH TWO (2) SETS OF SIGNED/SEALED LANDSCAPE
 PLANS AND A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE.
  
 2. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL CONTAIN PLANTING AND MATERIAL
 SPECIFICATIONS. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE FLORIDA NO. 1 OR
 BETTER.
  
 3. A SEPARATE PERMIT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR IRRIGATION.
 PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES,
 ALONG WITH TWO (2) SETS OF PLANS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2012-01-31 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2012-01-31 Time 14:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2012-01-13 Time 08:54 Sent To  
Notes
2012-01-31 15:00:25ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.31.2012
 PERMIT NO.: 11120505
 ADDRESS: NORTH AUSTRALIAN AVENUE
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT:
 TELEPHONE NO.:
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: VEHICULAR ACCESS RESTRICTION DEVICES
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SHEET C1-1
 A. IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO HAVE THE GUARDRAIL RUN IN
 A STRAIGHT LINE, AND CLOSE THE GAP BETWEEN THE PROPOSED
 GUARDRAIL AND THE EXISTING GUARDRAIL AT THE BRIDGE
 UTILIZING LANDSCAPE MATERIAL (I.E. TREES AND PALMS).
 B. THIS SECTION SHOULD BE OVERLAID WITH THE PLANS FOR
 THE CONTROL STRUCTURE TO ENSURE COORDINATION OF THE
 PROJECTS.
 C. SOME LEVEL OF LANDSCAPING (I.E. SHRUBS, GRASSES,
 ETC.) SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE INSTALLATION OF
 THE GUARDRAIL TO HELP THE GUARDRAIL BLEND IN WITH THE
 NATURAL SURROUNDING.
 D. LANDSCAPING SHOULD BE COORDINATED WITH THE SCREENING
 FOR THE CONTROL STRUCTURE THAT IS PROPOSED AT THE
 BRIDGE. SIGNIFICANT LANDSCAPING SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT
 THE NORTH AND SOUTH ENDS OF THE BRIDGE TO HELP SCREEN
 THIS STRUCTURE FROM NORTH-SOUTH TRAFFIC. PLEASE REFER
 TO THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN
 UTILIZED ALONG CLEAR LAKE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLANT
 SPECIES.
  
 2. SHEET C1-2
 A. IT IS PREFERRED BY PLANNING STAFF THAT THIS SECTION
 OF GUARDRAIL NOT BE INSTALLED AND THAT NEW AND EXISTING
 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL BE UTILIZED TO CLOSE THE GAP AND
 AVOID THE NECESSITY OF THE GUARDRAIL.
 B. THE EXISTING GAPS IN VEGETATION IN THIS AREA (AND
 THE HOLES IN THE GROUND) ARE THE RESULT OF
 PREVIOUSLY-PLANTED PALMS DYING AND NOT BEING REPLACED.
 THE LANDSCAPING WAS ORIGINALLY INSTALLED AS PART OF A
 MITIGATION PROJECT BY THE SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY. IT IS
 PLANNING STAFF'S OPINION THAT THESE AREAS SHOULD BE
 REPLANTED.
 C. IF A PHYSICAL BARRIER DOES NEED TO BE CONSTRUCTED
 BEYOND ANY PROVISION OF LANDSCAPING, ARE THERE
 ALTERNATIVES (I.E. BOLLARDS) THAT COULD BE INCORPORATED
 INTO THE LANDSCAPING INSTEAD?
 D. IF A GUARDRAIL IS NECESSARY, MOCK-ROOS IS WORKING TO
 SEE IF THE COUNTY WILL ALLOW THE GUARDRAIL TO BE PLACED
 WITHIN THE EASEMENT. IT IS PLANNING STAFF'S
 RECOMMENDATION THAT SOME LEVEL OF LANDSCAPING (I.E.
 SHRUBS, GRASSES, ETC.) SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE
 INSTALLATION OF THE GUARDRAIL TO HELP THE GUARDRAIL
 BLEND IN WITH THE NATURAL SURROUNDING.
  
 3. SHEET C1-3
 A. THE PROPOSED GUARDRAIL SHOULD BE RELOCATED BEHIND
 THE EXISTING ROYAL PALMS.
 B. SOME LEVEL OF LANDSCAPING (I.E. SHRUBS, GRASSES,
 ETC.) SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE INSTALLATION OF
 THE GUARDRAIL TO HELP THE GUARDRAIL BLEND IN WITH THE
 NATURAL SURROUNDING.
  
 4. SHEET C1-5
 A. IT IS PREFERRED THAT AN ALTERNATIVE BE USED TO THE
 PROPOSED TYPICAL GUARDRAIL AND THAT SOME LEVEL OF
 LANDSCAPING (I.E. SHRUBS, GRASSES, ETC.) SHOULD BE
 INCORPORATED INTO THE INSTALLATION OF THE GUARDRAIL TO
 HELP THE GUARDRAIL BLEND IN WITH THE NATURAL
 SURROUNDING. IN STAFF'S OPINION THIS AREA IS NOT AS
 HIGH OF A PRIORITY.
 B. IS IT NECESSARY TO LOCATE THE GUARDRAIL IMMEDIATELY
 ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK? THIS CREATES A LESS-DESIRABLE
 PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT ALONG THE SIDEWALK. IS THERE ANY
 WAY TO MOVE THE GUARDRAIL BACK AWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK
 AND MAINTAIN SPACING BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE
 GUARDRAIL?
 C. WHILE A GATED OPENING IS PROPOSED FOR MAINTENANCE
 ACCESS, IT IS STAFF'S OPINION THAT SOME CONSIDERATION
 BE MADE THAT IN THE FUTURE A RECREATION PATH MAY BE
 CONSTRUCTED AROUND THE LAKE AND THAT THE DESIGN OF THE
 GUARDRAIL SHOULD MAKE AN ATTEMPT TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE
 FACILITIES OR AT LEAST MAKE IT EASY TO MODIFY THE
 GUARDRAIL.
  
 5. SHEET C1-6
 A. THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING SHOULD SERIOUSLY BE
 CONSIDERED ON ALL FOUR (4) CORNERS OF THE BRIDGE TO
 CREATE A "GATEWAY" AND DISGUISE THE APPEARANCE OF THE
 EXISTING/PROPOSED GUARDRAILS.
 B. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL COULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THOSE
 MATERIALS THAT HAVE BEEN INSTALLED ALONG THE PALM BEACH
 LAKES BOULEVARD MEDIAN (I.E. PALMS, SHRUBS, GRASSES,
 ETC.).
  
 6. GENERAL COMMENTS
 A. ANY AND ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPING WILL NEED TO BE
 REVIEWED BY THE CITY'S PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT.
 B. IS IT NECESSARY TO HAVE A THREE (3) FOOT SECTION OF
 ASPHALT UNDERNEATH THE GUARDRAIL? PLANNING STAFF
 UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS IS TO EASE THE MOWING OF THE
 AREA, BUT WOULD LIKE TO ASK PARKS & RECREATION IF IT
 WOULD BE FEASIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE AREA AROUND THE
 GUARDRAIL IF IT WERE LEFT AS SOD/LANDSCAPING.
 C. HAS THIS PROJECT BEEN PRESENTED TO THE MAYOR/CITY
 COMMISSION FOR REVIEW/APPROVAL? HAS A FACE OF THE CITY
 PRESENTATION BEEN MADE AND APPROVED?
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE GENERATED BY THE CITY'S
 SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNER, ALEX HANSEN, WHO MAY BE
 REACHED AT 561.822.1463 OR VIA EMAIL AT
 [email protected]:
  
 1. WHILE I UNDERSTAND THE OVERALL GOAL OF THE PROJECT
 IS TO PREVENT MOTOR VEHICLES FROM ENTERING INTO LAKE
 MANGONIA AND CLEAR LAKE, I BELIEVE THIS GOAL COULD BE
 ACHIEVED IN WAYS THAT ARE MORE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING
 AND LESS VISUALLY OBTRUSIVE THAN THE GUARD RAILS THAT
 ARE PROPOSED IN THESE PLANS. I SUGGEST THAT THE
 PLANTING OF ADDITIONAL TREES OR THE INSTALLATION OF
 BOLLARD-LIKE STRUCTURES SPACED EVERY 6-7 FEET COULD BE
 USED INSTEAD OF THE GUARD RAILS. FURTHER, A COMBINATION
 OF TREES AND BOLLARDS SPACED FROM EACH OTHER COULD ALSO
 BE USED TO PROVIDE A MORE VISUALLY PLEASING BARRIER
 THAT WOULD STILL PREVENT VEHICULAR INTRUSION. IF THE
 INSTALLATION OF TREES/BOLLARDS IS NOT AN OPTION, THEN A
 SMALL HEDGE SHOULD BE INSTALLED IN FRONT OF THE
 RAILINGS.
  
 2. THESE SUGGESTED APPROACHES OF TREES, BOLLARDS,
 AND/OR HEDGES SHOULD IN PARTICULAR BE USED AT THE MOST
 VISIBLE AND HEAVILY TRAVELLED AREAS AFFECTED BY THIS
 PLAN SUCH AS AUSTRALIAN AVENUE (SHEETS C1-1 AND C1-2)
 AND OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (SHEETS C1-3 AND C1-4). I
 NOTICED ON C1-3 THAT THE INSTALLATION OF SABAL PALMS IS
 BEING PROPOSED TO CLOSE AN EXISTING GAP BETWEEN
 PLANTINGS IN THE AREA WHERE AUSTRALIAN CONNECTS WITH
 OKEECHOBEE. I BELIEVE THIS APPROACH IS CONSISTENT WITH
 MY SUGGESTIONS.
  
 3. SOME OF THE SECTIONS OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AFFECTED BY THIS PROPOSAL WERE
 RECENTLY THE SUBJECT OF BEAUTIFICATION PROJECTS THAT
 COULD BE HINDERED BY THESE PROPOSED RAILINGS. FOR
 EXAMPLE, ON SHEET C1-3, GUARD RAILS ARE PROPOSED TO BE
 INSTALLED IN FRONT OF ROYAL PALM TREES WHICH WERE
 RECENTLY INSTALLED. THE GUARD RAILS WOULD NOT ONLY
 IMPACT THE AESTHETICS OF THE ROYAL PALMS BUT WOULD ALSO
 NEGATIVELY AFFECT THE MAINTENANCE AND VIABILITY OF
 THESE TREES. IF A RAILING HAS TO BE INSTALLED AT THIS
 LOCATION THE RAILING SHOULD BE LOCATED BEHIND THESE
 TREES.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved