| 2011-10-31 15:28:24 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2009 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) FOR TILE TO BE |
| | INSTALLED AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. NONE SUBMITTED |
| | AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 2- SPECIFY HOW IS THE TILE GOING TO BE INSTALLED. IF |
| | USING ADHESIVE, THEN CHECK TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | LISTED ADHESIVES AND PROVIDE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 |
| | COPIES). IF USING NAILS/SCREWS, THEN PROVIDE THE UPLIFT |
| | CALCULATIONS AND NUMBER OF NAILS/SCREWS TO BE USED TO |
| | MEET SUCH UPLIFT PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | 3- SPECIFY WHICH FLAT ROOF APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING |
| | TO BE INSTALLED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.2.1.4.3. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | NAIL ENHANCING AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA |
| | 08-0410.09 SUBMITTED. |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DOING THE CALCULATIONS TO TAKE INTO |
| | CONSIDERATION THAT ACCORDING TO 2009 REVISIONS SEC. |
| | R301.2.1.4.3 THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED ON EXPOSURE "C". |
| | |
| | (NOTE: ASSEMBLIES WITH GENERAL LIMITATION #9 CAN'T BE |
| | USED IN THIS BUILDING. THEY DON'T MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES). |
| | |
| | 5- CLEARLY IDENTIFY HOW MUCH AREA IS FLAT AND HOW MUCH |
| | AREA IS TILE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE VALUE |
| | DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION TO COMPLY WITH SEC. |
| | 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. SQUARE FOOTAGE SPECIFIED |
| | ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO LOW COMPARED TO THE |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE HOUSE SHOWN ON THE PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISAL WEBSITE. |
| | |
| | 6- THE HOUSE VALUE IS MORE THAN $300.000. NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 611.8 OF 2007 FBC- EXISTING BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
