Plan Review Details - Permit 10090385
Plan Review Stops For Permit 10090385
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2011-07-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2011-07-28 Time 10:22 Rev Time 2.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2011-07-28 Time 08:30 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2011-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2011-02-03 Time 15:58 Rev Time 2.20
Received By jwitmer Date 2011-02-03 Time 15:58 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2010-09-27 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2010-09-27 Time 10:10 Rev Time 4.33
Received By jwitmer Date 2010-09-27 Time 10:09 Sent To  
Notes
2010-09-27 11:02:58BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 10090385
 ADD: 3319 S DIXIE HWY
 CONT: ABC LIQUORS, INC.
 TEL: (407)851-0000
  
 FL BLD CODE= 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 W/ 2009 FBC SUPPLEMENTS
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 2007EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3
 COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS,
 SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
 1ST REVIEW
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) THE COVER SHEET LIST AN INDEX OF PLANS, BUT NO PLANS
 ARE INDICATED AS A ROOF PLAN, NOTE A NEW PARAPET IS
 BEING ADDED PLEASE INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 FBC-B 1503.4 ROOF DRAINAGE. UNLESS ROOFS ARE SLOPED TO
 DRAIN OVER ROOF EDGES, DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF ROOF
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, PLUMBING CHAPTER 11. PLANS CURRENTLY INDICATE A
 GUTTER HEAD DETAIL 3 SHEET A-3 ALL DETAILS ON THIS
 SHEET ARE LABELED AS A-2, MISLABELED. PLANS DO NOT
 INDICATE IF THIS WILL BE THE SCUPPER OR OVERFLOW
 SCUPPERS, NOR IS THERE INFORMATION AS TO SLOPE OF ROOF
 FINSIH?
  
 2) PLEASE REVIEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE INSULATION
 VALUES FOR THE EXTERIOR WALLS. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 INDICATE 3/4 " ISO INSULATION, NOTE THIS INSULATION IS
 TO CONTINUE TO THE UNDER SIDE OF THE ROOF. DETAIL # 5
 OF SHEET A-4 PLEASE REVIEW SECTION FBC-B 13-406.AB.3.2
 WHERE UNVENTED DROPPED CEILING CAVITIES OCCUR OVER
 CONDITIONED SPACES THAT DO NOT HAVE AN AIR BARRIER
 BETWEEN THE CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED SPACE (SUCH
 AS T-BAR CEILINGS), THEY SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEALED
 FROM THE EXTERIOR ENVIRONMENT (AT THE ROOF PLANE) AND
 ADJACENT SPACES BY A CONTINUOUS AIR BARRIER THAT IS
 ALSO SEALED TO THE AIR BARRIER OF THE WALLS. IN THAT
 CASE, THE ROOF ASSEMBLY SHALL CONSTITUTE BOTH THE UPPER
 THERMAL ENVELOPE AND PRESSURE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 3A) SHEET M-1 INDICATES THE ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT CU# 1 &
 CU#2 ARE TO BE MOUNTED ON ROOF TOP STANDS. RULE
 9B-72(31)( G) WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR
 PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS.
  
 3B) 106.3.3 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE
 REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO
 SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
  
 3C) SHEET M-1 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE REFERS TO STRUCTURAL
 PLANS FOR LOCATION OF UNITS, PLEASE NOTE THE STRUCTURAL
 PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE
 ROOF TOP UNITS AND OR ADDITIONAL LOADING OR BRACING OF
 THE STRUCTURAL FRAMING OF THE ROOFING SYSTEM.
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.106.1.2.
  
 4) SHEET S-1 DETAIL 4& 5 BOTH OF THESE DETAILS ARE NOT
 REFLECTED AAS TO WHERE THEY ARE TO BE DESIGNED IT
 APPEARS THAT STRUCTURAL DETAIL # 1 IS MISSING
 INDICATING THE LOCATION FOR THESE SECTIONS. 106.1.2
 ADDTIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIED.
  
 5) SHEET S-2 DETAILS 2,3 & 4 FOR STEEL COLUMNS, ALL 3
 COLUMN INDICATE THE TYPE OF WELDS ARE TO BE USED FROM
 THE BOTTOM PLATE TO COLUMN BUT ARE MISSING FROM THE
 COLUMN TO THE TOP PLATE. NOR IS INFORMATION PROVIDED
 FOR THE CONNECTING OF SYSTEM.
  
 6) SHEET S-3 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE USE OF GALVANIZED
 WIRE LATH W/ 7/8 INCH STUCCO, PLEASE BE AWARE OF A
 CHANGE IN THE CODE THIS LAST CODE CYCLE:
 1404.2.1 WHERE CEMENT PLASTER (STUCCO) IS TO BE APPLIED
 TO LATH OVER FRAME CONSTRUCTION, MEASURES SHALL BE
 TAKEN TO PREVENT BONDING BETWEEN THE CEMENT PLASTER AND
 THE WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER. A BOND BREAK SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BETWEEN THE WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER AND THE
 CEMENT PLASTER (STUCCO) CONSISTING OF ONE OF THE
 FOLLOWING:
 1. TWO LAYERS OF AN APPROVED WATER-RESISTANT BARRIER OR
 2. ONE LAYER OF AN APPROVED WATER-RESISTANT BARRIER
 OVER AN APPROVED PLASTIC HOUSE WRAP, OR
 3. OTHER APPROVED METHODS OR MATERIALS APPLIED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION
 INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 7) SHEET S-3 DETAIL# 1 DOES NOT INDICATE THE TYPE OF
 WALL SHEATHING TO BE INSTALLED ON THE BACK SIDE OF THE
 DETAIL ONLY FLASHING. FBC-B 1403.3 STRUCTURAL. EXTERIOR
 WALLS, AND THE ASSOCIATED OPENINGS, SHALL BE DESIGNED
 AND CONSTRUCTED TO RESIST SAFELY THE SUPERIMPOSED LOADS
 REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 16.1604.9 COUNTERACTING STRUCTURAL
 ACTIONS. STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS AND
 CLADDING SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESIST FORCES DUE TO
 WIND, WITH CONSIDERATION OF OVERTURNING, SLIDING, AND
 UPLIFT. CONTINUOUS LOAD PATHS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 TRANSMITTING THESE FORCES TO THE FOUNDATION.
  
 8) SHEETS S-5 & S-6 WILL NOT BE REVIEWED AS PART OF
 THIS PERMIT. SIGNS REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT AND THESE
 SHEETS WILL BE REVIEWED WHEN THE SIGN PERMIT HAS BEEN
 SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
  
 JIM WITMER C. B. O.
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLAN REVIEW
  
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)805-6731
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO COMPLETE OUR ANONYMOUS ON-LINE
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY AT:
 WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES
  
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE
 HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP
  
 PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS
 LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS
 REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO
 THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE
 THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.
  
 MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF
 FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2011-02-07 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2011-02-07 Time 09:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2011-02-07 Time 09:29 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2010-09-23 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2010-09-23 Time 17:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2010-09-23 Time 17:24 Sent To  
Notes
2010-09-23 17:36:07OK PER JOHN DICKINSON CONTRACT PLAN REVIEWER LICENSE
 NUMBER PX3182
2010-09-23 17:32:23C
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2011-02-01 Cont ID  
Sent By ddaniels Date 2011-02-01 Time 14:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ddaniels Date 2011-02-01 Time 14:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2010-09-28 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 2010-09-28 Time 11:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 2010-09-28 Time 09:37 Sent To  
Notes
2010-09-28 11:12:383319 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
 PERMIT NUMBER 10090385
 "REMODEL EXISTING BUILDING"
  
  
 1. THE PERMIT APPLICATION INDICATES AN ADDRESS OF 3319
 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY, BUT THE PLANS INDICATES AN ADDRESS
 OF 3323 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. PLEASE CORRELATE
 INFORMATION.
  
 2. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241.
  
 3. DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY.
  
 4. THE ROLL-UP SECURITY SHUTTERS ARE TO REMAIN IN THE
 OPEN WHEN THE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED.
  
 5. TACTILE SIGNAGE REQUIRED AT EXIT DOOR LOCATIONS.
  
 6. A KNOX-BOX IS REQUIRED SINCE A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS
 PLANNED. PLEASE CONTACT WWW.KNOX-BOX.COM TO ORDER A KEY
 BOX.
  
 7. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE
 INSTALLATION OF THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. THE FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM SHALL BE CLASS A OR FULLY ADDRESSABLE.
  
 8. DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS UPON ACTIVATION SHALL INITIATE
 A GENERAL ALARM. NOTE X ON PAGE F-1 IS INCORRECT.
  
 9. PLEASE INDICATE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR
 ALL WALLS AND CEILINGS.
  
 10. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF PORTABLE
 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS CONTAINED WITHIN THE LOCATION.
  
 DENIED
  
  
 MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2011-11-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2011-07-28 Time 10:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2011-07-26 Time 16:34 Sent To  
Notes
2011-07-26 16:44:59C3
2011-07-26 16:35:17C3
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2011-07-26 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2011-03-17 Time 16:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2011-03-10 Time 14:59 Sent To  
Notes
2011-03-10 15:00:30ZONING
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2011-01-26 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2011-01-26 Time 16:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2011-01-26 Time 16:05 Sent To  
Notes
2011-01-26 16:06:11SENT TO C2.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2010-10-25 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 2010-10-21 Time 11:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2010-09-15 Time 09:59 Sent To  
Notes
2010-09-17 10:07:03C22
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2011-09-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2011-09-06 Time 11:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2011-09-06 Time 11:27 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2011-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2011-03-17 Time 09:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2011-03-17 Time 09:12 Sent To  
Notes
2011-03-17 09:12:57SEE ZONING COMMENTS 3/17/11.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2011-01-28 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 2011-01-28 Time 11:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 2011-01-28 Time 11:57 Sent To  
Notes
2011-01-28 13:11:20***LANDFSCAPE REVIEW FAILED***
  
 PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE AMENDED
 CONSTRUCTION VALUE AND DEMONSTRATE HOW THE COST OF THIS
 PROJECT HAS BEEN DRASTICALLY REDUCED. THE PERMIT IS
 STILL BASED UPON THE ORIGINAL COST ESTIMATE.
  
 2. REPEAT COMMENT: PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF
 THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR): AS
 THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK EXCEEDS 50% OF THE
 STRUCTURE'S VALUE (LISTED AS "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH
 THE P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING
 SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
 FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR.
  
 3. REPEAT COMMENT: A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS
 REQUIRED. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE
 PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445
 OF THE ZLDR. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST BE SIGNED AND
 SEALED BY A REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL SHALL ALSO INCLUDE A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE
 THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS
 AND LABOR, BROKEN DOWN INTO UNIT COST.
  
 4. REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE THE TABULATION
 NECESSARY FOR THE EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE
 XIV OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS,
 INCLUDING THE XERISCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS.
  
 5. REPEAT COMMENT: AN IRRIGATION PERMIT WILL BE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF THE
 IRRIGATION PLAN.
  
 6. THIS PROPOSAL HAS ELIMINATED ALL EXISTING
 LANDSCAPING IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING. PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 94-443 (E) (1), AT LEAST 30 PERCENT OF THE
 LINEAR FEET AROUND THE EXTERIOR OF ALL COMMERCIAL
 STRUCTURES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH TREES, SHRUBS OR
 HEDGES. YOU CANNOT REMOVE ANY EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA
 WITHOUT REPLACING IT SOMEWHERE ON SITE. IN THIS CASE,
 IT NEEDS TO REMAIN ALONG THE FRONT ELEVATION.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 8221462.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2010-10-21 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 2010-10-21 Time 14:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 2010-10-21 Time 14:07 Sent To  
Notes
2010-10-21 14:22:48***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED***
  
 PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR): AS THE VALUE OF
 THE PROPOSED WORK EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE
 (LISTED AS "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH THE P.B.C. PROPERTY
 APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF
 THE ZLDR.
  
 2. A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS REQUIRED. PLEASE
 SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF THE ZLDR.
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A
 REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE PERMIT SUBMITTAL
 SHALL ALSO INCLUDE A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE THAT
 INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND
 LABOR, BROKEN DOWN INTO UNIT COST.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TABULATION NECESSARY FOR THE
 EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE
 XERISCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS.
  
 4. AN IRRIGATION PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE SUBMIT
 TWO (2) COPIES OF THE IRRIGATION PLAN.
  
 5. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE DETAILS. THE TREES AND
 SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE GRADE WITH
 THE THREE (3) INCH LAYER OF MULCH PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE
 ROOTBALL. THE MULCH APPLIED OVER THE ROOTBALL SHALL NOT
 EXCEED ONE (1) INCH IN DEPTH.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 8221462.
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2011-03-07 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2011-03-07 Time 11:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2011-03-07 Time 11:28 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2010-10-07 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2010-10-07 Time 15:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2010-10-06 Time 12:38 Sent To  
Notes
2010-10-07 15:19:52PASS PROVISO
 THE MODEL NUMBER FOR THE LOUVERS ON THE PLAN AND THE
 MODEL NUMBERS IN THE PRODUCT APPROVALS DO NOT MATCH
 .PLEASE PROVIDE NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE STORM
 LOUVERS AT THE FIRST INSPECTION.
 PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2011-02-22 Cont ID  
Sent By lwagner Date 2011-02-22 Time 09:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lwagner Date 2011-02-22 Time 08:09 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2010-10-08 Cont ID  
Sent By lwagner Date 2010-10-08 Time 14:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lwagner Date 2010-10-07 Time 14:06 Sent To  
Notes
2010-10-08 14:32:22*****NOTE*****
 PLEASE SEE NOTE #1 IN BUILDING REVIEW CONCERNING ROOF
 DRAINAGE. I ROOF DRAINS ARE REQUIRED A REVISION TO THE
 PLUMBING DRAWINGS WILL BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2011-09-05 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2011-09-05 Time 13:03 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2011-09-05 Time 13:02 Sent To  
Notes
2011-09-05 13:17:06PASSED
  
 1) SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE SITE WORK (PARKING
 LOT), LIGHT POLES, SIGNAGE, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND
 LANDSCAPE. THESE PERMITS SHALL BE APPROVED, INSTALLED
 AND PASS FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO THE C.O. FOR THE
 INTERIOR RENOVATION.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2011-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2011-03-17 Time 09:01 Rev Time 0.50
Received By eschneid Date 2011-03-12 Time 13:38 Sent To PC
Notes
2011-03-17 09:09:32FAILED
  
 1) AFTER DISCUSSION WITH THE BUILDING REVIEWER, THE
 COST ESTIMATE PROVIDED APPEARS TOO LOW. PLEASE PROVIDE
 NOTORIZED COPIES OF ALL CONTRACTS AND SUB-CONTRATS
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS JOB SO THAT
 STAFF CAN VERIFY THE NEW PERMIT VALUE.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2011-02-14 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2011-02-14 Time 16:26 Rev Time 1.50
Received By eschneid Date 2011-02-14 Time 16:26 Sent To  
Notes
2011-02-24 10:04:53******UPDATED 2-24-11*******
  
 FAILED
  
 1) THE VALUE OF THE JOB HAS BEEN REDUCED FROM $125,000
 TO $95,000 AS PART OF THIS PERMIT RESUBMITTAL. THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS SHOW THE SAME SCOPE OF WORK AS THE
 ORIGINAL PLANS. PROVIDE A REVISED COST BREAKDOWN TO
 VERIFY THAT THE WORK IS $95,000.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT - A RECENT SURVEY, LESS THAN ONE YEAR
 OLD, IS REQUIRED.
  
 A SURVEY WAS NOT PROVIDED. THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 THE APPROVAL OF THE PERMIT BY THE ZONING DIVISION.
  
 3) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE HAS BEEN INCLUDED
 ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS (UNABLE TO VERIFY EXACT
 LOCATIONS AS NO SURVEY PROVIDED). ACCORDING TO THE
 ELEVATION DRAWINGS, ELEMENTS OF THE FACADE ARE BEING
 CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE PROPERTY LINE. THE BUILDING MAY
 NOT OVERHANG THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT APPROVAL
 FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE
 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY OVERHANG AND THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH FOR THE EL PRADO OVERHANG.
  
 4) PLEASE CONSIDER FINISHING THE BACK OF THE HIP ROOF
 INSTEAD OF DROPPING IT JUST BEHIND THE PEAK. THIS WILL
 PRESENT A MORE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPLETE LOOK FROM THE
 NORTH AND SOUTH VIEWS.
  
 5) THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT IS 30 FEET NOT 42 FEET AS
 SHOWN ON THE COVER SHEET. THIS SHEET WAS NOT CHANGED AS
 STATED IN THE COMMENT RESPONSES.
  
 6) PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE LIGHT POLE AND THE
 LIGHT FIXTURE.
  
 7) THE NEW SIGNS REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. NOTE: THE
 PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN APPEARS TO BE REMOVING A PARKING
 SPACE. THE CURRENT SITE IS DEFICIENT IN PARKING.
  
 8) THE POST IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE, WHICH
 PREVIOUSLY HOUSED A SIGN, DOES NOT CONFORM TO CURRENT
 SIGN LOCATIONAL STANDARDS FOR A NEW SIGN AND SHALL BE
 REMOVED AS PART OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION. IT SHALL BE
 SO NOTED ON THE PLANS.
  
 9) THE PARKING LOT STRIPING DOES NOT CONFORM TO WPB
 REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY REQUIRES THAT PARKING SPACES BE
 DOUBLE STRIPED. A SEPARATE PERMIT TO RESTRIPE THE
 PARKING LOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH CODE SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 PRIOR TO THE ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
2011-02-14 16:32:33FAILED
  
 1) THE VALUE OF THE JOB HAS BEEN REDUCED FROM $125,000
 TO $95,000 AS PART OF THIS PERMIT RESUBMITTAL. THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS SHOW THE SAME SCOPE OF WORK AS THE
 ORIGINAL PLANS. PROVIDE A REVISED COST BREAKDOWN TO
 VERIFY THAT THE WORK IS $95,000.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT - A RECENT SURVEY, LESS THAN ONE YEAR
 OLD, IS REQUIRED.
  
 A SURVEY WAS NOT PROVIDED. THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 THE APPROVAL OF THE PERMIT BY THE ZONING DIVISION.
  
 3) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE HAS BEEN INCLUDED
 ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS (UNABLE TO VERIFY EXACT
 LOCATIONS AS NO SURVEY PROVIDED). ACCORDING TO THE
 ELEVATION DRAWINGS, ELEMENTS OF THE FACADE ARE BEING
 CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE PROPERTY LINE. THE BUILDING MAY
 NOT OVERHANG THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT APPROVAL
 FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE
 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY OVERHANG AND THE CITY OF WEST PALM
 BEACH FOR THE EL PRADO OVERHANG.
  
 4) PLEASE CONSIDER FINISHING THE BACK OF THE HIP ROOF
 INSTEAD OF DROPPING IT JUST BEHIND THE PEAK. THIS WILL
 PRESENT A MORE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPLETE LOOK FROM THE
 NORTH AND SOUTH VIEWS.
  
 5) THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT IS 30 FEET NOT 42 FEET AS
 SHOWN ON THE COVER SHEET. THIS SHEET WAS NOT CHANGED AS
 STATED IN THE COMMENT RESPONSES.
  
 6) PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE LIGHT POLE AND THE
 LIGHT FIXTURE.
  
 7) THE NEW SIGNS REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. NOTE: THE
 MONUMENT SIGN APPEARS TO BE REMOVING A PARKING SPACE.
 THE CURRENT SITE IS DEFICIENT IN PARKING.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2010-09-30 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2010-09-30 Time 18:24 Rev Time 1.50
Received By eschneid Date 2010-09-30 Time 18:24 Sent To  
Notes
2010-09-30 19:22:05FAILED
  
 1) THE PROPERTY REQUIRES A UNITY OF TITLE FOR THE
 PARKING LOT AND THE BUILDING. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE
 NOEL, CITY SURVEYOR, AT (561) 494-1096 FOR INFORMATION.
  
 2) THE VALUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ($125,000) EXCEEDS 50%
 OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE ($215,872) ACCORDING TO THE
 P.B.C. PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE, PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE
 SITE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE
 REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. THE SITE
 DOES NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV; THEREFORE, A SEPARATE
 LANDSCAPE PERMIT WITH PLANS PREPARED BY A REGISTERED
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND AN IRRIGATION PERMIT
 SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO INSTALL THE MATERIAL TO BRING THE
 SITE INTO CONFORMITY PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS
 PERMIT.
  
 3) A RECENT SURVEY, LESS THAN ONE YEAR OLD, IS
 REQUIRED.
  
 4) SINCE THE BUILDING APPEARS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE
 PROPERTY LINE, PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY
 LINE ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS. IT APPEARS THAT
 ELEMENTS OF THE FACADE ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE
 PROPERTY LINE.
  
 5) THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT REQUIRES
 A FIVE (5) FOOT FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK. THE BUILDING
 APPEARS TO BE A DIMENSIONAL NON-CONFORMITY AS IT IS
 BUILT AT THE FRONT AND SIDE PROPERTY LINES (WILL VERIFY
 WITH THE SURVEY WHEN PROVIDED). PER SECTION
 94-513(B)(1)A, DIMENSIONAL NON-CONFORMITY MAY NOT BE
 ALTERED UNLESS THE ALTERATION REDUCES THE IMPACT OF THE
 NON-CONFORMITY ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. THE INCREASE OF
 THE PARAPET HEIGHT SEVEN (7) FEET AND THE HIP PORTION
 OF THE ROOF 11 FEET ABOVE ITS EXISTING HEIGHT, WITHIN
 THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK, AND THE NORTH ELEVATION
 SEVEN (7) FEET ABOVE ITS EXISTING HEIGHT INCREASE THE
 IMPACT OF THE DIMENSIONAL NON-CONFORMITY, AND THUS IS
 NOT PERMITTED.
  
 6) THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT IS 30 FEET. THE LIGHT POLE
 MAY NOT EXCEED THIS HEIGHT.
  
 7) PROVIDE ELEVATIONS WITH THE ACCURATE HEIGHT OF ANY
 ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (EX. A/C) AND DUCTS AND
 HOW THIS WILL BE SCREENED. THE PARAPET HEIGHTS ARE
 SEVEN (7) ABOVE THE ROOF, WHICH WOULD SCREEN EQUIPMENT
 OF A LESSER HEIGHT.
  
 8) THE NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW THE HIP
 PORTION OF THE ROOF. IF IT WAS INCLUDED, IT WILL BE
 EVIDENT THAT THE HALF A HIP ROOF THAT IS BEING PROPOSED
 DETRACTS FROM THE AESTHETICS OF THE BUILDING.
  
 9) THE NEW SIGNS REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. NOTE: THE
 MONUMENT SIGN APPEARS TO BE REMOVING A PARKING SPACE.
 THE CURRENT SITE IS DEFICIENT IN PARKING.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved