Plan Review Details - Permit 10100224
Plan Review Stops For Permit 10100224
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2011-05-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2011-05-19 Time 16:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2011-05-19 Time 16:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2011-05-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2011-05-06 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2011-05-06 Time 15:57 Sent To  
Notes
2011-05-06 16:18:37****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL
  
 1. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE PROPOSED GABLE END BRACING
 DETAIL WILL RESIST NEGATIVE WIND PRESSURES, SHEET SK-1.
 THE BRACING DETAIL DOES NOT EXTEND TO THE GABLE END
 WALL, BUT APPEARS TO PROVIDE BRACING AT THE 2ND AND 3RD
 TRUSSES. BLOCKING IS SHOWN AT THE TOP, NONE SHOWN
 GRAPHICALLY AT THE BOTTOM BUT IS REFERRED TO AS
 EXISTING. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW (OR WHETHER) THE 2X4 TOP
 AND BOTTOM BLOCKING WILL PROVIDE CONTINUITY TO THE
 PROPOSED X BRACE BETWEEN THE 2ND AND 3RD TRUSSES IN
 ORDER TO RESIST SUCTION PRESSURES. NOTE THAT THE
 TPI/WTCA BCSI 1-06 (PRODUCED JOINTLY BY THE WOOD TRUSS
 COUNCIL OF AMERICA AND TRUSS PLATE INSTITUTE) DETAIL
 EXTENDS FROM GABLE END WALL BACK 8' (FOUR TRUSSES).
 PLEASE REVISE DETAIL OR PROVIDE INFORMATION TO SHOW HOW
 THIS INFORMATION WILL RESIST NEGATIVE PRESSURES.
  
 2. TRUSS REPAIR DETAIL, SHEET SK-2, PLEASE SPECIFY
 TRUSS PLATE. STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS TO HAVE FLORIDA
 STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, FAC9N-3.
  
 3. THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ENGINEERING
 COMPANY, WARREN J. VON WERNE, PE, INC. IS NULL AND
 VOID. PLEASE EITHER REMOVE FROM TITLE BLOCK OR ACTIVATE
 THE COFA WITH FBPE, FS471, FAC61G15-23.002. ALSO PLEASE
 INCLUDE THE PRINTED NAME OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO IS
 SEALING THE PLAN SO THE TITLE BLOCK WILL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH FS471.
  
 4. PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA,
 FBC1603.1.4.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2011-02-01 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2011-02-01 Time 10:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2011-01-31 Time 10:41 Sent To  
Notes
2011-02-01 10:33:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL
  
 COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1. AS AN ARCHITECT SIGNED AND SEALED THE STRUCTURAL
 REPAIR, PLEASE SHOW HOW THIS IS INCIDENTAL TO HIS
 PRACTICE OF ARCHITECTURE, FS481.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT YOUR CONVENIENCE IF
 YOU NEED ASSISTANCE OR CLARIFICATION.
  
 2ND REVIEW, LETTER FROM ARCHITECT DATED 12/3/10 IS
 ACKNOWLEDGED (INCLUDES PHOTOCOPIED EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE 506.2.2.1 WITH LANGUAGE REGARDING DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL HIGHLIGHTED). PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 BUILDLING CODE IS BASED ON THE ICC CODE, A NATIONAL
 BASE STANDARD. LAWS & RULES GOVERNING DESIGN
 PROFESSIONALS WILL BE SPECIFIC TO EACH STATE, AND THE
 BASE CODE DOES NOT EXEMPT STATUTORY REQUREMENTS FOR
 LICENSING. ARCHITECT'S LETTER STATES THE EVALUATION WAS
 PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FS 471.03. SEE FLORIDA
 STATUTE 471.003(3). THIS FLORIDA STATUTE STATES:
  
 (3) NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER OR
 OF ANY OTHER LAW, NO LICENSED ENGINEER WHOSE PRINCIPAL
 PRACTICE IS CIVIL OR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, OR
 EMPLOYEE OR SUBORDINATE UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE
 SUPERVISION OR CONTROL OF THE ENGINEER, IS PRECLUDED
 FROM PERFORMING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES WHICH ARE PURELY
 INCIDENTAL TO HER OR HIS ENGINEERING PRACTICE, NOR IS
 ANY LICENSED ARCHITECT, OR EMPLOYEE OR SUBORDINATE
 UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISION OR CONTROL OF THE
 ARCHITECT, PRECLUDED FROM PERFORMING ENGINEERING
 SERVICES WHICH ARE PURELY INCIDENTAL TO HER OR HIS
 ARCHITECTURAL
 PRACTICE.
  
 SEE FIRST REVIEW, PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WORK PERFORMED
 WHICH MAKES THE TRUSS REPAIR DETAIL INCIDENTAL TO THE
 PRACTICE OF ARCHITECTURE FOR THIS PROJECT. BASED ON THE
 DOCUMENTS PROVIDED, ONLY A STRUCTURAL REPAIR IN THE
 ATTIC SPACE IS INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE.
  
 ALSO PLEASE SEE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1:
  
 102.1, WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS
 OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF
 CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST
 RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT
 BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC
 REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT SHALL BE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 2. PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH SHOWS LOCATION OF PROPOSED
 REPAIRS RELATIVE TO THE STRUCTURE.
  
 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE ADDRESS. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE THE
 BROKEN TRUSS IS LOCATED AND WHETHER THE BROKEN TRUSS
 AFFECTS OTHER CODE REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS THE TENANT
 SEPARATION (FIRE RATED WALL).
  
 3. THE LETTER (ROOF TRUSS REPAIR) QUOTES SECTION 506 OF
 THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE, WHICH MAKES REFERENCE TO
 STRUCTURAL AND NON STRUCTURAL REPAIRS, DANGEROUS
 CONDITIONS, SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT, ETC. IT IS NOT
 CLEAR WHY THE ENTIRE CODE SECTION WAS QUOTED AS THEY
 CANNOT ALL APPLY TO THIS JOB. PLEASE CLARIFY CODE
 INTENT.
  
 2ND REVIEW, A LETTER INCLUDING FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 506.2.2 WAS INCLUDED. EVAULATION AND DESIGN INTENT NOT
 CLEAR. SECOND LETTER INCLUDES CODE REFERENCES BUT NO
 LANGUAGE IN THE LETTER REGARDING THIS STRUCTURE. THE
 LETTER INCLUDES 502.2.2, EXTENT OF REPAIR FOR COMPLIANT
 BUILDINGS, AND ALSO 502.2.3, EXTENT OF REPAIR FOR
 NONCOMPLIANT BUILDINGS. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW BOTH APPLY
 TO THIS JOB.
  
 4. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER OR NOT THE GABLE BRACING
 DETAIL WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO RESIST WIND LOADS FBC1609.
 THE DETAIL PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SUFFICIENT AS
 IT DOES NOT HAVE ALL COMPONENTS WHICH ARE STANDARD FOR
 GABLE RETROFIT. SOME EXAMPLES: SOME COMPONENTS ARE
 SHOWN GRAPHICALLY BUT NOT IDENTIFIED, SUCH AS THE
 RECTANGLE WHICH SECURES THE DIAGONAL BRACE. LANGUAGE
 STATES IT IS "SECURED W/RATED BRACKET" BUT DOES NOT
 SPECIFY A CONNECTOR. BRACING AT THE TOP OF THE GABLE IS
 NOT SHOWN, BUT IS TYPICAL IN GABLE END REINFORCING AND
 RETROFIT.
  
 2ND REVIEW, DESIGN INTENT NOT CLEAR. PLEASE ADDRESS
 COMMENT BY REVISING DETAIL AND PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION
 (CALCULATIONS, ETC.). TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH WIND
 DESIGN CRITERIA. IF DESIGN INTENT IS TO DESIGN REPAIR
 TO WIND DESIGN CRITERIA WHEN THE BUILDING WAS BUILT,
 DESIGN CRITERIA IS TO BE STATED AND DEMONSTRATED.
  
 ADDITIONAL BRACING APPEARS TO BE NEW, NOT A REPAIR. SEE
 FBC EXISTING BUILDING 502.2.3 IN THE LETTER PROVIDED:
  
 NEW STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND CONNECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS
 REHABILITATION DESIGN SHALL COMPLY WITH THE DETAILING
 PROVISIONS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING FOR
 NEW BUILDINGS OF SIMILAR STRUCTURE, PURPOSE AND
 LOCATION.
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY DESIGN INTENT, STATE DESIGN CRITERIA,
 AND DEMONSTRATE THAT PROPOSED BRACING COMPLIES WITH
 MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 5. DESIGNER IS TO STATE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. REPAIR IS
 TO COMPLY WITH THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 6. PLEASE INCLUDE GABLE HEIGHT ON THE PLAN, FBC1609.
 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2010-10-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2010-10-13 Time 12:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2010-10-13 Time 12:45 Sent To  
Notes
2010-10-13 12:50:28****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
 FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007
 FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL
  
 1. AS AN ARCHITECT SIGNED AND SEALED THE STRUCTURAL
 REPAIR, PLEASE SHOW HOW THIS IS INCIDENTAL TO HIS
 PRACTICE OF ARCHITECTURE, FS481.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT YOUR CONVENIENCE IF
 YOU NEED ASSISTANCE OR CLARIFICATION.
  
 2. PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH SHOWS LOCATION OF PROPOSED
 REPAIRS RELATIVE TO THE STRUCTURE.
  
 3. THE LETTER (ROOF TRUSS REPAIR) QUOTES SECTION 506 OF
 THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE, WHICH MAKES REFERENCE TO
 STRUCTURAL AND NON STRUCTURAL REPAIRS, DNAGEROUS
 CONDITIONS, SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT, ETC. IT IS NOT
 CLEAR WHY THE ENTIRE CODE SECTION WAS QUOTED AS THEY
 CANNOT ALL APPLY TO THIS JOB. PLEASE CLARIFY CODE
 INTENT.
  
 4. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER OR NOT THE GABLE BRACING
 DETAIL WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO RESIST WIND LOADS FBC1609.
 THE DETAIL PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SUFFICIENT AS
 IT DOES NOT HAVE ALL COMPONENTS WHICH ARE STANDARD FOR
 GABLE RETROFIT. SOME EXAMPLES: SOME COMPONENTS ARE
 SHOWN GRAPHICALLY BUT NOT IDENTIFIED, SUCH AS THE
 RECTANGLE WHICH SECURES THE DIAGONAL BRACE. LANGUAGE
 STATES IT IS "SECURED W/RATED BRACKET" BUT DOES NOT
 SPECIFY A CONNECTOR. BRACING AT THE TOP OF THE GABLE IS
 NOT SHOWN, BUT IS TYPICAL IN
  
 5. DESIGNER IS TO STATE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. REPAIR IS
 TO COMPLY WITH THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA.
  
 6. PLEASE INCLUDE GABLE HEIGHT ON THE PLAN, FBC1609.
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2011-05-19 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2011-05-19 Time 16:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2011-05-18 Time 16:21 Sent To  
Notes
2011-05-18 16:21:29INCOMING SENT TO S HILL DESK. JW
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2011-05-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2011-05-06 Time 16:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2011-04-27 Time 12:57 Sent To  
Notes
2011-04-27 12:58:02INCOMING SENT TO S. HILL DESK. JW
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2011-01-19 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2011-01-19 Time 11:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2011-01-19 Time 11:36 Sent To B
Notes
2011-01-19 11:43:04SENT TO S. HILL'S DESK.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2010-10-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2010-10-13 Time 12:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2010-10-13 Time 12:21 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved