Plan Review Details - Permit 11080002
Plan Review Stops For Permit 11080002
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2011-09-15 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2011-09-15 Time 14:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2011-09-15 Time 14:37 Sent To  
Notes
2011-09-16 11:33:31SEE ATTACHED NOA LETTER FROM ARCHITECT FOR CURRENT
 PRODUCT APPROVALS.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2011-09-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2011-09-09 Time 15:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2011-09-09 Time 15:11 Sent To  
Notes
2011-09-09 15:14:002007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 1) ADDRESSED
  
 2) ADDRESSED
  
 3) ADDRESSED
  
 4) ADDRESSED
  
 5) ADDRESSED
  
 6) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE TRUSS ANCHORS AND
 LINTELS OR A LIST OF ALL TRUSS ANCHORS AND THE LINTELS
 THAT WILL BE USED WITH THEIR CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NUMBERS. DCA RULE 9N-3
  
 7) SUBMIT THE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE
 FOLLOWING ITEMS. THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR, THE FIXED
 WINDOW, THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOWAND THE ROOF TILE. DCA
 RULE 9N-3 (NOTE: THE WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULES ON THE
 PLANS LIST THE OLD PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS. ALSO,
 PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD.
  
 8) SUBMIT THE CURRENT ESR REPORTS FOR THE SELECTION 500
 OPEN CELL FOAM INSULATION (ESR 1172) AND THE NO BURN
 FIRE RESISTANT COATING (ESR 1838), WHICH HAVE BEEN
 REISSUED. SUBMIT THE LATEST REPORTS.
  
 9) NO TRUSS DRAWINGS OR TRUSS LAYOUT WAS SUBMITTED. IF
 YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THESE REVIEWED AT THIS TIME,
 PLEASE SUBMIT THEM. OTHERWISE, A SIGNED AND SEALED SET
 THAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD FOR EACH BUILDING TYPE CAN BE PROVIDED TO THE
 FIELD INSPECTOR TO BRING IN AND PLACED IN THE RECORDS
 WITH THE MASTERED PLANS.
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2011-08-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2011-08-17 Time 14:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2011-08-17 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2011-08-17 14:48:432007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS
  
 DENIED BY BUILDING
  
 1) ON THE TITLE SHEET T-1, NOTE #5 UNDER PLUMBING AND
 THE STRUCTURAL NOTES REFERENCE THE WRONG CODE. PLEASE
 UPDATE TO THE 2007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS.
  
 2) ON SHEET OP-1, BOTH THE LARGE AND SMALL PATIO
 ADDITIONS ARE LABELED ' PATIO OPTION 1'. IN ORDER TO
 AVOID CONFUSION, PLEASE IDENTIFY EACH AS A DIFFERENT
 OPTION NUMBER.
  
 3) SPECIFY THE HEIGHT OF THE OPTIONAL ALUMINUM FENCE,
 THE SPACING OF THE POSTS AND THE SIZE OF CONCRETE
 ENCASING THE POSTS ON THE PLANS.
  
 4) THE OPENING DESIGN PRESSURES IN THE DOOR AND WINDOW
 SCHEDULES ON SHEET TU-3.0 DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE
 WIND LOAD TABLES ON THE S-3 SHEETS. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 5) THE NOA PRESSURES LISTED ON THE PLANS FOR THE XOX
 HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOW IS INCORRECT. THE PRESSURES
 ARE +/- 75.0 PSF FOR TYPE D, E, F, J, K, L GLASS OR +/-
 56.2 FOR TYPE A GLASS, ACCORDING TO THE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 6) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE TRUSS ANCHORS AND
 LINTELS OR A LIST OF ALL TRUSS ANCHORS AND THE LINTELS
 THAT WILL BE USED WITH THEIR CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NUMBERS. DCA RULE 9N-3
  
 7) SUBMIT THE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE
 FOLLOWING ITEMS. THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR, THE FIXED
 WINDOW, THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOW, THE ROOF TILE. DCA RULE
 9N-3
  
 8) SUBMIT THE CURRENT ESR REPORTS FOR THE SELECTION 500
 OPEN CELL FOAM INSULATION (ESR 1172) AND THE NO BURN
 FIRE RESISTANT COATING (ESR 1838), WHICH HAVE BEEN
 REISSUED.
  
 9) NO TRUSS DRAWINGS OR TRUSS LAYOUT WAS SUBMITTED. IF
 YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THESE REVIEWED AT THIS TIME,
 PLEASE SUBMIT THEM. OTHERWISE, A SIGNED AND SEALED SET
 THAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD FOR EACH BUILDING TYPE CAN BE PROVIDED TO THE
 FIELD INSPECTOR TO BRING IN AND PLACED IN THE RECORDS
 WITH THE MASTERED PLANS.
  
 ROBERT MCDOUGAL
 BLDG. PLAN REVIEW
 (561)805-6714
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2011-09-07 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2011-09-07 Time 16:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2011-09-07 Time 16:15 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2011-08-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2011-08-17 Time 14:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2011-08-17 Time 12:51 Sent To  
Notes
2011-08-17 14:55:5711080002
 OAKTON PRESERVE TOWNHOMES
 BLDG. 1-5 7 8
  
 VERIFY THAT ALL NOTES REFLECT THE CURRENT ELECTRIC CODE
 AS BEING THE 2008 NEC.
 PROVIDE A NOTE DEFINING AF FOR THE ELECTRIC PANEL
 DIRECTORY AS MEANING ARC FAULT PROTECTED CIRCUITS.
 CORRECT NOTE ON THE ELECTRICAL LEGEND FOR AFCI TO
 REFLECT THAT ALL GENERAL PURPOSE OUTLETS IN ADDITION TO
 THOSE IN BEDROOMS MUST BE PROTECTED WITH COMBINATION
 AFCI DEVICES. NEC 210.12
 PROVIDE AN INTERSYSTEM BONDING TERMINATION POINT AT THE
 ELECTRICAL SERVICE LOCATION. NEC 250.94
 PROVIDE VERIFICATION FROM FPL THAT THE MAXIMUM
 AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT IS NO MORE THAT 22,000 AIC. NEC
 110.9
 A HALL WAY RECEPTACLE IS REQUIRED ON THE SECOND FLOOR
 OF END UNIT #2. NEC 210.52
 JACUZZI PUMP AND OPTIONAL HEATER (1800 VA) REQUIRE 20
 AMPERE BRANCH CIRCUITS WITH #12 WIRE NEC 210.19
  
 ROBERT LECKY
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6718
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2011-08-25 Cont ID  
Sent By wjolin Date 2011-08-25 Time 12:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By wjolin Date 2011-08-22 Time 10:48 Sent To  
Notes
2011-08-22 12:44:128321 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD - BUILDINGS 1 THROUGH 5, 7 &
 8
 PERMIT #11080002 (MASTER)
 REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
  
 DESIGN SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA
 FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2007 EDITION.
  
 DRAWINGS WILL BE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED BY THE
 FIRE DEPARTMENT AFTER ALL BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER
 COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
  
 WESLEY JOLIN
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 FIRE & LIFE SAFETY PLAN REVIEW
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2011-08-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2011-08-17 Time 14:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2011-08-17 Time 14:13 Sent To  
Notes
2011-08-17 14:28:562007 FBC W/2009 REVISIONS
 MECHANICAL
  
 MANUAL J EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED
 FOR EACH UNIT. IF THE EQUIPMENT DIFFERS FROM THE
 MASTER, A REVISED EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE WILL BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2011-08-15 Cont ID  
Sent By rmcdouga Date 2011-08-15 Time 13:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2011-08-15 Time 13:19 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2011-09-23 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2011-09-23 Time 15:51 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 2011-09-23 Time 15:51 Sent To  
Notes
2011-09-23 15:52:34PASSED WITH REDLINES AS NOTED ON PLANS.
  
 - CLARIFY ELEVATIONS.
  
 - CLARIFY PATIOS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2011-08-23 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2011-08-23 Time 15:53 Rev Time 3.00
Received By eschneid Date 2011-08-23 Time 15:53 Sent To  
Notes
2011-08-23 15:53:52FAILED
  
 1) SHEET 011, DRAWING A-3.1 (5-UNIT BUILDING) IS
 CONFUSING. THE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL SIDE WAS
 FOR THE WALLS WHICH DID NOT FACE THE SIDE OF AN
 ADJACENT UNIT. THE LABELS (RIGHT SIDE/LEFT SIDE) DO NOT
 MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THE BLDG. NO. 5 AND 9 ARE ONLY FOR
 THE ELEVATIONS ABOVE THEM. ADDITIONALLY BLDG. NO. 15
 SHALL HAVE THE ENHANCED DETAILING ON THE RIGHT SIDE AND
 BE SHOWN ACCORDINGLY.
  
 2) SHEET 012, A-3.1 (6-UNIT BUILDING) IS CONFUSING. THE
 ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL SIDE WAS FOR THE WALLS
 WHICH DID NOT FACE THE SIDE OF AN ADJACENT UNIT. THE
 LABELS (RIGHT SIDE/LEFT SIDE) DO NOT MAKE IT CLEAR THAT
 THE BLDG. NO. 2, 10, 1 AND 7 ARE ONLY FOR THE ELEVATION
 ABOVE THEM. ADDITIONALLY BLDG. NO. 13 SHALL HAVE THE
 ENHANCED DETAILING ON BOTH SIDES AND BE SHOWN
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 3) SHEET 013, A-3.1 (8-UNIT BUILDING) IS CONFUSING. THE
 ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL SIDE WAS FOR THE WALLS
 WHICH DID NOT FACE THE SIDE OF AN ADJACENT UNIT. THE
 LABELS (RIGHT SIDE/LEFT SIDE) DO NOT MAKE IT CLEAR THAT
 THE BLDG. NO. 6 AND 3 ARE ONLY FOR THE ELEVATION ABOVE
 THEM. ADDITIONALLY BLDG. NO. 5 SHALL HAVE THE ENHANCED
 DETAILING ON THE RIGHT SIDE AND BLDG. NO. 14 SHALL HAVE
 ENHANCED DETAILING ON THE LEFT SIDE AND BE SHOWN
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 4) SHEET 014, A-3.1 (9-UNIT BUILDING) IS CONFUSING. THE
 ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL SIDE WAS FOR THE WALLS
 WHICH DID NOT FACE THE SIDE OF AN ADJACENT UNIT. THE
 LABELS (RIGHT SIDE/LEFT SIDE) DO NOT MAKE IT CLEAR THAT
 THE BLDG. NO. 11 AND 12 ARE ONLY FOR THE ELEVATION
 ABOVE THEM. ADDITIONALLY BLDG. NO. 11 SHALL HAVE THE
 ENHANCED DETAILING ON THE LEFT SIDE AND BE SHOWN
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 5) NO HEIGHT PROVIDED FOR FENCE.
  
 6) IF THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL PATIOS, SCREEN
 ENCLOSURES AND FENCES IMPACT THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPE AT THE REAR OR SIDES OF THE UNITS, THEN A
 LANDSCAPE RELOCATION PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
 PERMIT FOR THE ADDITIONAL PATIO, SCREEN ENCLOSURE OR
 FENCE. THE APPROVED RELOCATION PLAN SHALL BE
 IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION FOR THE
 PATIO, SCREEN ENCLOSURE OR FENCE.
  
 7) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE OAKTON COMMONS DESIGN
 GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT PATIOS AND SCREENED ENCLOSURES
 BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET FROM NON-COMMON WALL
 SIDE PROPERTY LINES AND 3 FEET FROM THE REAR PROPERTY
 LINE. SOME UNITS MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE
 EXPANDED PATIOS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved