| 2010-12-29 15:56:18 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | 1. 4. REVISE EXPOSURE CATEGORY OR PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | FOR EXPOSURE B DESIGN PRESSURES. FBC1609, FBC |
| | R301.2.1.4. NOTE THAT THE CODE CHANGED EFFECTIVE MARCH |
| | 1, 2009. |
| | |
| | R301.2.1.4 EXPOSURE CATEGORY. FOR EACH WIND DIRECTION |
| | CONSIDERED, AN EXPOSURE CATEGORY THAT ADEQUATELY |
| | REFLECTS THE CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUND SURFACE |
| | IRREGULARITIES SHALL BE DETERMINED FOR THE SITE AT |
| | WHICH THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. |
| | FOR A SITE LOCATED IN THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN |
| | CATEGORIES, THE CATEGORY RESULTING IN THE LARGEST WIND |
| | FORCES SHALL APPLY. ACCOUNT SHALL BE TAKEN OF |
| | VARIATIONS IN GROUND SURFACE ROUGHNESS THAT ARISE FROM |
| | NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION AS WELL AS FROM |
| | CONSTRUCTED FEATURES. FOR ANY GIVEN WIND DIRECTION, THE |
| | EXPOSURE IN WHICH A SPECIFIC BUILDING OR OTHER |
| | STRUCTURE IS SITED SHALL BE ASSESSED AS BEING ONE OF |
| | THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES: |
| | |
| | EXCEPTION: AN INTERMEDIATE EXPOSURE BETWEEN THE |
| | EXPOSURE CATEGORIES DEFINED IS PERMITTED IN A |
| | TRANSITION ZONE PROVIDED THAT IT IS DETERMINED BY A |
| | RATIONAL ANALYSIS METHOD. |
| | |
| | 2. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED, |
| | FAC9B72, ROOF TILE. ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL, INDICATE |
| | METHOD OF FASTENING SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH WIND DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA CAN BE DETERMINED. IF FOAM ADHESIVE IS USED, |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ADHESIVE. PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 3. PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR A BUR ROOF WAS PROVIDED, PLANS |
| | SHOW A TILE ROOF. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 3. TERMITE PROTECTION REQUIRED FBC R 320. |
| | |
| | 4. TRUSS DESIGN ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS REQUIRED WITH ALL |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FBC R802.1.6.1. TRUSS |
| | ENGINEERING TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR |
| | TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 5. SEE DEFINITION OF PARTIALLY ENCLOSED, ASCE7-05, AND |
| | EXPLAIN RATIONALE FOR DESIGNING THIS STRUCTURE TO |
| | PARTIALLY ENCLOSED DESIGN PRESSURES. IT APPEARS THAT |
| | THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT IS NOT A FREE STANDING |
| | STRUCTURE, BUT AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |